Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
mikeosborne38

Scores improved after playing fade.

28 posts in this topic

My scores suffered recently after my draw turned into low hooks with not much carry distance on my drives and getting into trouble on approaches. I worked at the range for three hours to work on hitting a fade. I found a simple way by aiming left and weakening my grip and making my normal swing. My misses are nowhere near as bad with my fade and I find myself in less trouble the two rounds I have played since the change. My playing partners say I'm crazy for getting rid of my draw because it is seen as a shot hit by better players but to me a true fade is preferable. Has anyone else here made a similar switch concerning their primary ball flight shape?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

Has anyone else here made a similar switch concerning their primary ball flight shape?

Most tour players curve it one way 90% of the time and we encourage amateurs to do the same. If you "own" a pattern you'll definitely be able to play better golf.

Check out this thread

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

My scores suffered recently after my draw turned into low hooks with not much carry distance on my drives and getting into trouble on approaches. I worked at the range for three hours to work on hitting a fade. I found a simple way by aiming left and weakening my grip and making my normal swing. My misses are nowhere near as bad with my fade and I find myself in less trouble the two rounds I have played since the change. My playing partners say I'm crazy for getting rid of my draw because it is seen as a shot hit by better players but to me a true fade is preferable. Has anyone else here made a similar switch concerning their primary ball flight shape?


A guy named Jack Nicklaus won 18 professional majors with a fade is what I would tell your friends. Really a fade is a lot more easier shot to control and it usually will fly higher and stop faster so with approach shots it's probably the better shot.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As Lee Trevino once said, "You can talk to a fade but a hook won't listen"! :-)
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As Lee Trevino once said, "You can talk to a fade but a hook won't listen"! :-)

What did he say about the slice then? ;)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

What did he say about the slice then?

He said this, " :pound: " like everyone else!!!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

My "natural" ball flight was anything between a draw and a hook from the first day I ever played golf but I also had no problem hitting fades when I wanted.

It seems like my game stays more focused if I use both during a round. When a draw starts getting a little stale usually switching to a fade gets me back in the groove or vice versa. I also tend to do better on courses with a lot of trees that force me to do both often.

BTW. The very best golf I ever played was on a day when I only had enough daylight to play 8 holes and all I intended to do was work on hitting all fades that day. After 8 holes I had 7 birdies and one par. I had never done anything close to that either before or since.

Hmmm. Maybe there's a lesson in there somewhere if I was smart enough to use it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wish I could hit a controlled fade on command. When I try I usually miss left. It will be something I ask my new instructor about for those shots here and there when it would be nice. There are a few holes at our course that give me trouble playing the ball right to left. One is a par 3, almost all my double or worse scores are on this hole at that course.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

My playing partners say I'm crazy for getting rid of my draw because it is seen as a shot hit by better players but to me a true fade is preferable. Has anyone else here made a similar switch concerning their primary ball flight shape?

Better players can hit draws but don't necessarily prefer them or play them all the time.  As @mvmac mentioned most good players shape the ball one way or the other.  Know your natural shot and you can eliminate a side, work the ball away from a hazard etc.

Personally, when I was playing my best golf, I was playing a draw... When I quit and started playing again, my ball flight ended up being a fade...  I actually like the fade better because as @flopster mentioned, it's a shot you can hit high and stop fast.  On hard, fast greens, that is a must to have scoring opportunities.

If I could pick, go with the fade...  but in all honesty... play with what your hitting good that day...  Don't force either.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

My playing partners say I'm crazy for getting rid of my draw because it is seen as a shot hit by better players but to me a true fade is preferable. Has anyone else here made a similar switch concerning their primary ball flight shape?

The problem with a draw/hook as a miss is that it can go hot. It's typically low and has a lot of run. I think it is a myth that it is a preferred shot. I think the case is most beginner/high-handicappers slice the ball (reflective of swing faults that mostly involve bad or no turning of the body). Hence, the thinking is good is the opposite of slicing (hook or draw). The problem is you can have plenty of swing faults but teach yourself to draw if that is the only outcome you want. To get good at the game, it helps to be able to work the ball either way, but the key is being consistent. A slight draw or fade is no big deal, and no inherent harm either way. Ultimately, you want to be able to hit both shots and a lot of times it will be dictated by lie and other conditions like the wind, green, fairway tilt or other hazards.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with a draw/hook as a miss is that it can go hot. It's typically low and has a lot of run. I think it is a myth that it is a preferred shot. I think the case is most beginner/high-handicappers slice the ball (reflective of swing faults that mostly involve bad or no turning of the body). Hence, the thinking is good is the opposite of slicing (hook or draw). The problem is you can have plenty of swing faults but teach yourself to draw if that is the only outcome you want. To get good at the game, it helps to be able to work the ball either way, but the key is being consistent. A slight draw or fade is no big deal, and no inherent harm either way. Ultimately, you want to be able to hit both shots and a lot of times it will be dictated by lie and other conditions like the wind, green, fairway tilt or other hazards.

The first part @mvmac explained. If you aim up the right side you are eliminating misses to the left with it. Sure sometimes when I hook the ball it will go OB or get lost but most of the time it is just down the left rough and still runs big time so I don't lose tons of distance. What does that soft slice do when someone misses when trying to fade. Usually from what I see is even if it is playable it is a high ballooning soft shot that doesn't go far and usually leaves a much longer shot on the next shot. Which brings me to the 2nd part, I think a draw is promoted because it is usually a longer shot and rolls more. I know when I first got lessons and switched I feel a lot more power in my swing and hit it further. I don't play much of a draw with my iron game though, just a slight one.

To the OP, what are you going to do when the fade turns into a slice? Change back to a draw? In my opinion, what you need to do is figure out what causes the hooks instead of just switching. It will make you that much better to know why you are missing so you always know how to fix it. I hook because I get my club face closed big time at set up and I already come from way inside the ball. Or sometimes it's because I don't swing enough to right field after I make impact which causes me to follow through real low and left. So without seeing your swing maybe tweak your club face a little to more square or slightly open at impact and try to make sure you swing through to right field and finish high. But I am not a pro or even that good just letting you know how I stop hooks.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A guy named Jack Nicklaus won 18 professional majors with a fade is what I would tell your friends. Really a fade is a lot more easier shot to control and it usually will fly higher and stop faster so with approach shots it's probably the better shot.

Jack Nicklaus in Golf My Way ....

Chap. 8 is called: Why I Always Played the Fade - and Now Sometimes Play the Draw.

Nicklaus learned to be versatile... you need to go the other way sometimes. One side only can hurt: Rocco Mediate plays only the draw, and lost a U.S. Open playoff against Tiger with a leftward drive on a dogleg right Par 4.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Nicklaus learned to be versatile... you need to go the other way sometimes. One side only can hurt: Rocco Mediate plays only the draw, and lost a U.S. Open playoff against Tiger with a leftward drive on a dogleg right Par 4.

And Tiger played a fade the entire week, regardless of which direction the tee shot went.

Rocco hit the first fairway earlier that day, while Tiger missed it playing a fade.

Rocco lost because he hit a bad shot, not because he plays a draw.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

A guy named Jack Nicklaus won 18 professional majors with a fade is what I would tell your friends. Really a fade is a lot more easier shot to control and it usually will fly higher and stop faster so with approach shots it's probably the better shot.

Fade's don't necessarily stop faster than any other shot shape, nor is it any easier to control.

I play a pull-fade with my woods and a push-draw with my irons. Like mvmac said, just find a shot shape you are comfortable with.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I play a pull-fade with my woods and a push-draw with my irons.

that's me....not necessarily that I 'play' it that way, more so because that's the way my swing goes with least effort.

I have to really exaggerate club path to get my driver to draw, but it's doable.....

It's still nice to be able to shape an alternate hit once in a while, but I'm finding that the more effective my 'stock' shots get, the less I find myself in positions that require a shot that deviates from it.....

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Fade's don't necessarily stop faster than any other shot shape, nor is it any easier to control.

I play a pull-fade with my woods and a push-draw with my irons. Like mvmac said, just find a shot shape you are comfortable with.


Why do they not stop quicker? Unless it's a surface that slopes away from the shot a fade will stop faster by virtue of being hit higher on average. In reality a player would be better off with a draw off the tee and a fade for the scoring clubs and I'm not alone with this belief many of the scratch and + hdcp players I play with agree with this. Ultimately the golf course will decide what is the best shot shape by the hole design but on average I would play with that type of strategy if I could, I play a draw with all shots unless there is no other option though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do they not stop quicker? Unless it's a surface that slopes away from the shot a fade will stop faster by virtue of being hit higher on average. In reality a player would be better off with a draw off the tee and a fade for the scoring clubs and I'm not alone with this belief many of the scratch and + hdcp players I play with agree with this. Ultimately the golf course will decide what is the best shot shape by the hole design but on average I would play with that type of strategy if I could, I play a draw with all shots unless there is no other option though.

I feel I get high draw irons to stop the fastest myself.  Faster than the rare occasion when I am forced to play a fade.  I don't think it really matters, too much, like Mike said the most important thing is to "own" your pattern.  I fade my driver and fairway wood.  I naturally draw my irons but my wedges I naturally fade a tiny bit.  I seldom ever have to go away from my shot shape with each club.  It is extremely rare that I have to do so, the golf course very rarely decides this.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • My Swing (b101)
      It's just feeling a little bit more natural than it used to and I'm not stepping on the course with 5 or more swing thoughts, which is nice! I don't think it'll take much work getting back to making progress and I'm definitely seeing that some of the changes I've made have stuck - ball flight is really high compared to what I'm used to and the ball turns right to left about 50% of the time and stays straight for 30%. It's the 20% of rubbish, either duck hooks or generally wayward tee shots that I want to clear up, which is going to be this morning's target on the range. I didn't end up hitting the range yesterday - a mate texted to ask to play a round, so I went for that. What was obvious is that the little 9 hole course, where I don't need anything above a 4 iron, has been great for my iron play, but that the 3 wood, driver and course management need a bit of a refresher course. Shot an 86 with a ridiculous 7 penalty strokes (4 on one tough par 3), which says it all really as I don't normally take any! It is a tight track though and there is OB all over the place, but no excuse for the few 'head off' moments which prevented me scoring well. It was match play as well so I guess that's part of it... In short summary: Driving/3 wood - pretty poor and I'm just not comfortable over the ball with those clubs. On a longer course, I'd have struggled. Long irons - good, bar that atrocity of a par 3, where I think I'll just aim way left next time and take the safe miss. Both of those were actually really nice strikes, but went dead straight rather than drawing like I had expected. Still, my fault entirely for aiming towards the trouble  Mid-short irons - mostly pretty good actually. Put 6/14 approaches from outside 100 yards to (3/4 from within 100) inside 15 yards and bar two long bunker shots, the rest were manageable. Putting - really pleased again; I probably only made one that I wouldn't have expected (birdie on 13), but there's a lot of break on the greens and I thought it was pretty decent for a first time out in a while. http://www.gamegolf.com/player/benpage101/round/930037 Overall, pretty close to where I'd want it to be, but a better decision on 6, some better drives and a bit more luck on odd holes (like 16) and it'd have been a great round. I'd take that for the first time in ages. Should be able to post some video this afternoon.
    • What would a PGA Tour player shoot at your home course?
      And also, "speculation" is what the thread is all about! Sure, I'm placing the Tour guys on a pedestal but they DESERVE it. Yes "Golf is Hard", but those guys are GOOD. Low 60s are very much a possibility in any tournament they tee it up in, let alone on a public course that was designed with the average golfer in mind. Let's give credit where credit is due! If all the players from 75-125 on the money list decided to go out and play a new course (of "moderate difficulty" for amateurs) every week for the next 2 months, course records would be getting smashed all over the place. They might shoot the odd 70 or 72, but you darn well bet there would be a lot of 63's and 64's in there too. Regardless of poor course conditions, lack of course knowledge or anything like that, they are gonna make birdies in droves and they are going to go low!
    • The this math does not compute thread
      I was at a garage sale with my son who was like 10 years old at the time. The seller had a box full of cheap toys with a handwritten sign on the box that read "$1 each, or 2 for $3".  I nudged my son and pointed to the sign with my eyes (because the seller was standing right there). He glanced down at the sign and immediately grinned and shook his head in disbelief. And don't get me going on auctions. People will pay more for used crap than they know they would if purchased brand new, simply because they get caught up in a bidding war. The best part is listening to them try and justify it afterwards.
    • What would a PGA Tour player shoot at your home course?
      The odds of him shooting -32 would be slim, but not impossible. Those guys absolutely demolish a handful of the easier courses (ie. Kapalua, the old rotation for the Las Vegas Invitational, the old rotation for the Bob Hope, TPC Scottsdale before they toughened it up,  North Course at Torrey, etc.) and scores of ~ -30 haven't been terribly uncommon at some events. But I think the PGA Tour and the Web.Com Tour seem to be trying to get away from insanely low numbers and are moving tournaments away from some of the old venues that can't keep up with how far  they hit the ball now, and renovating other courses to beef them up. I recall the Tour players voted to eliminate the TPC Stadium course at PGA West in the late 80's from tournanent play because they thought it was "too hard" and this year when they used it again it seemed to be quite playable for them. In fact, they seemed to have no issues making their way around the course at all. That speaks to the quality and depth of the fields nowadays.  That being said - no, I wouldn't expect a -32 total. But it definitely wouldn't shock me either.  On a side note, I would be really interested to see this type of experiment revisited. This thread has fuelled some great speculation and debate, so thank you guys for playing along!
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

  • Blog Entries