Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3463 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, iacas said:

Congratulations Dustin Johnson. With the monkey off your back, I suspect you'll have many more good chances to earn more majors.

He hit a bunch of clutch shots in both Opens. The drive and approach on 18 last year were even better IMO.

I don't think the rule was misapplied. I do think the 'gut reactions' and perhaps uneven application do indicate an issue with the rule itself. I'll join that discussion

I agree this should be the lasting image for the tournament rather than DJ soling his putter:

m_01_16USODSC34831.jpg

Edited by natureboy

Kevin


Posted
1 hour ago, natureboy said:

He hit a bunch of clutch shots in both Opens. The drive and approach on 18 last year were even better IMO.

I don't think the rule was misapplied. I do think the 'gut reactions' and perhaps uneven application do indicate an issue with the rule itself. I'll join that discussion

I agree this should be the lasting image for the tournament rather than DJ soling his putter:

m_01_16USODSC34831.jpg

That is an Awesome picture for sure!


Posted
22 hours ago, 70sSanO said:

While interesting I would tend to disagree with this experiment based on how much air a hair dryer puts out.

But I am still wrestling with the fact that we live on a planet that is rotating at 800 mph or so (Pittsburg latitude) and speeding along at 65,000 mph.  I would think that the sheer forces in nature could have some effect on a millimeter of movement.

I wonder what is the approved distance from the ball for it not to be caused by the player... A foot? 5 feet? 10 feet?  If a player is 10 feet away and the ball moves a millimeter, what is the official cause of the movement.

John

Interesting point yourself! I once read an opinion somewhere that "no golf ball is ever completely at rest". Internal changes due to heating or cooling. The"odd" blade of grass under the ball. A bug sticking its head up to have a look around, or an earthworm tunneling through the soil underneath.

Of course, most of these changes would be on a scale far too small for us to perceive directly. But once in a while, they might.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

@ay33660, does this settle the case for you?

http://www.usga.org/rules/rules-and-decisions.html#!decision-34,d34-3-7

 

Quote

34-3/7 - Referee Determines Player Did Not Cause Ball to Move; Committee Subsequently Changes Ruling

Q.A player's ball in play moves and he is unsure whether he caused it to move in breach of Rule 18-2. The player asks for a ruling from a referee. Based on the evidence, the referee determines that the player did not cause the ball to move and instructs the player to play the ball as it lies without penalty. After the player plays, the Committee assesses the same evidence or additional evidence that was not available at the time and determines that the player had caused the ball to move. What is the ruling?

A.Rule 34-3 does not prevent a Committee from changing a ruling (see Decision 34-3/1). As the player caused the ball to move, he was required to replace the ball with a penalty stroke under Rule 18-2. When he failed to do so, he played from a wrong place. However, as he did so at the instruction of a referee, he does not incur the general penalty under Rule 18 for playing from a wrong place. Nevertheless, he does incur the penalty stroke under Rule 18-2 as he caused the ball to move before the ruling from the referee. The player must continue with the ball played from the wrong place. (Revised)

 

I mean, it's basically exactly what happened.

  • Upvote 2

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The media people for the tournament get into a lottery to play the course on the Monday after the tournament. The course left the pins in from the Sunday locations, and cut and rolled the greens to Sunday's speed. Here is one of the guy's write up of how hard he found the course ;) 

http://ftw.usatoday.com/2016/06/i-played-oakmont-after-the-u-s-open-and-it-was-insanely-difficult

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Apparently we weren't the only ones to notice Paulina...

https://www.yahoo.com/news/paulina-gretzky-stuns-skin-tight-184700671.html

Some GREAT comments about the cameraman!  :dance:

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

A former collegiate golfer and 4 handicap played Oakmont on Monday, and shot an 89 from the same tees the pros were playing: http://ftw.usatoday.com/2016/06/i-played-oakmont-after-the-u-s-open-and-it-was-insanely-difficult

Really puts it into perspective how good these guys are.

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
39 minutes ago, DeadMan said:

A former collegiate golfer and 4 handicap played Oakmont on Monday, and shot an 89 from the same tees the pros were playing: http://ftw.usatoday.com/2016/06/i-played-oakmont-after-the-u-s-open-and-it-was-insanely-difficult

Really puts it into perspective how good these guys are.

I beat you to that :-P. See the post two post above ;-)

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Sooooo...

Did the USGA even consider the R&A in this decision or non-decision for a penalty?

I don't think so, but it is did put them in an interesting situation since there was definite international flavor on the leaderboard of the US Open.  There has to be an undercurrent where European players surely want to win the at the US Open, and US players want to win the Open.  If DJ isn't penalized and wins by one, are there unspoken rumblings from abroad?

At the end of the day the USGA has to be so relieved that DJ played so well down the stretch and Lowry and Grace faded.

John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, saevel25 said:

I beat you to that :-P. See the post two post above ;-)

To be fair to me, I skip over anything posted by an Ohioan :-D

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
26 minutes ago, DeadMan said:

To be fair to me, I skip over anything posted by an Ohioan :-D

11-1 since 2004 :-P :whistle:

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 hours ago, DeadMan said:

A former collegiate golfer and 4 handicap played Oakmont on Monday, and shot an 89 from the same tees the pros were playing: http://ftw.usatoday.com/2016/06/i-played-oakmont-after-the-u-s-open-and-it-was-insanely-difficult

Really puts it into perspective how good these guys are.

One 89 was actually posted in the open, as well as several 84 and 85. Even Snedeker put up an 80. Although I suppose under tournament conditions, that 89 would have been a lot worse, perhaps.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
32 minutes ago, mtsalmela80 said:

One 89 was actually posted in the open, as well as several 84 and 85. Even Snedeker put up an 80. Although I suppose under tournament conditions, that 89 would have been a lot worse, perhaps.

They did play it under tournament conditions. Read the article. The played it the Monday after, they had Sunday's pin placements, and the greens were put at the speed they were on Sunday. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
22 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

They did play it under tournament conditions. Read the article. The played it the Monday after, they had Sunday's pin placements, and the greens were put at the speed they were on Sunday. 

 

Under competitive conditions I meant, as in the pressure of competition, anyhow for a former college player who just came out to Oakmont for the first time and played it as hard as it was setup for the us open, Id say an 89 is a damn good score.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

That reminds me a bit of the Torrey Pines Open in 2008. They had a celebrity foursome that included Tony Romo (2 Index), Justin Timberlake and Matt Lauer (both 6 indexes). 

To his credit, Romo shot an 84, which is impressive by any stretch. But the other two shot a 98 and 100 respectively, and a random 4 (8 index) ended up carding a 114. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
48 minutes ago, mtsalmela80 said:

Under competitive conditions I meant, as in the pressure of competition, anyhow for a former college player who just came out to Oakmont for the first time and played it as hard as it was setup for the us open, Id say an 89 is a damn good score.

Gotcha. 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
4 hours ago, 70sSanO said:

Did the USGA even consider the R&A in this decision or non-decision for a penalty?

No.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
30 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

Gotcha. 

Going off the published course rating and slope for the championship tees at Oakmont, that was an 8.6 differential he shot. I'd assume the course was rated when it was not in US Open condition, so you could argue it was maybe in the high 7 range with the US Open conditions.

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3463 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.