Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3546 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hope this is in the right place, but here it goes. I read an article supposedly from a pga professional where he spoke about distance from the tee, he had what to me, was some rather radical ideas. He states that slower swingers really benefit from more loft off the tee more than your faster swingers. He said its so dramatic, that many players should not hit driver off the tee but a three wood or hybrid from the tee because the slower swinger will actually hit those clubs slightly further than a driver. I have often been told Im a slower swinger and while Ive gotten lucky and hit a few 260 yard drives ive dropped another ball plenty of times just to see what happened and hit my three wood a few yards further and usually straighter. Whats your take? Is this guy crazy? Can I really possibly hit my three wood further on AVERAGE or is this just total nonsense and my very limited experience a fluke?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
7 minutes ago, stealthhwk said:

He said its so dramatic, that many players should not hit driver off the tee but a three wood or hybrid from the tee because the slower swinger will actually hit those clubs slightly further than a driver. 

Slower swing speeds can't produce the amount of backspin required to keep the ball in the air long enough. That is why more and more people are getting fitted for higher lofted drivers today with the lower spin designs. 

It use to be PGA tour players required 4-7 degree drivers. Now they are hitting 9-11 degree drivers. 

Amateurs should really be looking at 12-14 degree drivers if you swing slower. 

The issue with using the 3-wood is that the sweet spot is much lower. So your more likely to lose ball speed on average from mis-hits. 

I say get fitted for a driver before ditching it for a 3-wood. 

  • Upvote 2

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 minute ago, saevel25 said:

Slower swing speeds can't produce the amount of backspin required to keep the ball in the air long enough. That is why more and more people are getting fitted for higher lofted drivers today with the lower spin designs. 

It use to be PGA tour players required 4-7 degree drivers. Now they are hitting 9-11 degree drivers. 

Amateurs should really be looking at 12-14 degree drivers if you swing slower. 

The issue with using the 3-wood is that the sweet spot is much lower. So your more likely to lose ball speed on average from mis-hits. 

I say get fitted for a driver before ditching it for a 3-wood. 

So glad to hear u say that. Ive struggled with low ball flight esp with driver. Bought a callaway xr and set it to 12.5 degrees loft. Seems to be helping but only have two rounds under my belt so far so I still havnt figured out my average distances with it just yet. Thanks for the reply

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
13 minutes ago, stealthhwk said:

Hope this is in the right place, but here it goes. I read an article supposedly from a pga professional where he spoke about distance from the tee, he had what to me, was some rather radical ideas. He states that slower swingers really benefit from more loft off the tee more than your faster swingers. He said its so dramatic, that many players should not hit driver off the tee but a three wood or hybrid from the tee because the slower swinger will actually hit those clubs slightly further than a driver. I have often been told Im a slower swinger and while Ive gotten lucky and hit a few 260 yard drives ive dropped another ball plenty of times just to see what happened and hit my three wood a few yards further and usually straighter. Whats your take? Is this guy crazy? Can I really possibly hit my three wood further on AVERAGE or is this just total nonsense and my very limited experience a fluke?

Off topic here but, dude ... you gotta work on those thread titles.  The one earlier today didn't mean anything either until it got changed by a mod.

Make people interested and want to come read what you have to say. :beer:

To answer your question though ... its "for real."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 minutes ago, Golfingdad said:

Off topic here but, dude ... you gotta work on those thread titles.  The one earlier today didn't mean anything either until it got changed by a mod.

Make people interested and want to come read what you have to say. :beer:

To answer your question though ... its "for real."

Or is it "bs"??

;)

Tony  


:titleist:    |   :tmade:   |     :cleveland: 


Posted
Just now, pumaAttack said:

Or is it "bs"??

;)

Good point.  It very well could be.  What was the question again?:-P

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

 I say"for real". Imho most amateurs would be better off using a 2 wood.

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Both yes and no for me. Yes to them needing more loft (on the driver in particular - pretty much everyone does!), but if you hit both right, there's no way the hybrid or 3 wood are going further than the driver. The other suggestion I'd add would be to shorten the shaft on the driver to give you a bit more control. 

  • Upvote 1

Currently focusing on: Key 4 - shorter backswing.

What's in the bag: Callaway X2 Hot Driver, Titleist 915F 3 wood, X2 Hot 3 Hybrid, 3, 5-AW Apex Pro irons, 54*, 58* Cleveland RTX, Odyssey Versa 1 Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
3 hours ago, Golfingdad said:

Good point.  It very well could be.  What was the question again?:-P

Umm it's explicitly stated right in the title...:whistle:

  • Upvote 1

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Hit a driver no more than 45 inches, grip down on it, maybe put a 20g counterweight in it for better dispersion, and loft up to 12.5-13.5 of loft, get a 42g shaft, get a head that is lite weight and not low spin. Hit driver.

Edited by Mr. Desmond

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 hours ago, Golfingdad said:

Off topic here but, dude ... you gotta work on those thread titles.  The one earlier today didn't mean anything either until it got changed by a mod.

Make people interested and want to come read what you have to say. :beer:

To answer your question though ... its "for real."

LOL!!! I was gonna go with free beer, but didnt want to carsh the server. Im sorry my titles suck so badly. Too many years at my current job may be killing off brain cells. Any suggestions for a better title or if a moderator could hook it up, it wouldnt bother me any. Forgive the noob. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 hours ago, stealthhwk said:

Hope this is in the right place, but here it goes. I read an article supposedly from a pga professional where he spoke about distance from the tee, he had what to me, was some rather radical ideas. He states that slower swingers really benefit from more loft off the tee more than your faster swingers. He said its so dramatic, that many players should not hit driver off the tee but a three wood or hybrid from the tee because the slower swinger will actually hit those clubs slightly further than a driver. I have often been told Im a slower swinger and while Ive gotten lucky and hit a few 260 yard drives ive dropped another ball plenty of times just to see what happened and hit my three wood a few yards further and usually straighter. Whats your take? Is this guy crazy? Can I really possibly hit my three wood further on AVERAGE or is this just total nonsense and my very limited experience a fluke?

A properly fit driver is the best way to go. The head on a driver is larger and has a larger sweet spot than the 3W. If you hit 3W longer than your driver, then using 3W instead of driver is only a temporary fix.

Also, slow swing is also a relative term. My daughter swings a driver 85 mph and considers herself a slow swinger and my son swings 110 mph and considers himself a slow swinger. It's all relative to who you are playing with.

There is not enough information in "I hit 260 sometimes on a lucky hit". So, there's not much we can state one way or another to answer your question.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Lihu said:

A properly fit driver is the best way to go. The head on a driver is larger and has a larger sweet spot than the 3W. If you hit 3W longer than your driver, then using 3W instead of driver is only a temporary fix.

Also, slow swing is also a relative term. My daughter swings a driver 85 mph and considers herself a slow swinger and my son swings 110 mph and considers himself a slow swinger. It's all relative to who you are playing with.

There is not enough information in "I hit 260 sometimes on a lucky hit". So, there's not much we can state one way or another to answer your question.

I just feel more confident in the hang time of my three wood and driver. The ball just seems to stay in the air longer. I just dont have numbers to back it up. Even with the higher loft driver it seems like the ball doesnt stay airborne for long. And while I understand it has a bigger sweet spot, Im just not as consistant with my three wood. Maybe thats because I know exactly where the sweet spot is. These 460cc drivers may be more forgiving but I just feel like I never hit it in the sweet spot cus I cant find it. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
43 minutes ago, stealthhwk said:

I just feel more confident in the hang time of my three wood and driver. The ball just seems to stay in the air longer. I just dont have numbers to back it up. Even with the higher loft driver it seems like the ball doesnt stay airborne for long. And while I understand it has a bigger sweet spot, Im just not as consistant with my three wood. Maybe thats because I know exactly where the sweet spot is. These 460cc drivers may be more forgiving but I just feel like I never hit it in the sweet spot cus I cant find it. 

Possibly a contact issue? If you don't make good (also a relative term) contact on either club the higher loft will work better, but I'm confident that this is only a temporary condition until your swing gets better.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
27 minutes ago, stealthhwk said:

I just feel more confident in the hang time of my three wood and driver. The ball just seems to stay in the air longer. I just dont have numbers to back it up. Even with the higher loft driver it seems like the ball doesnt stay airborne for long. And while I understand it has a bigger sweet spot, Im just not as consistant with my three wood. Maybe thats because I know exactly where the sweet spot is. These 460cc drivers may be more forgiving but I just feel like I never hit it in the sweet spot cus I cant find it. 

Hit whatever club you feel is best for you at the moment, of course.

Just keep working on your swing, and the driver will reveal its worthiness. At least I hope so. I've hit some nice shots with a 3w in my time playing, but nothing compares to the ball flight of a big, gnarly drive.

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, stealthhwk said:

I just feel more confident in the hang time of my three wood and driver. The ball just seems to stay in the air longer. I just dont have numbers to back it up. Even with the higher loft driver it seems like the ball doesnt stay airborne for long. And while I understand it has a bigger sweet spot, Im just not as consistant with my three wood. Maybe thats because I know exactly where the sweet spot is. These 460cc drivers may be more forgiving but I just feel like I never hit it in the sweet spot cus I cant find it. 

Based on your handicap (I mean no offense by this, it's just a tendency and I do exactly the same), I bet you're still hitting down on the driver rather than up and de-lofting it further. Do you have a video of your swing or a My Swing thread? The driver should be more forgiving than the three wood, but because you swing it faster, it will impart more sidespin if you cut across it, which may be the issue. 

Currently focusing on: Key 4 - shorter backswing.

What's in the bag: Callaway X2 Hot Driver, Titleist 915F 3 wood, X2 Hot 3 Hybrid, 3, 5-AW Apex Pro irons, 54*, 58* Cleveland RTX, Odyssey Versa 1 Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, b101 said:

Both yes and no for me. Yes to them needing more loft (on the driver in particular - pretty much everyone does!), but if you hit both right, there's no way the hybrid or 3 wood are going further than the driver. The other suggestion I'd add would be to shorten the shaft on the driver to give you a bit more control. 

BAZINGA!!! I recently sold a buddy an old driver that I had retired. He was one of those guys who claimed he "could not" hit a driver, only 3 wood. And he hit those very nicely. I'm thinking, "What the Hell! It's the same swing!" Turns out it was a "mental" thing. He just didn't like the "cantaloupe on a broomstick" look of so many of the modern drivers.

So I looked around in my old club stash, and came up with a Cleveland Launcher Comp that I had retired years ago. It's a 460cc head, but it doesn't look all that large because the face is pretty deep. Plus, when I re-gripped it I cut an inch off the shaft. Also, what I discovered when I took the grip off, that it was a Fujikura shaft! Don't know why they didn't advertise that fact, other than maybe Fujikura didn't quite have the reputation it does now when Cleveland contracted them to make shafts for these drivers.

Anyway, shortening a shaft will stiffen it. It was an R according to Fujikura. Also it will lighten the swingweight. So I added a little lead tape to the head to bring the swingweight back to where it was. I didn't figure a little stiffer shaft would bother my buddy since he generates more clubhead speed than I do.

I handed it to him before one of our first rounds this year and told him to try it out. Next thing I know he's flat killing it right down the pipe! He's as happy as pig in slop!

This may have been a happy accident, but it points out the fact that you need to find a driver that works for you.

Edited by Buckeyebowman
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
58 minutes ago, Buckeyebowman said:

So I looked around in my old club stash, and came up with a Cleveland Launcher Comp that I had retired years ago. It's a 460cc head, but it doesn't look all that large because the face is pretty deep. Plus, when I re-gripped it I cut an inch off the shaft.

Perfect! The thought of going back to the stock, whippy 46" shaft in my X2 Hot driver scares the bejeebies out of me...

Currently focusing on: Key 4 - shorter backswing.

What's in the bag: Callaway X2 Hot Driver, Titleist 915F 3 wood, X2 Hot 3 Hybrid, 3, 5-AW Apex Pro irons, 54*, 58* Cleveland RTX, Odyssey Versa 1 Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3546 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.