Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

What Would a 20.1 (see post #95) Index Shoot at a Local U.S. Open Qualifier Site?


Note: This thread is 2228 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

So with the recent threads about the US Open Local qualifying, and my own personal experience in a USGA qualifying round, my group text full of golfers is buzzing every day. Guys with + handicaps are not breaking 80, so for anyone who is sane that just magnifies how hard it really is.

I posted about the "pro" who shot 127. My friend who is a 20.1 index says he could break 127 on that course. He is clearly delusional because he doesn't understand how hard these courses are set up. The length is daunting. The rough is literally rough. He thinks he can manage his game to a sub 126 round.

Of course all of the trash talk as stemmed into a bet, one foot on the back of the furthest tee box (7000 yards so he still has a 200-400 yard advantage). In June or July when our rough is the thickets. Has to walk. No laser.

Its quite funny but he just doesn't understand. What are your thoughts?

Kyle Paulhus

If you really want to get better, check out Evolvr

:callaway: Rogue ST 10.5* | :callaway: Epic Sub Zero 15* | :tmade: P790 3 Driving Iron |:titleist: 716 AP2 |  :edel: Wedges 50/54/68 | :edel: Deschutes 36"

Career Low Round: 67 (18 holes), 32 (9 holes)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

On these courses, many players who think they are a 20 index would struggle to reach most par fours in three shots even if their first two are the best they can do. They would also find that if the greens have serious contours and are fast, there are many 10 footers where the aim is to avoid three putts and the challenge for a downhill 3 footer is to have a shorter putt coming back if you miss.

The average player has no idea at all.

It's not so much theat they'd be racking up 12s and 14s on every second hole, which they probably wouldn't, but more the fact that it would be 7s and 8s on a lot of par 4s and 9s on par 5s where they can't even see how it happened - 300 yards from the green on a par 4 where they thought their 280 average drive (in actual fact 195) and then 5 to get down when they're 50 yards away when a shot that is their "drop and stop" on soft greens scuttles over the come back back and the chip they thought was going to end up next to the holes goes 20 feet past. And that's not even thinking about carries over gorse from trees and runs of holes with dams and creeks which affect each shot for 4 or five straight holes.

They reason they think they could break 120 is because they think they can break 90 when in fact they can't.

They think that every par 5 you play is reachable in two and they think every course has reachable par 4s. They don't realise that on a lot of courses they would hit driver on perhaps three of the par 3s and end up in bunkers and walk off with 8 before they've even blinked.

Try telling them, though. I mean.....there are guys on this site who think their "average" shot ends up 10 feet from the hole from 120 yards. (eye-roll emoji)

 

Edited by Shorty

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted

I don't have an answer to your questions but IMO the challenge for a high handicapper in a very difficult course other than the obvious length is the lie angle on the fairways. Hitting the green from 185 yrds with the ball above or below your feet for a HH is very very difficult, if you hit the green in most approach shots a HH could probably not be able to keep it from rolling out, and finally a HH is most likely going to 3 putt in most holes.   


Posted (edited)

Put me down for a strong, it depends...

Just to play with some numbers.  If the CR/slope is 75/145, shooting 127 results in a differential of 40.5.    

I'm sure they vary, but the 3 local qualifiers that I've attended as a spectator over the past couple of years were set up as very long, but little else was done to make them "Open tough".  Just good courses stretched about as far as they could.

With that type of setup, I think an honest 20 hcp gets around in less than 120 assuming there aren't any holes that are completely unplayable due to a forced carry with no options.  If they were to go nuts with the setup, all bets are off, but remember, the local qualifiers are simple one day tournaments that a course isn't necessarily going to go crazy over, when they also have every day play to contend with, before and after.

I haven't attended a sectional qualifier, but I could understand a little different mindset there.  And again, some local qualifiers may go to the extreme, but I just haven't seen that....

 

Edited by David in FL
  • Upvote 2

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I am struggling to play to my 15 right now; most of us do. Mine was set from the regular tees, as are most high handicaps. It is not just the distance, it is what that distance brings into play.

Considering 3 putts on every hole, and at least an extra shot to reach every green, my "perfect" score on such a course would be 108 with no "mistakes". Last time I played, I made a few mistakes.

Don

In the bag:

Driver: PING 410 Plus 9 degrees, Alta CB55 S  Fairway: Callaway Rogue 3W PX Even Flow Blue 6.0; Hybrid: Titleist 818H1 21* PX Even Flow Blue 6.0;  Irons: Titleist 718 AP1 5-W2(53*) Shafts- TT AMT Red S300 ; Wedges Vokey SM8 56-10D Putter: Scotty Cameron 2016 Newport 2.5  Ball: Titleist AVX or 2021 ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

There was a short lived special after the US open a few years back with different level golfers at the US open course. IIRC the single digit was the only one to break 100.

I think the networks over estimated how much we cared about watching golfers we don't know struggle their way around a course. 


Posted (edited)

The average HH player in the U.S. (from what I understand) chooses the tees he plays from, which means he thinks that par 4s are reachable in 2 and par 5s are reachable in 2 or 3. What he doesn't realise is that a lot of par 4s on tough courses from the back tees are longer and tougher than the average par 5s he plays.

Edited by Shorty

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted (edited)

Torrey South is the course I'm familiar with.  Last I played there I hit a 93 from the Green tees 73.3/133, that equaled a differential of 16.9.  The back tees are 78.1/144 so the extra distance would add 5 strokes for the rating 6 strokes for the slope.  So now I'm at 93 + 5 + 6 = 104 due to the extra length and slope.

Now assume I miss the fairway 50% of the time and since the rough is "rough" I can't do much but chop myself out.  I'll add another .5 strokes for each time I get in the rough (.5 harder than getting out of the shorter rough when I played, the rough was still high enough when I played that you could lose your ball in it).  (93 score minus 36 putts) times .5 times .5 strokes per incident= 14 additional strokes because of the rough.

So 104 +14 = 128...

Now add a bunch of putts because of hole placement and green speed, ah say 10.  128 + 10 = 138

I predict I could shoot a 138.   And, I'm not a 20 HI.

Edited by No Mulligans
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

I will preface this with the admission that I have never played in a Local Qualifier for the US Open.  

I looked up a typical venue, Jackson Country Club (TN). Their tips are 6,783 yards (72.9/128).  The site in MI, Muskegon Country Club, is fairly similar.

This makes sense. These are qualifiers, not the US Open. The venue in CO was really long, but the elevation has a lot to do with that.  The slope for the back tees is listed at 129 so the qualifier setup probably was near that number.

Edited by bkuehn1952
Typo
  • Upvote 1

Brian Kuehn

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
49 minutes ago, bkuehn1952 said:

Their tips are 6,783 yards (72.9/128)

The bogie rating for this course is about 97.     (128/5.381 + 72.9)  I can understand why most amateurs think they could beat 127.   But...most amateurs don't play by the rules.    

  • Upvote 1

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 minutes ago, dennyjones said:

The bogie rating for this course is about 97.     (128/5.381 + 72.9)  I can understand why most amateurs think they could beat 127.   But...most amateurs don't play by the rules.    

That is true.  But if we assume a legit 20.1 who arrived at that index following the Rules and not too distance challenged, he/she might put up a decent score 1 out of 5 rounds.

Brian Kuehn

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
6 minutes ago, dennyjones said:

The bogie rating for this course is about 97.     (128/5.381 + 72.9)  I can understand why most amateurs think they could beat 127.   But...most amateurs don't play by the rules.    

True, but this supposes a valid 20.1 handicap.  

30 strokes over the bogie rating? I've got to believe so, but again, absent something that renders the course unplayable for the high handicapper.

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I honestly think that if you set up the course in tournament conditions, but just didn't tell the 20.1 indexer that it was in tournament conditions... They'd probably shoot around 100, and just chalk it down to a 'bad day'. But if it was in an actual tournament with the pressure, then I don't think they'd come close to a 127. For a pro, I think 127 is just complete lack of focus or effort. I mean come on, what is that... 53-55 strokes over par? That's basically triple bogey every hole. Either, you really had a crappy day striking the ball, or you mentally gave up and stopped trying. I know the whole "these guys are good" saying, but if you gave a 20.1 index a shot to play there, they'd probably play as conservative as possible because they know that they're not going to have a chance to win, and if they didn't  play conservative they wouldn't even be able to get the balls to stick to the green. Of course, some 20.1 indexes are that way because they shank and top balls every hole in which case, I'd think they wouldn't break 130.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

What's that famous quote, I believe from Bobby Jones about two types of golf? And one of them is tournament golf. That seems to be important here. Put a HH in a tournament setting and they'll probably melt. It's a thoroughly new experience. 

I remember a few years ago at Bethpage Ben Roethlisberger and a couple of other athlete celebs played the course in tournament conditions a week or two before the Open. I think Ben shot like 85. But put him out there in the actual tournament?

Remember John Smoltz got an exemption on the buy.com tour? He promptly shot like 85-87 and missed the cut. I had him interviewed afterward and he was confused about how he had played so poorly. Well, it wasn't at your club championship or having a Sunday morning nassau. 

So I think I HH could be 127 on the course, but if you make it the actual qualifying round, that probability changes.

Edited by Aguirre

"Witty golf quote."


Posted
2 hours ago, kpaulhus said:

I posted about the "pro" who shot 127. My friend who is a 20.1 index says he could break 127 on that course. He is clearly delusional because he doesn't understand how hard these courses are set up. The length is daunting. The rough is literally rough. He thinks he can manage his game to a sub 126 round.

Its quite funny but he just doesn't understand. What are your thoughts?

I guess I'm delusional too, then.  :-P  I'm a 21.1 cap, and if you asked me to place a bet on either side, I'd bet I could break 127 on that course.  I don't fall victim to any of the specific delusions that @Shorty describes above, but it's just hard to imagine averaging above triple bogey.

I wouldn't feel confident about the bet, by any means, but I'd take the under if forced to bet, because my general sense is:

2 hours ago, David in FL said:

Just to play with some numbers.  If the CR/slope is 75/145, shooting 127 results in a differential of 40.5.    

I'm sure they vary, but the 3 local qualifiers that I've attended as a spectator over the past couple of years were set up as very long, but little else was done to make them "Open tough".  Just good courses stretched about as far as they could.

With that type of setup, I think an honest 20 hcp gets around in less than 120 assuming there aren't any holes that are completely unplayable due to a forced carry with no options.  If they were to go nuts with the setup, all bets are off, but remember, the local qualifiers are simple one day tournaments that a course isn't necessarily going to go crazy over, when they also have every day play to contend with, before and after.

That bolded part is the big caveat.  My driver swing speed is 95-100mph, so I'm looking at 230 yards carry as an absolute MAX.  If there are three or four holes where I need to hit a perfect drive just to carry a hazard, it's all over.

- John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 hours ago, kpaulhus said:

I posted about the "pro" who shot 127. My friend who is a 20.1 index says he could break 127 on that course. He is clearly delusional because he doesn't understand how hard these courses are set up. The length is daunting. The rough is literally rough. He thinks he can manage his game to a sub 126 round.

So this guy has to average 7 strokes a hole to hit 126. Lets say he has 40 putts. That means he needs to have 86 strokes to cover, lets say 7200 yards. That is 84 yards per stroke. So, if he took his 100 yard club on every shot. Given if there is any force carries off the tee the strategy changes. Breaking 126 is reasonable if you are really dedicated about it. :-P

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

127 is a lot of strokes to play with.  But still.  You're talking 20 handi here.  Nothing in the game can be counted on.  40 putts is probably too few if the greens are like what I have seen on a 'real course'. That's two putting everything with four three putts?  I dunno I've seen a lot of situations where the first putt for the twenty will end up 20 yards or more from the green If above the hole.  I doubt the 20 could do it. 


Posted
3 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

127 is a lot of strokes to play with.  But still.  You're talking 20 handi here.  Nothing in the game can be counted on.  40 putts is probably too few if the greens are like what I have seen on a 'real course'. That's two putting everything with four three putts?  I dunno I've seen a lot of situations where the first putt for the twenty will end up 20 yards or more from the green If above the hole.  I doubt the 20 could do it. 

I've seen some 20 handicap golfers have a decent putting game as well. It just depends. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2228 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.