Jump to content
IGNORED

The Dan Plan - 10,000 Hours to Become a Pro Golfer (Dan McLaughlin)


Jonnydanger81
Note: This thread is 2557 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator

I think it just boils down to finding a good teacher. That's the key. Find one - you get deliberate practice assignments, faster improvement. It's just with all the info out there, it's so crushingly confusing to a novice and from what I know, the guy has a few scratch guys giving him advice.

First teacher is so key. First pro is so money (from the movie, Swingers.)

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Not sure if this has been posted in the thread yet.

[The 10,000 Hour Rule Is Wrong and Perpetuates a Cruel Myth] http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2014/09/malcolm_gladwell_s_10_000_hour_rule_for_deliberate_practice_is_wrong_genes.html


Further proof that your genetic make up is more of a determining factor on how good you can be, the chess player that had to spend 22 more hours than another to reach the same level, and the identical/fraternal twin test proves it even more. I know my posts are mostly critical of Dan and the reason I am that way is that he looks at this process in way too simplistic terms, he at this point should already realize there is no holy grail to the golf swing and that after all these hours he should be aware of how elusive good ball striking can be, but it seems like we still hear the same old verbatim we hear at driving ranges about getting that "one" little key element dialed in and all the planets will fall in line with a perfect swing, hopefully Dan has an epiphany one day and realizes just how difficult this game really is and approaches it from a more humble realistic way. We have seen others without mentioning names make posts about how by this date they can reach this goal and by this another and that's just simply not how it works, too often players reach a plateau in playing ability and think there is improvement out there upon what they have already but the reality is what they may have could be complete crap and they need to completely deconstruct themselves in order to move beyond their current level, in Dans case I believe he in fact is in this predicament and probably needs to undo some things in order to get back on track. The poster that said he has played a few rounds with Dan pretty much shedded light upon what most of us believed already and that was Dan is a poor ball striker but a better short game player than his index and honestly that makes lots of sense since he does put in way more hours working on his short game than much of us do, I'm basically the opposite of being a better ball striker than short game player just because I simply don't put the hours in like Dan. I think Dan could still reach scratch level if he decides to break things down with his full swing and completely dedicates himself towards the process.

Rich C.

Driver Titleist 915 D3  9.5*
3 Wood TM RBZ stage 2 tour  14.5*
2 Hybrid Cobra baffler 17*
4Hybrid Adams 23*
Irons Adams CB2's 5-GW
Wedges 54* and 58* Titleist vokey
Putter Scotty Cameron square back 2014
Ball Srixon Zstar optic yellow
bushnell V2 slope edition

Link to comment
Share on other sites


So he's been at this for 6 hours a day, 6 days a week for over 3 years and he's a 7 handicap or so? Might as well pack it in. Scratch will be tough, let alone the Pros.

 - Joel

TM M3 10.5 | TM M3 17 | Adams A12 3-4 hybrid | Mizuno JPX 919 Tour 5-PW

Vokey 50/54/60 | Odyssey Stroke Lab 7s | Bridgestone Tour B XS

Home Courses - Willow Run & Bakker Crossing

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm disappointed in Dan spending so much time & money traveling to expensive mental camps. There is at least one great mental coach in the Portland area in Jim Waldron of BalancePointGolf. Dan could work with him during the entire Portland golf season. I'm rooting for Dan and wish him the best. I really wish he would see his local PGA pro more often. It's apparent that his ball striking should be his top priority at this point. I would even consider monthly contributions, if he were more prudent with his budget.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

I'm disappointed in Dan spending so much time & money traveling to expensive mental camps. There is at least one great mental coach in the Portland area in Jim Waldron of BalancePointGolf. Dan could work with him during the entire Portland golf season.

I'm rooting for Dan and wish him the best. I really wish he would see his local PGA pro more often. It's apparent that his ball striking should be his top priority at this point.

I would even consider monthly contributions, if he were more prudent with his budget.


Plus, the mental game isn't terribly important.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Plus, the mental game isn't terribly important.

I was gonna say...shouldn't a guy like Dan focus on the obviously problems with the physical aspect the game before worrying about getting a mental coach?

Ryan M
 
The Internet Adjustment Formula:
IAD = ( [ADD] * .96 + [EPS] * [1/.12] ) / (1.15)
 
IAD = Internet Adjusted Distance (in yards)
ADD = Actual Driver Distance (in yards)
EPS = E-Penis Size (in inches)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Further proof that your genetic make up is more of a determining factor on how good you can be, the chess player that had to spend 22 more hours than another to reach the same level, and the identical/fraternal twin test proves it even more. I know my posts are mostly critical of Dan and the reason I am that way is that he looks at this process in way too simplistic terms, he at this point should already realize there is no holy grail to the golf swing and that after all these hours he should be aware of how elusive good ball striking can be, but it seems like we still hear the same old verbatim we hear at driving ranges about getting that "one" little key element dialed in and all the planets will fall in line with a perfect swing, hopefully Dan has an epiphany one day and realizes just how difficult this game really is and approaches it from a more humble realistic way. We have seen others without mentioning names make posts about how by this date they can reach this goal and by this another and that's just simply not how it works, too often players reach a plateau in playing ability and think there is improvement out there upon what they have already but the reality is what they may have could be complete crap and they need to completely deconstruct themselves in order to move beyond their current level, in Dans case I believe he in fact is in this predicament and probably needs to undo some things in order to get back on track. The poster that said he has played a few rounds with Dan pretty much shedded light upon what most of us believed already and that was Dan is a poor ball striker but a better short game player than his index and honestly that makes lots of sense since he does put in way more hours working on his short game than much of us do, I'm basically the opposite of being a better ball striker than short game player just because I simply don't put the hours in like Dan. I think Dan could still reach scratch level if he decides to break things down with his full swing and completely dedicates himself towards the process.

Agreed, but the possibility of him getting to scratch is diminishing for him. He just does not appear to have the muscle mass, much less fast twitch muscle. That's definitely part of the "born" part you were alluding to earlier in your post. Even the shortest scratch golfers I have met are pretty muscular even at 5'4". Look at Luke Donald, he's about Dan's height. Luke is pretty well muscled. Of course, Luke is a touring pro. When you turn 30 it is very hard to develop fast twitch muscle if you did not have the natural affinity to build it. There are plenty of exceptions to the over 30 part, but not as many to the natural affinity part. It takes a ton of hard work to overcome natural deficiency. So, Dan is still about the same frame as when he started and it is unlikely he can build the needed mass. Not impossible, but a really low chance. I'm not saying he needs to look like a body builder, but he needs enough mass to make the fast swings and power to blast irons through deep rough and half inch roots to save pars. Scratch golfers are pretty impressive, too.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm disappointed in Dan spending so much time & money traveling to expensive mental camps. There is at least one great mental coach in the Portland area in Jim Waldron of BalancePointGolf. Dan could work with him during the entire Portland golf season.

I'm rooting for Dan and wish him the best. I really wish he would see his local PGA pro more often. It's apparent that his ball striking should be his top priority at this point.

I would even consider monthly contributions, if he were more prudent with his budget.


Like I said earlier it looks like Dan thinks he has something of a golf game to build upon/around and that simply is not the case, He needs to concentrate on basic swing mechanics and get that thoroughly ingrained into his motion, looking briefly at his stats his driver stats are just screaming inconsistent as hell, his misses are dead even left and right basically this means he has no clue to where the ball is going and I even more doubt he could even work it to any degree as well. If he wants to believe that it's between the ears that's holding him back then I guess I agree as well it's just his interpretation is what I disagree with. I don't know if Dan has anyone telling him not to waste his time and money on these seminars but if so he would be better off to listen.

Rich C.

Driver Titleist 915 D3  9.5*
3 Wood TM RBZ stage 2 tour  14.5*
2 Hybrid Cobra baffler 17*
4Hybrid Adams 23*
Irons Adams CB2's 5-GW
Wedges 54* and 58* Titleist vokey
Putter Scotty Cameron square back 2014
Ball Srixon Zstar optic yellow
bushnell V2 slope edition

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Like I said earlier it looks like Dan thinks he has something of a golf game to build upon/around and that simply is not the case, He needs to concentrate on basic swing mechanics and get that thoroughly ingrained into his motion, looking briefly at his stats his driver stats are just screaming inconsistent as hell, his misses are dead even left and right basically this means he has no clue to where the ball is going and I even more doubt he could even work it to any degree as well. If he wants to believe that it's between the ears that's holding him back then I guess I agree as well it's just his interpretation is what I disagree with. I don't know if Dan has anyone telling him not to waste his time and money on these seminars but if so he would be better off to listen.

We might have different ideas as to what he is missing in order to accomplish this. Do you think it is basic conditioning, building more power or "simply" getting the motions correct?

"simply" is in quotes, because as we all know it's really hard!

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

We might have different ideas as to what he is missing in order to accomplish this. Do you think it is basic conditioning, building more power or "simply" getting the motions correct?

"simply" is in quotes, because as we all know it's really hard!

:hmm::hmm::hmm:

This is golf we are talking about, right???

I am bigger, stronger, and faster than all of the guys that regularly kick my butt in golf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Well he has managed to get his index to 3.6 again but once again has an unusually high anti cap 9.4, I checked myself at 9.2 anti but a higher actual index at 6.2, Dan has got to be one of the most hot and cold players I have ever seen or something else is happening. Unless maybe there is something going on he may in fact have concentration issues and he should be shooting mid low 70's consistently but his head just gets in the way, when I was starting to shoot 70's some years ago I remember being able to do it fairly consistent this guy is just all over the place according to his posting.

Rich C.

Driver Titleist 915 D3  9.5*
3 Wood TM RBZ stage 2 tour  14.5*
2 Hybrid Cobra baffler 17*
4Hybrid Adams 23*
Irons Adams CB2's 5-GW
Wedges 54* and 58* Titleist vokey
Putter Scotty Cameron square back 2014
Ball Srixon Zstar optic yellow
bushnell V2 slope edition

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This is golf we are talking about, right???

I am bigger, stronger, and faster than all of the guys that regularly kick my butt in golf.


Like I stated further up the post chain, I'm not thinking he needs to look like a body builder. Just that he has enough mass to actually swing the club fast enough to be a scratch golfer. Still takes some strength.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

We might have different ideas as to what he is missing in order to accomplish this. Do you think it is basic conditioning, building more power or "simply" getting the motions correct?

"simply" is in quotes, because as we all know it's really hard!


Good technique goes a long ways towards consistency in distance and accuracy, I know guys who swing the club faster than me but I still outdrive them with better mechanics.

Rich C.

Driver Titleist 915 D3  9.5*
3 Wood TM RBZ stage 2 tour  14.5*
2 Hybrid Cobra baffler 17*
4Hybrid Adams 23*
Irons Adams CB2's 5-GW
Wedges 54* and 58* Titleist vokey
Putter Scotty Cameron square back 2014
Ball Srixon Zstar optic yellow
bushnell V2 slope edition

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Good technique goes a long ways towards consistency in distance and accuracy, I know guys who swing the club faster than me but I still outdrive them with better mechanics.

Proper mechanics increase your swing speed.

I was on the simulator at GG a week ago trying out hybrids...and one of my smoothest feeling swings hit 103 mph. Some of my swings that felt much faster were closer to 95-97 mph.

Proper technique will get you far, but unless you have a fast swing speed, you won't get a lot of distance off the tee. You need both.

Ryan M
 
The Internet Adjustment Formula:
IAD = ( [ADD] * .96 + [EPS] * [1/.12] ) / (1.15)
 
IAD = Internet Adjusted Distance (in yards)
ADD = Actual Driver Distance (in yards)
EPS = E-Penis Size (in inches)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Good technique goes a long ways towards consistency in distance and accuracy, I know guys who swing the club faster than me but I still outdrive them with better mechanics.

How do you get that "good technique"? I think it takes some strength. Even watching super thin high school kids at the driving range, you can see that they have some serious fast twitch muscle. I think good technique is a requirement, but you also need some strength.

Even scratch seems to be a difficult target for Dan.

Is scratch attainable by all the golfers on this site? Who knows? It depends upon a lot of things, but I would guess that it's not out of the realm of possibilities. That's why we're all here, to explore our potential.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Unless maybe there is something going on he may in fact have concentration issues and he should be shooting mid low 70's consistently but his head just gets in the way, when I was starting to shoot 70's some years ago I remember being able to do it fairly consistent this guy is just all over the place according to his posting.

There's definitely something else going on, such as vanity handicapping.

You just don't go from shooting mid-low 70's to never once breaking 80 in a tournament (unless he's done this without me noticing). The first tournament you ever play in turns you into a ball of nerves and I expected 85-ish scores from him (I shot 116-108 in my first tournament ever off a 24 handicap), but he should be improving his tournament scores to his handicap fairly soon. I personally don't put much stock in the scores he posts himself (I noted some of the inconsistencies I found in his statistics in an earlier post), but I do believe the tournament results. I would peg him as being around an 8 to 12 handicap if he were honest with himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There's definitely something else going on, such as vanity handicapping.

You just don't go from shooting mid-low 70's to never once breaking 80 in a tournament (unless he's done this without me noticing). The first tournament you ever play in turns you into a ball of nerves and I expected 85-ish scores from him (I shot 116-108 in my first tournament ever off a 24 handicap), but he should be improving his tournament scores to his handicap fairly soon. I personally don't put much stock in the scores he posts himself (I noted some of the inconsistencies I found in his statistics in an earlier post), but I do believe the tournament results. I would peg him as being around an 8 to 12 handicap if he were honest with himself.

There is incentive for him to do so.

He might be a bit better than a 12. On an unfamiliar course he still shot in the high 80s. Guessing 6 to 10?

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm disappointed in Dan spending so much time & money traveling to expensive mental camps. There is at least one great mental coach in the Portland area in Jim Waldron of BalancePointGolf. Dan could work with him during the entire Portland golf season. I'm rooting for Dan and wish him the best. I really wish he would see his local PGA pro more often. It's apparent that his ball striking should be his top priority at this point. I would even consider monthly contributions, if he were more prudent with his budget.

Dan has been to see a few pros and bottom line is he doesn't want to follow the instruction, I mean for the last year he has the same swing flaw. He claims to be doing deliberate practice 6 days a week but just ends up "playing 18". For some crazy reason he seems to think his swing is good and he needs mental work, he obviously has never been to the range at a pga tournament.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 2557 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • And pull their mouth away when they hit stronger notes. Mics can only take so much sound pressure. Every mic is different too. As I stated above, there are many variables to account for to even remotely have a chance to use sound to measure velocity. It would have to be in an extremely controlled environment with calibrated sound and metering devices. In addition, the swing must be absolutely repeatable as would the contact.  There is no possible way to use the dB meter on my iPhone to accomplish this. It’s not rational to think you could. It’s not even that good at measure the sound level of my amps accurately. Even reorienting it by 45 degrees changes the level.
    • I know there are a lot of people on the site with science and engineering backgrounds here so @p1n9183 is getting a lot of questions about how this theory would even work, but I’m going to ask the obvious one here… why? Like what is the purpose if you already have a speed radar, even if such a thing as you proposed was feasible?
    • It might be at some distances, but none are realistic. For example, if I put a microphone 2.5m away from a sound source and another 3.5m away, the fall-off there is only about 3 (2.98 I think), but your sound would have to be incredibly loud. A microphone that picks up an 80 dB sound at 1 millimeter will only pick up about 12 dB at 2.5 meters (and it's still only 20 dB at 1m from an 80 dB sound source). I also don't think swinging a club generates a very loud sound, and sounds that can injure your hearing require 85 dB or so. In other words… You need to generate (at the source) an ear-injuring level of sound with your club, and if the microphone is as little as one foot away, that 85 dB is already down to ~43.5 dB. It's almost half of what it was. Swing 14" away with the same 85 dB swing instead of 12" and the same swing will read 42 dB. Sound attenuation is subject to similar laws like light fall-off because it radiates, so it diminishes in the inverse square: I have also talked to some sound engineers, and they've laughed and said that unless you were controlling EVERY aspect of this, including: temperature distance of max clubhead speed from the microphone angle (both axes) to the microphone clubface orientation (a face open or closed will change the frequency) location of the max clubhead speed (reaching peak speed at the same exact place) everything in the vicinity, including the shoes and clothes you're wearing, the surface you're on, etc. ideally with all of them producing virtually no noise even when moving. You'd have to control all of those to within very small margins. Even just the doppler effect is going to dramatically change your input. No. No, you need to realize how wrong you've gotten all of this. See above about the doppler effect. Unless you're a swing robot, you're not going to generate the max speed at the same exact location every time. Tell me, @p1n9183, why do you think recording artists (singers) put their mouths so damn close to the microphone?
    • Digging deeper... you can use the frequency of the woosh also.  It is possible to measure the speed of an object using the noise it generates when passing through a decibel reader,  but with some limitations and considerations. The method relies on the relationship between the frequency of the sound emitted by the moving object and its speed.  When an object moves at a constant speed, it generates sound with a characteristic frequency, known as the "Doppler frequency." The frequency of the sound emitted by the object can be related to its speed using the formula: f = (v / c) * f0 where: - f: frequency of the emitted sound - v: object speed - 😄 speed of sound (approximately 343 m/s in air at standard temperature and pressure) - f0: frequency of the sound emitted when the object is at rest Having "C" been constant, and "f0" been unknown but equal for both swings you only need to compare the frequency of  each swing to know how much faster or slower is a swing over the other.  
    • As I told you before, the sound attenuation is 3 db at 1 meter (38").  At 7" (your example) is a wooping 1 db less, for an 80db 7 iron is under 1% error. I know for sure that my PRGR is not that accurate, even my skytrak isn't that accurate. For a FREE unit seams to be promising if you can't afford a speed meter.   Again, you are swinging in the same spot, over and over again in the same session. Phone position is the same , background sound is the same, environment is the same. The only difference is the peak sound you produce when you whoosh the club.     You need to do a lot better to discharge an idea.     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...