Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2106 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Alignment  

48 members have voted

  1. 1. Which of these three best describe how you aim?

    • Distant target only
      13
    • Intermediate target only
      9
    • Both intermediate and distant targets
      26


Recommended Posts

Posted
5 minutes ago, Bonvivant said:

I am 95% a distant target player. I think my alignment is fairly good, but shot variance is the killer. On putts, I usually pick out a spot that is "pin high" with the hole from where I am viewing, and aim there. The only time I use something intermediate is when I have a tricky double breaker or a mostly straight putt with a hard break at only one spot. When I have these situations, I still set up my aim relative to that break point. Once I align and take my stance, I rarely have my target in my FOV.

I used to be a fairly proficient bowler (298 high game 783 high series 202 average), and I always used the dots that are only 6 feet away from the foul line as opposed to the arrows. I didn't necessarily pick a dot, usually it was a board number (bowling lanes have 42 boards and I picked a board between number 12-20 right to left depending on conditions). I find it funny that in bowling I always had a mark as opposed to a target (with the exception of some spare shots), whereas golf I seem to do the exact opposite.

The marker dots between the foul line and the arrows? That have a dot every two boards? What the hell did you leave in the 12th for 298?

What's in Shane's Bag?     

Ball: 2022 :callaway: Chrome Soft Triple Track Driver: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond 8° MCA Kai’li 70s FW: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond  H: :callaway: Apex Pro 21 20°I (3-PW) :callaway: Apex 21 UST Recoil 95 (3), Recoil 110 (4-PW). Wedges: :callaway: Jaws Raw 50°, 54°, 60° UST Recoil 110 Putter: :odyssey: Tri-Hot 5K Triple Wide 35”

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, onthehunt526 said:

The marker dots between the foul line and the arrows? That have a dot every two boards? What the hell did you leave in the 12th for 298?

Correct on the dots. I found that it was easier to hit an exact mark, sometimes as small as a half a board, compared to the arrows. The golf conversation is really relavent with this, as it seems people pick spots that are as close as a foot and as far as the pin/target or potentially even farther (building off in the distance off course property). What is even more strange for my aiming, is that in pool (billiards), I typically make my stroke looking at the cue ball as opposed to the object ball, which is definitely atypically for most proficient players.

I came through the nose and left a 6/10 (righty).

Edited by Bonvivant
  • :titleist: 917 D2 9.5o EvenFlow blue shaft    :titleist: 917 F2 15o EvenFlow blue shaft    
  • :titleist: 818 H2 19o EvenFlow blue shaft 
  • :titleist: 712 AP2 4-PW
  • :vokey: 52/8o SM6 RAW    56/14o SM6 Chrome      60/4o SM6 Chrome
  • :ping: Anser Sigma G putter
  • :snell: MTB-Black Balls
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I voted intermediate, but tell me if I need to change.

Putts I aim over something where I want the ball to roll over it about a foot out.

All other shots, I stand behind the ball for where I want it to go, hold up the club shaft in the line I want the ball to start, and look for something on the ground to use as a marker to line up (that + the ball as a line parallel).  Then I have to shift my feet in the rare circumstances where I'm trying to produce a curved shot. 

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have tried intermediate, target, and combo.  Sounds weird but I like to see in my mind how the ball is going to go and area on the green that I want to be.  It is like shooting Clays compared instead to shooting precision rifle.  Different part of the brain.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 3/18/2020 at 4:37 AM, boogielicious said:

It also reminds me of the technique called "Quiet Eye". With Quiet Eye you first look where you want the ball to go. Then only looking at your ball, you hit it. The idea is your brain already knows where the target is and now only ball is important.

This also reminds me of mountain biking... I don't want to hit the tree, but if I look at the tree, I'll hit it.  Lol!

As far as the topic.  I've done both, but in recent times it is distance.

Picking a spot, trying to remember that exact spot (tuft or blade of grass), or believing it, from a setup perspective sometimes got me second guessing the line.  Once I start to second guess anything it's over.

But this thread has gotten me thinking about coming up with a way to accept (convince me) that is the correct line.

John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
2 minutes ago, 70sSanO said:

This also reminds me of mountain biking... I don't want to hit the tree, but if I look at the tree, I'll hit it.

I used to race. We would teach newbies this! Look where you want to go, don't look at the obstacle.:-P

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I pick out something, on the ground in front of the ball, and use that to align my feet when I address the ball.  I take a rehearsal swing to see if the club is following the path I envision.  Then I either make a small adjustment or swing away.  Whenever possible I chose a line while waiting my turn...including tee shots.

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

i use an intermediate target to START the ball on  a certain line with the intention itll curve to the distant target.

However

What tends to confuse my mind is, i align with the intermediate target but my mind wants to focus in on the distant target, the flag etc, which is NOT the starting line target just in front of me.

Im not sure how to get out of this to stop being drawn over towards the flag


Posted

I pick a spot between me and where i want the ball to start about 12 inches in front of the ball and align everything to that. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I've never used an intermediate target. I've always just looked at where I want to hit it and attempted to hit to that spot. Definitely something for me to try.

Back in PA!

Driver: :titleist: TSR3, 3W: :titleist: TSR3, Hybrid: :ping: Anser 20, Irons: Takomo 101T, Wedges: :titleist: Vokey SM5 (52, 56, 60), Putter: TBD

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

With driver, I pick a spot 8 or 10 ft out and generally align with slight left-center fairway.  Putting, I seem to forget to pick the spot to putt to and take a distance left or right of cup (like half a cup).  This is not working for me and I cannot seem to change my routine but that's my goal for this season.  My favorite shots, irons to the green, I thought that I could set up, pay attention to alignment and be inline.  Well, this past week, my partner informed me that I was consistently lined up left, enough to be 10 ft left of the green.  and it felt right lined up when I adjusted but flew straight at it.   

Edited by burr

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Moderator
Posted
On 3/18/2020 at 9:54 AM, David in FL said:

Since “poorly” wasn’t an option, I chose distant only.

Turns out, they’re one and the same.  😑

Yep - same here. I’ll have to give this a try

Driver: :callaway: Rogue ST  /  Woods: :tmade: Stealth 5W / Hybrid: :tmade: Stealth 25* / Irons: :ping: i500’s /  Wedges: :edel: 54*, 58*; Putter: :scotty_cameron: Futura 5  Ball: image.png Vero X1

 

 -Jonny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2106 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.