Jump to content
IGNORED

Tiger Woods Master Catch-All Discussion


Valleygolfer

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, iacas said:

Based on a ton. Lots of topics about this here. Tiger was physically better than everyone else. He had shots nobody else could hit. It wasn’t just a mental thing that separated him.

Foley taught a broken (injured) golfer.

I'm actually more interested in why you think Hal is full of shit. 

As to Tiger, ok ... injured. Fine. He didn't hit a bus head on did he? He got there on based on how he wanted to get there ... and the consequences. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
54 minutes ago, Vespidae said:

I'm actually more interested in why you think Hal is full of shit.

I'm confused. I thought this was pretty clear.

This statement is complete bullshit (by Hal): "He made the point that above a certain skill level, it’s all mental."

We have several topics and discussions about this stuff (the "mental game" aspect of golf).

54 minutes ago, Vespidae said:

As to Tiger, ok ... injured. Fine. He didn't hit a bus head on did he?

No, but so what? Does that mean his back wasn't bad, his knee wasn't bad…?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

10 minutes ago, iacas said:

This statement is complete bullshit (by Hal): "

He made the point that above a certain skill level, it’s all mental."

Great. No back up. Just an opinion. So a PGA Champion and Players Champion is full of it. So much for Hal's new venture teaching ... 

Hal BEAT Tiger in the Players Championship. Hal's point was that yes, there's equipment, yes there's skill, but once you have that ... it's mental. Peter Jacobsen said it (and introduced us to Chuck Hogan), Bob Rotella said it ... and so have countless others. 

I'm arguing that perhaps Tiger would not have hurt himself had he had a strong corner man. He had it with Earl. Who's filling that role today? I honestly don't know ... do you?

So back to Sean ... if you aren't going to coach him on skill (he's already good), perhaps there's an opportunity to coach on what he's thinking. Who knows?

If Sean was so concerned, he probably should have just said, "Tiger, I can't help. You are too injured." But he didn't ... so I don't really feel sorry for Sean. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
3 minutes ago, Vespidae said:

I'm arguing that perhaps Tiger would not have hurt himself had he had a strong corner man. He had it with Earl.

This makes no sense. He had a strong corner man in Earl and that’s why his body was not as broken? Tiger’s injuries are a culmination of years of wear and strain on his body. What does that have to do with his mental fortitude?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, billchao said:

This makes no sense. He had a strong corner man in Earl and that’s why his body was not as broken? Tiger’s injuries are a culmination of years of wear and strain on his body. What does that have to do with his mental fortitude?

Then you need to ask why. Why is his body broken? Why does he have the strain and the wear? He didn't fall down a flight of stairs. He didn't get hit head by a bus. He  chose to swing the way he did and yes ... a strong corner man would have said, "Whoa ... do you really want to do that to your body the way you are doing it?" 

I think Bryson is headed for the same outcome ... a meteor that flashes at great speed before he crashes. 

If Sean is not asking these questions ... boo hoo for Sean. He could have said "No thanks."

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
12 minutes ago, Vespidae said:

Then you need to ask why. Why is his body broken? Why does he have the strain and the wear? He didn't fall down a flight of stairs. He didn't get hit head by a bus. He  chose to swing the way he did and yes ... a strong corner man would have said, "Whoa ... do you really want to do that to your body the way you are doing it?”

I agree with @billchao; being in orthopedics, I see people with arthritis, tendinopathies, etc everyday that are an accumulation of years of work/activities. And we see this argument presented in court all the time with car accidents and workman’s comp cases; if there is no abrupt injury (“falling down a flight a stairs” as you put it), the degenerative type of injuries are presumed to be just that, a degeneration over long periods of time unless one can prove otherwise. So, the burden of proof lies with you saying his injuries weren’t due to all of those years under Earl. It’s simply wearing down tread on the tires and while he was younger under his dad, there was still more tread on his tires 

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
11 minutes ago, Vespidae said:

Then you need to ask why. Why is his body broken? Why does he have the strain and the wear? He didn't fall down a flight of stairs. He didn't get hit head by a bus. He  chose to swing the way he did and yes ... a strong corner man would have said, "Whoa ... do you really want to do that to your body the way you are doing it?" 

I think Bryson is headed for the same outcome ... a meteor that flashes at great speed before he crashes. 

If Sean is not asking these questions ... boo hoo for Sean. He could have said "No thanks."

Then your Earl argument is moot, because it was under Earl’s watch that Tiger developed his swing.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 minutes ago, billchao said:

Then your Earl argument is moot, because it was under Earl’s watch that Tiger developed his swing.

Actually not. Tiger really went after David Duval when Duval was number one in 1999. Look at what he was doing with his swing then ... on steel spikes. I'll bet money that was the period that started the wear and tear on his body. 

But look at Post 3486. These aren't my words, they are Sean Foley's ... "

“Looking back on it now, I think I probably over-coached him. I was there at a time when he needed someone to support him.

    It was a time in his life when a lot of people who’d been in his life for a long time started to ditch him. I think, unfortunately, I approached it from the point of view that good technique will take care of everything."

That IS my point. All these people that supported him mentally begin to move on, by death, by  divorce ... whatever. And Sean's focus was on technique. Sounds to me like Sean is saying, "I made a mistake." And I agree. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
5 minutes ago, Vespidae said:

Actually not. Tiger really went after David Duval when Duval was number one in 1999. Look at what he was doing with his swing then ... on steel spikes. I'll bet money that was the period that started the wear and tear on his body. 

Earl died in 2006. He was still around in Tiger’s life in 1999, so by your own argument, Earl should have been a stronger corner man and stepped in.

32 minutes ago, Vespidae said:

a strong corner man would have said, "Whoa ... do you really want to do that to your body the way you are doing it?" 

So again, your Earl argument is moot. Earl watched Tiger “ruin” his body, or whatever it is you’re insinuating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
13 minutes ago, Vespidae said:

“Looking back on it now, I think I probably over-coached him. I was there at a time when he needed someone to support him.

    It was a time in his life when a lot of people who’d been in his life for a long time started to ditch him. I think, unfortunately, I approached it from the point of view that good technique will take care of everything."

That IS my point. All these people that supported him mentally begin to move on, by death, by  divorce ... whatever. And Sean's focus was on technique. Sounds to me like Sean is saying, "I made a mistake." And I agree. 

 

I get what you’re saying here, and I think we would all agree that mental health after bereavement or depression is going to be primary to getting out there and competing at a high level, but that’s very different from simply handling the stress of higher level competitive golf. If I am understanding @iacas point correctly (and correct me if I wrong), Erik was saying that trying to coach someone to be mentally tough for that stress of competition would have been less than productive than working on mechanics. I see those as two separate mental areas, not apples to apples

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
23 minutes ago, Vespidae said:

Actually not. Tiger really went after David Duval when Duval was number one in 1999. Look at what he was doing with his swing then ... on steel spikes. I'll bet money that was the period that started the wear and tear on his body. 

But look at Post 3486. These aren't my words, they are Sean Foley's ... "

“Looking back on it now, I think I probably over-coached him. I was there at a time when he needed someone to support him.

    It was a time in his life when a lot of people who’d been in his life for a long time started to ditch him. I think, unfortunately, I approached it from the point of view that good technique will take care of everything."

That IS my point. All these people that supported him mentally begin to move on, by death, by  divorce ... whatever. And Sean's focus was on technique. Sounds to me like Sean is saying, "I made a mistake." And I agree. 

 

From what I understand, Tiger changed coaches because his swing was causing injury. He needed to find a way to stay on top and not continue to degrade his body. The mental game part was a much smaller component. He’s had many surgeries and injuries. He won a US Open with a broken leg for goodness sake.

Even now with his back fusion, he still is a force to be reckoned with. A lot of top level golfers have gone through the same thing from a physical standpoint. Tiger does not need mental coaching. He continues to look for ways to keep. That is what I read in Foley’s comments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
1 hour ago, Vespidae said:

Great. No back up. Just an opinion.

No, please read what I write.

We have a bunch of topics on this, where I've shared a BUNCH of opinions and facts about the mental game versus the physical game, etc. I told you this, that this was discussed in other topics. You're too lazy to go look for them, then flag me as "no back up." I've backed it up repeatedly. Many times. I don't feel like typing it all out again, since it's really not the topic here.

1 hour ago, Vespidae said:

So a PGA Champion and Players Champion is full of it.

It'd hardly be the first time, dude.

1 hour ago, Vespidae said:

Hal BEAT Tiger in the Players Championship.

So?

1 hour ago, Vespidae said:

Hal's point was that yes, there's equipment, yes there's skill, but once you have that ... it's mental.

And again, he's full of shit.

It's not mental. Tiger was not "mentally" 15 shots better than anyone else in the f***ing field in 2000. He was physically way better.

My disagreement here is not because I misunderstand what you or what Hal is saying. It's because I disagree with him entirely.

1 hour ago, Vespidae said:

Peter Jacobsen said it (and introduced us to Chuck Hogan), Bob Rotella said it ... and so have countless others.

Doesn't make 'em right. Tiger could do things, physically, that others could not do. I could give you "countless" tales of that type of thing, too.

1 hour ago, Vespidae said:

I'm arguing that perhaps Tiger would not have hurt himself had he had a strong corner man. He had it with Earl. Who's filling that role today? I honestly don't know ... do you?

You're arguing that perhaps something? Good luck with that.

I may as well argue that "perhaps" Tiger would have won half as much if he adopted whatever your strategy would have been.

1 hour ago, Vespidae said:

So back to Sean ... if you aren't going to coach him on skill (he's already good)

I don't think you understand how coaching works at that level.

He was "already good" in 1997 when he won the Masters by 12. Yet he kept with Butch. He was "already good" when he wanted to be even more consistent, and switched to Hank Haney, and played some of the most consistently great golf ever played. He was "already good" when he went with Sean Foley, "already good" when he switched to Chris Como, and "already good" when he went out mostly on his own.

Yet, at each turn, he wanted something different from his golf swing. Hence, he worked with a coach.

1 hour ago, Vespidae said:

If Sean was so concerned, he probably should have just said, "Tiger, I can't help. You are too injured." But he didn't ... so I don't really feel sorry for Sean. 

Nobody's asking you to feel sorry for Sean.

I was just stating the reality: Sean was dealing with a broken golfer.

1 hour ago, billchao said:

This makes no sense. He had a strong corner man in Earl and that’s why his body was not as broken? Tiger’s injuries are a culmination of years of wear and strain on his body. What does that have to do with his mental fortitude?

Yeah, this. I ignored your "better corner man" thing because others pretty well addressed it.

1 hour ago, Vespidae said:

Then you need to ask why. Why is his body broken? Why does he have the strain and the wear?

Because golf at that level beats the ever-loving-shit out of you?

Because other golfers who aren't as good as Tiger are forced to retire with his injuries in their 30s?

What are you even talking about here?

1 hour ago, Vespidae said:

He didn't get hit head by a bus.

He played high level golf for like 30 years, dude. He may as well have been hit by a bus. He'd have had a better chance of recovering more fully from that and losing less time to injury from that than what he had to deal with.

1 hour ago, Vespidae said:

He  chose to swing the way he did and yes ... a strong corner man would have said, "Whoa ... do you really want to do that to your body the way you are doing it?"

And that corner man, had he been really convincing, may have cut Tiger's win total in half.

1 hour ago, Vespidae said:

If Sean is not asking these questions ... boo hoo for Sean. He could have said "No thanks."

You're really misreading what people are saying here, man.

49 minutes ago, Vespidae said:

Actually not. Tiger really went after David Duval when Duval was number one in 1999. Look at what he was doing with his swing then ... on steel spikes. I'll bet money that was the period that started the wear and tear on his body. 

Tiger started putting wear and tear on his body when he was five years old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

16 minutes ago, iacas said:

No, please read what I write.

I was really interested in your opinion as to why Hal Sutton is full of shit. If there's a thread on that ... I'd love to read it. I can't find it ... can you send me the link?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator
14 minutes ago, Vespidae said:

I was really interested in your opinion as to why Hal Sutton is full of shit. If there's a thread on that ... I'd love to read it. I can't find it ... can you send me the link?

https://thesandtrap.com/search/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

9 minutes ago, Vespidae said:

I did a search on Hal Sutton and scanned all the articles. I can’t find anything really negative on him. What leads you to have such a low opinion of him? Seems like a pretty good golfer.

I don't think it's Hal Sutton specifically, but rather the importance (or lack of importance) of the mental game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo after clicking this link. For Mevo+, click this link or the image above.
  • Posts

    • I was able to pay off my loans early all by myself, so everyone else should too.  Of course I was only paying $1200 per year in tuition for a chemical engineering degree. Now get off my lawn. It does "feel" like colleges compete based on amenities more than cost than they did when I was in school. In addition to the added cost of those amenities, state governments have reduced funding per student to the schools which forced the schools to rely on  tuition more. The availability of student loans allowed the states to cut the funding. I don't know which happened first, the loans or the funding cuts. I assume there is also some waste at schools in the form of a higher administrator to student ratio. I don't know what to do about the high cost of college and the debt burden on students.  I don't think that the ROI is high enough for some degrees. Many would be better off learning a trade.  In addition to the limits Erik mentioned, I think loan forgiveness for certain degrees in certain locations could help.  In the mean time I recommend everyone use the plan that I used for my kids to graduate college debt free. I have 2 single siblings who make good money who started contributing to a 529 for my kids when they were little.  I only paid about $4K per year which was in order to get the max tax credits. Each kid did/does get some scholarships that covered around 25% of total costs. My son is currently in school and plays on the golf team, but he does not get any money for it. Maybe he can earn a little next year with some continued improvement. My back up plan was for my wife to get a full time job after having been a SAHM and then substitute teacher for all of our kids' lives.
    • I remember last summer, when he complained that a cameraman was "damaging my brand" by having the temerity to video Bryson's actions.  Same here, its not Bryson's fault, its everyone else.  If you care about other people's opinions of you, you better think before you open your mouth and give them a reason to think you're a doofus.
    • Well those are actual numbers for one school, so it’s a small sample. And it’s more years. 1957 was $600, 1978 was $6000 and WPI was $60,000 when my son graduated from HS in 2013. When I was in school it went from $6k to $8K in 4 years.
    • Technically yesterday- 80, Woodley Lakes from the whites - 38-42 with a horrendous 7 on the easy par 5 13th after hitting a great drive AND a very nice 3 wood to about 91 yards short…then the carnage began - 56 degree fat to the collar…square strike (yep, have on - love it) caught the seam of the collar and went 25 feet past…first putt burned the edge but slipped 4 feet by…4 footer right in the heart but only traveled 3 feet 11 inches…BOOM double bogey…   Tomorrow is Balboa - usually break 80 there, but we will see…   good round to all playing today!
    • Scale back the Federal backing of student loans. Allow students to default like any other loan. Universities can offer loans in conjunction with private banks. The universities would be responsible for making sure they have good, sound programs and solid students who can then get appropriate jobs after graduation to repay the loans. If a university pushes too many marginal degree programs to students who have questionable academic talents, they will pay the price with high defaults that hurts their bottom line. That is the only way to change this. There is nothing stopping universities coming up with endless silly programs, recruiting foolish or desperate people to take out huge loans that they will never be able to repay. We have laws against the payday loan people abusing the poorest in society, but here we are abusing the naïve youth of our nation who lack experience at life. Additionally, too many people go to universities. Some schools have programs for the mentally challenged and learning disabled. Why saddle them and their parents with useless debt? In some cases this has become a system rigged to fleece a class of people and the government is complicit. We are allowing the government at the state and federal level take advantage of its citizenry. With the government backing this scheme, prices naturally go up. If the government allows these loans to be written off, the prices will go higher thereby compounding the problem. I have 4 children who have earned a total of 7 university degrees and none have had any student debt, so I have thought a lot about this. I have also interviewed a lot of new graduates some of who have had loan amounts that are ridiculous. Two guys in particular with BS in mechanical engineering with loans just under $200k. To me that is a red flag they won't be able to solve basic engineering problems.  
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Augie
      Augie
      (63 years old)
    2. Dukes1304
      Dukes1304
      (36 years old)
    3. Mmgolfwiz
      Mmgolfwiz
      (58 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...