Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3311 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've been following John Hensby for a few years now where he has experimented with various golf actions to find the 'secret'. He's 75 (or even older), ultra fit , and used to teach the Moe Norman swing in some schools in Australia. In fact , he has many videos showing how to do Moe 'hybrid' type swings (no-one can actually swing exactly like Moe). He is confident now that after so many years he has found a method (not Moe Norman style -which he previously thought was best for him) which 99.99% golfers do not do. Although I have my doubts about the physics of the swing it is quite interesting that he has found an ultra short swing style that has not affected his ball distance (in fact he claims it  has improved by 1 club). 

What do people think of a golf swing where one keeps the rear elbow almost fixed behind the seam of your shirt, and basically use a rear forearm throwing action coupled with a reactive 'unhinge' of your dorsiflexed rear wrist just before impact to power the swing? No active pivot , no carry of the arms past the front of your body as you pivot, no perception of lag or flat left wrist through impact? Actually not even a straight lead arm in the backswing is needed for his Da Vinci Code swing, yet his ball striking seems phenomenal (which he demonstrates on his videos). Twilight zone stuff (for me anyhow) and shows there are many ways to swing a golf club.

Here is a more detailed explanation of his Da Vinci Code swing.

 

 

 


Posted

Somewhat interesting, but I never got the "A-ha!" moment that this would upgrade my golf game.

A couple of observations:

  • The softball pitcher position at top, and downward, reminds me of the "hands drop" downswing trigger some pros suggest.
  • A local pro emphasizes proper hand loading and unloading as the basis of a good golf swing. He teaches a vertical take-away move similar to the DaVinci demonstrator.
  • One confusion point. Longtime swing guru Jimmy Ballard (1980s) talked about The Connection, and used it to refer to a relatively stable position of the upper arms in relationship to the shoulder line during the swing. Our DV demo guy talks about connection, but has fairly free swinging of the arms throughout the swing. Not sure what DV guy means by connection.

Not sure what to make of the DaVinci swing idea. Interesting, but I'm not getting onboard. 

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I thought this was a new Dan Brown book.  :whistle:

-Jerry

Driver: Titleist 913 D3 (9.5 degree) – Aldila RIP 60-2.9-Stiff; Callaway Mini-Driver Kura Kage 60g shaft - 12 degree Hybrids: Callway X2 Hot Pro - 16 degree & 23 degree – Pro-Shaft; Callway X2 Hot – 5H & 6H Irons: Titleist 714 AP2 7 thru AW with S300 Dynamic Gold Wedges: Titleist Vokey GW (54 degree), Callaway MackDaddy PM Grind SW (58 degree) Putter: Ping Cadence TR Ketsch Heavy Balls: Titleist Pro V1x & Snell MyTourBall

"Golf is the closest game to the game we call life. You get bad breaks from good shots; you get good breaks from bad shots but you have to play the ball where it lies."- Bobby Jones

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

It was very surprising to me to see on Hank Haney project and just on the local range how many golfers don't really use their wrists constructively to generate club speed. That said, I don't hear a lot of whoosh with his clubs vs. a more full swing that also involves the wrists.

Where do you see his ballstriking? You can't even see where his balls are going in the posted video (which could be a lot shorter).

Edited by natureboy

Kevin


Posted

It's Ben Hogan's chipping advice applied to a full swing: one plane versus two plane.  Yeah...it works; but so do lots of things.  A much too elaborate explanation of a simple mechanic.  

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

i watched with no sound. wanted to slap the guy :C'mon hit the dang ball, why doncha?"

 

"James"

:titleist: 913 D3 with Aldila RIP Phenom 60 4,2 Regular Shaft,  :touredge: Exotics XCG-7 Beta 3W with Matrix Red Tie Shaft:touredge: Exotics EX8 19 deg Hybrid w UST Mamiya Recoil F3 Shaft:touredge: Exotics EX9 28 deg Hybrid w UST Mamiya Recoil F3  shaft, / Bobby Jones Black 22 deg Hybrid:touredge: Exotics EXi 6 -PW  w UST Mamiya Recoil F2 Shaft, SW (56),GW (52),LW (60):touredge:  TGS),/ ODDYSEE Metal-X #7 customized putter (400G, cut down Mid Belly)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

I watched the video. All nearly 20 painful minutes.

12 hours ago, DownAndOut said:

Although I have my doubts about the physics of the swing it is quite interesting that he has found an ultra short swing style that has not affected his ball distance (in fact he claims it  has improved by 1 club).

I believe it. I believe that instead of hitting his 7-iron 110 yards he now hits it 125 or so. :-P

12 hours ago, DownAndOut said:

What do people think of a golf swing where one keeps the rear elbow almost fixed behind the seam of your shirt, and basically use a rear forearm throwing action coupled with a reactive 'unhinge' of your dorsiflexed rear wrist just before impact to power the swing? No active pivot , no carry of the arms past the front of your body as you pivot, no perception of lag or flat left wrist through impact? Actually not even a straight lead arm in the backswing is needed for his Da Vinci Code swing, yet his ball striking seems phenomenal (which he demonstrates on his videos). Twilight zone stuff (for me anyhow) and shows there are many ways to swing a golf club.

There are many ways to swing the golf club.

This is not a good way.

And what he says he does is not even what he actually does.

01.jpg02.jpg

There's a pivot there (a small one). There's an extended (relatively straight) left arm there. It remains that way through impact, too. To counter his active flip he's moved the ball well back in his stance.


Here's the thing… this one guy, who seems to have plenty of free time, has gotten decent with what I'll call flat out is a bad swing. It lacks a pivot, it lacks arm and thus clubhead travel, and it lacks a solid impact position that's going to lead to failures to achieve a consistent face orientation at impact and low point control.

@DownAndOut, why are you so intent on chasing all of these little things? It's perfectly fine to be interested in the golf swing as a "thing," and it's even better (here, at least) to discuss the nuances of the golf swing, or to put forth theories or ideas and to discuss them. I'd love that.

But this isn't that. This is a crackpot with yet another "magical" swing that will cure all of what ails the struggling golfer. These videos all have the same sort of pattern, too: some unknown guy telling you how simple and easy golf can be if you just master these simple and easy things, and you'll add distance and shoot lower scores and have better sex and it's all that easy, just try my Hogwarts Magic Voodoo Priestess Mythical Name Swing method.

We had a guy who had paid a guy to film him with - at the time a pretty high-end digital video camera - on our range a few years ago. His whole swing theory was that the right elbow was the center of the golf club's swing arc. In demonstrating this on camera (I'd love to see the outtakes), he flat out duffed several shots, each time blaming something else like "well, I was a bit too far back on the mat for that one" and so on.

That video never did get released. Maybe he never paid the videographer or something.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

"why are you so intent on chasing all of these little things? "

Because its a fun hobby of mine and  I love experimenting with this sort of stuff (being just a recreational golfer who plays about 10 times a year).

Actually, I tried the Da Vinci code swing last week at the range and shanked about 10 in a row:-)

Funny that Iacus mentioned about that guy who thought  " His whole swing theory was that the right elbow was the center of the golf club's swing arc. "   Because (coincidentally) , I've mentioned that to John Hensby as a comment on his you tube video a few days ago.

If you see some of his shorter videos , he does hit shots with DTL views including short pitches.  He doesn't sell anything and is just on a quest for a golf swing which he feels is infallible where he won't 'lose' it. 

" This is a crackpot with yet another "magical" swing that will cure all of what ails the struggling golfer. These videos all have the same sort of pattern, too: some unknown guy telling you how simple and easy golf can be if you just master these simple and easy things, and you'll add distance and shoot lower scores and have better sex and it's all that easy, just try my Hogwarts Magic Voodoo Priestess Mythical Name Swing method. "

Tried finding more about him but all I could find was some profile below on another forum.

http://www.secretinthedirt.com/index.php/profile/475-john-hensby

 

 

 

Edited by DownAndOut

Posted (edited)
On 12/2/2016 at 1:32 AM, natureboy said:

It was very surprising to me to see on Hank Haney project and just on the local range how many golfers don't really use their wrists constructively to generate club speed. That said, I don't hear a lot of whoosh with his clubs vs. a more full swing that also involves the wrists.

Where do you see his ballstriking? You can't even see where his balls are going in the posted video (which could be a lot shorter).

Hi Natureboy

Here is a video with his DTL strikes using some made up device to stop his right elbow/arm from travelling and pitching his right wrist through impact.

 

Iacus said " I believe it. I believe that instead of hitting his 7-iron 110 yards he now hits it 125 or so.  "

I remember him saying in one of his DV videos that he hits the 7 iron 145 yards with his Moe Norman swing and that its about the same with this DV swing.

Edited by DownAndOut

Posted

Following on from the above comments , I actually asked John Hensby for some more information about his background and got the following reply.

---------------------------

I drove Speedway Sprintcars and Nascars... the Nascar was on a short track ..not the Super Speedway 1mile/1.5 mile/2 mile tracks ..we didn't have those in Australia...I have also raced motorcycles...in fact anything that 'could' be raced I have raced it at one time or another. I was never a Pro Golfer..I actually didn't start playing Golf until I stopped racing at 34 years old... I have a background in Body Dynamics and taught a lot of different sports before I started playing Golf.... Because I didn't start playing Golf until I was fairly old for a Golfer I didn't really have a great desire to make Golf a profession and frankly the dynamics/mechanics of the game intrigued me really than the actual playing which is why I ended up teaching the game rather than playing it,. I could play to a proficient level and compete with most players other than the high caliber National level players, I played a lot of high dollar sweep-stake matches in those days and lots of times we had more money on our games than guys on the minor Pro tour were getting for first place ... that was the interest for me ...testing myself against seasoned high stakes professional gambler golfers. I have always been a fitness devotee and will probably continue to be until I cant do it anymore..hopefully that is some time away. I guess I have something a bit unique for someone who started Golf as late as I did, I have had 14 hole in one's in competition.... I dont think Seve Ballesteros ever had a hole in one which shows how crazy Golf is , his talent compared to mine was ridiculously so much higher ... its that 'bounce' of the ball that goes for some people and not others.

I still teach but will be finishing that at the end of the year, I am hoping to do some travelling around the country on a Golf 'Odyssey' doing some crazy driving of Golf balls from unbelievably spectacular and dangerous locations.....it will be something no one has done before in this country.

------------------------------

 

 

 


  • Moderator
Posted

@iacas, I've never heard you mention the gunslinger position, yet you made the Golf Digest Best Young teachers...how is that possible?:content:

Driver: :callaway: Rogue ST  /  Woods: :tmade: Stealth 5W / Hybrid: :tmade: Stealth 25* / Irons: :ping: i500’s /  Wedges: :edel: 54*, 58*; Putter: :scotty_cameron: Futura 5  Ball: image.png Vero X1

 

 -Jonny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 hour ago, woodzie264 said:

@iacas, I've never heard you mention the gunslinger position, yet you made the Golf Digest Best Young teachers...how is that possible?:content:

I'm such a fast draw they never see my gunslinger position.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I started reading this thread and spit water all over my keyboard when I got to this part.

 

22 hours ago, DownAndOut said:

"why are you so intent on chasing all of these little things? "

Because its a fun hobby of mine and  I love experimenting with this sort of stuff (being just a recreational golfer who plays about 10 times a year).

Actually, I tried the Da Vinci code swing last week at the range and shanked about 10 in a row:-)

 

 

 

 


  • Moderator
Posted
7 hours ago, Marigold_Sparkle said:

He looks like he's wearing an invisible straight-jacket, as if he were locked up in an imaginary mental hospital.

And Nurse Ratched is the instructor!

Nurse Ratched.jpg

  • Upvote 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On ‎12‎/‎2‎/‎2016 at 11:38 AM, iacas said:

I believe it. I believe that instead of hitting his 7-iron 110 yards he now hits it 125 or so. :-P

 

On ‎12‎/‎6‎/‎2016 at 8:45 PM, DownAndOut said:

"why are you so intent on chasing all of these little things? "

Because its a fun hobby of mine and  I love experimenting with this sort of stuff (being just a recreational golfer who plays about 10 times a year).

Actually, I tried the Da Vinci code swing last week at the range and shanked about 10 in a row:-)

I had to laugh.   This really looks like my neighborhood fellows of older golfers I fit in with.   Who whirly bird, jump up, spin out, and try and hit the crap out of the ball just to the edge of the fairway.   But we play fast!   

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3311 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.