Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
iacas

Scott Langley's 25-second Putt at The Memorial - Add a Stroke or Not?

0  

  1. 1. Should he have added a stroke for waiting too long?

    • Add a stroke
      21
    • Do not add a stroke
      24

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

141 posts in this topic

What do y'all think? Did he violate the ten-second rule? Should he have added a stroke?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Excuse my ignorance, but I'm assuming that you only have 10 seconds to mark your ball after it stops?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Excuse my ignorance, but I'm assuming that you only have 10 seconds to mark your ball after it stops?

As you know, the Rules of Golf are online.

16-2. Ball Overhanging Hole

When any part of the ball overhangs the lip of the hole, the player is allowed enough time to reach the hole without unreasonable delay and an additional ten seconds to determine whether the ball is at rest. If by then the ball has not fallen into the hole, it is deemed to be at rest. If the ball subsequently falls into thehole, the player is deemed to have holed out with his last stroke, and must add a penalty stroke to his score for the hole; otherwise, there is no penalty under this Rule.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If it was still moving (I can't tell but the announcers thought it was) it wouldn't matter how long it took would it?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was still moving (I can't tell but the announcers thought it was) it wouldn't matter how long it took would it?

You're also talking about the same announcer in Feherty who confused the color of the hazard and the options available when Tiger hit the flagstick at Augusta.

I'm leaning toward "it wasn't moving and he should have added a penalty stroke."

A ball at rest can start moving when the grass cools, or a puff of wind comes up, etc.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

You're also talking about the same announcer in Feherty who confused the color of the hazard and the options available when Tiger hit the flagstick at Augusta.


Yeah I'm not going taking what he said as the Gospel but adding in both players looking at it, and the fact that I can't tell, there doesn't seem to be any evidence otherwise.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As you know, the Rules of Golf are online.

Thanks, it was instinctual to ask the question.. I appreciate the answer!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I voted "add a stroke." I'm not 100% that way, but in reading the Rule, he violated it. He did not proceed to the hole after the ball was overhanging, and when he got there he still took quite some time.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I voted add a stroke. If you consider the delay before he starts walking, then the delay after he stops walking, it's more than the allotted 10 seconds. Not to mention he made no attempt to actually walk to his ball... He is in breach of both the letter and spirit of the rule.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Two PGA Pros are standing right there, Bubba didn't call foul.

It was likely creeping slowly and they were eyeballing it.

I don't think the grass was cooling or the wind suddenly gusted or anything like that.

He stood there a reasonable amount of time (per the rules), then walked up and stopped to observe again..... Like he got closer and the ball movement was easier to see up close, (Bubba walked up too and then stopped and started watching intently too) I can see the players actions and posture are very consistent with that.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I looked like he spent a reasonable amount of time to walk towards the hole, and wanted to make sure he did not disturb the ball and consulted with his fellow (not sure if opponent or competitor) player, then waited just about 10 seconds when it fell in.

From the looks of it he should not get a penalty, but barely.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm not sure, I mean it was a long time to wait, but even the other player seemed to be watching it pretty closely and wasn't bothered by the wait.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

He waited the full 10 seconds, then took far too long to walk to the ball before it fell.  The rule is quite clear.  He should have added a stroke.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I would like to know what the players were saying, if anything. If Bubba said something like "Hey man it's still moving" or something like that it would make it an easy decision for me. As it is in a tough decision I have to give the player the benefit of the doubt.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two PGA Pros are standing right there, Bubba didn't call foul.

It was likely creeping slowly and they were eyeballing it.

I don't know that I agree with that. You're essentially relying on Bubba to know the exact rule on this?

I'd tell the guy "you've got ten seconds, it's gonna be close." Plus, since there's no problem waiting 15 seconds (you just add a stroke), what's the harm in waiting, particularly… if you're Bubba? It's not gonna do anything to you, and you get to watch to see if it falls or not, satisfying your curiosity.

He stood there a reasonable amount of time (per the rules)

No, that's not per the rules. He took far too long. He doesn't get to stand there at his address position, then slowly walk up, then stand there again.

I looked like he spent a reasonable amount of time to walk towards the hole, and wanted to make sure he did not disturb the ball and consulted with his fellow (not sure if opponent or competitor) player, then waited just about 10 seconds when it fell in.

He stood at his ball, not moving, for ten seconds. Literally, his feet didn't even move an inch. That's not allowed within the rules.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

He waited the full 10 seconds, then took far too long to walk to the ball before it fell.  The rule is quite clear.  He should have added a stroke.

I'd like to point out that he didn't walk to his ball, he walked a large arc around the hole and ended up some four feet from his ball when he stopped to watch it again.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

He stood at his ball, not moving, for ten seconds. Literally, his feet didn't even move an inch. That's not allowed within the rules.

I tend to agree that he took a little too long. Like a second or so. It could be argued that he was approaching with caution and did not want to disturb the ball, but that probably counts into the ten second allowable wait.

For me, I would have requested to tap it in, and incurred the extra stroke anyways. If my competitor/opponent did this, I would be a little more lenient and let him make the call himself.

This is a really tough one.

What was the ruling in the end?

EDIT, looked it up. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/golf/article-2647422/Scott-Langleys-cliffhanger-putt-Memorial-Tournament-stays-lip-24-SECONDS-dropping-cup.html

24 seconds, but still good.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I voted for adding a stroke.

At 0:08 the ball basically stops moving visually from the video

At 0:18 Scott starts walking towards the ball

At 0:30 the ball finally falls in. He basically took his 10 seconds plus another 12 seconds. The ball clearly didn't look like it was moving. Feherty saying "The ball is moving all the time", I mean come on, he's what 50-60 yards away off the green, not way he could be seeing that ball move. By the rules I think it should be another stroke added.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Where is the hole in your game?  Do you struggle close to the green?  Then look at lob wedge.  If you find yourself always needing a 200 yard club then go for a wood or driving iron. I would suggest since you already mentioned you don't hit your hybrid so well replacing it as well.  I don't hit hybrids myself, but there are many different types of hybrids from fat sole driving irons to short shaft woods.  A true hybrid will go a lot farther than an iron of the same loft making a 5 hybrid get into you 3 iron range.  If you go this route I would suggest a 2 and 4 hybrid to cover the gap between driver and irons. My personal preference is toward big fairway woods.  Most people will carry at least a 3 wood.  Lots of pros are using a strong 3 wood, whether it is called a 2 wood, 3+, or mini driver, these guys are using 11 to 14 degree woods with lots of club head speed to get 300 yards out of their fairway wood.  But with slower swings that most amateurs have they should be using a 12 to 14 degree driver meaning they should be using more loft on their fairway wood as well.  To go this route you might want to look at a 4 wood and 7 wood setup.  A 7 wood should be around the same yardage as a 3 hybrid. One last suggestion.  Find a 2nd hand store and look at some older model clubs.  You might just run across a 1 iron for less than $10.  For that price you could grab a hand full of long irons, hybrids, and woods that you can then hit the driving range and find what works for you.  
    • So IMO, if there are easier options to hit that can produce similar results, why play blades?  I had a set of Titleist 710 Cavity Backs and sold them for blades. Simply because they looked cool, and "all good golfers play blades". Well, I wasnt as good a ball striker that I thought I was. I now play AP2's and my handicap is as low as its ever been. For guys like Jordan Spieth and Luke Donald in your example, if they hit it pure most of the time, why risk that 1% where you dont pure it and the blade iron leaves you 15 yards short of your target and in a creek/hazard.  The technology in irons today is incredible for hitting high shots while still being able to work the ball plenty. Im not knocking anyone who plays blades, because that is impressive. It all comes down to preference.
    • KFC fried chicken scented sunscreen.   
    • Exactly, it comes up a lot in some of those "senior" golf tip sections on TV and in Magazines. We don't have those twist-o-flex spines anymore like we did in our 20's, so a little head start helps. But I think ANYONE can use it to help rotation. We may THINK we get around a lot, but sadly if you saw yourself on video... not so much. Then I wouldn't do it with the long irons. :^)  But seriously, folks... I run into this as well and it's my hands... I will tend to flip and steer the club trying to get the perfect ball flight. Hands get ahead and it's pulled or hooked. REALLY trying to keep my head behind the ball and WATCH the club hit the ball helps a bit, though. Good Luck.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Jason141
      Jason141
      (27 years old)
    2. ngreed86
      ngreed86
      (30 years old)
  • Blog Entries