Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Asking For Refund When Course In Poor Condition?


Note: This thread is 3377 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

A few weeks ago my girlfriend and I decided last minute to head out and play nine holes at the local muni. 

We were shocked to find that they had raised their rates significantly since the last time we had played, the fees were now in line with higher end courses in the area. We decided to go ahead and play anyway, but recognized that this course was now far less of a value. 

Upon reaching the first green we discovered it was completely torched. Brown, patches of dirt, and weeds everywhere. Very disappointing. We thought it was just a fluke and continued on. We found that every green was like that. Additionally, the tee boxes were overgrown with weeds and the rough was so long we lost a ball on nearly every hole. 

We weren't happy, but we pressed on, until ...

we approached the seventh green only to find a crew member spraying the green with some liquid solution. We approached him to ask what he was spraying on the greens, he said it was a fertilizer/pesticide mixture. He had no idea if it was toxic or if we should be playing golf on it immediately after he sprayed it. 

We weren't about to hit onto and putt on a still wet green covered in fertilizer and pesticides. We picked up our balls and returned to the clubhouse where they gave us a raincheck after we voiced our complaints. They said it was a dry summer so the course was in rough shape (this didn't explain the uncut rough, but I will give some leeway here). Upon asking about the fertilizer appliation occuring during peak hours on a Sunday, they had to explanation. They just shook their heads. 

Was I right to request a refund in this situation? Is that normal to apply fertilizer / pesticide during peak playing hours? Has anyone else ever requested a refund upon finding a course in very poor condition? 

  • Upvote 2

- Mark

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 minutes ago, Braivo said:

Was I right to request a refund in this situation? Is that normal to apply fertilizer / pesticide during peak playing hours? Has anyone else ever requested a refund upon finding a course in very poor condition? 

You always have a right to ask for a refund. The course doesn't have to give it to you. I don't see a rain check as a refund. 

I never requested a refund for poor course condition. Most courses are priced for what they with regards to condition. 

I've had courses give me discounts before if the course was in poor shape. In one case a free play because they aerated the greens right before an outing we had. The outing was scheduled before the course had their aerated scheduled. 

As for pesticides, I have no clue. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have never requested a refund, but I certainly wouldn't return if I wasn't happy. I will fill out a course review to warn others or give kudos to a course that is doing a good job.

- Shane

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I know the course where i play gives refunds for pre booked rounds (you have to pay one green fee) if the conditions are bad such as fog, snow or torrential rain but not for some of the conditions in the OP.

Spraying fertilzer during peak times (was it a peak time) is a little odd. I can understand them doing it towward the end onf the day or first thing and would have thought whatever they used would either be non toxic or have such a low toxicity that it would be ok. I think unless a person is into licking golf balls clean then it would have been pretty safe.

Russ, from "sunny" Yorkshire = :-( 

In the bag: Driver: Ping G5 , Woods:Dunlop NZ9, 4 Hybrid: Tayormade Burner, 4-SW: Hippo Beast Bi-Metal , Wedges: Wilson 1200, Putter: Cleveland Smartsquare Blade, Ball: AD333

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Most of the time, the online reviews will tell you what you need to know. A course can have a bad run or maybe miss a cutting, but the consistent goat tracks are named and shamed on golfadvisor.com and the like.

The closest I came was the time @Jeremie Boop and I played Moss Creek (Clayton, OH), . The reviews had been a bit mixed up to that point and I wasn't totally unaware. That said, it was pretty disappointing. The greens were a shambles, the rough hadn't been cut in a week and the bunkers full of weeds. I was hitting the ball straight off the tee so I blew off the putting altogether just to get to the next tee box.

Never went there again, but it sounds like its still going downhill. Damn shame to because the layout of that place is pretty decent.

 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I can't say I've ever had a similar experience. I've played courses that were very cheap and as soon as you step on the tee you know why, but that's sort of what you get for a cheap price. I have played more expensive courses that I didn't feel were worth the price but they weren't so bad that I felt I deserved a refund. However, if I were to encounter a situation like yours I'm not sure how I would react. I may have asked how many greens had been sprayed and skipped any that were sprayed. Last thing I would want is a rain check though, I would not have any desire to return to a course in such poor shape. It's unfortunate that you had such a bad experience. Most times I experience the opposite, where the price is low but I'm pleasantly surprised by how good the shape of the course is.

2 minutes ago, mcanadiens said:

Most of the time, the online reviews will tell you what you need to know. A course can have a bad run or maybe miss a cutting, but the consistent goat tracks are named and shamed on golfadvisor.com and the like.

The closest I came was the time @Jeremie Boop and I played Moss Creek (Clayton, OH), . The reviews had been a bit mixed up to that point and I wasn't totally unaware. That said, it was pretty disappointing. The greens were a shambles, the rough hadn't been cut in a week and the bunkers full of weeds. I was hitting the ball straight off the tee so I blew off the putting altogether just to get to the next tee box.

Never went there again, but it sounds like its still going downhill. Damn shame to because the layout of that place is pretty decent.

 

 

I remember that course, didn't we get the round for pretty cheap through that group golf discount site? I agree, the course was in rough shape but I thought the layout and such was actually really cool. It was a Chi Chi Rodriguez design if I remember correctly. I had hoped they were able to get in back into shape. Would have been a great course to play when it was being maintained well.

 

  • Upvote 1

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
7 minutes ago, Jeremie Boop said:

I remember that course, didn't we get the round for pretty cheap through that group golf discount site? I agree, the course was in rough shape but I thought the layout and such was actually really cool. It was a Chi Chi Rodriguez design if I remember correctly. I had hoped they were able to get in back into shape. Would have been a great course to play when it was being maintained well.

 

Sadly it doesn't seem so. A review two days ago says "Charging people to play this course is stealing their money".

It is for sale apparently. You and your big money Lima friends could probably snap it up and whip it into shape.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 minutes ago, mcanadiens said:

Most of the time, the online reviews will tell you what you need to know. A course can have a bad run or maybe miss a cutting, but the consistent goat tracks are named and shamed on golfadvisor.com and the like.

The closest I came was the time @Jeremie Boop and I played Moss Creek (Clayton, OH), . The reviews had been a bit mixed up to that point and I wasn't totally unaware. That said, it was pretty disappointing. The greens were a shambles, the rough hadn't been cut in a week and the bunkers full of weeds. I was hitting the ball straight off the tee so I blew off the putting altogether just to get to the next tee box.

Never went there again, but it sounds like its still going downhill. Damn shame to because the layout of that place is pretty decent.

Moss used to be nice. It's a Chi Chi Rodriguez signature course (or was). It has a pro grade layout, but they ran out of money and couldn't build the clubhouse and ended up operating out of a trailer. It was maintained nicely for many years, but the last 5-6 years have taken it's toll. Another problem is that they couldn't sell, and you aren't allowed to transport, alcohol on a majority of the back 9. It was just odd. Now that Meadowbrook CC up the street is public under the ownership of the City of Clayton, I imagine Moss will turn into a weed field like many other courses up there.

- Shane

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

It is definitely not normal to spray during peak times.  Most greens keepers will spray in early morning and the course is suppose to let golfers know and not let people out until the liquid has subsided into the greens a bit.  The general time is don't let people play until 30min after they spray.  Still don't lick your fingers or anything on those days.  You could get sick (depends if they spray herbicide or fungicides), but you won't die or melt or anything.

Most courses create their rates based on competition with other courses, but it can definitely be influenced by course conditions. Some may increase rates so that they can try to put more into improving the course.  Or as @saevel25 said, after aeration they may give 50% off rates or something for the 2 weeks or so that it takes to be playable.

Most courses will give rain checks for a situation that shouldn't be encountered for a normal round.  Getting a refund is usually out of the question at most places.

Philip Kohnken, PGA
Director of Instruction, Lake Padden GC, Bellingham, WA

Srixon/Cleveland Club Fitter; PGA Modern Coach; Certified in Dr Kwon’s Golf Biomechanics Levels 1 & 2; Certified in SAM Putting; Certified in TPI
 
Team :srixon:!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Braivo said:

A few weeks ago my girlfriend and I decided last minute to head out and play nine holes at the local muni. 

We were shocked to find that they had raised their rates significantly since the last time we had played, the fees were now in line with higher end courses in the area. We decided to go ahead and play anyway, but recognized that this course was now far less of a value. 

Upon reaching the first green we discovered it was completely torched. Brown, patches of dirt, and weeds everywhere. Very disappointing. We thought it was just a fluke and continued on. We found that every green was like that. Additionally, the tee boxes were overgrown with weeds and the rough was so long we lost a ball on nearly every hole. 

We weren't happy, but we pressed on, until ...

we approached the seventh green only to find a crew member spraying the green with some liquid solution. We approached him to ask what he was spraying on the greens, he said it was a fertilizer/pesticide mixture. He had no idea if it was toxic or if we should be playing golf on it immediately after he sprayed it. 

We weren't about to hit onto and putt on a still wet green covered in fertilizer and pesticides. We picked up our balls and returned to the clubhouse where they gave us a raincheck after we voiced our complaints. They said it was a dry summer so the course was in rough shape (this didn't explain the uncut rough, but I will give some leeway here). Upon asking about the fertilizer appliation occuring during peak hours on a Sunday, they had to explanation. They just shook their heads. 

Was I right to request a refund in this situation? Is that normal to apply fertilizer / pesticide during peak playing hours? Has anyone else ever requested a refund upon finding a course in very poor condition? 

I've never done it ... but I think you were well within your rights to do exactly as you did.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 minutes ago, mcanadiens said:

Sadly it doesn't seem so. A review two days ago says "Charging people to play this course is stealing their money".

It is for sale apparently. You and your big money Lima friends could probably snap it up and whip it into shape.

I know that's a joke, but I actually know the daughter of the owner of the course you came up and played. They were looking at buying one of the local courses that closed but the price was way too high to justify the work required to get it back ready to be played again. If Moss Creek was closer I would probably mention it to her, but I doubt they are looking to buy something that is so far away. Plus they ended up buying a different course so I would imagine they wouldn't have the ability to buy it even if they wanted to. 

2 minutes ago, CarlSpackler said:

Moss used to be nice. It's a Chi Chi Rodriguez signature course (or was). It has a pro grade layout, but they ran out of money and couldn't build the clubhouse and ended up operating out of a trailer. It was maintained nicely for many years, but the last 5-6 years have taken it's toll. Another problem is that they couldn't sell, and you aren't allowed to transport, alcohol on a majority of the back 9. It was just odd. Now that Meadowbrook CC up the street is public under the ownership of the City of Clayton, I imagine Moss will turn into a weed field like many other courses up there.

It's too bad really, some of the nicer courses tend to be the ones that go to pot because it costs more to maintain them. Having trouble with with having alcohol on the course is pretty much always going to be a killer for a course too.

I may be a rare type of golfer in that I'd rather play a course that is tougher and more interesting that one that is easy and boring. Even if that means my score isn't as good. 

That said, and on topic, even as interesting as the layout was I had no desire to go back unless they were able to get it back in shape, and even in as bad a shape as it was it never crossed my mind to consider a refund. Though I was a little miffed that range balls were supposed to be included in the price but they didn't provide them.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 minutes ago, phillyk said:

It is definitely not normal to spray during peak times.  Most greens keepers will spray in early morning and the course is suppose to let golfers know and not let people out until the liquid has subsided into the greens a bit.  The general time is don't let people play until 30min after they spray.  Still don't lick your fingers or anything on those days.  You could get sick (depends if they spray herbicide or fungicides), but you won't die or melt or anything.

Most courses create their rates based on competition with other courses, but it can definitely be influenced by course conditions. Some may increase rates so that they can try to put more into improving the course.  Or as @saevel25 said, after aeration they may give 50% off rates or something for the 2 weeks or so that it takes to be playable.

Most courses will give rain checks for a situation that shouldn't be encountered for a normal round.  Getting a refund is usually out of the question at most places.

If they had stated up front that the course was in poor condition and they were going to offer discounted rates I would have had a completely different view of the experience. This isn't normally a dog track type course, it is usually in good condition, I've played it since I was a kid. The inflated price coupled with the poor condition led to significant letdown. 

- Mark

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 minutes ago, Jeremie Boop said:

Plus they ended up buying a different course so I would imagine they wouldn't have the ability to buy it even if they wanted to. 

What did they buy?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 minutes ago, Braivo said:

If they had stated up front that the course was in poor condition and they were going to offer discounted rates I would have had a completely different view of the experience. This isn't normally a dog track type course, it is usually in good condition, I've played it since I was a kid. The inflated price coupled with the poor condition led to significant letdown

It seems weird that they would increase price for decreased condition, but then again, they might be hurting financially. It is very common these days. The odd thing is that increasing the price will tend to decrease revenue. Perhaps they've been spending too much time around the chemicals they've been spraying on the greens. 

- Shane

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 minutes ago, mcanadiens said:

What did they buy?

I can't remember off the top of my head, I had never heard of the course before it was mentioned. I want to say they bought Hillcrest up in Findlay.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Braivo said:

A few weeks ago my girlfriend and I decided last minute to head out and play nine holes at the local muni. 

We were shocked to find that they had raised their rates significantly since the last time we had played, the fees were now in line with higher end courses in the area. We decided to go ahead and play anyway, but recognized that this course was now far less of a value. 

Upon reaching the first green we discovered it was completely torched. Brown, patches of dirt, and weeds everywhere. Very disappointing. We thought it was just a fluke and continued on. We found that every green was like that. Additionally, the tee boxes were overgrown with weeds and the rough was so long we lost a ball on nearly every hole. 

We weren't happy, but we pressed on, until ...

we approached the seventh green only to find a crew member spraying the green with some liquid solution. We approached him to ask what he was spraying on the greens, he said it was a fertilizer/pesticide mixture. He had no idea if it was toxic or if we should be playing golf on it immediately after he sprayed it. 

We weren't about to hit onto and putt on a still wet green covered in fertilizer and pesticides. We picked up our balls and returned to the clubhouse where they gave us a raincheck after we voiced our complaints. They said it was a dry summer so the course was in rough shape (this didn't explain the uncut rough, but I will give some leeway here). Upon asking about the fertilizer appliation occuring during peak hours on a Sunday, they had to explanation. They just shook their heads. 

Was I right to request a refund in this situation? Is that normal to apply fertilizer / pesticide during peak playing hours? Has anyone else ever requested a refund upon finding a course in very poor condition? 

In reality I don't think it really matters what the rest of us think about others's decisions. That said, here is my take.  lol

If I think the course is so bad a refund is in order, I would leave after a couple holes. I wouldn't play the rest of the course, and then ask. Then again, I have never asked for a refund for bad conditions. Poor conditions means more thinking about how to play some shots. 

I have always gone (after paying my fees) with playing the course, and my ball as I find it. 

I have played on some really poorly maintained courses. I just made it a point to never go back for quite a while. You never know. A poorly maintained course today, might be in great shape in a month or so. 

As for spraying chemicals while playing, I would have problem with that due some of the chemicals being airborn, and a chance of inhaling some of the stuff. 

  • Upvote 1

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think you are fine to ask. The worst you can get is a "no". 

However I think you need to consider it from the golf courses perspective. Will you be prepared to pay an adder for the situation where the course is in fantastic shape? I think you need to consider the price you are paying as more of an average price. Sometimes you are on the shorter end of the stick and sometimes you walk away getting off cheaper. 

Let me also add, diseases on greens are common in the spring/fall because the grass is susceptible to those diseases. One one green gets the disease and a golfer walks onto the next green it spreads there, and so on. It can get out of control very fast. May have been a situation where the greens crew was always working to play catch up and they needed to get the treatment on the greens ASAP.  

  • Upvote 2

Michael

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
38 minutes ago, CarlSpackler said:

It seems weird that they would increase price for decreased condition, but then again, they might be hurting financially. It is very common these days. The odd thing is that increasing the price will tend to decrease revenue. Perhaps they've been spending too much time around the chemicals they've been spraying on the greens. 

I believe they are hurting and so they are making a last gasp at increasing revenue. Unfortunately, I don't think their strategy will work. Increasing prices AND improving conditions simultaneously could lead to them becoming a higher-end track. I hope this course cna make it. They hired a new greenskeeper this year and things haven't gone well for him. It is in a desirable area, I'm afraid it might start looking like a really good revenue option for the city to sell the property to a developer. 

Edited by Braivo

- Mark

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3377 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.