Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

What do you think of Fox network coverage?


Note: This thread is 3109 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm curious what everyone on these boards thinks of Fox 's coverage of the US Open? I have reserved judgement until this year, but I just don't think they do a good job. I'm not sure Joe Buck is a golf commentator. I do like Paul Azinger. It looked to me like Curtis Strange had some trouble with the interview with Brooks at the award ceremony. Holly Sonders is great to look at but I don't see the point of going to all those break away's to show some story about a player or something about various golf holes. I personally would like to see it go back to NBC or even ABC.

My bag:

Taylor Made R7 (x-stiff).
Taylor Made Burner 2 irons (stiff)
Cleveland Wedges (gap and 60)
Odyssey two ball putter (white) 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Joe buck is unnatural commenting on golf. But besides that foxs commentary is about the same as any of the others. Fox's attempts to do "new" things in how golf is covered just come off as a juvenile attempt of trying to hard to me. 

Edited by Groucho Valentine

Posted

Given Fox only does one tournament a year, I thought they did pretty well. I've read a lot of people ragging on Joe Buck, but he was fine, imo. Basically stayed out of the way & didn't over-commentate. I thought Holly Sonders was basically the extension of the trend started by other networks of having a babe in a tight dress standing in front of graphics to show off her rockin' bod....sort of like the weather chicks on local TV stations.

Ken Brown's bits were very informative & I like his wit. Azinger came off kind of grumpy to me, Faxon seemed a little more charitable.

Loved the use of graphics, shot tracer & the like. That especially works well on a 'featureless' course like Erin Hills where it's not clear where the fairway or green was.

But in all, and given it's their only golf event they do, it was fine.

  • Upvote 1

Posted

Not a fan of FOX golf coverage either.  It doesn't flow because they try to cram too much 'action' into every telecast minute. Compared to CBS and Golf Channel, I'd put FOX a distant 3rd.

Joe Buck is a baseball announcer by trade--not a golf guy.  The other reporters don't seem to have much of a rapport with the players, either.  I guess you can't show up one week out of the season and expect to have much of a relationship with the PGA Tour in general. Lack of relationship with Tour players comes across during the telecast and in interviews.

At the end of the day, (and like everything else) it's all about the money.  FOX bid the most $$ for US Open broadcast rights and have it for a long time. Let's all be thankful they didn't get The Masters.

The ultimate "old man" setup:

Ping G30 driver
Ping G Fairway woods - 5 and 7 woods
Callaway X-Hot #5 hybrid; Old school secret weapon
Ping G #6-9 irons; W and U wedges
Vokey 54 and 58* Wedges
Odyssey Versa Putter
Golf Balls

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I thought it was fine. Just fine. Nothing jumped out at me as particularly great or particularly bad.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

I think Fox is just barely behind NBC for the best golf coverage. They are miles ahead of CBS. The only negative for me with them is that I don't like Joe Buck (but I don't like Nantz, at all, either, so it's a wash). Positives:

  1. Great use of graphics and protracer - this is so much better than showing a golf ball against the sky.
  2. I like or am neutral on all of their color guys.
  3. They show a good amount of golf - not perfect, but miles ahead of CBS.
  4. Brownie points segments were absolutely fanastic
  5. Kept the fluff to a minimum, in my view. No shots of people fixing a hole for 5 minutes, fewer prerecorded human interest segments, and no swing analysis.

They showed golf, and lots of golf. I don't think I had any problems with their Sunday coverage beyond Joe Buck. I don't care about players' girlfriends or anything like that, so it doesn't bother me if they get that stuff wrong.

Edited by DeadMan

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Yeah, I'd have to say it was fine too despite all the words written on this the broadcasts on all channels are equally tired and hackneyed because the announcers have been there forever and aren't exactly a breathe of fresh air. 

The big difference is the number of shots where the trajectory was shown. I still want to see the actual ball's flight in full but if that's possible that's a long way off. The audio occasionally cut out on me too, which was annoying. Glad to hear the birds from Augusta made it over. 

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
6 minutes ago, DeadMan said:

I think Fox is just barely behind NBC for the best golf coverage. They are miles ahead of CBS. The only negative for me with them is that I don't like Joe Buck (but I don't like Nantz, at all, either, so it's a wash). Positives:

  1. Great use of graphics and protracer - this is so much better than showing a golf ball against the sky.
  2. I like or am neutral on all of their color guys.
  3. They show a good amount of golf - not perfect, but miles ahead of CBS.
  4. Brownie points segments were absolutely fanastic
  5. Kept the fluff to a minimum, in my view. No shots of people fixing a hole for 5 minutes, fewer prerecorded human interest segments, and no swing analysis.

They showed golf, and lots of golf. I don't think I had any problems with their Sunday coverage beyond Joe Buck. I don't care about players' girlfriends or anything like that, so it doesn't bother me if they get that stuff wrong.

I'm not even sure one can compare a network's single coverage of a Major event to another network that covers minor events every week.  Frankly, I was hoping for a bit more out of Fox since the event was a Major, but still forgave them a lot because it's their only event.  But your points are well noted.

Something about the flow of it seemed off to me.  I cannot say if that made it worse or if it was just that I'm used to NBC's style.

1. Agreed.

3. Absolutely

5. Never cared for swing analysis, so I enjoyed the lack.  Human Interest is so hit or miss that I'm glad they didn't gamble.

 

All in all, I think the coverage was quite good.  Some of the commentary was rough, but I can forgive it.

 

Now if we can get the LPGA coverage to be similar instead of ridiculous game show moments of how much a caddie knows about the golfer.


Posted (edited)

My wife provides an interesting perspective on the quality of a golf telecast, since she really doesn't know many of the announcers by name, but she does have her favorite players (Rory, Ricky, Sneeeedeker). 

At one point, she said to me, "Who in the hell is Paul Azinger?" I said why, what did he say? "He just seems a little douchey to me...ragging on the players."

So I gave her a little bio on Zinger, mentioned that he overcame cancer & won again, that he was a scrappy player who loved knocking off the Greg Normans of the world.

She then Google'd him & told me, "Okay...he's a cancer survivor. He's okay in my book."

Edited by zipazoid

Posted
1 hour ago, Bucki1968 said:

I'm curious what everyone on these boards thinks of Fox 's coverage of the US Open? I have reserved judgement until this year, but I just don't think they do a good job. I'm not sure Joe Buck is a golf commentator. I do like Paul Azinger. It looked to me like Curtis Strange had some trouble with the interview with Brooks at the award ceremony. Holly Sonders is great to look at but I don't see the point of going to all those break away's to show some story about a player or something about various golf holes. I personally would like to see it go back to NBC or even ABC.

maybe that is the point.

"James"

:titleist: 913 D3 with Aldila RIP Phenom 60 4,2 Regular Shaft,  :touredge: Exotics XCG-7 Beta 3W with Matrix Red Tie Shaft:touredge: Exotics EX8 19 deg Hybrid w UST Mamiya Recoil F3 Shaft:touredge: Exotics EX9 28 deg Hybrid w UST Mamiya Recoil F3  shaft, / Bobby Jones Black 22 deg Hybrid:touredge: Exotics EXi 6 -PW  w UST Mamiya Recoil F2 Shaft, SW (56),GW (52),LW (60):touredge:  TGS),/ ODDYSEE Metal-X #7 customized putter (400G, cut down Mid Belly)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

My takeways? I learned a little bit about hay and balloon blimps. :-P

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

They did a great job:

1 - much more plain english commentary without all the stupid "golf shot" "of the golf ball" type comments the other guys litter their comments with.  Fox cleaned it up a ton since last year.

2 - I LIKE the tracer, and the graphics.  Big improvement.  Would like to see more.

3 - good balance of watching a lot of players

4 - they didn't artificially try to manufacture sets of contention or drama, even just let the players hit without constant chatter - that's nice.

5 - The winner of it all will be the network that can filter out the 'get in the hole' comments - and that annoying airplane constantly droning - hope that pilot loses his advertising permits.  And, the winning putt of Brooks - seriously, one asshole just HAD to scream out during a 16 inch putt?  it would have been great to have silence, let it fall, and THEN the whole crowd shouts out.  COmpletely ruined the scene and the moment. Jacka$$.

Personalities:

1 - Zinger - seriously, he looked constipated the entire time, couldn't tell if he dislikes the other people and players or just has resting annoyed face.  He looks a bit like the Church Lady from SNL.  Does he hate Curtis Strange?  or is that just how he looks all the time?

2 - Faxon - good commentator, I think players responded to him well also.

4 - Buck - he tries, but I don't think this is his comfort zone

5 - Holly - good on her for staying with it as an example of fitness in life.  But the poor woman isn't really attractive like she was before all the plastic work.  She was great as natural and fit.  plastic and fit is just really, really wrong. Not much added value to the interviews.  Fox didn't give her a chance, or her ability to ask good questions is weak.

6 - Interviews - good player interviews.

7 - the color coverage (Brownie, etc) was a lot of fun actually

Edited by rehmwa

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 hour ago, zipazoid said:

Given Fox only does one tournament a year, I thought they did pretty well.

They cover all of the USGA's tournaments.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think it was fine.  Not great, certainly nowhere near as high quality as the first major of the year.  But Fox is getting better.

Best thing they can do without having to hire new talent at the network would be to replace Buck with someone else.  In another thread, I nominated Darrell Waltrip.  Both he and Buck work for Fox in other endeavors, and I think Waltrip would be much better for the Open, even though he's (understandably) busy elsewhere that day.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
6 hours ago, rehmwa said:

4. Buck - he tries, but I don't think this is his comfort zone

6 hours ago, dave s said:

Joe Buck is a baseball announcer by trade--not a golf guy. 

Some guys just don't do golf very well, Buck being one of them. Back here in StL, there's another very good TV sports reporter named Rene Knott. (He had a dangerous bout with lung disorder circa 2015 - fortunately he had recovered). He's good on most sports, but I cringe when Rene shows up to cover local golf events. He churns out generic who's in the lead stuff which can be used for any sport, but doesn't seem to grasp deeper elements of golf.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

When Buck said there are a lot of minuses on the leaderboard, did that sound strange to you? Seems like I've gotten used to most announcers saying lots of red figures or players under par or something like that.

 

Maybe we've been conditioned or expect to hear certain turn of phrases and that Buck doesn't do that it sounds "funny".

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

-  Joe Buck is terrible.

-  Even though it's a little rough, the increased use of shot tracker is nice.

-  Holly Sonders is fun to watch, as long as you turn the volume off so you can't hear her speak.

 

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 hours ago, DeadMan said:

I think Fox is just barely behind NBC for the best golf coverage. They are miles ahead of CBS. The only negative for me with them is that I don't like Joe Buck (but I don't like Nantz, at all, either, so it's a wash). Positives:

  1. Great use of graphics and protracer - this is so much better than showing a golf ball against the sky.
  2. I like or am neutral on all of their color guys.
  3. They show a good amount of golf - not perfect, but miles ahead of CBS.
  4. Brownie points segments were absolutely fanastic
  5. Kept the fluff to a minimum, in my view. No shots of people fixing a hole for 5 minutes, fewer prerecorded human interest segments, and no swing analysis.

They showed golf, and lots of golf. I don't think I had any problems with their Sunday coverage beyond Joe Buck. I don't care about players' girlfriends or anything like that, so it doesn't bother me if they get that stuff wrong.

Nice post. Pretty much sums it up. As much as I love the endless shots of a golf ball in the sky, the extensive use of sky tracker was a nice change. And I can wait until CBS coverage to get a year's worth of commercials and fluff in a single event. 

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane iMix 11.5*
Fairway: Cobra Baffler Rail F 3W & 7W
Irons:  Wilson Ci
Wedges:  Acer XB (52* & 56*)
Putter:  Cleveland Classic #10 with Winn Jumbo Pistol Grip


Note: This thread is 3109 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.