Jump to content
IGNORED

Are you ready for some NFL Football? 2014 Edition.


phan52
Note: This thread is 3290 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I just did another calculation using the Packers/Cowboys game as an example.  If the Packers inflated the ball to the max, 13.5 psig, the ball would have been well below the minimum of 12.5 at the game temperature of 20F.  The NFL now has the problem of determining if the rule applies to all game conditions.  They test inside at most likely close to 70F.  In the really cold games, it will go below the minimum.

Makes me want to go buy an NFL regulation football and do some testing :-D

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

This is probably the best explanation as to why its a dumb rule that I've seen.

But since I'm a hater, I'm going to spin you.  Remember that game you used as an example of the Vikes not getting in trouble?  They weren't cheating like the Pats, they were simply trying to keep the PSI in the acceptable range!

Dude, come on!

Why'd you ditch Johnson Wagner and his floppy hat!?!?!? :-P Now I gotta go and get used to a whole new avatar.  (Funny thing is I remember when they wore those hats and you took that avatar but I don't remember what you had before.  I'll get used to this one too.) :beer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I dont understand why they would feel the need to cheat cause i doubt the colts could beat them 1 out of 10 times in foxboro.I guess they didnt want to take the risk especially considering a trip to superbowl was on the line.Since the NFL would not strip a victory from a team for cheating just like in nascar its worth the risk since theres no win punishment.Like nascar the team doesnt mind a fine or suspension if you get a win especially in a big game.I imagine the NFL will give them a heavy fine but who cares cause they are going to the superbowl.Until they start taking away wins nothing will change.I would have liked to seen what was on them tapes the NFL destroyed in spygate because  obviuously it was pretty bad for nobody to be told what was on them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Who's excited for the Pro Bowl?!?!?!?!

Cricket...

Dude, come on!

Why'd you ditch Johnson Wagner and his floppy hat!?!?!?   Now I gotta go and get used to a whole new avatar.  (Funny thing is I remember when they wore those hats and you took that avatar but I don't remember what you had before.  I'll get used to this one too.)

Isn't it funny how you start to recognize people by the avatar and its actually kind of hard to get used to new ones?  I'll only keep this one until the super bowl or so.

Before Johnson Wagner I had a trophy that we give to the loser of a golf outing I have with my friends every year.  Its a female golfer and says "MANGINA" on it.  Oh, here...

By rule, the loser has to have that displayed prominently in their home or office.

Wow, going through my photos on here was like a trip down memory lane.  Here are a couple other relevant photos that are saved in my profile or whatever that seemed relevant.....

Every couple of months I send those to my brother in laws.  or is it brothers in law?  brothers in laws?

I dont understand why they would feel the need to cheat cause i doubt the colts could beat them 1 out of 10 times in foxboro.

I think the Jets won 4 games in 2007 when the Pats were caught taping their practice or sideline or whatever.  Its the mentality that you can to gain an edge.  Which is sort of why I think BB should get in trouble regardless of his personal involvement.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Cricket...

Isn't it funny how you start to recognize people by the avatar and its actually kind of hard to get used to new ones?  I'll only keep this one until the super bowl or so.

Before Johnson Wagner I had a trophy that we give to the loser of a golf outing I have with my friends every year.  Its a female golfer and says "MANGINA" on it.  Oh, here...

By rule, the loser has to have that displayed prominently in their home or office.

Wow, going through my photos on here was like a trip down memory lane.  Here are a couple other relevant photos that are saved in my profile or whatever that seemed relevant.....

Every couple of months I send those to my brother in laws.  or is it brothers in law?  brothers in laws?

I think the Jets won 4 games in 2007 when the Pats were caught taping their practice or sideline or whatever.  Its the mentality that you can to gain an edge.  Which is sort of why I think BB should get in trouble regardless of his personal involvement.

It's brother ins law. :-P

I'd laugh at him in that picture on the water slide, but I'm pretty sure that's the same reaction I have when I see a big spider I can't identify or when a bee dive bombs me, so ... I'll reserve judgment. :beer:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Quote:

Originally Posted by dsc123

This is probably the best explanation as to why its a dumb rule that I've seen.

But since I'm a hater, I'm going to spin you.  Remember that game you used as an example of the Vikes not getting in trouble?  They weren't cheating like the Pats, they were simply trying to keep the PSI in the acceptable range!

Does anyone know what the reason for the rule is?  I was thinking it might be more about the kicking game than anything else.  But who knows?


This is just a guess, but the official ball I have says, "inflate 13 lbs" on it.  Wilson probably says it performs best there +/- 1/2 lbs.  We looked up the rule yesterday.  There's nothing about temperature or the the officials have to pressure test each ball.  The rule is very general.  They seem more concerned with the kicking balls.

Rule 2 The Ball

Section 1

BALL DIMENSIONS

The Ball must be a “Wilson,” hand selected, bearing the signature of the Commissioner of the League, Roger Goodell.

The ball shall be made up of an inflated (12 1/2 to 13 1/2 pounds) urethane bladder enclosed in a pebble grained, leather case (natural tan color) without corrugations of any kind. It shall have the form of a prolate spheroid and the size and weight shall be: long axis, 11 to 11 1/4 inches; long circumference, 28 to 28 1/2 inches; short circumference, 21 to 21 1/4 inches; weight, 14 to 15 ounces.

The Referee shall be the sole judge as to whether all balls offered for play comply with these specifications. A pump is to be furnished by the home club, and the balls shall remain under the supervision of the Referee until they are delivered to the ball attendant just prior to the start of the game.

Section 2

BALL SUPPLY

Each team will make 12 primary balls available for testing by the Referee two hours and 15 minutes prior to the starting time of the game to meet League requirements. The home team will also make 12 backup balls available for testing in all stadiums. In addition, the visitors, at their discretion, may bring 12 backup balls to be tested by the Referee for games held in outdoor stadiums. For all games, eight new footballs, sealed in a special box and shipped by the manufacturer to the Referee, will be opened in the officials’ locker room two hours and 15 minutes prior to the starting time of the game. These balls are to be specially marked by the Referee and used exclusively for the kicking game.

In the event a home team ball does not conform to specifications, or its supply is exhausted, the Referee shall secure a proper ball from the visitors and, failing that, use the best available ball. Any such circumstances must be reported to the Commissioner.

In case of rain or a wet, muddy, or slippery field, a playable ball shall be used at the request of the offensive team’s center. The Game Clock shall not stop for such action (unless undue delay occurs).

Note: It is the responsibility of the home team to furnish playable balls at all times by attendants from either side of the playing field.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Rule 2 The Ball

Section 1

BALL DIMENSIONS

The Ball must be a “Wilson,” hand selected, bearing the signature of the Commissioner of the League, Roger Goodell.

The ball shall be made up of an inflated (12 1/2 to 13 1/2 pounds) urethane bladder enclosed in a pebble grained, leather case (natural tan color) without corrugations of any kind. It shall have the form of a prolate spheroid and the size and weight shall be: long axis, 11 to 11 1/4 inches; long circumference, 28 to 28 1/2 inches; short circumference, 21 to 21 1/4 inches; weight, 14 to 15 ounces.

The Referee shall be the sole judge as to whether all balls offered for play comply with these specifications. A pump is to be furnished by the home club, and the balls shall remain under the supervision of the Referee until they are delivered to the ball attendant just prior to the start of the game.

Section 2

BALL SUPPLY

Each team will make 12 primary balls available for testing by the Referee two hours and 15 minutes prior to the starting time of the game to meet League requirements. The home team will also make 12 backup balls available for testing in all stadiums. In addition, the visitors, at their discretion, may bring 12 backup balls to be tested by the Referee for games held in outdoor stadiums. For all games, eight new footballs, sealed in a special box and shipped by the manufacturer to the Referee, will be opened in the officials’ locker room two hours and 15 minutes prior to the starting time of the game. These balls are to be specially marked by the Referee and used exclusively for the kicking game.

In the event a home team ball does not conform to specifications, or its supply is exhausted, the Referee shall secure a proper ball from the visitors and, failing that, use the best available ball. Any such circumstances must be reported to the Commissioner.

In case of rain or a wet, muddy, or slippery field, a playable ball shall be used at the request of the offensive team’s center. The Game Clock shall not stop for such action (unless undue delay occurs).

Note: It is the responsibility of the home team to furnish playable balls at all times by attendants from either side of the playing field.

I can only say I am dumbfounded.  Apparently the pressure in the football isn't all that important to the NFL because the way this rule is written only ensures game ball has air it and the referee thought it was OK to play with.

Butch

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator

Quote:

Rule 2 The Ball

Section 1

BALL DIMENSIONS

The Ball must be a “Wilson,” hand selected, bearing the signature of the Commissioner of the League, Roger Goodell.

The ball shall be made up of an inflated (12 1/2 to 13 1/2 pounds) urethane bladder enclosed in a pebble grained, leather case (natural tan color) without corrugations of any kind. It shall have the form of a prolate spheroid and the size and weight shall be: long axis, 11 to 11 1/4 inches; long circumference, 28 to 28 1/2 inches; short circumference, 21 to 21 1/4 inches; weight, 14 to 15 ounces.

The Referee shall be the sole judge as to whether all balls offered for play comply with these specifications. A pump is to be furnished by the home club, and the balls shall remain under the supervision of the Referee until they are delivered to the ball attendant just prior to the start of the game.

Section 2

BALL SUPPLY

Each team will make 12 primary balls available for testing by the Referee two hours and 15 minutes prior to the starting time of the game to meet League requirements. The home team will also make 12 backup balls available for testing in all stadiums. In addition, the visitors, at their discretion, may bring 12 backup balls to be tested by the Referee for games held in outdoor stadiums. For all games, eight new footballs, sealed in a special box and shipped by the manufacturer to the Referee, will be opened in the officials’ locker room two hours and 15 minutes prior to the starting time of the game. These balls are to be specially marked by the Referee and used exclusively for the kicking game.

In the event a home team ball does not conform to specifications, or its supply is exhausted, the Referee shall secure a proper ball from the visitors and, failing that, use the best available ball. Any such circumstances must be reported to the Commissioner.

In case of rain or a wet, muddy, or slippery field, a playable ball shall be used at the request of the offensive team’s center. The Game Clock shall not stop for such action (unless undue delay occurs).

Note: It is the responsibility of the home team to furnish playable balls at all times by attendants from either side of the playing field.

I can only say I am dumbfounded.  Apparently the pressure in the football isn't all that important to the NFL because the way this rule is written only ensures game ball has air it and the referee thought it was OK to play with.


Plus, if they haven't ruled on the Vikings getting caught heating the balls on Nov 30th yet, we won't see a decision on this any time soon.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

He threw ones with 13 psi in the second half of the AFC Championship.  They only scored 28 points.  The refs changed the balls at half time.  It made no difference. I guess you haven't been paying attention.

They've been deflating balls for years. 187 touches per fumble vs league avg of 105 since 2010. That's an outlier not possible due to good coaching. C'mon Boog, try to be objective, you typically are but have gone off the deep end here. http://www.sharpfootballanalysis.com/blog/?p=2932

In my Bag: Driver: Titelist 913 D3 9.5 deg. 3W: TaylorMade RBZ 14.5 3H: TaylorMade RBZ 18.5 4I - SW: TaylorMade R7 TP LW: Titelist Vokey 60 Putter: Odyssey 2-Ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Quote:

Originally Posted by boogielicious

He threw ones with 13 psi in the second half of the AFC Championship.  They only scored 28 points.  The refs changed the balls at half time.  It made no difference. I guess you haven't been paying attention.

They've been deflating balls for years. 187 touches per fumble vs league avg of 105 since 2010. That's an outlier not possible due to good coaching. C'mon Boog, try to be objective, you typically are but have gone off the deep end here.

http://www.sharpfootballanalysis.com/blog/?p=2932

LOL!  They fumbled three times in the Ravens game and just did not lose possession.  Steven Ridley was a fumble machine.  They fumbled twice against Indy but they fumbles went out of bounds.  You're the one who is reaching because of your hate.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

LOL!  They fumbled three times in the Ravens game and just did not lose possession.  Steven Ridley was a fumble machine.  They fumbled twice against Indy but they fumbles went out of bounds.  You're the one who is reaching because of your hate.

Did you read the article?  It included all fumbles, not just fumbles lost.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There's a lot of interesting stuff on that site.

Quote:

The Patriots went 14-1 (93%) in Tom Brady’s home games played in wet weather since 2007.  Their only loss was to the San Francisco 49ers in 2012.  For some comparison, the Patriots went 51-9 (85%) in home games played in dry weather during that same period.  On average, in both wet and dry weather, the Patriots were favored by approximately 9 ppg.  In the NFL, 9 point favorites should win the game approximately 81% of the time.

......

The Patriots went 31-29 ATS (52%) in dry weather home games, but 10-5 ATS (67%) in wet weather home games.  The oddsmakers on the games projected the Patriots would score an average of 28 ppg, whether the conditions were wet or dry.  But the Patriots scored 35 ppg in wet weather (+7) vs 31 ppg in dry weather.  They also held opponents to 5 ppg fewer in wet weather home games.

This doesn't conclusively prove anything (small sample), but its not nothing.  You might think they are just good in bad weather because...well I don't know why...but now that they've been caught cheating in a way to counteract wet weather, that's as good a theory as anything else.

That's the problem with cheating.  It casts a cloud over everything you've ever done.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

They've been deflating balls for years. 187 touches per fumble vs league avg of 105 since 2010. That's an outlier not possible due to good coaching. C'mon Boog, try to be objective, you typically are but have gone off the deep end here. http://www.sharpfootballanalysis.com/blog/?p=2932

Why couldn't it simply be that they are good? To say that they obviously cheated because they fumbled less is a wtc7 level jump to conclusions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Why couldn't it simply be that they are good? To say that they obviously cheated because they fumbled less is a wtc7 level jump to conclusions.

What I find most incredible about that article is that the patriots have been a revolving door at RB.  From 2007-2014, they've started, Corey Dillon, Kevin Faulk, Sammy Morris, Benjarvis Green-Ellis, Stevan Ridley, James Develin, Legarette Blount.  Despite having all of those players, they had record low numbers of fumbles.

The team that fumbled the most since 2010 (Redskins), was closer to the team that fumbled the second fewest (Baltimore), than the second best was to the Patriots.  31 teams fell between 37 and 55 plays per fumble.  The patriots were at 75.

Part of its probably coaching emphasis, part of it is that this is when they started to rely on Brady--when he changed from Trent Dilfer to Payton Manning--so they were running the ball less, and part of it is probably deflated balls. :-P

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

What I find most incredible about that article is that the patriots have been a revolving door at RB.  From 2007-2014, they've started, Corey Dillon, Kevin Faulk, Sammy Morris, Benjarvis Green-Ellis, Stevan Ridley, James Develin, Legarette Blount.  Despite having all of those players, they had record low numbers of fumbles.   Part of its probably coaching emphasis, part of it is that this is when they started to rely on Brady--when he changed from Trent Dilfer to Payton Manning--so they were running the ball less, and part of it is probably deflated balls. :-P

When something like this breaks out it is naturally expected to have people within the organization or people who have left start talking about this specific issue. The fact that no one has come out tells me that this is a non issue and not as big a conspiracy as everyone is making it sound.. Oh and in terms of fumble average what is the team with the highest fumble rate per amount of touches? They must be over inflating the ball. :)

:adams: / :tmade: / :edel: / :aimpoint: / :ecco: / :bushnell: / :gamegolf: / 

Eyad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

When something like this breaks out it is naturally expected to have people within the organization or people who have left start talking about this specific issue. The fact that no one has come out tells me that this is a non issue and not as big a conspiracy as everyone is making it sound.. Oh and in terms of fumble average what is the team with the highest fumble rate per amount of touches? They must be over inflating the ball. :)

The Patriots cheated for 7 years before mangini ratted them out.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The Patriots cheated for 7 years before mangini ratted them out.

There must be some disgruntled pats employees who would want to get into the middle of things now. What motivation do they have for keeping their silence? Do I think they deflated the balls.. Yeah, probably.. Is it a big deal? No, it is much ado about nothing. Just not this big conspiracy everyone including the media is making it sound like..

:adams: / :tmade: / :edel: / :aimpoint: / :ecco: / :bushnell: / :gamegolf: / 

Eyad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3290 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Feel free to read or not, this is more of a benchmark post for me but I wouldn't mind questions and feedback either. In the words of Arnold Palmer, "Swing your swing". So much easier said than done. Videos to come soon (to the probable horror of most of you here lol), but man: this took along time. Hogan wasn't kidding when he said the secret was in the dirt. Can't say I'm not happy about it though. So here was my situation: My first (and only) post here was back in 2019 about trying to game a new 3-wood to replace my old 2008 Taylormade Burner (which I loved but only carried 208 yards with a stupid-high spin rate).  At that time I had been golfing for about 8 years., I was hitting four 80-ball buckets per day (320 total, I'm a psycho) and playing two rounds per week. I was using a "Width Swing" (probably my 15th try at a 'better' swing) from a book and videos called "The L.A.W.S of Golf" by Jim Suttie, TJ Tomasi and Mike Adams. Since I had hardly any flexibility back then at 49 (still don't lol), I had to get my clubhead depth from the width dimension, meaning dropping back my right foot, flaring my feet, and swinging around my body. This took a ton of work, but I got down from a 15 handicap to an 8 by using it, so I was pretty ecstatic. The problem? My lower back hated it, and I mean bad. Really bad. Like pull-out-in-the-middle-of-a-Houston-Amateur-Golf-Tour-tournament bad. Soooo...while playing some of my best golf, I just figured my golf days were over, especially after the Rona hit the next year in 2020 and shut everything down. I figured I would simply be a golf fan for the rest of my life, and that my days of playing (painfully) were done Fast forward three years. I *really* missed playing golf. I started watching (hold your nose) videos of Moe Norman's swing on YouTube and then that led down the rabbit hole of watching videos of Matt Kuchar and Craig Stadler and Bryson DeChambeau and videos by Kirk Junge and Todd Graves...you get the idea. This went on for weeks...and this is how we always get sucked back in, right? Single plane was supposedly the cure for lower back pain because the extension and torque could be mitigated to a degree that might make a golf swing tolerable for someone with lower back issues. I really missed playing the game, so last fall I thought to myself: "Self, you have nothing to lose. Get your clubs out of the trunk (they'd been sitting in there for three years).  Hold your arms straight and look like an idiot at the PGA Superstore in one of the swing bays trying this single plane swing and at least you'll be the only one who has to witness it." I tried it...and it went horribly wrong. I couldn't even get the ball in the air, I was topping everything at first. Then when I tried Moe Norman's famous 'vertical drop' as he called it, I fatted the mat every time. This went on for the hour I was in there. I left there tired, frustrated and about to say 'screw it'. But when I got to my car and went to get in the seat, I noticed something: Even after about a hundred swings, my back was totally fine. I thought maybe it was because I had injured it all those years ago with a rotary swing and now it had healed. Hmmmm...maybe that was it. After a couple days at home, and more video-watching of Moe and Moe alone, I went back to the hitting bay to see if I could find some sort of workable single plane swing based on what I had watched and taken notes on. This session went much better. Pretty straight ball flight (my miss was a slight cut), and no pulls or hooks (my old misses were the dreaded two-way misses, block or pull-hook). I had kinda-sorta figured out the 'vertical drop' deal, but it was too hard to time it consistently. When I did get the timing right, the ball went dead straight. HOWEVER...I was hitting with a 7-iron the whole time and my normal 148-yard shot now only traveled 134. 14 yards is a lot to give up...but I chalked it up to my swinging slower to get the timing down. Plus, I had no idea how the longer clubs would do or if I could even hit, say, a 3-wood with this swing. After another hundred shots or so, I called it a session and went home. So far, all I hit was a 7-iron with this 'swing' of mine. I had completely forgot about my back and didn't think about it until that evening and realized it felt fine. I thought to myself: "Even if you never get your normal distance back...wouldn't it be fun to just play golf again?" Then I thought to myself: "Self, it would be fun to be back on the golf course again." BUT...I was determined not to make a fool of myself out there, so I kept going back to the hitting bay. This third time I went back, I brought in only my Taylormade Burner 7 wood, thinking the shaft length is short enough that I can make contact with the ball, but it's a fairway wood, so I'll see if this swing can handle that. I hit it great...and straight...but the distance was, alas, like the 7-iron...just not there. "You're hitting it *really* straight though", I sad to myself, as if saying that would console a Recon Marine veteran who's ethos is that manly men do manly things...and a 165 yard 7-wood for me is about the furthest thing from 'manly' there can be on a golf course. Ego... I was torn between my love of playing the game on one hand, and on the other hand going out to the course with a swing that would be mocked, ridiculed and laughed at...but would look passable and understandable if I was 75 years old (I'm 54). Decisions decisions... I went back to the drawing board at home and thought "There's got to be some sort of compromise to this swing...some kind of combination of swings...something I can build that would get my old distance back but not destroy the lower lumbar of my spine." In the past 13 years, I had tried it *all*. Conventional swing, modern swing, stack and tilt (my back still hurts when I think of that one), rotary swing (hello shanks), the peak performance golf swing (don't ever fat one while trying that swing, you might break your wrists), 3/4 hold-off swing (great for wedges, not so much a driver), hand-and-arm swing...and on and on. Soooo...I went back to thinking about the width swing I had learned in the L.A.W.S of golf book and videos I had studied, and how I could implement the width element of that swing without destroying my back. It was the only swing technique I ever tried that got me comfortable distance and consistent impact and ball flight while swinging around say 85% or thereabouts. Hmmmm... What if I could combine it with a single plane swing? I know, I know...it sounds loony tunes. But I had already plunked down the $149 for a year's worth of unlimited hitting bay time at the PGA Superstore (commitment, right?), so I figured I had nothing to lose by attempting what would appear to be  moronic and ridiculous-looking setups and stances and swings in a hitting bay all by myself. The results have been nothing less than astounding to me. Setup (after four months of this on an actual driving range and getting *really* strange looks) is as follows (I'll have pics and video soon for whoever can bear to watch it): Grip: Left hand *slightly* strong, right hand neutral (this is to keep the ball from hooking off the planet). Alignment: All irons straight off the nose (I'll explain why in a bit), fairway woods of my left cheek, driver off my left nipple. Posture: *Slightly* hunched over with rounded shoulders (this is to give me room for my arms to come under my chest in the back swing). Foot Position: Left foot flared, right foot flared and dropped back about 12 inches (this gives me room to rotate my thoracic spine and gives the club depth in the width dimension, since I don't have Bubbas Watson's flexibility). Shoulders stay square with the target line. Hands stay high and in line with the lead forearm a la Moe Norman. Slight spine tilt away from the target. Backswing is in and up at a 45 degree angle if looking from behind. I only swing back until my lead forearm is parallel to the ground. I tuck the left elbow on the downswing and let it rip. The reason I play all my irons off my nose? Wait for it... All my irons... 7 iron to Sand Wedge... are single length irons. So I'm using a rotational swing...on a single plane...with single length irons (based off my 7 iron). Never hit my irons better in my life - and hitting just as far now as I was when I started golfing 13 years ago. Also - driver and fairway woods are stupid-easy for me to hit now. My misses are mostly a high cut now, and that only happens when I slide my left hip because I get fast at the top. As long as I keep my lower body quiet until my hands drop (they don't have far to drop, either), then I get a pretty dang straight ball flight. Pull hooks and block are now a thing of the past. Anyhoo, here's the setup of my clubs. I have about a 94 mph driver swing speed. Driver: Ping G410 9 degree cranked up to 10.5 degrees, Alta CB R flex carry is 235-ish  3-wood: Ping G 410 13.5 degrees Alta CB R flex 65 grams, flat setting, stated loft, carry is around 215 5-wood: Ping G-410 17.5 degrees Alta CB R flex 65 grams, flat setting, stated loft, carry is 202 7-wood 2008 Taylormade Burner, 21 degrees, stock REAX S flex 49 grams, carry is 192 9-wood Ping G410 23.5 degrees Alta CB R flex 65 grams, flat setting, stated loft, carry is 182 6 hybrid Ping G425 31 degrees Alta CB R flex 70 grams, stated loft, flat setting, carry is 158  Irons: are all custom fit Sterling single-length irons by Wishon Golf. 7 146 yds 8 135 yds 9 125 yds PW 110 GW 98 SW 83 Putter: Custom Edel blade I had made in 2012 after golfing for a year and I can't hit the broad side of a barn with it. REALLY interested in getting fitted for a L.A.B DF 3 with a forearm grip...stroked a L.A.B. DF 2.1 at the PGA Superstore they had on the 'pre-owned' rack and it was $519 wuuuuut!!! So that's only 13 clubs...but I am looking on eBay to fill that gap where the 5 hybrid should be, would be a perfect 170 yd club right there I think. Before doing to the single length clubs, I had Ping irons 7-PW and four Vokeys in 48, 52, 56 and 60 in the bag and the single length clubs were gathering dust in the closet for the last 5 years. However, after actually playing a few rounds and seeing where the numbers were adding up, it was missed greens from 150 and in. So, I wanted to take the variable length mid and short irons out the the equation to keep my setup simpler. Gotta say, it worked like a charm.  Same setup as a 7-iron for all my scoring clubs and it keeps everything repeatable. Yes, it feels weird looking down at a wedge with 7-iron length, but I got used to it. The ball goes the same distances as my Ping irons and Vokey wedges used to but flies *way* higher and lands super soft. Also, if I want to chip or pitch with them I just choke down a little, as the swing weight difference won't matter much for those shots. I haven't actually kept score yet, as I haven't even gotten around to really working on my short game or putting at all. Right now, I'm just scoring fairways and greens hit or missed, approaches hit or missed and how many pars per round I can make. So far my best since this 'comeback' started is 8 pars, 1 birdie (almost had a hole-in-one lol), two bogies and seven 'others' (fats, thins, skulled chips across the green and tears may have been involved). I hit 3 of the Par 4 greens in regulation and hit 10 of 14 fairways. The ones I missed were not off the fairway by much and I finished the round with the same Pro V1X I started with - albeit a little scuffed up. Anyway, that's the story and after years of struggle I finally found something that works *for me*. I'll try to get some pics of setup and possibly video if anyone's interested and has a strong stomach haha. I'm gonna start reading the Dave Pelz short game and putting bibles this week, I'm sure that will be an adventure haha! Thanks for the space to write this.
    • Day 125 - Played 18. Ball striking is still off. Way off. 
    • Day 28: Wind really aggravated my allergies today, so attempted some full swing work outdoors but was kind of miserable. Moved indoors for some putting and mirror work. 
    • Also, the drop was legit: PGA Tour Fargo Championship 2024: Xander Schauffele controversial drop video, ruling, leaderboard, Jason Day, highlights ‘Most ridiculous thing I’ve seen’: Golf fans fume at US star‘s unbelievably lucky break The rules don't exist only to punish golfers.
    • Day 304: did a stack session. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...