Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 1246 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Vanity Handicaps  

50 members have voted

  1. 1. Are you a vanity handicapper?

    • Definitely not.
      35
    • I don't know (i.e. maybe?)
      10
    • Definitely, yes.
      5


Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted
3 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

Negative handicap is good, strokes gained is good, game golf stuff... It's hard to keep track of +/- anymore 😉

+ handicaps are good. A bogey golfer is about a -20.

You know this.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I don't play competitive golf or in a golf league. I just like to play casual golf for fun once a week. I play by the rules. I write my scores down on the card. I use Shot Scope to keep track of progress, and have to reconcile SS with my written card after the round. At one point earlier this year I needed a HC for a fun match so I entered my rounds into The Grint to get a handicap I could use. I worked okay. What's more important to me is the gross score. I've never played a round to break net 72. It's always been to break 100, and then to break 90. So I guess I have to say I'm not a vanity capper because I don't really care about them. Today I shot 88 and I played like :poo: - there were good moments, and there were some pretty bad moments.

Julia

:callaway:  :cobra:    :seemore:  :bushnell:  :clicgear:  :adidas:  :footjoy:

Spoiler

Driver: Callaway Big Bertha w/ Fubuki Z50 R 44.5"
FW: Cobra BiO CELL 14.5 degree; 
Hybrids: Cobra BiO CELL 22.5 degree Project X R-flex
Irons: Cobra BiO CELL 5 - GW Project X R-Flex
Wedges: Cobra BiO CELL SW, Fly-Z LW, 64* Callaway PM Grind.
Putter: 48" Odyssey Dart

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
12 hours ago, David L Yskes said:

I am not a Vanity Capper,  I'll be honest, I'm sure my handicap is probably 20something idk????   But it all depends on the course... 

On a short n easier course, i could shoot a low 40 over 9 holes, but then struggle on the back 9... 

If the course starts to get long and tough, i could struggle to break 50 over 9 holes..   

But it doesn't mean i won't have my chances at par's and birdies..   

You're describing why the concepts of handicap index and course handicap are different but related things 🙂 

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Slightly.  I consider it more handicap maintenance than vanity handicapping.  I would much rather have people view my handicap as vanity than have them view it as sandbagger.  I believe my handicap is within a fraction of a stroke of where it should be, but I will occasionally skip posting under one of the following categories of scores where my scoring tends to be worse than usual.  These types of rounds probably amount to 10-15% of my rounds:

  • Rounds in the first two weeks of the season, even though I am trying my best to score.  After not swinging a club for 6-7 months, and playing in rough early spring course conditions, I don't view those scores as being indicative of my abilities.  Most of the time, I will tell myself going into the round that this is a practice round and I will not be counting it, but if I happen to play the round in my typical scoring range, I would likely post it.
  • Occasionally when I am playing a recreational nine with my wife and / or kids and they are really struggling, it leads me to play really sub-par.  If I end up scoring above my reasonable nine hole norm, I will consider these rounds as family time and not post them. 
  • Probably one or two rounds a year, I have a fun round where I get really drunk.  I don't view those rounds as indicative of my ability, so I do not post. 
  • Post green aerification I might skip posting a round if conditions are really rough.  I have maybe also adjusted my scores to give myself an automatic two putt if I end up three or four putting a hole.  This situation maybe happens one time a year.
  • Like 1

John


Posted

I am definitely a vanity cap. I don't play in any leagues or tournaments, and don't plan on doing so, I keep a handicap through my golfpad app for keeping track of personal progress. I will drop a ball where I thought it went out, only taking a stroke penalty. In the situation someone mentioned before where I've hit a shot nowhere near OOB, but I can't find my ball, so I'll just drop and keep playing. I take mulligans, but I'll limit it to 1 off green (drive, approach, chip etc.), and 1 putt. 

  • D1-SIM MAX D 9° Diamana pd 50 reg lofted down 1 click 
  • D2-SIM MAX D 10.5° project x riptide cb 50 reg lofted up 2 clicks
  • 5w- Radspeed motore f3 
  • 3H- Tour Edge Exotics e722 kbs hybrid stiff
  • 4-5h tour edge exotics ex9
  • 6-AW- Cleveland launcher xl Nippon Zelos 7
  • 56°-Cleveland CBX Zipcore
  • P-Odyssey eleven tour lined slant neck

Posted
4 hours ago, roejye said:

I am definitely a vanity cap. I don't play in any leagues or tournaments, and don't plan on doing so, I keep a handicap through my golfpad app for keeping track of personal progress. I will drop a ball where I thought it went out, only taking a stroke penalty. In the situation someone mentioned before where I've hit a shot nowhere near OOB, but I can't find my ball, so I'll just drop and keep playing. I take mulligans, but I'll limit it to 1 off green (drive, approach, chip etc.), and 1 putt. 

Consciously choosing to not submit scores, playing mulligans and gimmes, incorrect drops and penalties…I dunno but I kinda consider this cheating.

But I think it’s perhaps a weakness of the system. Golf in Australia is so stringent about ensuring carded rounds are played to the exact rules in formal completion and having your card formally marked. If the WHS is meant to standardise things across the globe then why do these discrepancies exist from country to country?

  • Like 1

Posted

Just to add, I’ve always thought the sandbagging ‘myth’ ties into the vanity capping. I don’t buy into the belief that so many golfers deliberately don’t try their best on the course. Sure there are some that do, for sure, but in general I think it’s produced from the cognitive dissonance of jealous vanity handicappers - those who think they are better than they are and manipulate their handicap by ‘forgetting’ mulligans and penalties, and when it comes time to play by the exact rules they can’t shoot anything close to their handicap, but need an outlet to justify why they scored higher than other players of supposedly inferior ability.  


Posted
1 hour ago, Hugh Jars said:
5 hours ago, roejye said:

I am definitely a vanity cap. I don't play in any leagues or tournaments, and don't plan on doing so, I keep a handicap through my golfpad app for keeping track of personal progress. I will drop a ball where I thought it went out, only taking a stroke penalty. In the situation someone mentioned before where I've hit a shot nowhere near OOB, but I can't find my ball, so I'll just drop and keep playing. I take mulligans, but I'll limit it to 1 off green (drive, approach, chip etc.), and 1 putt. 

Expand  

Consciously choosing to not submit scores, playing mulligans and gimmes, incorrect drops and penalties…I dunno but I kinda consider this cheating.

I am not sure I consider what  @roejyeis doing as vanity capping.  He is keeping for himself only and not on an official HCP system such as GHIN or The Grint and is not holding it out as a true HCP.  Vanity Cappers try to claim the are better than they really are, I do not hear him doing that.

also, since not in competition and not entering into an official HCP he is not cheating, they are, for all practical purposes, “practice rounds” and every golfer has the right to enjoy as the wish, as long as they do not submit them as an official score.

 

 

  • Thumbs Up 2

Stuart M.
 

I am a "SCRATCH GOLFER".  I hit ball, Ball hits Tree, I scratch my head. 😜

Driver: Ping G410 Plus 10.5* +1* / 3 Hybrid: Cleveland HIBORE XLS / 4,5 & 6 Hybrids: Mizuno JP FLI-HI / Irons/Wedges 7-8-9-P-G: Mizuno JPX800 HD / Sand Wedge: Mizuno JPX 800 / Lob Wedge: Cleveland CBX 60* / Putter: Odyssey White Hot OG 7S / Balls: Srixon Soft / Beer: Labatt Blue (or anything nice & cold) 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I belong to a Club with a fair share of vanity cappers, but there are far more sandbaggers. A lot of the vanity cappers won't play for much money and try to keep their cap at a level to qualify for championships, where they get immediately drummed out by the elite players. I don't get it. What's wrong with winning the A or B flight when that is the level of your ability?

I think my cap is generally very accurate to my abilities. I play very little winter golf to keep my game intact so my cap usually goes up a bit in the spring and back to my norms by June. I play my best golf in the late summer every year so I end up with scores that will stay with me through to the end of the golf season and keeps my cap down. Which is also what I start with at the beginning of the next season. 

 

Bill M

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The GHIN handicap is a good tool for us to improve our game. It is a way to measure where we are so that we can make the incremental changes to get to our goals. How can you improve what you have not measured? How do you track your progress? The vanity cap is one of those ways where we can "con" ourselves. There is a thread somewhere on this site about that topic.

Get a GHIN number and enter every round where you are not practicing or playing alone. It also helps you to not give up on a round. Some of my best rounds have been when I have had a bad first few holes, but kept grinding away. This is how you gain confidence in your game. I have read here where a bad start can then become a practice round. I would suggest that you don't get into that habit and encourage you to keep grinding away and record the round. If your index goes up, then you know you need to step back and refocus.

My index had bottomed out at a 6.2 and recently went to 6.4 and is back to 6.3. I have been struggling off the tee and had lost confidence. This got me back to the driving range yesterday, where I started to rebuild some of that lost confidence.

I have played a lot of rounds the past few years with people who keep a GHIN and have a good feel where someone might sit on the GHIN spectrum. If someone says they are a 9 or a 12, I have a decent database of that for comparison. Don't con yourself. You are impeding your progress as a golfer and not fooling anyone really besides yourself.

There are better tools out there like arccos, but I don't have that much patience right now for that level of data collection. If I keep progressing in my game before my body gives out, I may move to something like that.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, phan52 said:

I belong to a Club with a fair share of vanity cappers, but there are far more sandbaggers. A lot of the vanity cappers won't play for much money and try to keep their cap at a level to qualify for championships, where they get immediately drummed out by the elite players. I don't get it. What's wrong with winning the A or B flight when that is the level of your ability?

As someone who won low gross (by two shots) of D-flight in his club championship last year, nothing is wrong with that :-)  

But you knew that already. 

12 minutes ago, Carl3 said:

There are better tools out there like arccos, but I don't have that much patience right now for that level of data collection. If I keep progressing in my game before my body gives out, I may move to something like that.

I'm not familiar with Arccos specifically, but don't a lot of systems do most of the work automatically for you?  ShotScope does, for example. 

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
33 minutes ago, Carl3 said:

There are better tools out there like arccos, but I don't have that much patience right now for that level of data collection. If I keep progressing in my game before my body gives out, I may move to something like that.

Yeah…

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I am...sort of...except completely not. Recently bettered my previous best by 3 full strokes in one round. 2 weeks later, broke 80 again thus making 2 of my 4 ever rounds breaking 80 in the last 2 weeks. On a completely unrelated not, my cap dropped nearly 4 points in the last 2 weeks...the first round felt like a fluke but having had one round since where I should have broken 80 but, full disclosure, I did something I rarely do and absolutely choked my way to 3 putt from 5'. That will not happen again for quite some time. 

So while it FEELS like a vanity cap as it is so much lower than it has historically been...it does reflect the scores I have been putting up lately which in turn are a result of the swing redesign I started back in November. Reminds me I should update that thread. I have reached the point where I expect to hit reasonable shots, be around the green in regulation, and make some chips and putts. This Saturday have a tournament where if I play like I have been lately, this course plays to my strengths and I would not be surprised to better my personal best...unless the wind is up in which case I will look like a vanity capper for sure. Regardless, I have no regrets. Every score I believe legal for me to post I post, whether good bad or indifferent. By contrast, my solo rounds I don't post whether good, bad or indifferent. 

With that said...I did see something Dave said that made me question if I know posting rules. Off to ask that question.

 

On 7/22/2022 at 5:21 AM, DaveP043 said:

One of the remaining regional differences under the World Handicap System is the choice of which scores are to be posted.  Given my choice, I'd like to see the USGA move towards the model in the rest of the world.  I'd like to see competition scores be posted, as well as pre-registered and attested casual scores.  I think that would decrease the opportunity for a player to manipulate his (or her) handicap.  

I thought I knew the rules: a round played solo cannot be posted regardless. A round posted with others must be posted and the rules of golf must be followed to the best of my ability. But from your comment, here and elsewhere in the thread...I may be inadvertently recording invalid scores by posting rounds that are accompanied but not attested so to speak. When I play with other people I report those scores...but having seen most of the people I am randomly paired with, they would have no clue what I shot. Should I no longer post those as they are accompanied but not attested?

Full disclosure: it would reduce my posted rounds to strictly tournaments...so that will be 2 this year...and mean my handicap has no relation to my ability as I am indisputably much improved since the last tournament I played nearly a year ago. I do, however, want to be following the rules correctly. Appreciate your feedback (in advance)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
10 minutes ago, darthweasel said:

I thought I knew the rules: a round played solo cannot be posted regardless. A round posted with others must be posted and the rules of golf must be followed to the best of my ability. But from your comment, here and elsewhere in the thread...I may be inadvertently recording invalid scores by posting rounds that are accompanied but not attested so to speak. When I play with other people I report those scores...but having seen most of the people I am randomly paired with, they would have no clue what I shot. Should I no longer post those as they are accompanied but not attested?

You're fine.  I was trying to identify a change I'd like to see in future revisions to the Handicap Rules in the USGA areas.  I think its a bit off-topic in this thread, so I'll suggest that if we want to continue we should go over here:

 

  • Thumbs Up 1

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 7/23/2022 at 7:12 PM, Hugh Jars said:

Consciously choosing to not submit scores, playing mulligans and gimmes, incorrect drops and penalties…I dunno but I kinda consider this cheating.

But I think it’s perhaps a weakness of the system. Golf in Australia is so stringent about ensuring carded rounds are played to the exact rules in formal completion and having your card formally marked. If the WHS is meant to standardise things across the globe then why do these discrepancies exist from country to country?

@roejye isn't "cheating" and I don't think there's anything wrong with what he's doing.

He's not even registered with GHIN, so the "choosing to not submit scores" doesn't even apply and what he is doing is in no way any reflection of "a weakness of the system" because he's not even in "the system"

He openly admits his "handicap" that he keeps is for his purposes only, he has no intention of entering any tournaments or competitions, and if he did agree to play a match with any of his buddies, so long as they all agree to play by the same set of rules that's all that really matters at the end of the day.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Driver: :titleist:  GT3
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood
Irons: :titleist: U505 (3)  :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   :titleist: SM9 54/58  
Putter: :tmade: Spider X

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, klineka said:

@roejye isn't "cheating" and I don't think there's anything wrong with what he's doing.

He's not even registered with GHIN, so the "choosing to not submit scores" doesn't even apply and what he is doing is in no way any reflection of "a weakness of the system" because he's not even in "the system"

He openly admits his "handicap" that he keeps is for his purposes only, he has no intention of entering any tournaments or competitions, and if he did agree to play a match with any of his buddies, so long as they all agree to play by the same set of rules that's all that really matters at the end of the day.

Yes fair enough if he is not entering his scores towards an actual national handicap system. But tracking handicap using some other means while not playing to the full rules - you're only cheating yourself I believe. I know it was a shock to the system for me going from playing muck-around golf to actual formal competition. 

But anyone who submits a score towards their official handicap (USGA, Golf Australia etc) and does the following:

- takes mulligans

- takes gimmes, assumes two putts when in a certain distance of the hole (seriously who does that!)

- assumes a score on any hole

- incorrectly takes stroke and distance penalties

- submits a scorecard that hasn't been marked and signed off by a playing partner

is blatantly cheating as far as I'm concerned.

In Australia you can get disqualified from competition and even have your Golflink number revoked for doing this, and your course membership reviewed.

As for deciding to not submit a score when they start playing too 'poorly' or too 'well' - how is this possible? Don't you have to at least flag prior to playing a round that you will be entering your score towards your handicap? Again, not submitting a card results in NSA and if you keep doing it your club membership would be looked at I reckon.

 

Edited by Hugh Jars

Posted
5 minutes ago, Hugh Jars said:

But anyone who submits a score towards their official handicap (USGA, Golf Australia etc) and does the following:

- assumes a score on any hole

- submits a scorecard that hasn't been marked and signed off by a playing partner

is blatantly cheating as far as I'm concerned.

There are people far more knowledgeable about this kind of stuff than I am but I'm pretty sure the two bullet points that I left in your quote are two that people can do and still submit valid rounds for USGA handicapping purposes. 

If the rules allow it then it's not cheating.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Informative 1

Driver: :titleist:  GT3
Woods:  :cobra: Darkspeed LS 3Wood
Irons: :titleist: U505 (3)  :tmade: P770 (4-PW)
Wedges: :callaway: MD3 50   :titleist: SM9 54/58  
Putter: :tmade: Spider X

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
3 minutes ago, klineka said:

If the rules allow it then it's not cheating.

Came here to say the same.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1246 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
    • Day 23 - 2026-01-12 Finally outdoors again with 10 minutes of 7 iron work in the net. Also mirror work. Excited to get back on the range tomorrow and maybe do some film.
    • Day 10: 2026.01.12 Hit 25 balls at the range, working on rotating right hip during backswing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.