Jump to content
IGNORED

"Tiger Woods" by Jeff Benedict and Armen Keteyian (March 2018)


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

8 minutes ago, iacas said:

My copy was delivered to my home on Tuesday. Too bad I won't be able to start reading it until Saturday afternoon.

I'm a little jealous. I just received notice mine shipped yesterday. I would've enjoyed starting it this weekend...

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
14 minutes ago, GrandStranded said:

I'm a little jealous. I just received notice mine shipped yesterday. I would've enjoyed starting it this weekend...

Amazon pre-orders. Saved ~$5 too.

Or start reading the Kindle version now:

I almost did that.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 hours ago, iacas said:

I'm inclined to believe Band.

I agree.  I don't read a lot of biographies anyway, but the excerpts I've seen from this book have not convinced me to buy this one.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think I'll read it at some point. Maybe order it in a week or two. I want to get through Tiger's 1997 Masters book first.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

14 hours ago, GrandStranded said:

I disagree that the best version of his story would come from Tiger himself. I think most people would agree very few people are going to be completely candid when it comes to talking about their shortcoming/ failures in life, when writing their own autobiography. Tiger, from what we know about him, would be one of the last to do so. It's understandable if you're a huge Tiger fan you wouldn't have any interest in a book written by anyone besides him or a trusted associate of his. Again, I think most would agree that any fair minded attempt to write about him has to include what his fans look at as "the outside the ropes" stuff. You cannot fault these writers for Tiger and or his inner circle not allowing them access to their chosen subject. Personally, I think the odds are these two authors and this book will be judged much more favorably then any "authorized" effort the Tiger camp might decide to write in the future.  

Most autobiographies are exculpatory.

Most biographies are "blows the lid off...previously unrevealed secrets, from sources close to..." efforts.

There are exceptions. Political biographies (which tend to read like history textbooks), and autobiographies written by figures from the arts, who are happy to let it all hang out in the name of art, but still spin it how they want you to hear it - examples of the latter include Keith Richards and Bob Dylan.

Sports autobiographies are nearly always ponderous, ghost-written affairs. Sports biographies are nearly always the latter (explosive new details...)

The tenuous reference to "evidence" that might, possibly, perhaps,maybe, point to PED use suggests that this one is very much of its type. When it eventually shows up in my public library I'll give it a glance - and willingly be prepared to be proved wrong.

Edited by ScouseJohnny
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Administrator
1 hour ago, jamo said:

I think I'll read it at some point. Maybe order it in a week or two. I want to get through Tiger's 1997 Masters book first.

That one wasn’t very good.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
1 minute ago, MuniGrit said:

I wonder which call girl is going to be his favorite in the book? I'm guessing the Rachael girl that had his back. 

Did you buy it? Given your obsession with TW negatives I’d assume yes.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

52 minutes ago, iacas said:

Did you buy it? Given your obsession with TW negatives I’d assume yes.

Nah I'll wait until you get pissed off with yours and let me borrow it. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 3/28/2018 at 5:53 PM, iacas said:

Leaving aside just how silly "In reality, it is Band's letter that is inaccurate" sounds, their sources were "three people with direct involvement" - yet Band had "direct involvement," was there that day, was Clinton's aide for a long stretch of time on both sides of the event, etc.

I'm inclined to believe Band.

If he's willing to stake his reputation on it, and the other guys remain anonymous, then it's a no-brainer.

On 3/28/2018 at 7:28 PM, GrandStranded said:

I disagree that the best version of his story would come from Tiger himself. I think most people would agree very few people are going to be completely candid when it comes to talking about their shortcoming/ failures in life, when writing their own autobiography.

Sure, I'd agree with that.  But I think most people would also agree that when someone who's never even talked to the guy about a given incident starts telling you what Tiger was thinking, rather than what he did or said, you can't put too much weight on it.  The fact that they timed it to come out when it did also implies a high sleaze factor.  And people wonder why Tiger had to develop a shell.

I just got my copy, and I've only read a couple dozen pages.  So far the young Tiger sounds like an innocent victim of his stage-father Earl, whom they portray as a real piece of work.  It sure didn't look like Tiger bore a lot of resentment on the 72nd green of the 1997 Masters, but you never know.  I would be very interested to hear Tiger's comments on it, but I expect that, unlike certain people I could mention, he will just ignore the book, rather than keep it in the headlines by counterattacking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

I'm on page 67. So far, aside from Tiger being a dork, not much is revealed about Tiger himself.

I think this book reveals almost nothing new, though. It's based largely on other books, including Hank's and Tiger's book about the 1997 Masters.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sports writers are notoriously full of $#@!, packaging their own opinions and what they want things to be as fact.  Most of them try to portray themselves as confidantes of the players they cover, as part of the in group, as kind of a big deal.  A few are.  Feinstein, Sampson, Jenkins et al.. but many of the new crop are just trying to be somebody.  Shane Ryan comes to mind.  He sure knows a lot about the players, what they are thinking, what motivates them etc. while bitching about the fact that they won't talk to him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, 3jacker said:

Sports writers are notoriously full of $#@!, packaging their own opinions and what they want things to be as fact.  Most of them try to portray themselves as confidantes of the players they cover, as part of the in group, as kind of a big deal.  A few are.  Feinstein, Sampson, Jenkins et al.. but many of the new crop are just trying to be somebody.  Shane Ryan comes to mind.  He sure knows a lot about the players, what they are thinking, what motivates them etc. while bitching about the fact that they won't talk to him.

Really? I've never gotten that impression. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sorry, edited to reflect what you bolded above.

I read his book Slaying the Tiger... it seems to be a whole lot about what he thought about various pros, while at the same lamenting their lack of communication with him.  Just because someone declines to meet with you doesn't mean attributing sinister motives to them in the absence of directly sournced material is the right thing to do. 

I enjoyed the read, though, I just kept an open mind about it.  While the stories he told of the various players' flaws may be true to some degree, writers have flaws too. 

Edited by 3jacker
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • iacas changed the title to "Tiger Woods" by Jeff Benedict and Armen Keteyian (March 2018)
  • Administrator
10 minutes ago, Chanceman said:

Tiger has had a self-described "miracle" recovery from his last back operation. There has to be a reason.

Ha!

Doesn't seem like you read the really long post in the other topic. Please feel free. You'll find there's not a shred of actual evidence.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • Played the weekly clubtournament yesterday: A stableford tournament from the yellows (6300 yards, Rated 72,7, slope 147) Shot 86 (36 stableford points). A pretty good round, but it was far from a perfect round.  Positives: - No lost balls (despite hitting one in the creek on 8 (found it, but had to take the penalty and a drop there) - Played solid through the 2 hardest stretches on the course. Hole 5-7 (+1) and hole 13-14 (E) - Birdie on the tough 13 (390 yards par 4 playing into wind  with a narrow teeshot and the approach playing 15 yards downhill) after a good drive (275 yards) into the wind to the right side of the fairway and a perfect soft AW from 120 that landed a foot short of the pin and jumped a couple of feet back to 3 feet. That shot looked like it was going in. - Only hit 3/13 fairways, but none of the missed fairways was by more than 5 yards and only one cost me a shot (on 16 where I had to chip it back to the fairway). So all my misses were pretty much in the right places.  - Hit 8 greens (14 nGIRs). Good, but not great.  - The round took my index south of 10,0, so new my new index is now 9,9 Negatives:  - The par 3s - shot +7 on the 5 par 3s, which is the worst I've done so far this season. Managed to shoot a 5 on hole 4 (205 yards into wind yesterday) without using my putter and without penalties. Duffed the teeshot 130 yards short and a little bit right, shanked the next shot into the left greenside bunker, hit the first bunkershot fat and still found my self in the sand, thinned the next bunkershot and flew it over the green and holed the 15 yards chip from there for a 5 and 0 stableford points. To a lot of amusement for everyone in my flight. The 6 i shot on hole 8 (180 yards uphill with wind from behind and left) was quite forgettable: Pulled my 8'iron slightly and flew it over the green right into the creek there, penalty drop, chipped it to 15 feet from there and needed 3 putts to hole it (found the ball in the creek(Y) ).  - Struggled with the speed on a 15 footer (sent it 6 feet past on 8 ) and 40 footer (left it 12 feet short on 14) , which I normally don't struggle with. Putting was good apart from those 2 and were the only 3-putts I made. On both those putts it felt wrong in the backswing and I still didn't abort the swing. Need to work on that.  33 putts total is not great, but is acceptable with the chances I gave myself on the greens. - A little inconsistant with my longer chips, needs to get them a little closer. This is a part of the game I have been very good at lately and this was not my best round around the greens. Only 2 1-putts after chipping and one holeout. Should do better.   
    • After a decent round yesterday i finally reached goal number 1 this season: HCP-index: 9,9.  Now let's keep it there or lower. 
    • You really need to call out your cheating partner.  Never allow it to continue.  Otherwise you will either get bitter about it or refuse to play with him.
    • Or wager against them, but watch them closely and play strict rules.  After all, their handicaps are probably treating their concessions as sunk. Three players in my club's match play qualifier were DQ'd for taking gimmes during the qualifier.  Those are a no-no when it's medal play for a match play qualifier. 
    • Parred the first hole at an away course today to make my away course composite even par (3 birdies 3 bogeys)
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. benharris
      benharris
      (29 years old)
    2. Erik Tedfelt
      Erik Tedfelt
      (26 years old)
    3. ForcedCarry21
      ForcedCarry21
      (30 years old)
    4. hlan
      hlan
      (36 years old)
    5. Hookman
      Hookman
      (29 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...