Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3531 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all,

I am interested to know why it is that when I watch the pros play a greenside chip (not a pitch, from further out) they almost always seem to play the ball waaay back in their stance, sometimes even outside their back foot. This seems contrary to a lot of advice seen on this and other sites.

Surely even highly skilled pros would want to play a shot with (supposedly) a higher margin for error, using the bounce?


  • Administrator
Posted

By definition here chips use the leading edge. Pitches use more bounce.

I'm not sure the camera angles are directly square. Turning your feet forward can be deceptive too.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
27 minutes ago, deekay said:

Hi all,

I am interested to know why it is that when I watch the pros play a greenside chip (not a pitch, from further out) they almost always seem to play the ball waaay back in their stance, sometimes even outside their back foot. This seems contrary to a lot of advice seen on this and other sites.

Surely even highly skilled pros would want to play a shot with (supposedly) a higher margin for error, using the bounce?

I think it has to do with the skill level of the pro golfers.   I see lots of times the pros hit down on their chip shots and sort of stick the club in the ground with very little follow through.  This requires a very precise strike on the ball with very little margin for error.  Most amateur golfers are better off not trying that.   But that's just my opinion.   I may be wrong.  

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
12 minutes ago, iacas said:

By definition here chips use the leading edge. Pitches use more bounce.

I'm not sure the camera angles are directly square. Turning your feet forward can be deceptive too.

I think this is the main reason you see it like that.

If you watch them hitting shots when they warm up most of the balls and divots are around the middle with some deviation. 

 

Phil is the only player I've seen so far out it that far back, and even this picture is messing with you because his stance is open so it's more around where his heel is in a normal stance.

 

 

image.jpeg

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Compared to pitches, chips are tad bit more descending with less loft (to ensure leading edge strike without as much bounce interference, flatter trajectory, check spin and stance wise before bottom of the swing). Also, back of stance is correct but remember it is only very slightly back, it is a very narrow stance to begin with, so center/forward/backward of stance is not the same kind of difference that you would see in fuller swings. Phil's pic above is on an uphill slope so not a good representative of a flatter slope set up.

 

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Might also be because their teaching pros teach the ball ball back more so, than for normal full swings. I know Harmon teaches the ball back. It's not as far back as the picts make it out to be. Most have the ball in the center of the stance. This would show up better if they were standing square to the ball. Once they open their stance, it all looks different. Try that at home. 

I am thinking that the lie of the ball dictates where the ball should be in the stance. Some chips require a steeper angle into the ball. Moving the ball back accordingly helps with better ball first contact. (fewer fatties)

Myself I set up square to the ball, after aiming my club face.The ball is pretty much in the center. I don't open my stance much if at all, since I use a putting stance, and stroke. 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If the grain is into the clubface, they would play it a bit further back to make a cleaner hit.  We have a lot of grain here in Florida and if you don't catch the ball first when the grain is growing into you, chunk city.  Uphill lies (like around greens) tend to have a lot of in grain shots.

Plus, the pros play what they've found to be most successful and they practice it a LOT.

Driver.......Ping K15 9.5* stiff 3 wood.....Ping K15 16* stiff 5 wood.....Ping K15 19* stiff 4 Hybrid...Cleveland Gliderail 23* stiff 5 - PW......Pinhawk SL GW...........Tommy Armour 52* SW...........Tommy Armour 56* LW...........Tommy Armour 60* FW...........Diamond Tour 68* Putter.......Golfsmith Dyna Mite Ball..........Volvik Vista iV Green Bag..........Bennington Quiet Organizer Shoes.... ..Crocs


Posted
8 hours ago, deekay said:

Hi all,

I am interested to know why it is that when I watch the pros play a greenside chip (not a pitch, from further out) they almost always seem to play the ball waaay back in their stance, sometimes even outside their back foot. This seems contrary to a lot of advice seen on this and other sites.

Surely even highly skilled pros would want to play a shot with (supposedly) a higher margin for error, using the bounce?

I'm no expert by far, but chips as have been stated (by many here) are low lofted (and I do get a lot of practice in my short game).  You want the ball way back in your stance.  Use a pitch when you have go up and over something.  Use a chip when there are no hazards between you and the green, AND you have a 1 part rough to a 2 part green ratio.  That is 1/3 (or less) of rough to travel over and 2/3 or more green.  I don't like to use them on a downhill, where the green is sloping away from me as the ball may roll off the green.  When the ratio is wrong, experience has shown that the ball will slow down way too much before reaching the green.  Another difference is that the chip swing looks like a putt swing with zero lower body movement (just the arms), while the pitch involves the lower body sway.


Posted
On February 18, 2016 at 4:30 PM, No Mulligans said:

Jim Furyk puts the ball in the middle of his stance:

 

 

 

Thanks for sharing that video. I like how Jim uses a consistent stroke and just varies the club selection to get the desired distance and roll out.

Dave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

More of the technique Furyk is using.

 

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
14 hours ago, boogielicious said:

More of the technique Furyk is using.

 

Worked on this today at the practice range, since my chipping was such a glaring disaster in yesterday's round. This is the perfect solution for those short fringe shots where the putter might not work due to the terrain issues. I used the 7,8 and 9 iron and noted the distances of rollout. Thanks for the reminder on this posting.

Dave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...
Posted
On 17/02/2016 at 9:30 PM, No Mulligans said:

Jim Furyk puts the ball in the middle of his stance:

 

 

 

Came here looking for a reminder of chipping technique - this is perfect; thank you!

Currently focusing on: Key 4 - shorter backswing.

What's in the bag: Callaway X2 Hot Driver, Titleist 915F 3 wood, X2 Hot 3 Hybrid, 3, 5-AW Apex Pro irons, 54*, 58* Cleveland RTX, Odyssey Versa 1 Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3531 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.