Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast!
IGNORED

Which Would Be More Impressive: An Amateur Winning the Open, or a Grand Slam?

jamo

By jamo
in Tour Talk

 Share
Note: This thread is 3788 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Which would be more impressive?

    • An Amateur Winning the British Open or U.S. Open
      12
    • A Grand Slam
      42

Recommended Posts

jamo Incredible Member

jamo

Posted
Posted
This is coming out of the Open Championsip, as amateur Paul Dunne co-leads through 54 holes and Jordan Spieth sits one back. So which would be more impressive: an amateur winning a major, or someone completing a calendar year grand slam?

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1

Fourputt Incredible Member

Fourputt

Posted
Posted

I'm on the amateur.  A player competing against the 100 or so best players in the world and coming out on top?  Last time was Bobby Jones, and he didn't have close to the level of competition that is out there this week.  Enough said. :doh:

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1

  • Moderator
nevets88 Incredible Member

nevets88

Posted
  • Moderator
Posted

This is fun to ponder.. I was thinking about this too. The only amateur to win was Ouimet? I may be wrong on that, but it was a bloody long time ago. The only grand slam, Bobby Jones, was probably in the bloody long time ago timeframe as well. So if you base it on history (assuming my fuzzy history is correct), it's a wash, but times have changed. Fields are deeper, but the development process is intensely competitive.

I would say the Grand Slam. Because one has to win four times over a period of 5 months. The anticipation and pressure mounts after each major is won. You have to string together 16 good rounds. And each course has different characteristics.

As an amateur, you're coming out of nowhere, so no one is expecting anything out of you, way less pressure and you only have to do it once. And the amateur in this case is older than the GS prospect, albeit one year-ish, so it's not like the amateur is lacking life experience (compared to GS candidate) and not fully physically developed. Plus Dunne has a bit of a home field advantage, I'd give him a better chance in the OC than the USO. McIlroy and Woods won their first major at a very young age - 21/22. They weren't that far off from their amateur days. But I'm looking at it a bit much w/respect to the example today. If Guan Tian Lang ( 关天朗) won the Masters, I would say there's less of an impressive gap as he was 14 (or close) and had such a distance and experience disadvantage.

Some club pro winning the PGA championship would be more impressive than winning the GS I would think.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1

Natural Patrick Great Member

Natural Patrick

Posted
Posted

The Grand Slam for sure. You have to beat the best players in the world 4 times in the same year. On the world's biggest stages. Instead of doing it one time over a life time. Enough said :beer:


tristanhilton85 Great Member

tristanhilton85

Posted
Posted

I got to go with the grand slam. Winning four times in one year is very impressive and to do it in the four majors is just unreal. An amateur winning would be impressive as well, but it would just be that guy catching lightning in a bottle for that one week.

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
Titleist TSR2 Driver (Fujikura Pro 2.0 TS; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrid (MMT 80; 22°) · Edel SMS Irons (SteelFiber i95; 5-GW) · Edel SMS Pro Wedges (SteelFiber i110; 56°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · Maxfli Tour Ball · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · SuperStroke Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Vessel Player V Pro 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

14ledo81 Super Member

14ledo81

Posted
Posted
Grand slam. To much to overcome with 4 wins against the best in the world.

-Matt-

"does it still count as a hit fairway if it is the next one over"

DRIVER-Callaway FTiz__3 WOOD-Nike SQ Dymo 15__HYBRIDS-3,4,5 Adams__IRONS-6-PW Adams__WEDGES-50,55,60 Wilson Harmonized__PUTTER-Odyssey Dual Force Rossie II

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1

ghalfaire Great Member

ghalfaire

Posted
Posted

Either one would certainly be impressive but I have to believe that a Grand Slam is the more difficult to accomplish since no one has ever held all four titles in the same calendar year.

Bobby Jones did have four major titles in a single year but they were the US Open, The US Amateur, The British open, and the British Amateur.  Amazing but not sure it is considered a "grand slam".

Butch


Mr. Desmond Super Member

Mr. Desmond

Posted
Posted

Grand Slam.

As to great amateurs, we can "blame" Tiger for opening up the game to athleticism. I think some parents are raising their kids to be professional golfers ... they have the financial resources for every type of coach and technology needed, and some kids have great talent and experience. So it's not too surprising that we have an outstanding number of amateurs who are ready for professional golf.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1

  • Moderator
mvmac Incredible Member

mvmac

Posted
  • Moderator
Posted

I voted Grand Slam. An amateur winning would be impressive but a player beating the best golfers in the world, four times in a row, on different courses is just crazy good.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook! 
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My Facebook, Twitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1
1
1

  • Moderator
nevets88 Incredible Member

nevets88

Posted
  • Moderator
Posted
Grand Slam. As to great amateurs, we can "blame" Tiger for opening up the game to athleticism. I think some parents are raising their kids to be professional golfers ... they have the financial resources for every type of coach and technology needed, and some kids have great talent and experience. So it's not too surprising that we have an outstanding number of amateurs who are ready for professional golf.

I think tennis was a harbinger of this. There was more money in tennis earlier and top ranked women got younger and younger and tennis academies were a thing for kids before your Leadbetters were.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1

Mr. Desmond Super Member

Mr. Desmond

Posted
Posted

I think tennis was a harbinger of this. There was more money in tennis earlier and top ranked women got younger and younger and tennis academies were a thing for kids before your Leadbetters were.


Agree.

I remember the 70s and 80's tennis camps... just could not return a high speed serve.

And there is so much more than Ledbetter and Haney now ... thank goodness for the game. Spieth was nurtured under a relatively unknown coach, and then there are the Randy Smiths of the world... lots of fine under-the-radar coaches.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1

  • Moderator
billchao Incredible Member

billchao

Posted
  • Moderator
Posted

Grand Slam, as others have mentioned, because a guy has to win four majors to do it. It's much easier for someone to win a single major, even as an amateur, than for a guy to win four majors in one calendar year.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1
1
1

saevel25 Incredible Member

saevel25

Posted
Posted

I voted winning the grand slam. Tiger's the only one who's ever held all 4 at a time, but still not in a calendar golfing season.

You have three majors that allow amateur's to play. I think the odds are much more in favor of an amatuer winning than a professional winning all four in a season.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: :titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

Gunther Great Member

Gunther

Posted
Posted
Grand Slam, no-brainer. 4 vs. 1. Hell, 2 in a row is more impressive than an amateur winning.

In my Bag: Driver: Titelist 913 D3 9.5 deg. 3W: TaylorMade RBZ 14.5 3H: TaylorMade RBZ 18.5 4I - SW: TaylorMade R7 TP LW: Titelist Vokey 60 Putter: Odyssey 2-Ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1

  • Moderator
nevets88 Incredible Member

nevets88

Posted
  • Moderator
Posted
Interesting WSJ piece on ams. It mentions last am who won a major. http://www.wsj.com/articles/this-professional-golf-major-is-looking-amateurish-1437345493

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1

ChrisP Great Member

ChrisP

Posted
Posted
I think winning just 3 straight legs of a grand slam is more impressive than an amateur winning. Tiger did it in 2000 but didn't think we'd ever see that happen again in our lifetime, especially with the level of competition today.

  • Moderator
nevets88 Incredible Member

nevets88

Posted
  • Moderator
Posted
Anyone know what's the largest prize money amount an amateur would have earned if not for his amateur status?

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades
1
1

Note: This thread is 3788 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up

  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).

  • Posts

    • DeadMan
      "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge

      By DeadMan · Posted

      Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • xrayvizhen
      Differential vs Course Handicap

      By xrayvizhen · Posted

      I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • 5amZ
      "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge

      By 5amZ · Posted

      Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • WillieT
      "5 Minutes Daily" Practice Challenge

      By WillieT · Posted

      Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • mdl
      Differential vs Course Handicap

      By mdl · Posted

      Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

  I accept