Jump to content
IGNORED

The (No) Sixes Challenge


iacas

Recommended Posts

  • iacas pinned this topic

This is an amazing idea - haven't done it yet but a new focus for the weekend. If this post is out of line (i.e. the thread is reserved for those who achieve it) feel free to delete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
1 hour ago, alleztom said:

This is an amazing idea - haven't done it yet but a new focus for the weekend. If this post is out of line (i.e. the thread is reserved for those who achieve it) feel free to delete.

Nah. It’s fine to bump it in the meantime. Especially the first time you read it. Then you can follow it or subscribe to notifications in it.

It’s also fine to post in it when you come close but lose the Six Challenge on the last hole or in an excruciating fashion or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I just went back over the 21 rounds for which I have readily available statistics and 5 of them I have no worse than a 5. 2 of them I had only one 6 or worse and one of those was a triple bogey 7 on the last hole at Bethpage Black. That one was quite painful.

This is a great idea by the way. Back when I was playing regularly and reasonably well, I had two goals for myself. One was no doubles. The other was no bogeys in the first 6 holes. So basically I would play pretty safe through 6 holes. Middle of the greens and whatnot and if I could get through 6 without a bogey, then I knew I was playing well and could start being a little more aggressive. My home course at the time started off with a short par 5 and a short par 4. 3 and 4 were not too hard, but then 5 and 6 were quite tough holes, so it wasn't easy, but if I could achieve my two goals I pretty much invariably shot a good score. 

Nowadays I don't play regularly enough to achieve these goals hardly ever. I should really focus on it more. I think the no bogeys in the first 6 was a good goal, because it was quite a high bar to set for myself and that in itself had a positive effect on my golf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

14 minutes ago, woodzie264 said:

Wow - this will be tough

Yep, and reminded me of this thread...

While not exactly the same, it's close.  It's tougher than it might sound, even for better players.

Good challenge.

 

15 minutes ago, Popeye said:

.....I managed this on my last round although there was a few Mulligan's involved!

Then you didn't "manage it".... ;-) 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
23 minutes ago, David in FL said:

Yep, and reminded me of this thread...

While not exactly the same, it's close.  It's tougher than it might sound, even for better players.

agreed - good memory

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Two weeks ago I shot 76 (par 70) with no 6s for the very first time in a long long time. Did make 7 bogeys (and 1 birdie) - none on the two par 5s. They were pretty much all failure to get a one putt after nGIRs and bunkers and three 3-putts on freshly aerated greens. 

What stood out to me most to me after reflecting on the round is I had:

1) Zero penalties off the tee. Some really good drives but wasn't creaming it all day or anything. Had plenty of drives in the rough and 1 in the trees but no replays/un-playables, etc.

2) Did not stub/flub any nGIR chip/pitches (have gotten better in last 2 months but up until then I was good for at least two crappers). Have focused on 'Quickie Pitching Video' technique and using the bounce. No hero/wow chipping seems to be necessary.

Strategy going forward is to do shot selection aimed exclusively to get an nGIR (consider GIR a bonus) at all costs on 160 yards and over approach shots by using aiming point as the center of the tree frame. 

Yesterday, I had 2 OB drives on par 4s so ended up getting two 6s. But the strategy helped in shooting a very acceptable 81. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Really interesting. Looking back at the last "normal" course Ive played, i missed this by 3. I would say 2 could have been prevented easier.(4putted, duffed ngir chip that went 3 feet)

Hitting tee shot OB will kill this, which it did for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

11 minutes ago, cutchemist42 said:

Hitting tee shot OB will kill this, which it did for me.

I think this is part of the point. You shouldn't really be aiming your tee shots anywhere that OB is a risk more than maybe 5% of the time. You really shouldn't hit it OB very often at all. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

I feel like this is out of reach for me, given my swing. Maybe if I get really conservative off the tee I might have a chance, but even my all-time low round of 82 last year had three 6s in it and I only hit driver six times (I looked it up). Two of those 6s are directly related to the driver, though.

Now I'm curious to see if I can do it with the season winding down. I've been hitting driver a lot more this year and something in the back of my mind always told me it's not the best way for me to score low.

3 hours ago, Ty_Webb said:

I think this is part of the point. You shouldn't really be aiming your tee shots anywhere that OB is a risk more than maybe 5% of the time. You really shouldn't hit it OB very often at all. 

Unfortunately that doesn't work for my swing because I randomly return my club 10° open at impact. I already aim down the left side as it is, which actually punishes my good strikes that draw slightly. Hard to aim when there's just not enough real estate to account for my miss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I tried today at my home course.   I shot an 88 which for me is about average here.   With 2 penalties and too many 3 putts, it wasn't going to happen.    The goal is attainable and I will persevere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • iacas changed the title to The (No) Sixes Challenge

This would be difficult for me last round par 72 I had one on the front and two on the back on the way to 78.

I don't keep stats but my feeling is I'd rather face a par three than a five as long as it's 175 or under.  I MAY BE unique in that haha.

I may really suck at par fives...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • iacas unpinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    Whoop
    SuperSpeed
    FlightScope Mevo
    Use the code "iacas" for 10% off Mevo and the code "iacasjun21" for 10% off SuperSpeed.
  • Posts

    • Ah, okay. I was responding to you saying "RoC is related to clubhead speed." It's true in a time-based system. If a player goes from 90° to 90° from A6 to A8, that's 180° in that "distance," but if they swing at 92 MPH their "rate of closure" in a time-based system (i.e. RPM) is going to be slower, almost surely, than someone who goes 90° to 90° at 132 MPH. So, you can reduce RoC (distance) while swinging faster, increase RoC (distance) while swinging slower, etc. I'm just making the point that it's important to understand whether you're talking about it in time (RPM) or distance (whether that's within the foot before/after impact or from A6 to A8 or something like that). Few do, yeah. But instructionally, it's more about how some amateurs do it versus how the pros do it. Most amateur golfers will stall the pivot, and the clubhead will more "overtake" as part of a flip/roll. PGA Tour players don't stall the body, so I'm often trying to reduce a little closure to encourage the body to do a lot more work. I don't know if I'd say that. These aren't "measurements" by any stretch, but… I think you'd be surprised at how many PGA Tour players draw their drivers.
    • You’re doing the classic B1G argument Matt. Stop trying to say beating unranked teams by a lot is more credible than beating ranked teams even if by one score. You’re way to absorbed in numbers and disregarding what’s actually happening out there. You’re right about the AP poll. But nobody wants to play tough games week after week as opposed to unranked, unmatched opponents. I don’t care how much OhioSt bests Rutgers by, or NW or Maryland. They’re unmatched teams for OhioSt. Oregon beat OhioSt. OhioSt lost. Period. I don’t care what the numbers show. They lost. Oh! But OhioSt destroyed Rutgers, struggled against Tulsa, destroyed Maryland so let’s rank them above Oregon? Again, numbers against flops are meaningless. Let’s see how they do when they finally play a ranked team, the steadily fading PSU.
    • I've seen instruction on trying to match your spin angle at A6 and A8, so like 60˚ open to 60˚ closed. So 180˚ would be a lot by that standard. But I've seen very few pros who do that. They're usually in the 60-90˚ open range at A6 (even DJ with his pre-bowed wrist comes in around 60˚ in the videos I've seen). And almost always past 90˚ closed at A8. How far depends a lot on shot shape as I understand. For example, Morikawa gets to ~90˚ closed at A8. But Rory and Rahm get more to ~120˚ closed. In the videos I've viewed the correlation is lower but in general I've noticed a similar relationship to the A6 position. Cutters are closer to 60˚ and drawers are closer to 90˚. To me this is a good indication of why most tour pros have gone away from the draw with the driver. Rotating the face 200˚ (90˚ open to 120˚ closed) from A6 to A8 sure seems harder to make pro level consistent than rotating 150˚ (60˚ open to 90˚ closed).
    • I wouldn't say I'm great at reading the numbers off a launch monitor, but I do feel like the path, face, HSP, VSP, low point, dynamic loft numbers are a big deal. I dunno what curve is and the difference between that and shot shape nor do I know what the acceleration and speed profiles are. The livestream also mentioned official recommended external battery packs because if you get one that provides too much juice, you can fry the M+'s chips. Also that they anticipated limited supplies and bought extra and have 3K M+ in inventory.  
    • This just happened to my XHot Driver.  Love the Driver but this has happened several times where it becomes loose.  Does anyone know where you can buy replacement screw bits? I can't seem to find any online, etc.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Double_AA
      Double_AA
      (28 years old)
    2. FCAPT
      FCAPT
      (67 years old)
    3. ScrilltheDeal
      ScrilltheDeal
      (33 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...