• Announcements

    • iacas

      Introducing TST "Clubs!"   08/28/2017

      No, we're not getting into the equipment business, but we do have "clubs" here on TST now. Groups. Check them out here:
Sign in to follow this  
dwade247

Anyone else find it easier to hit blades?

Recommended Posts

dwade247    2

So I was just messing around hitting golf balls and I noticed some old "Jack Nicholas" blades. I grabbed a couple of them along with some offbrand (I think acuity) cavity backs. The blades felt so much better. They were nice and light and didn't have a huge clumsy head on em. Has anyone else (especially high handicappers) found it easier to hit blades?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

FWMS    0
Used blades for many years, Ping S59. Mid season I switched to Ping G25's. Gained about 5 yards per club and off center hits performance was better with the G25's. Still adjusting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dave40    2

If you develop your swing using blades, it is sometimes difficult to transition to cavity backs, at least the game improvement type of cavity backs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

JonMA1    371

I don't know if Hogan Radials (early 80's) qualify as "blades", but they're not tremendously harder for me to hit than my Adams A4's (GI). An off-center shot with either is not good.

In some ways, I really like the smaller club head of the Hogans. But I tend to believe what the majority of experienced players say about GI clubs and I need all the help I can get right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

dwade247    2

Did you mean Jack Nicklaus?

Yes I did, knew someone was going to point this out. I pretty much agree with everyone else. The GI irons are probably easier to hit but I personally feel they are very clunky. However I have only hit cheap clubs. Are there any GI irons out there that have smaller heads with thinner soles?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

mvmac    1,759

Yes I did, knew someone was going to point this out. I pretty much agree with everyone else. The GI irons are probably easier to hit but I personally feel they are very clunky. However I have only hit cheap clubs. Are there any GI irons out there that have smaller heads with thinner soles?

That would tend to go against the GI theme.  Take a look at the Mizuno MP 54 irons, good mix of both worlds.  Just hit them the other day and was very impressed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

PirateJim    28
.... Has anyone else (especially high handicappers) found it easier to hit blades?

Not me. My game needs improvement and game improvement clubs work better for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

lumpuckeroo    29

I don't think I would say I find them easier to hit, but I have a LOT more confidence hitting a blade over a GI and for sure a super GI iron.  I just can't get past the thick top line and offset, I just don't feel like I'm hitting a golf club, I struggle trying to hit GI irons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

GaijinGolfer    84

Ive never found it easier to hit blades but blades are certainly much more satisfying when struck well.  Having said that, Ive tried blades and I still play cavity backs.  Golf is hard enough already, no sense in making it even harder with blades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

MS256    145

I play with cavity backs (it's all I've ever owned) but the times I hit someone's blades I hit them just fine.

Usually pull the first shot or two with blades because the MOI from the shaft to the toe makes the blade seem easier to square up. After a shot or two the adjustment isn't a problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

dwade247    2

I don't think I would say I find them easier to hit, but I have a LOT more confidence hitting a blade over a GI and for sure a super GI iron.  I just can't get past the thick top line and offset, I just don't feel like I'm hitting a golf club, I struggle trying to hit GI irons.

I think this is how I was feeling when I hit the blades. Blades are so simple and when I look at the club head it just says to me, "go get that dang ball and smack it!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

k-troop    228

Titleist AP2 are another option that provide a player's look with a little added sole relief and forgiveness on off-center hits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

duotone    0
I used my blades to hit Jack once, and I couldn't tell the difference between blades and CB.... ;-) I learned on Blades, quit the game for 11 years, got back into golf this Spring and got X20's, switched back to blades and will never look back again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jodastra    6

I seem to hit both CB's and blades about the same. I demoed the 714 MB's last week and they worked out real well for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

David in FL    1,520
Titleist AP2 are another option that provide a player's look with a little added sole relief and forgiveness on off-center hits.

They had a demo day going at the course I played yesterday.  I got to hit the 714 AP2's and MB's.......while I didn't get much time with them (had to get to the tee), my quick impression was that as much as I'd like to be able to play the MB's, they're too much club for me.  I'm sorry, but you have to be a very consistent ball striker to play them effectively.   The AP2's were outstanding though.  VERY impressive.....and they look almost identical to the MB's at address, which surprised me a little.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Dave2512    275

I definitely strike the ball the same with MB's and CB's. With rare exception it's usually bad and not in the intended direction. I'll take all the technological help I can get.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • It may. I'm assuming the driver is the biggest issue right now, and not just by a little. If I have a student who is coming for > 1 lesson, I take a slightly different approach. I'll work more often with an iron swing, because many of the same issues are present across the board. But if they're just coming once? I have to show them that I can help them get better with their biggest weakness. And so sometimes that means "yeah, you probably do that with your irons, but since it's magnified even more with the driver, let's work with that." It's not always a pure "golf" decision. Sometimes it's a business decision. If you've got someone coming for eight lessons, you can work up a longer-term plan, and if the driver still isn't fixed you can address it in a later lesson, and the student is more comfortable with that too. If you have one shot, you've got one chance to leave the student feeling happy at the end of the lesson. Your priorities change a little, as does the student's - he's not looking for a long-term ten-shot improvement, he wants to save two or three shots by not hitting a huge slice 14 times a round. Depending on what you mean by "generally." The driver and iron swings can be fairly different. There's less importance on getting your weight forward when the ball is teed up, you can swing faster, many pros play a different shape with the driver than irons, etc. It's a similar but different swing… depending on how picky you want to be about calling something the same or different.
    • Why?   I'll assume you're familiar with logical fallacies and spare explaining why this isn't a legitimate argument.   I don't remember Jack complaining when he was outdriving most of his fellow competitors in the 60s and 70s.    
    • There's no one commonality here Frankie. If letting your head/neck rotate through more will help your chest/torso rotate through more, go for it.
    • Well, some people equate long game with length alone. Straight is a huge factor as well. Length without the ability to find the darn thing is pretty useless. All other aspects of the their games being equal someone who hits the ball farther will win as they should have a better chance of getting the ball in the hole in the fewest number of strokes. That being said in the real world that would never happen as people's games would almost never be equal in all other areas. And I never said that, too many factors exist. I just never did buy into the "practice your short game 80% of the time" theory for the mere fact that even the best players on the planet only get it up and down at an average of about 60% of the time. I mean the best guy on tour only gets it up and down 67% of the time. So even the best amateur can only hope to achieve 50%. (although there are people on this forum who would make you think they get it up and down 90% of the time ) Basically my belief has always been to be successful you have to have as many looks at birdie as possible, so you have to have as many GIRs as possible which means you have to be in the best position possible to hit greens. Which in turn means hit it as long as you can AND hit it where you can find it. Even the best hybrid player on the planet from 225 yards is not as good as I am with sand wedge from 110.
    • I literally watched about ten seconds of that video, and he says "most of my weight is still behind the ball." Uhhh, no. Not really. With a driver? Sure. With a ball positioned forward a bit more than usual? Maybe? But probably still not then either? (And that's only if we're talking about weight and not pressure. If we're talking pressure, it's always well forward at impact with something hit off the ground.) But relative to the middle of your stance? No. Almost never. And what's more, your PRESSURE is WAY under the LEFT (front) foot at impact. WAY forward. Or it should be. Again, I only watched ten seconds, but those ten seconds were not good IMO. I'd check out this topic: Get your weight forward at impact. There's a reason it's Key #2.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Bryan Kasper
      Bryan Kasper
      (25 years old)
    2. Greg Pickett Golf
      Greg Pickett Golf
      (62 years old)
    3. hobecorning
      hobecorning
      (75 years old)
    4. Lfm
      Lfm
      (73 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon