Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

2014 Ryder Cup Discussion Thread


Note: This thread is 4073 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
'Working from Home' on Friday.

Haha, same here!

~Jorrit

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Not sure how much I'll see. Matches start around midnight here. Will be tough to avoid results if I chose to watch later considering I am on the net all day at work. It's definitely taken the excitement level down for me.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm not conceding, just stating an observation that I and others that follow golf have made, typically Europeans play in tougher weather conditions than the Americans do so the weather forecast favors the Europeans.  Weather factors into home field advantage, but they still have to play the rounds to decide the winner.

I don't think so. Not when most of the Europeans play a lot in the U.S. anyway. Also Americans have experience playing in the British Open, etc.


Posted

So when will we know the winner on Sunday morning? I am in central standard time zone, so will the Cup be finished around 11 am?


Posted
I don't think so. Not when most of the Europeans play a lot in the U.S. anyway. Also Americans have experience playing in the British Open, etc.

That's right now. They played first like 20 years or so solely in one continent. I really believe it might make a difference..

~Jorrit

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Not sure the weather will be a factor, the forecasts i've seen are high 50's/low 60's, no rain and wind in the mid teens. Of course its Scotland in late September, anything could happen!

Posted

Here's some info on the course if, like me, you are unfamiliar with this place and are also curious: http://www.gleneagles.com/golf/golf-courses/pga-centenary-course/virtual-course-guide

(Was also going to add a pic of the scorecard, but my computer is being a butt)

OK, its cooperating now ...

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Today's practice groups (starting on the 9th hole):

10.30am: McIlroy, Kaymer, Dubuisson, MCDowell
10.45am: Poulter, Rose, Garcia, Stenson
11am: Bjorn, Westwood, Gallacher, Donaldson

~Jorrit

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Taking a queue from Crenshaw in 99, I've got a feeeling here for the Americans. And I don't think it will be that close. I think we win by a few points.

On paper, we're the better team, but the RC isn't played on paper, it's about the intangibles which the Euros have managed to bring for 30 years and we haven't. This year is different. The Americans are playing with a chip on their shoulder as a unified team with less to lose (as the underdogs) and everything to gain.

I also think Tiger's absence helps this team. It comes down to personal responsibility. When Tiger is on a team, he's obviously viewed as the alpha dog and that diffuses the responsibility somewhat from the other players, consciously or subconsciously. Without a clear leader, each player has to step up and share a relatively equal level of responsibility for the team....last time this happened was 2008, not coincidentally the one RC we've one this century. Furthermore, when Tiger goes out and doesn't put points on the board it demoralizes the US squad and emboldens and galvanizes the Euros (think Tiger and Phil pairing in 04). These are factors outside of Tiger's control and if he were healthy I'd want him on the team regardless, but I think there's a chance here for the rest of the team to step up here and lay the hammer down in his absence.


Posted

Tiger's absence might help the team, I can follow you with that, but that doesn't make the team all of a sudden a better team then Europe. It might make them a better team compared to 2010 or 2012 for example, but doesn't reflect to the Euro 2014 team ofcourse. I have to say I have high expectations from Europe, with both the better players (in my opinion) and the advantage of playing at home. The captain's picks might become a key factor from both sides (Gallacher with no experience in RC, Westwood and Poulter not having their best season).

~Jorrit

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Left stirring it up a bit.

http://www.golfchannel.com/news/golf-central-blog/mickelson-needles-rory-mcdowell-over-legal-battle/?cid=facebook-gc-a-phil-needles-at-rory-graeme-legal-battle-092414

Most of these guys are good friends or at least very friendly competitors.  That is why the hype and Us vs. Them is more for show than a real rivalry.  They want to win no doubt, but it will never start a border war.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Some European bookmakers offering prices on an American win now of between 6/1 to 8/1 (admittedly for limited stakes and as part of a promotion)

Wow. Really? I got the USA to win Sunday night at 7/4 odds (+175).


  • Moderator
Posted

Left stirring it up a bit.

http://www.golfchannel.com/news/golf-central-blog/mickelson-needles-rory-mcdowell-over-legal-battle/?cid=facebook-gc-a-phil-needles-at-rory-graeme-legal-battle-092414

Phunny Phil

Phil: “Well, not only are we able to play together, we also don't litigate against each other"

As we await the Fleet Street feasting, some American takes on Phil Mickelson livening up the Ryder Cu p proceedings Wednesday with a jab at the Rory McIlroy lawsuit that has dragged old buddy Graeme McDowell into the mix.

Bob Harig with the quote and context:

"Well, not only are we able to play together, we also don't litigate against each other, and that's a real plus, I feel, heading into this week," Mickelson quipped.

Mickelson said it with a smile and was clearly joking, but the comment hits home.

Ryan Herrington of GolfDigest.com with this :

Mickelson's quip drew laughter and a few wry smiles from the press in attendance. Moderator Michael Gibbons even offered a playful "ouch" in response.

"I might get roasted but I couldn't resist," Mickelson told GolfDigest.com. "I can handle it. We all need to laugh at ourselves. I think it's funny."

Jason Sobel at GolfChannel.com :

What’s the agenda here? Maybe he wanted to pump some life into festivities that were clearly lacking. Maybe he wanted to take the heat off his teammates who have been continuously – and tiresomely – answering questions about being overmatched this week.

Or maybe this was a public dig at McIlroy, who hasn’t held back from opining about Mickelson lately.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Jason Sobel at GolfChannel.com:

What’s the agenda here? Maybe he wanted to pump some life into festivities that were clearly lacking. Maybe he wanted to take the heat off his teammates who have been continuously – and tiresomely – answering questions about being overmatched this week.

Or maybe this was a public dig at McIlroy, who hasn’t held back from opining about Mickelson lately.

Why does everyone need an agenda these days.  Phil was making a joke and trying to get some laughs, that was his agenda. :doh:

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Why does everyone need an agenda these days.  Phil was making a joke and trying to get some laughs, that was his agenda.

Was about to say the exact same thing.

Never been a Sobel fan at all.


Note: This thread is 4073 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.