Jump to content
ThEsLiCeKilLs

Putters of Choice?

30 posts / 2902 viewsLast Reply

Recommended Posts

Hey there everyone,

 

Not sure if there is another thread on this or not. However, is there anyone on here who has played a couple rounds with a SeeMore Putter?

 

I am wanting to get a new putter, but I don't have a lot of money to spend.

 

But I was wanting to see what y'all thought. I have it narrowed down between either a SeeMore or Cleveland TFi 8.0 Blade.

 

Any thoughts?

 

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

I have tried the SeeMore putter. I tried it for 20 rounds or so. Great putter. Great quality. Rolled the ball nicely for me. That said, it did not replace my long time, tried, and true, $29.99 (?) Zone 1 putter.  

Here's the deal. My Z-1 gamer fits my stroke. I have a ton of confidence in it. I know when I miss a putt with it, it is my fault. 

The SeeMore was not fitted to my stroke. I never got comfortable using it. Never developed any confidence in it. 

I guess my point is, which ever putter you purchase, have it fitted to your stroke. It's highly probable if I had taken the time to be fitted for the SeeMore, it would now be my gamer. 

The Cleveland blade, I know nothing about it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Putters are personal.  If a hot dog on a stick works for you; you should putt with a hot dog on a stick.  As I understand it; the ones with cheese in the middle have a softer feel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I've had a lot of nice putters, but lately, I've been using an old bronze Ping Zing that has green stuff on the back. I don't know why, but my speed control has been better with this putter than it has in a long time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am by no means an expert, but the biggest help I got was to discover that my putting stroke was straight back and straight thru....That told me the I needed, I think they call it a face balanced putter.  Before that, I would miss short every time and was convinced I could not read even the easiest to read green.  It helped with my distance and with my accuracy.  You should be able to find an affordable putter on e-bay to fit your stroke.  You may find something on this forum about different balanced putter for different strokes....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I recently bought a new putter after using the same Odyssey two ball for the about the past 6-7 years. I tried various models/types and after spending a couple months working on it decided on  a Scotty Cameron. The point is, I tried a bunch of different styles, types and lengths before finding the one I liked best. Putters are probably the most "personal" golf club you can buy. It seems like everyone has a slightly different opinion/preference. Take your time and find the right one. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Osnola said:

I am by no means an expert, but the biggest help I got was to discover that my putting stroke was straight back and straight thru....That told me the I needed, I think they call it a face balanced putter.

Two things, and though it's brief, it's really not intended to be confrontational…

  • I doubt that your stroke is SBST. Almost nobody's is outside of about six-footer max.
  • The forces and torques in putting are incredibly small. Face balanced, toe hang… that stuff doesn't matter much at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I purchased a Piretti Teramo 365 G, 34" putter new on the web, (don't even remember where I got it from), without even trying it. (Please don't ask me why I do these things, LOL, I guess I'm just a club hound). Anyway, it replaced my Odyssey and I can't believe how great this putter fits my particular stroke. I guess I just lucked out.

I guess it just comes down to your particular feel and confidence which is only built over time. Maybe that is why I have about ten putters in my garage. They all felt great in the store, (I swear they have magnets in the holes and balls in the store, they all seem to go in), but on the course it is a completely different story.

Good luck with whichever putter you decide to buy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On ‎04‎/‎02‎/‎2018 at 11:15 PM, ThEsLiCeKilLs said:

But I was wanting to see what y'all thought. I have it narrowed down between either a SeeMore or Cleveland TFi 8.0 Blade.

Tried a SeeMore putter a last year when i was looking to replace my GEL Diamond, didnt take to it. They had some end of season/overstock sale putters and it included the Cleveland Smart Square mallet and blade.

Loved the blade putter and ended up getting it down to £30. The TFi range are really nice as well (couldnt compete with my haggling skills though!).

Either one will give you a quality product so just have a play with both.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Give them a try in person and compare to your current putter.  See how their alignment configurations work for you.  You have to be able to line it up right and that's all up to your eyes.  If you can't aim it, you wont make anything.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Watching guys on tour nobody is SBST yet a good number of them use face balanced putters.  If u have a slight arc, either face balanced or an Anser style toe hang will work.  

Where i saw the big drop off is when I went to a heel shafted putter like the odyssey 9.  Too much arc for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

6 hours ago, Typhoon92 said:

Where i saw the big drop off is when I went to a heel shafted putter like the odyssey 9.  Too much arc for me.

Again, the forces and torques involved in putting are incredibly small. You didn't putt well with that putter for some reason, but it almost surely wasn't because of the physics of a heel-shafted putter. Maybe your mind more than anything, if you give any actual weight to the idea that this stuff matters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

13 minutes ago, iacas said:

Again, the forces and torques involved in putting are incredibly small. You didn't putt well with that putter for some reason, but it almost surely wasn't because of the physics of a heel-shafted putter. Maybe your mind more than anything, if you give any actual weight to the idea that this stuff matters.

Maybe just the shaft in the heel having a different feel to it caused it to not work.  I bought it because it felt really good but I just could not get the ball on line at all.   Face balanced and Anser style I'm fine with.... They feel the same.

A good test too is taking the Ping Tyne putter which comes in SBST and slight arc and see what u do better with.  My stroke is slight arc but with those 2 putters the SBST model wins hands down.

Give me something heel shafted and I'm a 50 handicap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Since I can't figure out how to edit my last post...  I realized after watching Jason Day today that I putt really well with the Spider Tour which looks to be heel shafted....but not much toe hang.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Typhoon92 said:

Since I can't figure out how to edit my last post...

You have 316 posts here… you can't edit after about 9, 18, or 27 minutes, depending on which membership group you're in.

On 2/10/2018 at 3:34 PM, Typhoon92 said:

A good test too is taking the Ping Tyne putter which comes in SBST and slight arc and see what u do better with.  My stroke is slight arc but with those 2 putters the SBST model wins hands down.

I disagree that's a good test. I'm not sure you read what I wrote up above: the forces and torques in putting are incredibly small. Negligible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I agreed with u... The reason I think it is a good test is I know I have a slight arc stroke but the SBST putter works better for me.  Anyone who thinks they have to use a slight arc putter for their slight arc stroke is wrong.  The forces and torque are negligible...correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

A good putter should do the following,

1. Let you aim where you want to.
2. Let you have good tempo and speed control.

Here is a pretty good resource, https://edelgolf.com/pages/classic-fit

If you find that you aim your putter too much left, then try to find one with design combinations that correct that. A small change can go along way. I've seen putter fittings were adding a few alignment lines would drastically change how a person aims their putter.

For me, I got lucky with my choices over the years. When I got fitted for my Edel, they basically copied the same look as my previous putter. The big issue for me was weighting. I needed a much heavier putter head and back weighting in the grip.

If you struggle with speed control, then you probably are using a putter that is too lightweight. Major manufactures are finally seeing that, and coming out with heavier options and counter balance options.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Typhoon92 said:

The reason I think it is a good test is I know I have a slight arc stroke but the SBST putter works better for me.  Anyone who thinks they have to use a slight arc putter for their slight arc stroke is wrong.  The forces and torque are negligible...correct.

Okay, cool. But to further clarify, yeah, there's not really any such thing as an "SBST putter." Or an "arc putter."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2018 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    More to come…
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • It's speculation that doesn't actually matter. GOAT is not the longest driver or we'd already be throwing Cameron Champ's or Jamie Sadlowski's names in the discussion. He hit it about 267 or so when he was 40-43. Tiger hits it about 297 at the age of 43 with a fused back. And I couldn't care less… if Tiger hit it 350 or 250, he won a major this year. 15 >> 18, 81 >>> 72. That's 90% of the GOAT discussion for me. Y'all can make up whatever reasons you want, but own them, and accept that you're speculating on some of them.
    • How far would golf's legends drive the ball using modern equipment? At the 2016 Ryder Cup, the 6-foot-5 Thomas Pieters belted a drive 324...   An interesting article on how players way back would have driven the ball with today's ball and equipment.  I didn't realize that Jack had driven the ball 341 yards in a longest drive competition when he was 18.  
    • Oy. I don't give a shit about two top ten finishes in a decade. Nor am I comparing Jack to Vijay Singh, a guy whose putting stroke has been AWOL since roughly 2011. He wasn't. That's easily refuted. As for straighter you're not comparing like to like - you don't know what the fairway widths were, how far the ball bounced, etc. But we do KNOW that Tiger was longer than Jack. Tiger at 43 with a fused back is longer than Jack was when Jack was 40, 41, 42, or 43. Tiger @ 43: 297.8 Jack @ 40: 269.0 Jack @ 41: 264.3 Jack @ 42: 264.6 Jack @ 43: 266.1 Tiger was almost 30 yards longer at 43 than Jack was at 40, 41, 42, or 43. Now, several posts in, you're changing that up to say that, given modern equipment or whatever, Jack would probably have been as long as Tiger. But that's not what you said. Uhhhhh… He didn't do that. Neither did I. No they aren't. Furthermore, if all Tiger had to do was hit the ball 266 yards, he could probably hit 80% of the fairways. Fairways that are likely narrower, etc. So you lost the distance one, and if you want to measure "accuracy" by "fairway hit percentage" I again will point out you're not comparing like to like. They aren't playing the same golf courses, the same fairways, or hitting it the same distances. Furthermore, and more importantly, I don't care about stats like this when determining who the GOAT is. If you do, that's cool, but what I care about is wins, dominance, scoring averages, that sort of thing. I don't care who had a better short game (Tiger by far), who was a better putter (tie?), who hit a better 7-iron (almost surely Tiger), or whatever. I care about Ws. So not only are you provably wrong on distance, possibly off-base on accuracy, but you're arguing about things that most people don't even care about. Nobody considers Calvin Peete in the GOAT discussion because of how accurate he was off the tee. Huh? No. 🤦‍♂️ Uhhh, according to Jack, it was 118 MPH. I call bullshit on that. Oy. I don't give a shit about two top ten finishes in a decade. Nor am I comparing Jack to Vijay Singh, a guy whose putting stroke has been AWOL since roughly 2011. He wasn't. That's easily refuted. As for straighter you're not comparing like to like - you don't know what the fairway widths were, how far the ball bounced, etc. But we do KNOW that Tiger was longer than Jack. Tiger at 43 with a fused back is longer than Jack was when Jack was 40, 41, 42, or 43. Tiger @ 43: 297.8 Jack @ 40: 269.0 Jack @ 41: 264.3 Jack @ 42: 264.6 Jack @ 43: 266.1 Tiger was almost 30 yards longer at 43 than Jack was at 40, 41, 42, or 43. Now, several posts in, you're changing that up to say that, given modern equipment or whatever, Jack would probably have been as long as Tiger. But that's not what you said. Uhhhhh… He didn't do that. Neither did I. No they aren't. Furthermore, if all Tiger had to do was hit the ball 266 yards, he could probably hit 80% of the fairways. Fairways that are likely narrower, etc. So you lost the distance one, and if you want to measure "accuracy" by "fairway hit percentage" I again will point out you're not comparing like to like. They aren't playing the same golf courses, the same fairways, or hitting it the same distances. Furthermore, and more importantly, I don't care about stats like this when determining who the GOAT is. If you do, that's cool, but what I care about is wins, dominance, scoring averages, that sort of thing. I don't care who had a better short game (Tiger by far), who was a better putter (tie?), who hit a better 7-iron (almost surely Tiger), or whatever. I care about Ws. So not only are you provably wrong on distance, possibly off-base on accuracy, but you're arguing about things that most people don't even care about. Nobody considers Calvin Peete in the GOAT discussion because of how accurate he was off the tee. Huh? No. 🤦‍♂️ Uhhh, according to Jack, it was 118 MPH. I call bullshit on that. Ha ha ha.
    • I’ve never been one to sit on my donkey for too long. The past four and half decades have pretty much been work for me , as so I know, for many others as well.  Developing my golf game will (not) dominate my new found free time. It will though give me a new avenue of pursuits that I hope will keep my mind expanding. Thanks for the input and reply. 
    • That sort of extrapolation is not possible.  You are talking that he would be hitting the golf ball further than the average long drive competitor. I am not buying it. He would be one of the longer hitters on tour. Jack is not the physical freak like Dustin Johnson. I would put him probably a top 10 in distance yearly if he was in his prime competing today.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dan42nepa
      Dan42nepa
      (63 years old)
    2. James Dalton
      James Dalton
      (78 years old)
    3. JMHARDING
      JMHARDING
      (29 years old)
    4. mwh1023
      mwh1023
      (52 years old)
    5. Skeesh
      Skeesh
      (47 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...