Jump to content
IGNORED

Does anyone get the idea that technology has gone way too far?


Lihu
Note: This thread is 2445 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

The light switch in my lab keeps turning off. My administrator said that by law, every switch installed in an office has to have a motion sensor (guessing 24GHz doppler sensor since Alibaba sells them in the hundreds of millions).

In any case, mine keeps "crashing".

Note the two cat5/6 cables plugged into it. . .

589ded57ae180_IMG_28591.thumb.JPG.81261355abf80605afeac70af24d37bb.JPG

The day there's an OS and Wifi on every light bulb or switch is going to be the day that I slap my forehead. :doh:

Oops, we've got that too. :-D

Technology is getting way too much, and new "power saving" laws are getting pretty outrageous if we end up with light switches that turn off every 2 minutes without movement. On top of that, one that needs to be rebooted every hour. . .Obviously broken, but if it was just a simple switch. . .:-P

 

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Groucho Valentine said:

You lost me at GHz...

Actually, my mistake, it was a ceiling mounted PIR sensor that isn't working reliably. Getting a new one installed. :whistle:

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator

I don't.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don't think tech has necessarily gone to far, but the way it gets used certainly can.

For example, based on government mandates, all residential electric water heaters of 55 gallons must be of the heat pump design.  True, these water heaters are very efficient, but the air it is taking heat from is inside the house, and needs to be warmed back up using your heating appliance.  What if the heating equipment has a low efficiency rating?  I think this is a code that looks good on the surface, but does not look at the big picture.

-Matt-

"does it still count as a hit fairway if it is the next one over"

DRIVER-Callaway FTiz__3 WOOD-Nike SQ Dymo 15__HYBRIDS-3,4,5 Adams__IRONS-6-PW Adams__WEDGES-50,55,60 Wilson Harmonized__PUTTER-Odyssey Dual Force Rossie II

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

IoT gonna happen whether you like it or not, might as well adapt.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

They will probably just add more/smarter sensors that can tell how many people enter and exit rooms so you wont have to worry about lights turning off while still in there. Some companies already use them in case of fires to tell if everyone has evacuated buildings and if fire fighters need to be sent in to rescue people.

I don't think technology has went to far yet, once people start uploading their consciousness into computers may be the point of going to far or unconstrained AI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

I don't either. Power saving laws are there to take stress of the grid. If technology helps that, then it is ok by me.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I was talking to a guy who's company supplies the meters for residential electrical utilities.  He told me every one of them transmits data over the lines and every 100th one or so is slightly thicker as it's the one that transmits the data wirelessly to get around the transformers.  All this data is MASSIVE and untapped at this point.

He said they can detect what brand your refrigerator is, know it has a faulty part and identify the part to order.  He also said they can detect when a tree is causing resistance on the power lines due to growing too close etc.  Crazy stuff for sure.

But to answer the original question, no, not I don't.

I think in less than 10 years no one will need own a car, that autonomous cars will become so prevalent and efficient that you would simply walk outside and you would have a ride waiting and you would go where you need to go and the car would then leave.  

I also think an eye implant/contact will replace the smartphone.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

16 minutes ago, bmartin461 said:

They can detect what brand your refrigerator is, know it has a faulty part and identify the part to order.  He also said they can detect when a tree is causing resistance on the power lines due to growing too close etc.  Crazy stuff for sure.

By the power signature? Or through some residential control protocol over the AC lines?

 

16 minutes ago, bmartin461 said:

I think in less than 10 years no one will need own a car, that autonomous cars will become so prevalent and efficient that you would simply walk outside and you would have a ride waiting and you would go where you need to go and the car would then leave.  

Makes sense for short urban routes for sure. Not so sure about cross country type of driving though.

 

Quote

I also think an eye implant/contact will replace the smartphone.  

That's a bit scary, but one of my cousins would be the perfect candidate for one. :-P

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Was having this conversation with my girlfriend just last night.  She sells data storage, and is all about bigger/better/faster/stronger technology, etc.  I agree that advancements have the potential to do wonders for society and the world.  However, it does scare me a bit that tech has seemed to affect the ability of people to actually take care of, and think for, themselves.  I used the example of her almost putting us under a tractor trailer 3 weeks ago b/c her lane-departure-warning-system malfunctioned, but she just assumed that it was safe to change lanes at 75mph since nothing "beeped" telling her not to.

Really went down the rabbit hole when the conversation evolved to incorporate Maslow's Hieracrhy of Needs and the effect tech has on this scale.  She argued that tech will soon be able to satisfy the basic needs of every human, leaving more time for humans to reach/attempt to reach self-actualization.  I agreed with the basic thought behind this (food, water, etc), but that the feelings of relationships/belongingness  may become blurred between reality and virtual reality.  One step further - when everything is given to you, or taken care of for you, is it truly possible to feel like you've accomplished something?  Lots of levels here, so who knows.

 TL:DR -  Technology is awesome, but I hope it doesn't eventually take away the things that make us human.

- Bill

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

15 minutes ago, bmartin461 said:

I was talking to a guy who's company supplies the meters for residential electrical utilities.  He told me every one of them transmits data over the lines and every 100th one or so is slightly thicker as it's the one that transmits the data wirelessly to get around the transformers.  All this data is MASSIVE and untapped at this point.

He said they can detect what brand your refrigerator is, know it has a faulty part and identify the part to order.  He also said they can detect when a tree is causing resistance on the power lines due to growing too close etc.  Crazy stuff for sure.

 

Wow, that is the stuff of science fiction. 

There's no stopping any of this, whether I like it or not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

14 minutes ago, Let it Fly said:

Was having this conversation with my girlfriend just last night.  She sells data storage, and is all about bigger/better/faster/stronger technology, etc.  I agree that advancements have the potential to do wonders for society and the world.  However, it does scare me a bit that tech has seemed to affect the ability of people to actually take care of, and think for, themselves.  I used the example of her almost putting us under a tractor trailer 3 weeks ago b/c her lane-departure-warning-system malfunctioned, but she just assumed that it was safe to change lanes at 75mph since nothing "beeped" telling her not to.

This example of your is very scary. Too much dependence upon the technology while your senses are potentially ignored? Wow.

What's also scary is that high level code and OS are being put into what would ordinarily be mundane things. The amount of complexity and the fact that humans programmed them make them inherently faulty.

It's like we're just waiting for that day everything starts failing at the same time.

 

48 minutes ago, nevets88 said:

IoT gonna happen whether you like it or not, might as well adapt.

Sigh, I know. I build these things that supposedly make our lives "easier".

 

Quote

Really went down the rabbit hole when the conversation evolved to incorporate Maslow's Hieracrhy of Needs and the effect tech has on this scale.  She argued that tech will soon be able to satisfy the basic needs of every human, leaving more time for humans to reach/attempt to reach self-actualization.

My self actualization is building stuff like in the OP, I just didn't think I'd be the victim of it. I wonder if the person who designed this switch system is using one of the products that I made with similar results? I certainly hope so. . .payback! hehehe.  :-D

 

Quote

I agreed with the basic thought behind this (food, water, etc), but that the feelings of relationships/belongingness  may become blurred between reality and virtual reality.  One step further - when everything is given to you, or taken care of for you, is it truly possible to feel like you've accomplished something?  Lots of levels here, so who knows.

This is very deep, indeed.

 

Quote

 TL:DR -  Technology is awesome, but I hope it doesn't eventually take away the things that make us human.

Like having to wave our arms every 2 minutes? :-D

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
44 minutes ago, bmartin461 said:

I think in less than 10 years no one will need own a car, that autonomous cars will become so prevalent and efficient that you would simply walk outside and you would have a ride waiting and you would go where you need to go and the car would then leave.  

I also think an eye implant/contact will replace the smartphone.  

I'd take that bet at any reasonable odds.

No way that happens in only ten years. Not even if we limit "no one" to people within 20 miles of cities with 100k people or more. In the U.S.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

 

Just now, iacas said:

I'd take that bet at any reasonable odds.

No way that happens in only ten years. Not even if we limit "no one" to people within 20 miles of cities with 100k people or more. In the U.S.

Correct, it is gong to take much longer than ten years for the acceptance to be wide spread.  In ten years the majority of people who do now are still going to own cars.  If not then I need to find a new line of work quick, but I am very confident that won't happen so quickly.  

The tech is already available for on board crash diagnostics and parts procurement through the computer systems and modules though.  

Nate

:tmade:(10.5) :pxg:(5W/7W) MIURA(3-PW) :mizuno:(50/54/60) 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

11 minutes ago, iacas said:

I'd take that bet at any reasonable odds.

No way that happens in only ten years. Not even if we limit "no one" to people within 20 miles of cities with 100k people or more. In the U.S.

Fair enough, maybe 10 years is aggressive, how about 2-1 on "in our lifetime"?

I selfishly wanted to just document this prediction somewhere as years ago I predicted they would improve technology so much that you would be able to walk into a grocery store, pick what you want and walk out without having to check out.   Damn you AMAZON!    Of course, now when I tell people of that prediction no one believes me.  LOL.

 

 

45 minutes ago, Lihu said:

By the power signature? Or through some residential control protocol over the AC lines?

I would think each appliance has a fingerprint, it would be just knowing what it was.

How about this for crazy:

 

Smart meters that monitor electricity usage in homes in parts of Germany leak data that could reveal what programs are being watched on the digital TV, researchers there say.

The researchers tested smart meters made by German company Discovergy and found that someone with network sniffing skills and equipment could use a "man in the middle" attack to eavesdrop on data related to power use in the home.

The smart meters record high-resolution energy consumption of appliances every two seconds and transmit it to the server at the utility company over the Internet. The system gives utilities up-to-date information on power usage and allows customers to use a Web browser to get detailed data and statistics that can help them track usage and expenses. The data includes the amount of electricity used and the type of appliances used, but also granular information based on the lighting display of the digital TV, according to the researchers.

The household electrical usage profile reveals content displayed on a cathode ray tube (CRT), a plasma display TV, or a liquid crystal display (LCD) TV set with dynamic backlighting, the paper says. The lighting patterns, basically the amount of light and dark emitted on the display for individual frames, is unique for each TV program and movie. Someone would have to already know the light pattern "fingerprint" of the specific content to compare with samples coming from the smart meters at the homes to be able to look for a match to recognized content.

This technique of matching the light patterns could be used to determine what channels are being watched on TV and what TV programs, DVDs, or even downloaded videos are being viewed, said Dennis Loehr, a researcher at Muenster University of Applied Sciences who is getting a doctorate degree at Ruhr Universitat Bochum.

 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
16 minutes ago, cipher said:

 

Correct, it is gong to take much longer than ten years for the acceptance to be wide spread.  In ten years the majority of people who do now are still going to own cars.  If not then I need to find a new line of work quick, but I am very confident that won't happen so quickly.  

The tech is already available for on board crash diagnostics and parts procurement through the computer systems and modules though.  

I agree too. Politics, legal issues, insurance (one policy for driving, one for autonomous), infrastructure, etc... so many non technical factors. People were predicting flying cars by now. Ha! People can barely drive today. We'll definitely need autonomous for flying cars.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2445 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Good points all. My coach has something similar to these, but not these ones specifically. He was telling me they are bespoke made for him by a scientist he works with. He showed me my pressure info and compared it with Padraig Harrington's. Mine looks pretty similar to his in directions and timing and so on, but my max GRF is something like 130% of my bodyweight, while his is something like 180% of his bodyweight. So while I'm doing it sort of right, I'm not doing it enough. That was pretty eye opening for me and helped me understand what I need to do. They don't get used all the time by any stretch, but if there's something that he wants me to work on and it'll show up on the force plates, then we break them out. I think that basically mirrors your point 4 exactly. Regarding point 3, yes I think they are. You can say "you want that arrow to be pointing up, back and right", but until I can stand on the plate and move around until I get the line where I need it to be, I don't really know what that means or how to get it there. Sometimes you get yourself in a spot where it's simply impossible to get the line to move there without falling over, but it's very useful to understand why that happens and what you need to do to fix it. 
    • And Titleist Trusoft are 11.99 (white) or 15.60 (yellow) per dozen. Amazon.com Edit: just saw these are sold as used. Sorry. Still…
    • That's incredibly helpful, thank you!  I've been working on my posture quite a bit based upon your lengthy posture post from years back.  Here is a picture of my old posture - hopefully it's better now compared to then.  I've been trying not to stick my butt out and trying to get rid of the arch in my lower back.  It does feel a bit too upright at times, so the idea of engaging the legs more might do wonders.   I used to have a terribly unbalanced sway to my right.  When I'm struggling and hitting the ball thin, it really feels like my low point is behind the ball at impact.  I end up flipping to reach the ball and still hit thin with lower back pain.  I was afraid of my old habit of swaying too far back and not being able to get fully recentered, so I'm focusing on maintaining a centered pivot.  That being said, I still feel like I'm hanging back too much on my right foot at impact, but when I try to get further left at impact, I just can't do it.  Is it correct to say that shifting right early in the backswing can actually make it easier to properly finish with my weight left?  I'll give it a try tonight on my simulator and see how it goes.   Thanks a million for the input, it's so greatly appreciated!
    • I would say hang in there. I do get where you're coming from. My history follows if you're interested (or if you're not, it's still here, but you don't have to read it 🙂 ) I started playing in 1990 (14 years old). I got steadily better every year and reached about a 5 handicap when I was 18 (this is on the old CONGU system in the UK, which lags changes in ability much more than the WHS system). I took a year off between school and university to see how good I could get. I finished that year off a 6 handicap. That wasn't the best, but I did funnily enough get a lot better over the period. Then went to university, got into the golf team there and my first year we won the British Universities. That's a year long thing. 6 universities in a round robin that you play home and away, then the top team goes through to knockout. I think about 5 rounds of knockout. Got down to 2 by the time I finished university, then started work and got down to scratch a year later. 1998 summer I played some of my best golf. Broke the course record at my club (and shot 98 for 27 holes in a two round event - last 9 not so good). Then in about 2000 I got a hiccup in my driver swing. I'd get very stuck and hit these high blocky cuts out right. Couldn't release it. I went from +0.5 to 1.9 (up 2.4 shots) in 27 rounds. The way the system worked is your handicap goes up 0.1 if you shoot worse than 1 over your handicap, so 24 out of 27 rounds were worse than that and 3 of them were at my handicap or 1 over it. It was awful. I pretty much stopped hitting woods. Just used irons everywhere. My irons were still decent so I could still get a reasonable round going from time to time, but try as I might I couldn't get to grips with it. Then I got chip yips too - that was fun. My handicap ended up about 2.4 I think. Then I moved to the US in 2007 and didn't really play a whole lot for the next year or so.  Then I started playing a bit more once I'd got to grips with how to get out to play from living in NYC. Sort of stumbled along playing around a 2-4 handicap level for a few years and moved out to Long Island when my son was born. I found a local pro who was well thought of and he was quite technical, which worked for me - I am technically minded. I've been working with him for about 7 years or so and my current handicap is +0.3. I think I have one score in the past 12 months that wasn't a tournament score and I've played maybe 20 rounds this year (10 of which were in one week in April and 6 of those were only playing every other shot). I'm pretty much rusty every time I play, but I've put some pretty good scores together this year, including a 72 on Bethpage Black in a tournament - I was quite pleased with that.  Long story short - there is a path out of this. There was for me and I'm sure there will be for you. You might need to find a new coach or try something new somehow, but don't give up. The game is worth it.
    • Titleist Trufeel are $24.98/dz at Amazon
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...