Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1476 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

MLB strike zone box  

23 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you like the strike zone box graphic imposed on your tv for viewing?

    • No, I am a sports fan that doesn't need this gimmicky graphic to let me know balls and strikes!
      3
    • Yes, it is sort of cool, it helps me see the strike zone and the close pitches.
      13
    • I don't care one way or the other, whatever!
      7


Recommended Posts

Posted
25 minutes ago, burr said:

The first down marker on tv is a reference only tool for the fan.

Isn't that what the strike zone box is too? A reference only tool for the fan.

  • Like 1

Driver: :titleist:  GT3
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood
Irons: :titleist: U505 (3)  :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   :titleist: SM9 54/58  
Putter: :tmade: Spider X

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

certainly so.  It also generates the attitude of not only the armchair Qback, but the armchair referee or umpire too.


Posted

Not related to the OP, but my dad is certainly an "armchair" umpire. Back when I was a kid, and we watched baseball games at home, he would yell at the umpire (on TV) at any borderline strike/ball call that didn't go the A's way. Now with the strike zone graphic, he can yell at the umpire, or yell at the graphic, or both.

-Peter

  • :titleist: TSR2
  • :callaway: Paradym, 4W
  • :pxg: GEN4 0317X, Hybrid
  • :srixon: ZX 3-iron, ZX5 4-AW
  • :cleveland:  RTX Zipcore 54 & 58
  • L.A.B. Golf Directed Force 2.1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

I like the box and would LOVE for automated balls and strikes to replace the human element of an ump. Especially those strikes high in the zone, we gotta get more guys swinging for contact and not just for hitting home runs.

Edited by colin007
Spelling
  • Thumbs Up 1

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, Darkfrog said:

Not related to the OP, but my dad is certainly an "armchair" umpire. Back when I was a kid, and we watched baseball games at home, he would yell at the umpire (on TV) at any borderline strike/ball call that didn't go the A's way. Now with the strike zone graphic, he can yell at the umpire, or yell at the graphic, or both.

On any pitched baseball that's moving in time and space there is often a lot of movement after that sucker passes through the TV box.  Seems the graphic box is over the front of the plate.  The caught pitch is 3-4 feet back... hence the framing of pitches.


Posted
6 minutes ago, Darkfrog said:

Not related to the OP, but my dad is certainly an "armchair" umpire. Back when I was a kid, and we watched baseball games at home, he would yell at the umpire (on TV) at any borderline strike/ball call that didn't go the A's way. Now with the strike zone graphic, he can yell at the umpire, or yell at the graphic, or both.

I'd love to hear him down the 1st baseline during games as this is a huge part of the game.  Not waiting on the 'call upstairs'.


Posted
44 minutes ago, burr said:

I also don't like the instant replay in baseball nowaday either.

I don't mind it for certain things, like did the ball clear the fence or not. There are no umpires in the outfield, and that is a long distance away. 

I don't think displaying information takes the umpires out of the game. Its not like it's making the calls. Again,, it is a way for us to see if umpires make a bad call or not. I think it has helped umpires. They are getting better at calling balls and strikes. 

umpirefeature-1.jpg?w=700

Dusty Dellinger knows how difficult it is to be an umpire. “There’s an old saying that they expect you to be perfect from day one and get better,” the...

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

If you are a Tiger fan, back in 2010 you would have passionately loved to have had the instant replay, and I think this particular incident was part of what triggered the new instant replay usage. Armando Galarraga's perfect game was mistaken taken from him, and all Tiger fans by a missed call at first base by umpire Jim Joyce. Even though the IR takes up time in the game, and may interfere with the flow of the game, this incident and many like it, are good reasons for IR. As far as the strike zone graphic, it is there just for the viewing fans pleasure, or in my case, displeasure. I don't seem to be as bothered as I use to be, and maybe get use to it, but still prefer it not being there. There are probably different make ups of technology used to create the box, but I remember the box being less video quality then it is now, because it seemed to be a different quality picture inside the box than outside the box. For me this seemed to create a distracting optical illusion when trying to follow the baseball. If this distortion doesn't exist then I will be satisfied with the box. I watched yesterday's Tiger opener and the box looked more palatable then even last year's. So we will see. 

Check out this video, it testifies to the need of IR: 

 

Edited by iacas
embedded video

Thomas Gralinski, 2458080

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Good God man-Your arguments are not even consistent with themselves.

34 minutes ago, Billy Z said:

There are probably different make ups of technology used to create the box, but I remember the box being less video quality then it is now, because it seemed to be a different quality picture inside the box than outside the box. For me this seemed to create a distracting optical illusion when trying to follow the baseball. If this distortion doesn't exist then I will be satisfied with the box.

The box does not use different video inside the box versus outside.-Whatever you are smoking man lay off. The box is overlaid on the same video.-That is why replays can use the same video but not show the box.-It is a production level drawing just like the leaderboard, player names floating above them in the field, etc.

So now it is no longer about being a purist but about whether you perceive-incorrectly- a difference in video quality? Good God.

  • Funny 1
  • Upvote 1

"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 4/1/2021 at 12:47 PM, boogielicious said:

 

When I was a kid, on a 12” Black and White TV, you had to go by the players movements to guess where the puck was. The exception was when Bobby Orr had the puck. He was so fluid, poetry in motion.

As to the topic, I don’t mind the strike zone. It really highlights how bad the umps are behind the plate. We’ve known this forever. A strike should be a strike and not what they’re feeling at the time. 

And yes I played baseball.

And I think it generally highlights how GOOD they are considering the difficulty of what they are being asked to do.  That said, I'm 100% in favor of electronic ball/strike calls.

Anyways, regarding the topic; if I'm not watching baseball with my dad, then I like having it there, because it gives me a better idea of where the ball crossed the plate since the centerfield camera is almost always off-center.

If I am watching with him, then I'd prefer it not be there because he never misses a chance to snicker and gripe about the missed calls and it just gives him more ammo.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If they starting calling balls and strikes electronically, how would you imagine the system being setup with regards to what role the plate umpire has and how the batter would be notified? Maybe a audible buzz to an ump's headset? A home plate ump would still be an necessity. Thoughts?

Thomas Gralinski, 2458080

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
19 minutes ago, Billy Z said:

If they starting calling balls and strikes electronically, how would you imagine the system being setup with regards to what role the plate umpire has... 

Somebody still has to use that little broom to dust off home plate.

  • Funny 1

  • Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, Billy Z said:

If they starting calling balls and strikes electronically, how would you imagine the system being setup with regards to what role the plate umpire has and how the batter would be notified? Maybe a audible buzz to an ump's headset? A home plate ump would still be an necessity. Thoughts?

Headset would be the easiest way, probably. They’d still have to have a home plate umpire.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

https://www.insidehook.com/daily_brief/sports/does-espns-k-zone-ruin-baseball-on-tv

(The main problem with the four-sided virtual graphic is it obstructs what the viewer can see and isn’t really all that accurate about what constitutes a strike as an umpire still makes the final call.

“The square is supposed to be akin to the NFL first-down marker, which was a great invention that enhanced the viewer experience and provided objective, important information while staying out of the way of the action,” according to The New York Post. “The square does not do that.”)

Edited by iacas
https://thesandtrap.com/how-to/formatted-text/

Thomas Gralinski, 2458080

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 4/2/2021 at 6:41 PM, billchao said:

Headset would be the easiest way, probably. They’d still have to have a home plate umpire.

Loudspeaker.  So everyone in the park would know you let a strike go by.  And yes, a home plate umpire would still be needed.  Other than dusting off the plate you'll need someone to call sliding Mariners safe.  On that note, baserunners should be careful to not slide into home plate with feet in the air... could knock that little graphic box askew.

  • Like 1

  • Administrator
Posted
17 minutes ago, Billy Z said:

https://www.insidehook.com/daily_brief/sports/does-espns-k-zone-ruin-baseball-on-tv

(The main problem with the four-sided virtual graphic is it obstructs what the viewer can see and isn’t really all that accurate about what constitutes a strike as an umpire still makes the final call.

“The square is supposed to be akin to the NFL first-down marker, which was a great invention that enhanced the viewer experience and provided objective, important information while staying out of the way of the action,” according to The New York Post. “The square does not do that.”)

So you found one guy from 2018 who kinda sorta agrees with you. And I have this, from 2021:

image.png

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
38 minutes ago, iacas said:

So you found one guy from 2018 who kinda sorta agrees with you. And I have this, from 2021:

image.png

Well actually ,there was a multitude of like minded people who agree with me. 

Thomas Gralinski, 2458080

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1476 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • No one should measure a joint mobility away from that joint. If you go to physical therapy, they are not measuring your knee mobility based on your midline. It is based at the joint. Shoulder mobility should be measured in reference to the shoulder joint. 
    • He's using a driver swing, while I used the iron swing. Bryson goes from about 65° B to 15° B, hence the 50°. If you bend your right elbow, you're going to pull your hands across your chest some. Conversely, if you abduct your right arm and hold onto a grip with your left arm, you can see how extending the right elbow as we do in the golf swing during the downswing will "pull" the right shoulder/humerus forward (adducting it, as going from 65° to 15° of abduction is). Even people who pull their right shoulder WAY too far around them eventually get it "back in front" when their right arm/elbow extends. So, such a motion shows up as shoulder adduction even though the movement that causes it is just widening the trail elbow. The left hand on the grip almost "pulls" the hands forward as the left arm can't stretch much (there's some shoulder protraction, but that's almost maxed out at P4). Oh, I downloaded it and watched it (and commented there) before he blocked me. It's what led to him posting the comment in the "update" above. 😄  Single shoulder range of 75°, and that's going out well into the follow-through. 50° Max range up to impact. Manavian's video is bad. He keeps saying "midline" which is just a horrible way to look at it. He also kept saying that the club was moving that amount — also wrong. Adding left and right together is really freaking dumb. Another golf instructor said "That's like saying the player has 100 degrees of knee bend (adding left knee bend to right knee bend) 🤦‍♂️" (similar to what the biomechanist said about squatting). Also, see my post above about elbow bend. That's why Plummer’s alignment stick demo is so intellectually dishonest. A golfer can't get anywhere near that position on the left with his left hand on the alignment stick (quoted below).  
    • That makes no sense at all.  so, I watched that Instagram. Here is a summary...  Bryson.... Address: Trail Shoulder 0 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 65-deg abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 15-deg abduction. P9: 10 degrees adduction. Rory... Address: Trail Shoulder 16 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 26 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 0 degrees abduction.  P9: 18 degrees of adduction.  DJ... Address: Trail Shoulder 4 degrees adduction. P4: Trail Shoulder 42 degrees abduction. Impact: Right shoulder 2 degrees abduction.  P9: 15 degrees of adduction.  Their point is that arm doesn't stay on the trail side. That the arms have to get across the chest from P4 to P9. I mean they do. What matters is the rate of which it happens relative to the position of the swing. The trail shoulder at P9 is not abducted a lot. The range of that total abduction movement is like 40 to 70 degrees. Bryson might be an outlier. Rory might be an outlier as well.  A couple of points.  1. None of them had any adduction at impact. So, this tells me the trail arms stays on the trail side of the body at impact. Is it moving towards lead shoulder, yes. It doesn't happen till post impact. The right side of the body is moving towards the target, so the arms don't have to as much as people think.  2. Trail shoulder adduction from Impact to P9 is 18 to 25 degrees.  3. P9 adduction of the trail shoulder is only about 2 to 12 degrees more adducted than at address. The arms/hands stay in front of the chest a long-time post impact. If Rory, from his address position just rotated his body towards the target and raised up his arms so he is at P9. He basically didn't have to move his trail arm further across his chest than where he started at address. Visualize that for a bit. I bet for people who tend to stall and drag their arms across their body to hit the ball, that would emphasize how much the arms stay in front of the body and how much you have to turn.             
    • Do you know how Manavian is measuring his shoulder adduction-abduction that purports to demonstrate 50 degrees or motion in Bryson's downswing? I know the broader biomechanics research/scientific literature on this suggests shoulder adduction-abduction is only a modest contributor of force generation in the downswing, so I'm definitely not convinced by anything he's arguing, I'm just curious how different people can be claiming to use ostensibly the same "data" to tell a much different story.
    • I have an update… I don't have much of a response, because the fact that they would ADD the numbers for the lead and trail shoulder together… I mean, wow. I was giving them too much credit. Nobody would think to assume they were doing THAT. That's beyond comical. One of the biomechanists I talked to put it this way: "So if I squatted down and went from 180 to 90 deg knee angle, then I would say 180 deg range of motion because I have two knees?" I'd type more (maybe), but honestly, I'm laughing a bit too hard. 🤣 Update: Mini Manavian blocked me on Instagram, so I cannot see his post showing Bryson with about 50° of range of motion (with a driver) from P4 to P7, and 75° only if you go out to the mid-follow-through. What a terrible loss for me. 😉 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.