Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2559 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

To tee or not to tee...  

52 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you use a tee on shorter holes?



Recommended Posts

Posted
On 1/2/2019 at 11:53 AM, p1n9183 said:

I only tee up with my driver and i never hit driver from the deck.
I prefer to hit every other club from the deck, it´s like when i tee up my swing changes and i hit it more upwards like the driver. Nevertheless i hit the ground before the shot in order to create an artificial tee in the ground, like an elevated spot in the grass in order to put the ball above it.

This describes me exactly.  

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I couldn't answer the poll, because "Sometimes" wasn't an option.  I do it most of the time, but it depends on the turf and on what club I'm using.  The tee boxes here at the 9 hole course I play on most weekdays has "lush" teeing grounds, and the grass is thick enough that the ball sits up as if it's on one of those brush tees anyway.  It "feels" funny to try and tee it up when I don't really gain anything from the process.  I also have never been able to figure out how to hit my 7 wood from a tee, and that's my 180ish club, so it's fairly common to play it on longish par 3 holes.

I used to be all in with the "always give yourself a perfect lie when you can" crowd.  I still do when the tee boxes are mowed fairly closely, but I tee very low as Erik said, no more than 1/8" above the grass, and usually the bottom of the ball is still below the tips of the grass blades.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I tee it up on every tee.

Don

In the bag:

Driver: PING 410 Plus 9 degrees, Alta CB55 S  Fairway: Callaway Rogue 3W PX Even Flow Blue 6.0; Hybrid: Titleist 818H1 21* PX Even Flow Blue 6.0;  Irons: Titleist 718 AP1 5-W2(53*) Shafts- TT AMT Red S300 ; Wedges Vokey SM8 56-10D Putter: Scotty Cameron 2016 Newport 2.5  Ball: Titleist AVX or 2021 ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

On a full length course, I always use a tee when it is allowed. 

When on an executive course, I'm usually practicing and will typically not use a tee. I treat my tee shots as if they were approach shots on par 4's.

-Jimmy

:nike: VR_S Covert 2.0 Driver, 3W
:pxg: 0311 X (3), 0311 XF (4-6), 0311 (7-PW, 52/56/60)
:titleist: 2016 Scotty Cameron Newport Select Putter

"That tiger ain't go crazy; that tiger went tiger!" - Chris Rock

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Only time I don’t tee up is on the pitch and putt.  But it’s because I treat it more as practicing than a real round.  If I was playing a tournament on the pitch and putt is probably tee it up.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
On 1/2/2019 at 4:01 PM, miggusrises said:

Yeah I get that the ball is always rising from the moment of impact and exerts no force on the ground (compression is a misnomer), but it does feel like it is being squeezed out, and that feeling is stronger when the ball is on the deck. 

It's not an important point, and I don't think there are any quantitative differences in terms of spin or launch (unless there is grass between the ball and clubface).

Ok - you like the feel of the clubhead pushing through the lie...

As for compression being a 'misnomer' - what do you mean?  Though the ball isn't being compressed 'between' the club and another surface as you noted (it's funny when people think that, even more when an announcer says something along those lines), it is being compressed between the club and it's own mass as it accelerates.  High speed vids of impact are the simplist way to get people to understand the difference.  Perhaps you prefer 'deformation' for better clarity?  I'd get that.

 

Edited by rehmwa

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
36 minutes ago, rehmwa said:

Ok - you like the feel of the clubhead pushing through the lie...

As for compression being a 'misnomer' - what do you mean?  Though the ball isn't being compressed 'between' the club and another surface as you noted (it's funny when people think that, even more when an announcer says something along those lines), it is being compressed between the club and it's own mass as it accelerates.  High speed vids of impact are the simplist way to get people to understand the difference.  Perhaps you prefer 'deformation' for better clarity?  I'd get that.

 

It is actually deforming, not compressing. Compression would be a reduction in the volume of the ball. The ball deforms in these high speed videos as you state.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Agreed, we're on the same page. 

alternately, for the normal discussion, the idea of 'compressing' along the one axis is enough for the discussion to be understandable.  Good stuff.

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, rehmwa said:

Ok - you like the feel of the clubhead pushing through the lie...

As for compression being a 'misnomer' - what do you mean?  Though the ball isn't being compressed 'between' the club and another surface as you noted (it's funny when people think that, even more when an announcer says something along those lines), it is being compressed between the club and it's own mass as it accelerates.  High speed vids of impact are the simplist way to get people to understand the difference.  Perhaps you prefer 'deformation' for better clarity?  I'd get that.

 

I may be wrong, but most of the time I hear people use the word ‘compression’, they are not talking about the short lived deformation of the ball, but are instead referring to the “squeeze” feeling of a properly struck iron. They imagine that this squeeze feeling results from the ball somehow being trapped between the club and the ground and so refer to it as compression. Since no compression of this sort occurs, ‘compression’ used in this context is a misnomer in my opinion. 


Posted (edited)
11 minutes ago, miggusrises said:

I may be wrong, but most of the time I hear people use the word ‘compression’, they are not talking about the short lived deformation of the ball, but are instead referring to the “squeeze” feeling of a properly struck iron. They imagine that this squeeze feeling results from the ball somehow being trapped between the club and the ground and so refer to it as compression. Since no compression of this sort occurs, ‘compression’ used in this context is a misnomer in my opinion. 

For your first sentence, It's kind of both - those that know are talking about the deformation effect and the resulting stored energy and subsequent release.  That does result in a very nice feel ("a properly struck iron"), but mostly just one of a subjective 'great' contact.  If the ball doesn't deform, then it sucks and feels like a rock, if it deforms too much then it's squishy and kind of sucks.  So that's not a misnomer.

For the second sentence - anyone talking about trapping a ball between the ground and club is an idiot.  and yes, major network golf announcers have done just that.  that's a misnomer for sure.

 

There's no reason to use the term compression if it was simply 'nice contact'.  there's a reason one leads to the other

Edited by rehmwa

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, rehmwa said:

no - those that know are talking about the deformation effect and the resulting stored energy and subsequent release.  That does have a very nice feel, but mostly just one of a subjective 'great' contact.

anyone talking about trapping a ball between the ground and club is an idiot.  and yes, major network golf announcers have done just that.

I almost always hear about it when players are hitting mid irons or wedges, and almost never when they hit driver, when the most physical compression actually occurs. So I think that most of the time people are referring to the thing that doesn't happen. 


Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, miggusrises said:

I almost always hear about it when players are hitting mid irons or wedges, and almost never when they hit driver, when the most physical compression actually occurs. So I think that most of the time people are referring to the thing that doesn't happen. 

I wouldn't be surprised.  I think most golfers don't really care about the why's, just the feels.  And that great if it works for them.   Not for me though. 

The "compress the ball" ad campaign, to me, was a total failure and has led a lot of golfers into misunderstanding the effect.  engineers and salesmen don't talk well to each other....

(For me, it's most blatantly 'feelable' when good vs bad contact happens with long irons more than any other clubs.)  I don't every really use trite phrases like "wow, really compressed that ball" - it sound goofy to me, usually just "that felt really pure/nice/clean"....then I do a little dance.

Edited by rehmwa

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
15 minutes ago, rehmwa said:

For your first sentence, It's kind of both - those that know are talking about the deformation effect and the resulting stored energy and subsequent release.  That does result in a very nice feel ("a properly struck iron"), but mostly just one of a subjective 'great' contact.  If the ball doesn't deform, then it sucks and feels like a rock, if it deforms too much then it's squishy and kind of sucks.  So that's not a misnomer.

I mean, technically the golf ball always deforms a little, even on a putt! The information that the ball has been struck has to propagate to the centre of mass by some mechanism.

But you're right, it is definitely possible to get a ball that deforms too much, and matching up your club head speed to the type of ball does result in a better feeling than hitting a ball that is too soft. I just never see compression used in this context, but everywhere is different. 

With regards to the feeling difference, the 'compressing the ball against the ground' feeling only really comes when there is a reasonable angle of attack, and is a different sensation to when the ball is picked cleanly off the turf. So thats why I think it generally applies to wedges and mid irons, and wouldn't feel it as much with the long irons. 


Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, miggusrises said:

 the 'compressing the ball against the ground' feeling

IMHO - You're talking about club vs lie interaction and overall clean ball contact for those shots.  But....if the illusion of that helps....then cool, I'm a fan of whatever 'feel' works for people.

It's been a good chat.  But I'm not going any farther with that aspect - I've made my point => This "compression/ground" idea is not a real thing.  Compression/deformation of the ball during contact as a concept has a real basis.

Edited by rehmwa
  • Thumbs Up 1

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
20 hours ago, rehmwa said:

IMHO - You're talking about club vs lie interaction and overall clean ball contact for those shots.  But....if the illusion of that helps....then cool, I'm a fan of whatever 'feel' works for people.

It's been a good chat.  But I'm not going any farther with that aspect - I've made my point => This "compression/ground" idea is not a real thing.  Compression/deformation of the ball during contact as a concept has a real basis.

I always used to call it "pinching" the ball.  I realize that isn't what happens, but it's more of a mental key to help keep my hands ahead of the clubhead, and to strike the ball before the bottom of the swing path.  The "feel" is that I'm trying to pinch the ball between the club and the ground, even though it never actually happens.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yes compression is part of the reason why I do not tee on  on 200 yards or less. It vibrates hard through my arms.  


Note: This thread is 2559 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.