Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

What Is Considered a Hard Golf Course Rating?


Note: This thread is 1602 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi,

what is a considered a hard golf course rating? The course I normally play is on a rating 72.8/149 and course yardage is 6711. I struggle to break 90 and only manage to do it twice 89 and a 87. I am not a long hitter and average between 230-240 drives. My average scores are in the mid 90s and its been my mission to break 90 consistently. I have been trying to break 90 for the last 10 games and only manage to hit 91. It is so frustrating and I feel depressed playing this golf course. 


Posted

I would say any course that, from the tips, has a rating of par or higher and a slope in the high 130s or higher. A few examples from some of my local courses:

•Treyburn Country Club is a par 72, 7175 yards from the tips. The rating is 74.1/137

•Duke University Golf Course is a par 72, 7154 yards from the tips. The rating is 74.8/142

•Croasdaile Country Club is a par 72, 7068 yards from the tips. The rating is 74.1/141

  • Like 1

WITB:
Woods: Cleveland Launcher (Driver, 17 degree, 22 degree)
Irons: Titleist T200 (4-PW)
Wedges: Callaway Jaws (50/54/60)
Putter: Odyssey White Hot

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

A rating/slope  of 72.8/149 is very difficult for mid/high handicap players.   It's beyond my scope to enjoy a round from those tees.     Does the course have shorter tees?   My home course from the tips plays 76.0/146 but I play either 72/135 or 69.0/123 or the hybrids between those.    

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
18 minutes ago, tadpole87 said:

The course I normally play is on a rating 72.8/149 and course yardage is 6711.

Most of rating is length, or how long the course plays.

72.8 for a 6711, that course plays long. A 149 is pretty stout test for a bogey golfer. 

Lets say you have a par 72 course, that has a rating of 72, but a slope of 113 rating. A bogey golfer, what ever they shoot over par will be their handicap differential. 

Your course, which has the rating close to 72, would take that 18 over par score and turn it into a 13 differential. A bogey golfer, who shoots bogey golf on that course, just played 5 strokes better than bogey golf. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 minutes ago, dennyjones said:

A rating/slope  of 72.8/149 is very difficult for mid/high handicap players.   It's beyond my scope to enjoy a round from those tees.     Does the course have shorter tees?   My home course from the tips plays 76.0/146 but I play either 72/135 or 69.0/123 or the hybrids between those.    

Yes they do have the white tees which is 70.1/142 playing at 6130 yards. But I have never played from them because my playing partners all play from the blues. There is a another course I play within the same club and that is even more of a monster I have never break 90 there rating 74.7/150 playing at 7015 yards.

6 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

Most of rating is length, or how long the course plays.

72.8 for a 6711, that course plays long. A 149 is pretty stout test for a bogey golfer. 

Lets say you have a par 72 course, that has a rating of 72, but a slope of 113 rating. A bogey golfer, what ever they shoot over par will be their handicap differential. 

Your course, which has the rating close to 72, would take that 18 over par score and turn it into a 13 differential. A bogey golfer, who shoots bogey golf on that course, just played 5 strokes better than bogey golf. 

 

thank you for the info!


Posted (edited)

The last two places that I've been a member at play very similar.   Here's the ratings, from the normal men's tees:

69.5/124.  (6100)

72.5/145.  (6600)

Since the main driver is distance for a rating, the fact that the "easier" course is much shorter doesn't give it an effective rating for me personally.   Although I believe the ratings are done for what a scratch golfer should shoot and I believe that the system works for that.   If you hit the ball straight on the easier course, you'll be fine and you'll have less club in, hence you'll be more accurate.

Both places, your handicap travels very well to other courses.  Most misses on either course are a straight up 2 shot penalty, even for red/yellow hazards (opposed to OB) because where you have to drop is usually a killer.

The back tees are like 74.1 and 148 slope.   And even the pro thought it was a little under-rated.

 

Edited by imsys0042

—Adam

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The closer you get to being a scratch golfers, the more the course rating matters more. 

The equation for differential is (Score - Rating) x (113 / Slope Rating). 

If you are scratch, your differential is zero. So that means that you are shooting at the course rating. With it being near zero, the slope doesn't matter as much. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 minutes ago, imsys0042 said:

The last two places that I've been a member at play very similar.   Here's the ratings, from the normal men's tees:

69.5/124.  (6100)

72.5/145.  (6600)

Since the main driver is distance for a rating, the fact that the "easier" course is much shorter doesn't give it an effective rating for me personally.   Although I believe the ratings are done for what a scratch golfer should shoot and I believe that the system works for that.   If you hit the ball straight on the easier course, you'll be fine and you'll have less club in, hence you'll be more accurate.

Both places, your handicap travels very well to other courses.  Most misses on either course are a straight up 2 shot penalty, even for red/yellow hazards (opposed to OB) because where you have to drop is usually a killer.

The back tees are like 74.1 and 148 slope.   And even the pro thought it was a little under-rated.

 

yes the course I play is quite narrow and keeping the driver in play is a must. surrounded by water hazards and bunkers. miss the fairway and its an easy double minimum and the par 3s are the most absolute score killer. 


Posted
2 hours ago, tadpole87 said:

Hi,

what is a considered a hard golf course rating? The course I normally play is on a rating 72.8/149 and course yardage is 6711. I struggle to break 90 and only manage to do it twice 89 and a 87. I am not a long hitter and average between 230-240 drives. My average scores are in the mid 90s and its been my mission to break 90 consistently. I have been trying to break 90 for the last 10 games and only manage to hit 91. It is so frustrating and I feel depressed playing this golf course. 

Don't feel bad, your scores are good (89 and 87) considering the difficulty.  You are (roughly speaking) about a bogey golfer, probably better.

So, it helps to look at the bogey rating of the course you are playing. Bogey rating is analogous to course rating, except instead of using a scratch golfer's characteristics, a "bogey golfer" is used. A course such as yours with a 72.8/149 rating, has a bogey rating of 100.5!  So  your scores are well under that, which is great. You are doing well, even though I know it maybe doesn't feel that way all the time.

The course rating is determined by a combination of course length and obstacles, so I can see that your course has many challenges. 

 

Mike

Driver: TM Sim2 9* Ventus Black, M5 9* Kuro Kage
Fwy: TM SLDR 3W, 5W;    Hybrid: TM M1 4 Hybrid
Irons: TM Tour Preferred MC 2014
Wedges: TM Tour Preferred, 52 @ 51*, 56
Putter: Ping Scottsdale TR Anser 2 or Odyssey Rossie

It isn't the hours that you put in at practice that count. It's the way you spend those minutes. -- tony lema

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Slope ratings that get up to 130 are where I start to consider it tough.  Below that are varying degrees, and under about 120 or so I start to think it's a [relatively] easy course.  Of course, it's still golf, and golf is hard.  

A scratch player at Torrey Pines South, playing the tips, gets 7 strokes.  That sounds pretty tough!

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think a course is hard when the course rating is more than a stroke above par and the slope is above 135.  I wouldn't want to play a course with a slope rating near 150 all that often. Sheesh.

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, DeadMan said:

I think a course is hard when the course rating is more than a stroke above par and the slope is above 135.  I wouldn't want to play a course with a slope rating near 150 all that often. Sheesh.

I second this. Anything above slope 135 means difficult. IMHO difficult means you don't have to hit super shitty shots to take a big number. Even mild offline hit will often result in a scramble to save double bogey+ for a close to bogey golfer like myself.  

Edited by GolfLug

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

One of my couple times a month stops can be a beast, especially when the wind is blowing off the lakes. Rattle Run is 74.8 /140 from the tips, where I used to play it till I turned 60..... and can bring you to your knees without the use of silly gimmicky holes. Even from the more forward tees it is a demanding course that punishes sloppy play.

https://michigan.twoguyswhogolf.com/reviews/rattlerun.html

 

 


Posted (edited)

That's a very abnormally high slope rating, at least compared to the majority of even difficult courses. For reference, the maximum possible slope is 155. If I had to guess I'd assume that while it's not a long course, it probably has lots of forced carries longer than what the average bogey golfer is expected to hit the ball that would raise the course's bogey rating (in addition to heavily penalizing misses and having small greens).

The hardest course I've played is TPC Colorado, which has a course rating and slope of 77.2/138 from the tips. From the Gold tees for ladies it is rated 78.6/151, with the slope being so high specifically because of forced carries and the "average" bogey lady golfer used for slope calculations not hitting it far enough to really handle that (plus it's still 6,875 yards from the Golds, very long for ladies).

How difficult a golf course is will be reflected in the course rating, not the slope. A hard course has a higher course rating, with very hard courses having a course rating 3+ strokes higher than par. The slope rating doesn't tell you how hard a golf course is, it just tells you how much easier the course is for a scratch golfer than a bogey golfer. A par 72 course with a 63/150 rating would still be an easy course, it just would be more difficult for bogey golfers than it would be for scratch golfers (scratch golfers would be expected to shoot more than 18 strokes better than a bogey golfer there). Similarly a course with a 77/90 rating would not be an easy course, it's just that you'd expect the difference between a scratch golfer and a bogey golfer to be less than 18 strokes.

Edited by Pretzel
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
2 hours ago, GolfLug said:

I second this. Anything above slope 135 means difficult.

Is a par 72, 67.5/136 course “difficult”?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
11 minutes ago, iacas said:

Is a par 72, 67.5/136 course “difficult”?

I never knew slope is meant to measure how much harder a course is for a bogey golfer versus a scratch. Sounds like that's a course that's super easy for, say, mid single digit caps and below, and pretty hard for a bogey golfer, especially one who isn't super long.

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
13 minutes ago, mdl said:

I never knew slope is meant to measure how much harder a course is for a bogey golfer versus a scratch. Sounds like that's a course that's super easy for, say, mid single digit caps and below, and pretty hard for a bogey golfer, especially one who isn't super long.

I never looked at slope to make a determination. I just looked at course rating as compared against par. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 hour ago, mdl said:

I never knew slope is meant to measure how much harder a course is for a bogey golfer versus a scratch.

It's not quite that.

1 hour ago, mdl said:

Sounds like that's a course that's super easy for, say, mid single digit caps and below, and pretty hard for a bogey golfer, especially one who isn't super long.

It's not really "pretty hard" at all, though: a golfer (say, an 18 handicapper) only needs to shoot 17 over par to get an 18 differential.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1602 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.