Jump to content
IGNORED

New PING i200 Irons


mvmac
Note: This thread is 2614 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator

From Ted Purdy on Twitter. Cavity design is similar to the S55 irons (but deeper) mixed with a little TaylorMade Rac. From what I've heard the head shape is basically the same as the i E1 irons but with the same finish as the Glide wedges and iBlade irons. The 6-iron (maybe the long irons as well) don't seem to have the tungsten weight on the toe that many of the previous models did.

Looks cool, nice "clean tech" look and the style seems to match up well with their wedges, iBlades and even Vault putters.

Non-PING, no up charge shafts are going to be DG, KBS Tour, Pro Modus Tour 105, Project X, and XP 95.  

 

 

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm not sure that I like the look of the backs more than the previous i irons but that isn't really so important for me.  Will be interested to try them out as I am thinking about changing my 3-4-5 s55 irons to i.  Can't imagine they are going to be that much better than the previous generation though.

What is going on with their numbering system?  Is there some ping history thing where i200 makes sense?  They seem to be just jumping around all over the place with their club names at the moment.

Adam

:ping: G30 Driver 

:callaway: XR16 3W
:callaway: Big Bertha 5W
:ping: S55 4-W 
:ping: 50' , 56', 60' Glide Wedge
:odyssey: White Hot #7 Putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


6 hours ago, mvmac said:

Cavity design is similar to the S55 irons (but deeper) mixed with a little TaylorMade Rac.

You nailed it with that description!  Nice looking clubs.

 

2 hours ago, ZappyAd said:

What is going on with their numbering system?  Is there some ping history thing where i200 makes sense?  They seem to be just jumping around all over the place with their club names at the moment.

That is odd for Ping.  They were pretty good with the name/number scheme.  Nothing like trying to follow the Mizuno lineup!  :~(

Driver: :callaway: Diablo
Woods: :callaway: Big Bertha 2 & 4
Irons: Miura MC 102's 3 - PW & Mizuno MP 67's 3 - W
Wedges: :mizuno: MP-R12 52* & 58*
Putters: :ping: WRX Ti4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Non-PING, no up charge shafts are going to be DG, KBS Tour, Pro Modus Tour 105, Project X, and XP 95.  

20 hours ago, ZappyAd said:

I'm not sure that I like the look of the backs more than the previous i irons but that isn't really so important for me.

I prefer the satin finish and they also go well with the S55 irons or iBlades if someone wanted to do a split set.

20 hours ago, ZappyAd said:

Can't imagine they are going to be that much better than the previous generation though.

Yes I'd figure the playability will be pretty darn similar to the i E1 irons. Only so many things you can do with an iron, especially a forgiving "players" iron.

TaylorMade once told me golfers replace their irons every 5-7 years so that's more of who they're marketing to than the guy who is playing the i E1 irons. 

20 hours ago, ZappyAd said:

What is going on with their numbering system?  Is there some ping history thing where i200 makes sense?  They seem to be just jumping around all over the place with their club names at the moment.

Yeah it's kinda funny. I guess i200 might be a nod to the "next generation" of the Eye 2?

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

This is starting to pique my curiosity. . .

They look really nice.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

31 minutes ago, CarlSpackler said:

I'm glad the days of Ping making ugly (awkward looking at least) seem to be over. 

I think that ended several years ago.  Probably when they went away from that high toe that the Zings and probably a few other models may have had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just now, Golfingdad said:

I think that ended several years ago.  Probably when they went away from that high toe that the Zings and probably a few other models may have had.

I know. I've been gaming G30s for a few years now. Happy that they are not showing signs of reverting I should have said.

  • Upvote 1

- Shane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

Looks pretty darn similar in shape/design to the iE1 irons.

 

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...

They look really nice. I agree with many opinions that they have a bit of the TM RAC look about them. The reviews I've seen so far are pretty good on these.  Looks like Ping has another winner. 

In my Sun Mountain 14 Way Stand Bag:

Driver - Ping G30 10.5* : Fairway - Ping G30 18* : Hybrids - Titleist 915H 21* & 915 H 24* : Irons - Mizuno JPX 850 Forged 5 - GW : Wedges, Vokey 54.14, Vokey 58.12 : Putter - Scotty Cameron Studio Select Newport 2 or Ping Craz-E-R  : Ball - Bridgestone B330RX, Cart - Cliqgear 3.5

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Got to hit these recently at one of the local golf shops.  Sadly they don't have an LM (if you can believe that) so I didn't get any stats.  That said, I love the looks of this iron all around.  Appeared to have less offset than traditional Ping irons, which I liked.  In terms of feel, they were right on with the i20 and i25 irons from a few years back.  I really like that Ping has aligned the look of the i200, iBlades and Glide wedges so you could very easily build a mixed i200/iBlade set and it'd look really nice in the bag.

Driver: Cobra FlyZ | 9.5 Degrees Draw | Fujikura Pro 63 Tour Spec
Fairway Wood: Cobra F7 3-4 Wood | 14.5 degrees | Fujikura Pro 65
Hybrid: Cobra F7 3-4H | 19 degrees | Fujikura Pro 75H
Irons: Srixon Z545 (4-Iron) | Srixon Z 765 (5-PW)
Wedges: Titleist Vokey SM6 | 50 F Grind | 54 M Grind | 58 K Grind
Putter: Odyssey O-Works 1W WBW

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
1 hour ago, OrangeHog said:

Appeared to have less offset than traditional Ping irons, which I liked.

i200 and iE1 have the same amount but yes the past 5-10 years they'e been going with less offset in their irons.

1 hour ago, OrangeHog said:

I really like that Ping has aligned the look of the i200, iBlades and Glide wedges so you could very easily build a mixed i200/iBlade set and it'd look really nice in the bag.

Yes that is pretty cool.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 hours ago, mvmac said:

i200 and iE1 have the same amount but yes the past 5-10 years they'e been going with less offset in their irons.

I wanted to like the iE1 but the the cavity badging was a little odd.  Very minor complaint, as I thought it felt solid when I got to demo them.

Driver: Cobra FlyZ | 9.5 Degrees Draw | Fujikura Pro 63 Tour Spec
Fairway Wood: Cobra F7 3-4 Wood | 14.5 degrees | Fujikura Pro 65
Hybrid: Cobra F7 3-4H | 19 degrees | Fujikura Pro 75H
Irons: Srixon Z545 (4-Iron) | Srixon Z 765 (5-PW)
Wedges: Titleist Vokey SM6 | 50 F Grind | 54 M Grind | 58 K Grind
Putter: Odyssey O-Works 1W WBW

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have the I e-1 irons but will be selling them to get the I200 with the same specs.  Just love the face being all satin vs. the 2 tone look of mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2614 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Welcome to TST @Camjr.   We're glad you've joined.  
    • Angle is not a factor. I hit the ball 100’ high. Par is net birdie. My CH is 16. The rough between the bunkers is like 10’ wide though. That’s not something you’re going to try to hit on purpose. Most of the area to the left of that is fescue/native vegetation and I’m pretty sure there isn’t a flat lie in any of it. It’s the second hole.
    • Hello all.  I'm about to be 57 yrs old, started playing when I was 16, and have quit and restarted the game more times than I can count.  I had started playing a weekly round with a friend, and finally made the jump to Senior A shafted Tour Edge clubs.  Instantly gained 10 yds with an easier swing (why didn't I make that jump sooner???).  Glad to be a part of the group. Cheers all,
    • I think I like this hole.  It is a clear "Risk-Reward" choice.  Since most of the shots in your cone cleared the bunkers I would say they are a minor risk and not a big issue.  Playing the aggressive line may give you 70ish yards in from what looks to be playable rough while conservative play is 120ish from fairway.  I know you said 70 vs 120 is minor for you but how does the approach angle in impact your results?  I figure both strategies are playing for Birdie since holing out from either is mostly luck. Looking at your proximity hole I think it says @ 50 feet when hitting from the fairway from 100-150 and 40 feet if hitting 50-100 from the rough.  Neither of those is an easy birdie putt.   I like the approach angle from the rough between the bunkers & the adjacent tees over the angle from @ 120 in the fairway but I really do not like the idea of hitting onto the adjacent tee boxes and that may impact my confidence with making the shot.  Also, too far left may be a worse approach angle then from the fairway short of the bunkers. For me this may come down to how confident do I feel when I reach that tee box.  If I am stroking it well off the tee leading up to the hole I would try for over the bunkers and the better angle in but if I am struggling that day I would likely opt for the fairway to take more bad stuff out of play.
    • Wordle 1,035 2/6 🟨🟨🟨⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...