Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator
Posted
26 minutes ago, Chris Brooks said:

Finally remembered to post this - had a no sixes round last week at Tobacco Road. Key for me was smarter par 5 play - not trying to be a hero with the second shot, plus I had solid wedge play all day.

Saved my double bogey for the par 3! Shot a 77.

All set!

What par three?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, iacas said:

All set!

What par three?

Thanks @iacas. It was on number 14, the beautiful return hole over the water.

See all that action around the green? Had a hard-pan sand lie with a lip in front. Thought I could work it out softly but alas bladed it almost into the water across the green. Tough chip from there led to a two putt.

First rule of green-side bunkers and chipping: get the ball on the green... somewhere!

Hole-14.png.db1871f442bcd3a8f150b24809764a9a.png

  • Funny 1

-Chris Brooks

I've blogged about my wanderings since 2003. I love roaming throughout the USA looking for remote public golf courses to play.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I've never really given much thought to this topic, but like the idea, so I went back to some old posted scores and realized I had no sixes on my card a couple weekends ago. Shot a very scrappy 74 despite really poor ball striking. 

Conversely, this last weekend I shot 70. Three sixes, all on par 5s, which is kind of silly to think about. Definitely not the normal way to shoot a good round...

Definitely going to keep this though actively on my mind for future rounds, as a scorecard free of sixes means a good round. 

  • Like 1

Posted
47 minutes ago, dman1260 said:

 

Conversely, this last weekend I shot 70. Three sixes, all on par 5s, which is kind of silly to think about. Definitely not the normal way to shoot a good round..

 

That’s crazy! One of my overriding goals is to eliminate 6s on par 5s and limit damage to par 3s and 4s. To hear that you shot a 70 with that sort of damage… I’m not sure how to react. Outlier / singularity?

-Chris Brooks

I've blogged about my wanderings since 2003. I love roaming throughout the USA looking for remote public golf courses to play.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Chris Brooks said:

That’s crazy! One of my overriding goals is to eliminate 6s on par 5s and limit damage to par 3s and 4s. To hear that you shot a 70 with that sort of damage… I’m not sure how to react. Outlier / singularity?

I think it's somewhat of an outlier, but my par 5 scoring has not been good relative to my overall game lately. The par 5s at the course I played are also generally 3 shot holes (or maybe 2.5 shot), so it's not like they yield easy scores. Still wouldn't expect to be 3 over on those holes and 5 under on the rest.

I've been making some swing changes so I practice a ton with my short irons / wedges, so those clubs are on much more "on" vs. my longer irons. The changes are starting to flow through to longer clubs, but it's taking its time, so that's also a factor. 

 


Posted

To follow-up on this topic, I've now shot 36 holes in a row without a 6, which is great. However, it doesn't necessarily translate as well to "good" scoring as I would have thought. It definitely ensures I'm shooting ok rounds (few over), but I need more 3s and 4s (on par 5s) to take my game to a higher level.  

One day, I'd love to be good enough to go for no 5s, but that's a ways away. 

  • Thumbs Up 2

Posted
On 11/2/2021 at 6:41 PM, Chris Brooks said:

Thanks @iacas. It was on number 14, the beautiful return hole over the water.

See all that action around the green? Had a hard-pan sand lie with a lip in front. Thought I could work it out softly but alas bladed it almost into the water across the green. Tough chip from there led to a two putt.

First rule of green-side bunkers and chipping: get the ball on the green... somewhere!

Hole-14.png.db1871f442bcd3a8f150b24809764a9a.png

Not sure why this cute little hole has so much bite. It's like Pinehurst area's own version of the Golden Bell. I've played it thrice now and luckily never found water but came away sweating each time.  

Congrats on the no sixes BTW. I'm not a big 'goal' guy but this one will have me doing flips when I eventually do. 

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Damned near pulled this off yesterday. First hole is a par 5, parred it. 

Second par 5 is hole #6. It's the number one handicap on the course. Hit a decent drive kinda behind a tree on the left. Low punched 3 wood up to about 110 yards out on the right, again blocked by a tree. Hit a decent punched 9 in front of the green. Chipped on, and I was left a 12 footer for par. .... Yeah, I made it. Saved par. 🥳

Birdies on the other 2 par 5's. 

No sixes on the card, 3 over par teeing off on number 18, a 340 yard, par 4. 

My tee-shot was a wicked slice into the trees on the right. Ugh. From there... let's just say it went badly. 💩the bed. Made a 7.

I have had rounds without any sixes. I've recently had 9-hole rounds with no sixes. But I have not yet had an 18 hole round with no sixes since I've been a member of this forum. 2022 awaits. 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 2

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Did it again today.  Parred the 3 par 5's uneventfully - two GIR's,  and one easy up and down. 

Overall, 13 pars, 5 bogeys for 76. (Started with 10 pars, so disappointing finish.)

A poor trouble shot and a thin bunker shot, respectively, led to difficult up and downs for bogey 5's on #15 and #16 -  close as I got to a 6. Knowing about this challenge, the 10 foot putt for a 5 on #16 was gratifying.  

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 hours ago, reidsou said:

Did it again today.  Parred the 3 par 5's uneventfully - two GIR's,  and one easy up and down. 

Overall, 13 pars, 5 bogeys for 76. (Started with 10 pars, so disappointing finish.)

A poor trouble shot and a thin bunker shot, respectively, led to difficult up and downs for bogey 5's on #15 and #16 -  close as I got to a 6. Knowing about this challenge, the 10 foot putt for a 5 on #16 was gratifying.  

Great job, brother. 

I have to confess I'm envious. I've not been able to pull this off since I've been aware of this thread. 

Congrats again. 

  • Like 1

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Another round with no 6's. Two pars and a birdie on the par 5's. Played better than the previous times I did this. Longest putt for a 5 was 2 feet. 

Overall, 1 birdie, 12 pars, and 5 bogeys for 75. Hit 8 GIR. 29 putts. 

Strokes gained was -3.8 driving, -4.5 approach, +0.1 short, and -1.6 putting. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
33 minutes ago, reidsou said:

Another round with no 6's. Two pars and a birdie on the par 5's. Played better than the previous times I did this. Longest putt for a 5 was 2 feet. 

Overall, 1 birdie, 12 pars, and 5 bogeys for 75. Hit 8 GIR. 29 putts. 

Strokes gained was -3.8 driving, -4.5 approach, +0.1 short, and -1.6 putting. 

That is a nice round. Congratulations on the no 6's. 

  • Like 1

My bag is an ever-changing combination of clubs. 

A mix I am forever tinkering with. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
1 hour ago, reidsou said:

Another round with no 6's. Two pars and a birdie on the par 5's. Played better than the previous times I did this. Longest putt for a 5 was 2 feet. 

Overall, 1 birdie, 12 pars, and 5 bogeys for 75. Hit 8 GIR. 29 putts. 

Strokes gained was -3.8 driving, -4.5 approach, +0.1 short, and -1.6 putting. 

Cool. It's just an award given out once, though, as you know. 😄

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, ChetlovesMer said:

@reidsou, it's time for you to start the "No Fives Challenge". 

The ‘no more than four’ challenge. Otherwise 6s will be cool!

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
2 hours ago, ChetlovesMer said:

@reidsou, it's time for you to start the "No Fives Challenge". 

Interesting. I think I actually have done that at my home course. But, either way, it’d be a good goal. 

Philip Kohnken, PGA
Director of Instruction, Lake Padden GC, Bellingham, WA

Srixon/Cleveland Club Fitter; PGA Modern Coach; Certified in Dr Kwon’s Golf Biomechanics Levels 1 & 2; Certified in SAM Putting; Certified in TPI
 
Team :srixon:!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 6 months later...
Posted

I’m claiming the No Sixes Challenge! Shot 78 yesterday, and here’s my hole by hole!

 

      PAR: 4-5-4-3-4-4-3-4-4—35

SCORE: 4-5-5-3-4-5-3-5-5—39

 

      PAR: 4-4-4-4-5-3-4-3-5—36

SCORE: 5-5-5-4-4-4-4-3-5—39

 

A couple of highlights from the round:

•Saved par on the seventh hole after I hit a miraculous flop shot to within two feet.

•Made an 8-footer for bogey on 12 after hooking a drive OB. That proved to be critical.

•After a perfect drive on 14 (short par 5), I had only a 6 iron in. Was on the fringe in two and birdied easily. Almost made the eagle putt!

Nothing super crazy happened during the round, and it was just one of those days you just feel like everything was clicking.

  • Thumbs Up 2

WITB:
Woods: Cleveland Launcher (Driver, 17 degree, 22 degree)
Irons: Titleist T200 (4-PW)
Wedges: Callaway Jaws (50/54/60)
Putter: Odyssey White Hot

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.