Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

NCAA Suspends 5 College Baseball Players for Fantasy Football


Note: This thread is 3289 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
17 minutes ago, freshmanUTA said:

Especially when it's a free league.

This isn't verified.  OP says he knows somebody who said it was a free league, but the article linked specifically talks about leagues with entry fees as being violations, which directly implies that leagues without money involved are not violations.

Considering that the school seemed to agree with the NCAA that there were violations, then the facts we have lean towards this not having been a free league at all.

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Part of what makes NCAA punishments seem petty is that they have a very hard time catching the perpetrators. For the few that get caught it's a bit hard to swallow because you know perfectly well that a large number of other athletes or programs are doing the very same thing. Those five baseball players probably know dozens of other athletes at their same school guilty of the same thing. 

 

 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 minutes ago, mcanadiens said:

Part of what makes NCAA punishments seem petty is that they have a very hard time catching the perpetrators.

True, but there are examples where you catch the perpetrator and still can't figure out how to punish them.  (See: UNC)
 

4 minutes ago, mcanadiens said:

For the few that get caught it's a bit hard to swallow because you know perfectly well that a large number of other athletes or programs are doing the very same thing. 

And that is basically UNC's defense...or at least how most of their supporters defend UNC.  I have opinions on this but that is :offtopic:.

 

9 minutes ago, mcanadiens said:

Those five baseball players probably know dozens of other athletes at their same school guilty of the same thing. 

Hell, I'd bet their pool had more than that in athletes alone!  

Fairways and Greens.

Dave
 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think I'm most troubled by this statements - "The five players will remain suspended until the NCAA completes the reinstatement process"

Yeah, the whole we'll get back to you aspect, when those kids are on a limited eligibility clock is kind of bunk. Tell them it is a season, or 10 games or forever, but to just say we don't know how or when to reinstate you is weak sauce.
And FWIW, in my opinion they are taking older rules and making them fit newer issues like Fantasy sports.
Also, while I don't think the NCAA runs any March Madness pools, I do think they get license fees for allowing them to use/advertise them as March Madness and promote them during the broadcasts. Double standards and such.

I would love to know the back story on this, seems kind of random that a school self reports these secondary violations; and "only" five players are involved.

Players play, tough players win!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Fantasy football is a pretty well accepted and pervasive cultural activity.  I can understand why NFL football players shouldn't play fantasy football, but anyone else...

This is like enforcing Jaywalking on a vacant street in a residential area.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
55 minutes ago, No Mulligans said:

Fantasy football is a pretty well accepted and pervasive cultural activity.  I can understand why NFL football players shouldn't play fantasy football, but anyone else...

This is like enforcing Jaywalking on a vacant street in a residential area.

 

Thats exactly my feelings as well. It's like Pete rose with the MLB. You can't bet on baseball as a player because you influence the game. That i understand.


Posted
3 hours ago, iacas said:

Why?

The NCAA has a pretty strict "no gambling" policy.

Everyone's made VERY aware of this.

Exactly this. The NCAA, while strict in its rulings, does at least lay them out clearly.

Whether or not you think the rule is fair is one thing, but it was a very clear policy violation. Personally I think the rule should be kept similar to professional sports in that you're forbidden to gamble on events in your own sport and league (so NCAA D1 basketball players cannot gamble on NCAA D1 basketball games), but I don't see much harm in gambling on other events. It's not really a great habit to get into, gambling, but it isn't detrimental to the sport if it takes place in a fashion unrelated to their performance in any way.

The thing I wonder is how this affects college golf teams. I know my high school golf team regularly broke the CHSAA rule against gambling by making bets within the team (during practice rounds, not in tournaments), as well as a number of other teams that I know did the same. It was ignored because it wasn't to the detriment of competition, even though it happened during the state championship's official practice rounds (though it was covered up then). I doubt, however, that it would fly in the NCAA, but I haven't looked at the rule to know exactly where it draws the line besides saying, "no gambling".

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, mcanadiens said:

Part of what makes NCAA punishments seem petty is that they have a very hard time catching the perpetrators. For the few that get caught it's a bit hard to swallow because you know perfectly well that a large number of other athletes or programs are doing the very same thing. Those five baseball players probably know dozens of other athletes at their same school guilty of the same thing. 

Yes, it seems violating NCAA rules on recruiting and player off the table benefits is necessary just to compete with the other big programs.  Getting caught and sanctioned is just a necessary "risk/cost of doing business".

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, No Mulligans said:

This is like enforcing Jaywalking on a vacant street in a residential area.

Well, technically it's not because there is no such thing as jaywalking on a vacant street in a residential area.  It's been awhile (about 25 years now - so it's possible the rules are different) but the first time I went to traffic school I learned that the law for jaywalking only applies when the intersections in either direction are controlled and have crosswalks.:-P

And back on topic:

I think that @NCGolfer made a good point regarding lumping all gambling together.  Sure, a baseball player who is into fantasy football is not gambling on his own sport, but what happens when he starts to fall in debt to somebody?  It takes awhile to snowball, but this is how point-shaving scandals come to fruition.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 hours ago, mistermuhl said:

I agree that the rule is cut and dried. I'm not really debating the legality of it. I am more concerned with the pettiness of it. 

And a guy I play with now went there and we were discussing it today he said that the league was unpaid. I'm not saying that it is guaranteed fact, I'm simply saying that based on my information, I feel that NCAA is splitting hairs. 

To take eligibility from guys who have lived and breathed baseball for their whole lives for participating in fantasy football feels insane. 

It's not petty. The kids agree to obey by NCAA bylaws when they compete in college sports. They broke the bylaws. 

It is part of being an athlete under an NCAA governed sport. Just because they play baseball, love baseball, put their heart and soul into it, doesn't mean they get a free pass from NCAA bylaws. 

It might be a can of worms for the NCAA to differentiate from non-pay to pay fantasy leagues, or leagues that do not pay out money at all versus ones where you do win money or do have to pay in. How much more investigation do they have to do to confirm money was transferred? I don't think the NCAA has the authority to subpoena that type of information to even confirm if money was transferred or won. It's pretty much up to the athlete, and school to cooperate with the NCAA. It would be more practical to just ban all fantasy sport leagues. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
10 hours ago, saevel25 said:

It's not petty. The kids agree to obey by NCAA bylaws when they compete in college sports. They broke the bylaws. 

It is part of being an athlete under an NCAA governed sport. Just because they play baseball, love baseball, put their heart and soul into it, doesn't mean they get a free pass from NCAA bylaws. 

It might be a can of worms for the NCAA to differentiate from non-pay to pay fantasy leagues, or leagues that do not pay out money at all versus ones where you do win money or do have to pay in. How much more investigation do they have to do to confirm money was transferred? I don't think the NCAA has the authority to subpoena that type of information to even confirm if money was transferred or won. It's pretty much up to the athlete, and school to cooperate with the NCAA. It would be more practical to just ban all fantasy sport leagues. 

 

Nobody can argue that they broke a rule. They did. They are being punished. I just more want to point out that this is just one of so many other problems with the NCAA (title IV, brackets, scholarship allowance, recruiting). It just sucks to see these guys get grilled for something that a very high percentage of students, let alone athletes, participate in; for money or not. 

I get that they broke a rule. But I don't think anyone can argue that the NCAA can Be and frequently is ridiculous. 


  • Administrator
Posted
43 minutes ago, mistermuhl said:

Nobody can argue that they broke a rule. They did. They are being punished. I just more want to point out that this is just one of so many other problems with the NCAA (title IV, brackets, scholarship allowance, recruiting). It just sucks to see these guys get grilled for something that a very high percentage of students, let alone athletes, participate in; for money or not. 

I get that they broke a rule. But I don't think anyone can argue that the NCAA can Be and frequently is ridiculous. 

They are ridiculous. But not here. The guys broke a rule, and were caught.

Yeah, probably thousands and thousands of NCAA athletes play fantasy sports and/or gamble. But they can only punish those caught, and do what they deem a worthwhile expenditure of time/capital to catch more.

They seem to prefer to do a few high profile "busts" and keep it to that, and hope to keep the lid on things.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Like Wanzo said you have to draw the line somewhere, but some of the places the NCAA has decided to draw those lines is pretty damn dumb! Like players can have bagels but having cream cheese to put on them just goes too far! HUH?! Besides, who has a bagel without a smear anyway?

Yes, March madness is NCAA basketball's big show, so much so that it has just about made the regular season irrelevant. At least is has for me. They want ratings, so they set their brackets, people bet on them like crazy, and it's all good because it encourages viewership.

After all, why does the NCAA football committee begin announcing rankings after week 5 or 6 (I think) of the season? There's really no need to do so, but it keeps their product front and center.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, Buckeyebowman said:

Yes, March madness is NCAA basketball's big show, so much so that it has just about made the regular season irrelevant. At least is has for me. They want ratings, so they set their brackets, people bet on them like crazy, and it's all good because it encourages viewership.

After all, why does the NCAA football committee begin announcing rankings after week 5 or 6 (I think) of the season? There's really no need to do so, but it keeps their product front and center.

So? This has nothing to do with the players being suspended. Just because the NCAA promotes their brand doesn't mean that players get to violate NCAA rules. 

I agree certain rules are stupid. The NCAA has no real investigating power except the threaten of sanctions for not cooperating. In the end, they have no way to subpoena information like bank records to tell if someone actually paid or gained money from betting. In the end, the NCAA has taken the stance of outlawing certain activities because of this. They want to make sure no one is betting. To do that they do not say, "Don't bet". They say, "No playing fantasy sports". That is totally fine. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3289 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • The first post is here:   Do you have an overly long backswing that ruins sequencing and leads to poor shots? In nearly 20 years of teaching, I've found 5 common faults. You don't have to swing like Jon Rahm, but a shorter swing will probably help you #PlayBetter golf. Which is your fatal flaw? #1 - Trail Elbow Bend Average golfers ♥️ bending their trail elbows. It can feel powerful! Tour players bend their trail elbows MUCH less. A wider trail elbow creates a longer hand path and preserves structure. It also forces more chest turn; not everything longer is bad! Overly bending your trail elbow can wreak havoc on your swing. It pulls your arms across/beside your body. It requires more time to get the elbow bend "out," ruining your sequencing. The lead arm often bends and low point control is destroyed. The misconception is that it will create more speed, but that's often the opposite of what happens. Golfers often feel they swing "easier" but FASTER with wider trail elbows. Want to play better golf with a shorter backswing? Don't bend your elbow so much. #2 - Hip (Pelvis) Turn I see this all the time: a golfer's hips are only 5-10° open at impact, but he turns them back 60°+ in the backswing. Unless your father is The Flash, your hips are probably not getting 40° open at impact from there! That's more rotation than Rory! Golfers who over-rotate their pelvis often over-turn everything - trail thigh/knee, chest/shoulders, etc. They have more work to do in the same ~0.3 seconds as a Tour player who turns back ~40° and turns through to impact 40° or so. Want to shorten the pelvis turn a bit? Learn to internally rotate into the trail hip, externally rotate away from the lead hip, and do "less" with your knees (extending and flexing) in the backswing. Learn some separation between chest and pelvis. #3 - Rolled Inside and Lifted Up Amateurs love to send the club (and their arms) around them. You see the red golfer here all the time at your local range. The problem? Your arms mostly take the club UP, not around. Going around creates no height until you have to hoist the club up in the air because you're halfway through your backswing and the club is waist high and three feet behind your butt! 😄  Learn to use your arms properly. Arms = up/down, body = around. Most golfers learn how little their arms really have to do in the backswing. The picture here is all you've gotta do (but maybe with a properly sized club!). #4 - Wide Takeaway Width is good, no? Yes, if you're wide at the right time and in the right spots. Golfers seeking width often don't hinge the club much early in the backswing… forcing them to hinge it late. Hinging the club late puts a lot of momentum into the club, wrists, and elbow just before we need to make a hairpin turn in transition and go the other direction at the start of the downswing. When you're driving into a hairpin curve, you go into it slowly and accelerate out of it. Waiting to hinge is like coasting down the straightaway and accelerating into the hairpin. Your car ends up off the road, and your golf ball off the course. Give hinging at a faster rate (earlier) then coasting to the top a try. You'll be able to accelerate out of the hairpin without the momentum of the arms and club pulling in the wrong direction.   #5 - Sway and Tilt Some sway is good but sometimes I see a golfer who just… keeps… swaying… Their chest leans forward a bit for balance, resulting in a whole lotta lean. The green line below is the GEARS "virtual spine." Pros sway a bit, but stay ~90°. This sway often combines with the extra pelvis turn because this golfer is not putting ANY limits on what the "middle of them" (their pelvis) is doing in the backswing. These golfers spend a lot of energy just to get back to neutral! The best players begin pushing forward EARLY in the backswing. Often before the club gets much past their trail foot! Pushing forward (softly) first stops your backward sway and then begins to get your body moving toward the target. Push softly, but early!  
    • I  no longer spend the time and effort trying to sell something I no longer need. Instead, if the clubs are in good condition, I go to my local golf shop or even Dicks Sporting Goods. Trade the clubs in for store credit and pick up something I need, like a hat. Cause you always need another golf hat!
    • Day 205 3-10 Wider backswing, reconnecting arm in downswing/arching wrist through. Also worked on less pause at the top. Recorded and hit a few foam balls. 
    • I really enjoyed this episode with Nick from Callaway. I didn't know the problem with swing weight and female golfers, but it makes sense. I actually think swing weight might not matter that much. If everyone senses the club differently, then wouldn't it mean that people might feel swing weights differently? Swing weight is a way to classify how heavy a club feels during the swing. Yet for a 70-year-old golfer, a D0 might feel like a D4 for a 25-year-old golfer? I think stronger people would consider higher swing weights lighter. Maybe a C8 equals a D2 in terms of feel?   
    • Wordle 1,725 3/6 ⬜🟨⬜🟨⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.