Jump to content
IGNORED

Green Reading Books to Be Banned on PGA Tour in 2022


DaveP043
 Share

Recommended Posts

Jim Stracka makes green-reading books. Here’s his case against a ban | Golf News and Tour Information | GolfDigest.com

Quote

“People don’t read greens—they hit putts based on memory. We all know how much easier it is to hit a putt when your competitor just hit one on the same line. Green-reading is more memory. They move so much earth around today that you can’t rely on the visuals. Your mind will play tricks on you. If you’re good enough and use Aimpoint [the green-reading technique] to read them with your feet, great. But when they say it’s a necessary skill, I say that’s baloney. Green-reading is more memory. We all know how well we read greens when we play a course on a regular basis. You remember a point, and that’s what you rely on.”

This is probably true to some extent. We do pattern recognition, and golf course designers mess with that. I played a course in Orlando, FL where half the greens looked flat. They were not very elevated, and the bunkers were not pushed up near the green. So the breaks were subtle. I just learned Aimpoint then, and putted the best out of our group. The greens confused the crap out of my friends who used their eyes to read greens. 

About it causing play to slow down, the article above sad it sped up college players by 15 minutes. So, if true, then yay for that. 

I can understand the argument that it takes skill out of green reading. Honestly, I don't think it's that big of a deal. They still have to aim their putt, and hit the speed. There is still skill in putting. I think most PGA Tour players are halfway decent at green reading anyways. I wonder how many strokes gained there is in green reading from the worst to the best on the PGA Tour? 

  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I don’t think anything they do will make a meaningful impact on pace of play except keeping players on the clock and enforcing it. Without books they may just spend more time reading the green since they don’t have anything to help them. I just don’t see where players would get the incentive to play faster if they think spending their allot time will help them score better. Many players play fast and enjoy keeping a good pace, but with 125 players out there, there will always be many that take their time.

The Masters has banned books, so some players already has some experience with it. Do they play faster there? The greens at Augusta are difficult and it’s a special tournament, so maybe they spend their time even without books. Perhaps not the best tournament to compare with.

I came across this article:

https://www.golfchannel.com/news/2021-us-open-rory-mcilroy-thinks-green-reading-books-should-be-outlawed-greater-good-game

Quote

I'd like to get rid of them,” said McIlroy, who also noted that he uses the green-reading books. “I think everyone is in the same boat, most guys on Tour are in the same boat, that if it's going to be available to us and it helps us, people are going to use it, but I think for the greater good of the game, I'd like to see them be outlawed.”

“Honestly, I think it's made everyone lazier. People don't put in the time to prepare the way they used to,” he said. “That's why you see so many more players at Augusta, for example, take their time around the greens, hit so many more putts, it's because they have to. It's because there is no greens book at Augusta.”

In an effort to speed up play, the Tour has taken a closer look at ways that players can trim time off of rounds. Both officials and players consider green-reading books an obvious option.

There seems to be a combination of reasons behind the idea, rather than one. I’d maybe think the for-the-greater-good thoughts like Rory’s are more common than pace of play, but also a combination.

I like the thoughts about the greater good of the game, and wouldn’t object to the books being outlawed. It puts more focus on reading greens and trusting what you see rather than consult a book. As Erik said, if they don’t putt better today than before the books, is there a reason to keep them?

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If the majority of players want to see them banned, then I support their collective decision for the good of the game. I do hope they justify this with an official position.  

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


4 hours ago, Zeph said:

As Erik said, if they don’t putt better today than before the books, is there a reason to keep them?

That is a good point. 

I don't think its a pace of play issue. 

To me, its about what golf should be about. 

I wouldn't mind green reading material less information. No numbers. Nothing specific toward pin locations. Like, you can't have book that shows the pin and the putting lines. Just a general green, with contours arrows is fine with me. They still have to determine the amount of break they want to play. If it lets them know which way it breaks, fine. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 6/17/2021 at 10:27 AM, iacas said:

They are all saying it's about the skill, not the time.

If it was about skill, and if the green reading books made bad putters better than they otherwise would perform, we'd see the worst putters on tour being closer to the best putters because there is less of a skill gap between the two.

Instead we see that the gap between the best and the worst at putting has only grown larger since the widespread introduction of green reading books. This means they have not had any measurable impact on a player's ability to putt well, because it isn't allowing the worst putters on tour to keep up with the best like you would see if some part of the game took less skill suddenly.

I ignored the skill issue because claiming it's a matter of skill is patently ridiculous, and provably false. They can say whatever they like, doesn't mean a word of it is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
1 hour ago, Pretzel said:

I ignored the skill issue because claiming it's a matter of skill is patently ridiculous, and provably false.

I’m not disagreeing in general, but that’s not true because the samples are different and SG:P is relative.

And my point was that it’s what they are saying, not that it’s the actual reason.

But I do think that many believe it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 4 months later...
  • iacas changed the title to Green Reading Books to Be Banned on PGA Tour in 2022
  • Administrator
10 minutes ago, boogielicious said:

Makes sense to me. Green reading should be a skill not a reference book.

Well, it also says handwritten notes:

  • must be derived from theexperiences or any observations of a ball rolling on a green.
  • No devices, levels or other technology may be used to gather information to be kept as notes, and no information may be copied from another source into the approved book.

Of course, if they didn't have those notes, you could just handwritten copy the existing books. But, still… that feels like a rough thing. If a player draws an arrow into the book and a "4%" written next to it, how can they know if it was measured by a level or whatnot? If you set a bottle of water down on a slope and see the slope direction, is that "illegal"? Enforceable how?

Word from the Tour players is that they can't even use a level on the practice green. Basically, no levels on Tour sites the week of the tour event.

AimPoint catching strays at this point, then.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
2 minutes ago, Kingkat1954 said:

Is the issue pace of play?

Yes. There's been no real change to the putting stats of players with the green books. It's mostly about the "look" and pace of play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
8 minutes ago, Kingkat1954 said:

The "look" has been banned before. Just note: Snead "croquet style" putting. 

It's not just the "look" here, though. It's probably somewhat that, but it's more about the fact that even in an arm-lock, the end of the putter (both ends) can swing. It's not creating a fixed point in 3D space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 11/2/2021 at 9:53 PM, iacas said:

 

I haven’t read the rule(s) regarding this, so forgive my ignorance.
 

Surely players and caddies can use these off the course, though. I mean, I know most probably cannot memorize the information, but they could still get something from them. Maybe even use them in practice rounds or something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
13 minutes ago, ncates00 said:

Surely players and caddies can use these off the course, though. I mean, I know most probably cannot memorize the information, but they could still get something from them. Maybe even use them in practice rounds or something. 

Use what? An old greens book? Of course, the PGA Tour isn't the CIA.

But by rule they can't copy any of the info in them into their new books. Not even by hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo after clicking this link. For Mevo+, click this link or the image above.
  • Posts

    • Wordle 217 4/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟩 🟨⬜⬜🟨🟩 🟨🟩⬜🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • I get it. We are angry with those refusing to get vaccinated. I really don't understand it either. Which is why there must be more to it than meets the eye.  Honestly, why would anyone not get vaccinated? If a person knows they are putting the lives of everyone they encounter at risk, why on Earth wouldn't you get vaccinated? It jus doesn't make sense. I don't believe anyone would say "Yeah, I'm hoping to go out and kill off ten people today." So, instead of yelling at them or screaming at them or calling them names. I'm trying really hard to understand them. I haven't succeeded yet. I feel like screaming at them, begging them, bribing them, any of that hasn't worked. So, what will work?  I think if we can get to the core of their reasoning perhaps we can help them? If it was like 2 or 3 percent of the population, I'd be like "Yeah, they are just crazies or idiots". But it's not. It's a large slice of the population, so they must be getting bad information.  I still have a hard time believing that given the choice "Would you like to be Typhoid Mary, or would you NOT like to be Typhoid Mary?" that anyone would raise their hand and say "OOO, OOO, ... I want to be Typhoid Mary!" 
    • Wordle 217 5/6 ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • My neighbors would disagree.   They are unvaccinated, got a slight case of Covid-19 and believe it's nothing more than the flu.   They have access to all of the information floating around and believe because they have had Covid they are immune.  
    • Day 31 1/22/22 I got up early this morning and did a little left over work in my office. Then I got to the important stuff and knocked out my mirror work.  The next two weeks work should lighten up a bit, so I hope to get more and varied practice in. 
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. csarge
      csarge
      (26 years old)
    2. ecrugger
      ecrugger
      (42 years old)
    3. Fairway_CY
      Fairway_CY
      (43 years old)
    4. paperclip
      paperclip
      (60 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...