Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

90° Rule, Respect for the Course


Note: This thread is 3430 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was playing with three other golfers on a very wet course today. The course had the 90* rule sign out in the office/clubhouse. The person I rode with seemed completely oblivious. I politely mentioned that we need to stay off the fairways as much as possible and reminded him that the 90° rule was in effect, but it did no good. The best part... I've heard this guy complain about the condition of the course in the past. (These are the types of things that keep me playing as a single.) 

This is not a high-end course, there is no marshall out there, and management is very laid back. But the rough, fairways and greens are kept in good shape by the grounds crew. The other two playing partners seemed able to comply with the 90° rule. They also fixed ball marks and divots.

What are your thoughts on respecting a golf course and those who maintain it? I suspect most will agree we have a certain responsibility in the upkeep. But all you have to do is look around and it's obvious others do not feel this way.

Jon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The course I belong to always has a 90º rule unless it is cart path only.   It tends to be wetter than other courses.   I still see many golfers ignore it.

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

And here I was thinking the 90 degree rule was fully in effect at all times and all courses. Crazy game...golf. Ya learn something new everyday.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I didn't even know what the 90 degree thing meant for probably my first 2 years playing.  I also played a round once and got paired with a couple guys who were part of the grounds crew for the course we were playing.  One of them kinda barked at me for not driving through the colored posts that apparently mark where you're supposed to enter and exit the fairway with your cart... another thing I had no idea about.  :mellow:


Posted
9 hours ago, stealthhwk said:

And here I was thinking the 90 degree rule was fully in effect at all times and all courses. Crazy game...golf. Ya learn something new everyday.

It means different things to different courses and conditions.  

On many of the courses I play, it's not even possible because the cart paths only exist near the tees and greens, and along the edge of the par 3 holes.

On some courses 90° only means that you drive out on the path to near where your ball lies, then straight across to the ball.  From that point on you stay in the fairway until you and your riding companion have both hit to the green, then 90° back to the path and drive to the green parking area.

On other courses 90° means that you drive the path until you are even with your ball, then 90° to the ball, hit, then straight back to the path.  

Whether the 90° rule is in effect or not, a responsible driver pays attention to where he's driving and avoids any apparent soft or wet spots.  

  • Upvote 2

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
14 minutes ago, Fourputt said:

Whether the 90° rule is in effect or not, a responsible driver pays attention to where he's driving and avoids any apparent soft or wet spots.  

Exactly.  I think the spirit of the rule  guideline or recommendation is to encourage people to stay aware of where they are driving the cart and to keep their footprint to a minimum.

Most of the courses I play don't have a 90* rule but they do rope off the edge of the cart path from the tee to the first portion of the fairway except for a floating section they leave open.  That way they can at least control the point where everybody enters the fairway and keep the wear down.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Oh gosh, this, yeah.

The members at the course I work (public course) at like to come in after their rounds and complain about conditions on the everywhere from fairway to green to which parts of the rough we cut.  Which is fine, I can handle complaints and such.  But what erks me is that we have a big sign in our shop with 90* degree rule in effect, and when I drive out sometimes i see them tee off and drive straight down the middle of the fairway then veer off to the rough where their ball is.  Hello??? What the heck are they thinking?  Oh your upset that its super dry out and we can't water the fairway much so it's crusting a bit, but you just drive over it with your cart anyway?! I mean come on, one cart sure doesn't hurt but when one person sees someone doing it, everybody does it.  Then I see them next parking right next to the fringe on the green.  They certainly know how to walk, so when we have our signs stating stay away from greens and stay on cart paths near greens, why do they drive right next to the green anyway?  It seems that because they pay some yearly membership fees to play that deems them invincible and can do what they want.  I think it should be the opposite.  They should be setting an example for public play to see.  Drive on cart paths, do 90* with the carts, etc.  I don't want to make excuses for our members behaving badly. It's not all members, it's really just a few people, but it still annoys me.

Philip Kohnken, PGA
Director of Instruction, Lake Padden GC, Bellingham, WA

Srixon/Cleveland Club Fitter; PGA Modern Coach; Certified in Dr Kwon’s Golf Biomechanics Levels 1 & 2; Certified in SAM Putting; Certified in TPI
 
Team :srixon:!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Most of the 90 degree times I see are during the rainy times. That, or after the reseeding process. It's a good rule that needs to be followed.

As for respecting the course, and those who maintain it, that is a no brainer. All golfers should do what they can to help enhance the playability of the course they are on. Some of the maintenance folks will appreciate the help too. 

I think when it comes to following rules, in anything, most will look at them as what I call "rules of convenience". If it's convienient to follow the rule, some will, while others won't. It's no different in golf. 

 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If 90 degrees is in effect or the fairways are wet I always comply.  There are some courses that are very protective of their rough and when it is dry out they encourage driving down the fairway if a cart path is not nearby.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

As far as the 90* rule or CP Only, I certainly comply when indicated. It is there course, not mine. I had a course manager tell me once that it is better for people to drive up the fairway than it is the rough because the water the _____ out of them and they grow back quickly. Also, the longer blades of grass in the rough are more likely to break under the weight of the cart and take longer to heal. The keys are to not drive through soggy areas, avoid driving over the same area that other carts do (scatter) and make turns slowly. He didn't like the 90* rule because too many people drive out to their ball then whip the cart around to head back to the cart path.

- Shane

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3430 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.