Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • iacas

      Snell 20% Off   11/24/2017

      TST Partner Snell Golf is having a 20% off Black Friday/Cyber Monday sale! Check it out at snellgolf.com.
nevets88

PXG Bob Parsons Suing TaylorMade for Patent Infrigement

44 posts in this topic Last Reply

Recommended Posts

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

It's spread now and is reported elsewhere.

This should be interesting. Bob Parsons doesn't exactly have shallow pockets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There were certainly comparisons to PXG irons when the P790s were announced. TPE injected into the hollow cavity is definitely something I associate with PXG, though I'm sure there are more similarities to the manufacturing and design that I don't know about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Don't know if the P790 irons are the same or different than the 0311T...

I don't have $2800 to shell out for a set of irons (the 0311T) or really $1400 for the TMs and no one has demos of PXG around...

Does Bob think it's got something to do with what is injected to the hollow iron? If it's just because they are hollow headed irons, they all have to pay David Glod loyalties for that...

What material is injected into the P790? I can't remember...

Bob Parsons has enough money, he could buy out TaylorMade if he wanted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I hope if Bob takes the stand in court he uses his tough guy deep voice from his commercials!

Edited by Typhoon92

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

44 minutes ago, iacas said:

It's spread now and is reported elsewhere.

This should be interesting. Bob Parsons doesn't exactly have shallow pockets.

Definitely. Parsons net worth almost 2.5 billion. No small players in this match.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

11 minutes ago, onthehunt526 said:

Bob Parsons has enough money, he could buy out TaylorMade if he wanted.

He could. But he started his own company, and is suing TaylorMade instead. :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 9/12/2017 at 7:15 PM, onthehunt526 said:

What material is injected into the P790? I can't remember...

They call it Speed Foam. According to TaylorMade, it different. 

Quote

In the two years TaylorMade spent developing the P-790 irons, it tested several filler materials, one of which was thermoplastic elastomer (TPE), the material PXG uses to fill the inside of its 0311 irons. “The problem with the TPE is that it completely kills your COR,” Bystedt says.

COR, or coefficient of restitution, is the measure of spring-like effect of a golf club. The higher the number, the faster a golf ball rebounds off the club face. To keep the COR of the P-790 irons as high as possible, TaylorMade’s iron design developed Speed Foam. Think of it like EVA, or ethylene vinyl acetate, the cushioning material used in running shoe, Bystedt says. Then think of something “much softer and less dense than that.”

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On ‎9‎/‎12‎/‎2017 at 9:53 PM, billchao said:

There were certainly comparisons to PXG irons when the P790s were announced. TPE injected into the hollow cavity is definitely something I associate with PXG, though I'm sure there are more similarities to the manufacturing and design that I don't know about.

Taylormade has been using different materials to fill the slots or cavities in their clubs for a while now. This type of technology isn't something new to Taylormade.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm not a lawyer, obviously, but this doesn't feel like the kind of thing PXG will win. TaylorMade could easily show prior art, I think, and end up getting PXG's patents disallowed.

The material isn't the same. The injection process likely isn't the same. The general idea isn't new to PXG.

I don't know what PXG has going for it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, saevel25 said:

Taylormade has been using different materials to fill the slots or cavities in their clubs for a while now. This type of technology isn't something new to Taylormade.

I believe it's the first time they've filled the hollow body of the clubhead though. PXG was the first company I heard of doing that, but that doesn't mean it hasn't been done before.

For all I know, somebody could have filed a patent on the process ten years ago and never used it in production. I don't know where the line is on two similar designs that serve the same basic purpose is, I'm not well versed in patent law.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 9/12/2017 at 7:15 PM, onthehunt526 said:

I don't have $2800 to shell out for a set of irons (the 0311T) or really $1400 for the TMs and no one has demos of PXG around...

If PXG pushes this lawsuit, it would definitely make people think twice before shelling out $2800 for a setup of PXG and wait for something TM has to offer that is similar to the P790 but "patent infringement free".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

38 minutes ago, billchao said:

I believe it's the first time they've filled the hollow body of the clubhead though. PXG was the first company I heard of doing that, but that doesn't mean it hasn't been done before.

I believe it's been done well before PXG.

144_1.jpgarc_blades_iron_large.jpg

 

Now, commenters say that the ARC (accelerated rebound core) had thicker faces, a different filling material, etc.… but that seems like it could still show prior art if the patent is not super specific.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, iacas said:

I don't know what PXG has going for it.

Well they have convinced a lot of people they should shell out upwards of $3000 for a set of irons, they have that going for them. :-P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Interesting, the more I look at this the more it sounds like PXG is just trying to protect their $2800 club sets. Maybe they should golf plate it like Honma and use more exotic materials?

 

Quote

The material, called SpeedFoam, was suggested to the iron team engineers by colleagues in the golf ball side of TaylorMade’s business. It’s not a material used in golf balls, but it had the right properties to allow the thin face to flex while not adding weight that would negatively affect the center of gravity location.

I see myself in the market for one of these TM sets, once my kids are safely out of college. . .

Edited by Lihu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

43 minutes ago, iacas said:

I believe it's been done well before PXG.

144_1.jpgarc_blades_iron_large.jpg

 

Now, commenters say that the ARC (accelerated rebound core) had thicker faces, a different filling material, etc.… but that seems like it could still show prior art if the patent is not super specific.

Right, so like you mentioned earlier, it could end up negating PXG's patent claim. If their process is different enough from from Nickent's to warrant it's own patent, the argument could be made in favor of Taylormade for the same.

Dick's Sporting Goods owns Nickent, right? Maybe they own that patent or sold it to PXG. I'm going to stop now because I'm really just speculating.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

36 minutes ago, billchao said:

Right, so like you mentioned earlier, it could end up negating PXG's patent claim. If their process is different enough from from Nickent's to warrant it's own patent, the argument could be made in favor of Taylormade for the same.

Dick's Sporting Goods owns Nickent, right? Maybe they own that patent or sold it to PXG. I'm going to stop now because I'm really just speculating.

Yeah who knows.

If I'm bored I'll look for the PXG patents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I would assume Taylormade would have their lawyers look into it before even trying to release something like this but who knows. Also in 1993 Taylormade released the burner midsized iron which was a foam filled, so this isn't really a completely new concept.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now




  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    Talamore Golf Resort
    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Mission Belt
    Snell Golf
    Frogger Golf
    PitchFix USA
  • Posts

    • I don't know what Titleist is attempting to do other than introduce their version of a Chrome Soft at a ProV1 price - good distance, soft feel, good spin around greens is what I see posted. For people who were buying Chrome Soft, and Titleist did not want people to desert the Titleist brand... still, worth $10 more than a Chrome Soft? And Callaway is introducing a revolutionary Chrome Soft and CS-X in 2018... Still the AVX will probably be enough to keep most Titleist loyalists at home.
    • I like this visual face on view of the kinda rocking hip look showing the tilt from face on.  This view simplifies the tilts in my brain.  
    • On the Titleist website, one guy who tried them mentioned a price of $48 a dozen.
    • I’m no instructor but I think the key will be to work on one priority at a time.  Erik has given you that one thing. Practice it in slow motion. Take video of those slow motion swings. Speed up til you have it right at full speed. Then continue that until you don’t think about it much. Then incorporate the next thing. The shanks should take care of themselves when you change the picture. Take a look at this: The other things I might add to the mix at any point are static like grip and posture (if those are problems, or if you need a refresher- and I’m not saying you do). Those things can be found here: Basically the shanks will fix themselves as you change the picture. That takes time and deliberate effort, not just a day on the range hitting balls at full speed with new thoughts.  
    • From course to course and region to region, bunkers represent the largest inconsistency in golf conditions as I see it. Example:  Many of the bunkers in and around NE Ohio public courses are, a) rarely in good condition; b) can be a sand and micro pebbly mix; playbox sand; worse. Then you go to a quality place and the bunkers are raked, in good shape and you catch a pretty good lie most of the time.  That is until you take your swing and find out only the top half inch of the sand is good. Your club bounces off the rock hard base beneath the good sand and blade one over the green and into more trouble. Played a couple of RTJ golf trail courses last year.  The sand was powder.  More like moist talcom powder than sand.  No idea how to hit from a bunker with very dense, heavy sand.  Left a few in because I'd never played from that type of sand. Tour pros are fortunate that bunker conditions are consistent from week to week for them.  The rest of us suffer with 'no idea' how the bunkers will behave from round to round. Remedy?  Stay OUT of the bunkers at all cost.  They are not fair, not in good condition and sand consistency is definitely NOT part of bunker play for most of us.
  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. AlexPodlogar
      AlexPodlogar
      (42 years old)
    2. gowpowdsp
      gowpowdsp
      (43 years old)
    3. mambo1888
      mambo1888
      (34 years old)
    4. Stanley51
      Stanley51
      (66 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon

×

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...