Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3027 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted
24 minutes ago, cutchemist42 said:

That my club is extending too early so Im hitting the bottom instead of higher up?

Could be. It just identifies that you aren't hitting the center. It doesn't specifically identify a swing fault per se. You can hit a shank coming too far over the top or from swinging too far out.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Actually, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that most of the pics here show contact that is a little high on the face. I could be, and prolly am, wrong. But I seem to remember seeing the wear marks on pros irons being much lower. Like between the second and third groove.

Example

 

9f4858bc_iron_wearmark.PNG

  • Upvote 1

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
13 hours ago, colin007 said:

Actually, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that most of the pics here show contact that is a little high on the face. I could be, and prolly am, wrong. But I seem to remember seeing the wear marks on pros irons being much lower. Like between the second and third groove.

Example

 

9f4858bc_iron_wearmark.PNG

Could it be from hitting off mats? If I hit it a bit fat, the ball will bounce up a bit and my contact will be higher I believe.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
18 hours ago, colin007 said:

Actually, I'm going to go out on a limb and say that most of the pics here show contact that is a little high on the face. I could be, and prolly am, wrong. But I seem to remember seeing the wear marks on pros irons being much lower. Like between the second and third groove.

Example

 

9f4858bc_iron_wearmark.PNG

Interesting thing to bring up. Is the clubface center actually designed to be lower??

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, cutchemist42 said:

Interesting thing to bring up. Is the clubface center actually designed to be lower??

Actually, when I look at my clubs, most of the mass is low on the back of the club head, pretty much on the other side of where that third groove would be.

 

6 hours ago, boogielicious said:

Could it be from hitting off mats? If I hit it a bit fat, the ball will bounce up a bit and my contact will be higher I believe.

Hmm....not sure? I don't think the ball would pop up that quickly. If anything I would think it's from the club head descending at too steep a rate.

mizunomp-58betterplayerirons.jpg

Edited by colin007
Forgot something

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Updated results from my range session today, after a month of working on tempo and swinging "easier" (and my priority piece). Much tighter pattern but still drifting towards the toe...

6-iron-impact-2017-05-25.jpg.fb7420a2727028eca073ccbda989f5cf.jpg

Edited by roamin

Jake
"If you need to carry a water hazard, take one extra club or two extra balls." - Unknown (to me)

My Swing | Course Vlogs | Favorite Post | Roamin' for life. (MCATDT)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Today I was playing around with a diff club.  Steel project x 6.0.  This club was pristine before it hit maybe 20 balls while switching to my normal gamer Pings.  Looks a bit towards the toe.  One was heel side but doesn't show up.  Not my normal club and my Pings are dirty right now but I circled the pattern that was formed.  

IMG_1893.thumb.JPG.45f1ea58510be99348c8796e90321f68.JPG

 


  • 3 weeks later...
  • Moderator
Posted

7232017194425.jpg

Updated shot. My practice 7i. This explains why I've been hitting my irons well lately.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3027 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 12: stole about 10 minutes in the garage, doing my drill with foam balls. 
    • Day 116 12-6 Still working on getting to lead side. Tonight I also tried some skill work with clubface awareness.  Hit foam balls. 
    • To flog this subject even further, if that's even possible, this article from Golf Monthly just appeared today in one of my news feeds. Written by a golf writer in the UK who I never heard of, he's basically saying that there should be only 3-5 rounds from the most recent 20 that should count towards the average and only competitive rounds should count. He claims the erratic scorers would have less of an advantage than they do now. He makes a lot of references to "club golfers" in the UK being the ones who are mostly dissatisfied. https://share.google/qmZZBEoJvOxHxJGil  In my experience with my league where we have golfers with indexes ranging from 5 to 40, looking at the weekly results from the past two years, I can detect no pattern that would substantiate the claim that the current system gives an unfair advantage to either erratic golfers (aren't we all?) or higher handicappers. Apparently though, at least in the UK, this seems to be "a thing."
    • Day 26 (6 Dec 25) - Another day of rainy weather - got in some mirror work rehearsing forward weight shift as finishing back swing. 
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* 🟨⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 no eagle -  but a birdie is a nice follow-up
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.