Jump to content
IGNORED

Does the 80% swing exist?


Note: This thread is 3818 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I recently read a teaching pro (not on this forum) say that the 80% swing being ideal was a myth.  He said you'll do better swinging all out.  Is he right?


I think that's probably right.  I've tried swinging easy, it doesn't do squat except leave you a long way from the pin.  Learn the right technique and swing 99% imo.


My brother swears by 83%. He might be overestimating his distances by about 17% and he's actually swinging full but I can't tell either way. The whole concept of percents as they apply to the swing is pretty subjective though.

In My Bag:

Adams Super LS 9.5˚ driver, Aldila Phenom NL 65TX
Adams Super LS 15˚ fairway, Kusala black 72x
Adams Super LS 18˚ fairway, Aldila Rip'd NV 75TX
Adams Idea pro VST hybrid, 21˚, RIP Alpha 105x
Adams DHY 24˚, RIP Alpha 89x
5-PW Maltby TE irons, KBS C taper X, soft stepped once 130g
Mizuno T4, 54.9 KBS Wedge X
Mizuno R12 60.5, black nickel, KBS Wedge X
Odyssey Metal X #1 putter 
Bridgestone E5, Adidas samba bag, True Linkswear Stealth
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
  Gary L said:

I recently read a teaching pro (not on this forum) say that the 80% swing being ideal was a myth.  He said you'll do better swinging all out.  Is he right?

Depends on your control I guess.  If you can swing all out while keeping form, they maybe it will work.  Most of us will lose form if we try to swing as hard as possible. That being said, I have occasionally swung with anger and absolutely crushed it.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

One man's 80% is another man's 100% is another man's 75% and so on. I think a better way to look at is to swing within yourself. Figure out what the biggest swing you can make while still getting consistently good results and call that your full swing. I basically stop my swing at what feels like A3 (lead arm parallel to ground) but on video I can see that I go past that to a full A4, it just feels like I stop earlier. That's my full swing. I can, on occasion get away with a bigger swing but the wheels eventually fall off. If you were to put me inside Rory's body when he swings it would probably feel like 250% to me but clearly it's not to him. FWIW, I get "full" distance with what feels like a shorter swing. In fact, some of my biggest bombs have come from swings where I really made a conscious effort to keep the backswing from getting too long.
  • Upvote 1

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm all about the 80% swing .... when I swing from the heels, rarely does anything good happen.     I play a conservative, control based game though, so YMMV

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

One man's 80% is another man's 100% is another man's 75% and so on. I think a better way to look at is to swing within yourself. Figure out what the biggest swing you can make while still getting consistently good results and call that your full swing. I basically stop my swing at what feels like A3 (lead arm parallel to ground) but on video I can see that I go past that to a full A4, it just feels like I stop earlier. That's my full swing. I can, on occasion get away with a bigger swing but the wheels eventually fall off. If you were to put me inside Rory's body when he swings it would probably feel like 250% to me but clearly it's not to him.

FWIW, I get "full" distance with what feels like a shorter swing. In fact, some of my biggest bombs have come from swings where I really made a conscious effort to keep the backswing from getting too long.


Definitely agree with EJ. One size does not fit all in golf instruction. When someone is going way past parallel AND it is causing problems, then telling them to swing 80% it probably a good thing.

- Shane

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I have to agree that the percentages are subjective. I know I swing at what feels like 70-80% on my good days, but it depends on where your 100% is. For me, 100% is as hard as you can possibly swing, whereas others place 100% as the hardest you can swing while still in control. This instructor is likely in the latter group.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  Pretzel said:

I have to agree that the percentages are subjective. I know I swing at what feels like 70-80% on my good days, but it depends on where your 100% is. For me, 100% is as hard as you can possibly swing, whereas others place 100% as the hardest you can swing while still in control. This instructor is likely in the latter group.

If 100% is as hard as you can swing, than I probably always swing around 80%. At this point, anything over 80%...the control and the ability to connect with the sweet spot goes way down.

Maybe some day I'll be comfortable swinging max speed, but I see that being years down the road.

Joel Holden

https://twitter.com/JHolden138


For me 100% is as hard as I can swing with out loosing balance. From there I tone it down to something that is more repeatable. I am sure my 100% might be like 95%, 105%, 102%, 98%. I rather not live with the ones above 100% because then I will be all over the place with my balance.

I know some might say, "Well you can't go over 100%". The way I look at it, there is over 100% for me. I like to error on the conservative side for this one.

I guess if I wanted to get technical about it. I could go get on trackman or flightscope and make swings till I can hit shots that are 80% distance.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Control, balance, and timing in the golf swing, are three keys to a decent, repeatable swing. If the golfer can swing at 100%, and still maintain those three keys, they will shoot better scores than those who can't. I suspect the 80% swing thought is there for those golfers who can't maintain those three keys when they swing at 100%.

I know if I swing as fast as I physically can, I lose accuracy, and/or usable distance most of the time. Of course there are situations where I might have to swing faster than normal. When those situations come about, I pretty much try to make the best of a poor situation.

  • Upvote 1

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  Pretzel said:
I have to agree that the percentages are subjective. I know I swing at what feels like 70-80% on my good days, but it depends on where your 100% is. For me, 100% is as hard as you can possibly swing, whereas others place 100% as the hardest you can swing while still in control. This instructor is likely in the latter group.

What is the point of swinging at any power level if you can't control it?

What I realized is trying to mitigate bad form by swinging less hard is completely pointless.  You're still 3 miles from the pin and still probably going to record a bogey or worse.  Figure out what you're doing wrong that is making the ball go places you don't want it to go-- and I'll bet money it's not the strength of your swing. B-)


I think the phrase could be considered a metaphor for swing within yourself/put less effort than what will cause you to get knocked off your feet. No need to get anymore technical/literal than that. Not productive for most high/mid handicappers.

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Most mishits, thinned, toe or heeled shots are often results of a uncontrolled swing and often stems from a way too aggressive swing.

Most golfers recognize when they are too fast or quick, which is usually the result of not completing the backswing or a too aggressive takeaway.

As mentioned above @Patch "Control, balance, and timing in the golf swing, are three keys to a decent, repeatable swing."

@ 80% or less th an a full swing, more often leads to better results.

Often a shot will require a more aggressive manner for certain results.

Most better players will swing the driver and woods 100% and swing scoring irons less than 90%.

High handicappers would benefit by controlling their approach shots with alternative thoughts of always taking a full 100% swing.

Club Rat

Johnny Rocket - Let's Rock and Roll and play some golf !!!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I think it does exist but I think I definitely misunderstood the idea and possibly many others do as well.  I always try to swing as *fast* as I can without losing my balance or form (what form I have, anyway).  But I see my "power" coming from the amount of turn in my backswing . .and I usually only turn about 80-90% of what I *could* turn if I really wanted to.


...FWIW, I get "full" distance with what feels like a shorter swing. In fact, some of my biggest bombs have come from swings where I really made a conscious effort to keep the backswing from getting too long.

I'm exactly the same. Been trying the last few weeks do exactly this as I was/do get way too long far too often. I get the same effect re. distance as well - (re-)gained about 5-10 yards on irons the last few weeks and hit some bombed drives. For me, at least, a longer backswing certainly doesn't make for maximal distance. Contact's better, accuracy too, with a slightly shorter backswing.

Home Course: Wollaton Park GC, Nottingham, U.K.

Ping G400, 9°, Alta CB 55S | Ping G400, 14°, Alta CB 65S | Adams Pro Dhy 18°, 21°, 24°, KBS Hybrid S | Ping S55 5-PW, TT DGS300 | Vokey 252-08, DGS200 | Vokey 256-10 (bent to 58°), DGS200 | Ping Sigma G Anser, 34" | Vice Pro Plus

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  Pretzel said:

I have to agree that the percentages are subjective. I know I swing at what feels like 70-80% on my good days, but it depends on where your 100% is. For me, 100% is as hard as you can possibly swing, whereas others place 100% as the hardest you can swing while still in control. This instructor is likely in the latter group.


The instructor was a former long-drive champion, so that kind of puts his belief in context.  To him, 80% meant "too easy."


I think it does exist but I think I definitely misunderstood the idea and possibly many others do as well.  I always try to swing as *fast* as I can without losing my balance or form (what form I have, anyway).  But I see my "power" coming from the amount of turn in my backswing . .and I usually only turn about 80-90% of what I *could* turn if I really wanted to.

And arm extension imo.  I was underestimating that, when I do a better job of keeping my arms extended and get a nice wide, comfortable turn that's when I seem to get the really nice drives.


Note: This thread is 3818 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure who said it first but I've seen it a lot. There's this "think box" vs "play box" theory. I've also seen it with a planning vs doing line on the ground. The idea is basically you stand away from the ball (a couple feet) and do your "think box". This is where you do your planning, your swing cues, your practice swings (if you believe in practice swings.) All of that is done in the "Think Box". Then you step into your "play box" address the ball and hit it. Sometimes it's done with a imaginary line on the ground. You do all of the think box stuff behind the line. Then once you cross the line you step up and hit it.  Here's Annika Sorenstam demonstrating the "Think box" and "Play box": So, Annika's time over the ball is really short. Because she did all of that other stuff not over the ball, but in her "Think box".  There are lots of variations on this theme. But I think you get the idea. 
    • I speak for myself. If I inventory my swing thoughts, swing tempo, optimum muscle tension and rehearse a swing before I take my address, then I pull the trigger reasonably quickly with usually acceptable results. Like a proper program download before deploying it. If I don't bother to by forgetting or just not caring, I am inclined to look for my cues while hovering over the ball after taking the address, while tension builds up and then I fire with a half ass program that is still buffering. I guess that's no better than rolling a dice. In other words, a good pre-shot routine does wonders. I am not advising folks to take 13 practice swings while the flowers wilt waiting for something to happen, but one or maybe two are reasonable and good for you. I am certain hitting half ass shitty shots and making double bogey takes longer than making a par.  My desire this year is to just that as I have not developed a habit taking a practice swing and as a result have tendency to freeze over the ball after address, that is counter productive for both time and result. I think that is what @saevel25 is talking about in the OP.      
    • Wordle 1,339 2/6 ⬜🟨🟩🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • I think there's a difference between taking time over the ball and taking time to play a shot, at least IMO. One thing I've noticed in a few guys I play with who take a long time over the ball to pull the trigger, is that their backswing is really fast and I think it makes it harder to have a smooth rhythmic down swing. It's almost like they take so long to swing that when they do they speed to catch up. Doesn't lead to good golf IMO.
    • Wordle 1,339 3/6 🟨🟨🟨⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...