Jump to content
IGNORED

What Would Your Home Course Rate on the Doak Scale?


HJJ003
Note: This thread is 1291 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I'm rating my home course, Shuksan, a 7.1.  Well-maintained and manicured.  Lots of interesting topography.  Greens roll true.  Friendly pro shop.  Several beautiful views of snow-capped Mount Baker.  Ponds and creeks meandering through the holes.  No houses interfering with the natural views.  And the cart girls are all 10's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
4 minutes ago, iacas said:

Well you're awfully close to the "course you should definitely see if you're within 100 miles." From a quick look at GCA, your opinion seems to be your own only. 🙂

The 100 mile qualification is one we don't fit into for sure.  But we are also very unique, good conditions, and tough.  Some people call us a "hidden gem" near Seattle, while others don't like it.

2 minutes ago, Double Mocha Man said:

I'm rating my home course, Shuksan, a 7.1.  Well-maintained and manicured.  Lots of interesting topography.  Greens roll true.  Friendly pro shop.  Several beautiful views of snow-capped Mount Baker.  Ponds and creeks meandering through the holes.  No houses interfering with the natural views.  And the cart girls are all 10's.

I'd put Shuksan at a 6-6.5 with Eaglemont.  Loomis, I'd say is the 7 in our area.

Philip Kohnken, PGA
Director of Instruction, Lake Padden GC, Bellingham, WA

Srixon/Cleveland Club Fitter; PGA Modern Coach; Certified in Dr Kwon’s Golf Biomechanics Levels 1 & 2; Certified in SAM Putting; Certified in TPI
 
Team :srixon:!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 minutes ago, phillyk said:

The 100 mile qualification is one we don't fit into for sure.  But we are also very unique, good conditions, and tough.  Some people call us a "hidden gem" near Seattle, while others don't like it.

I'd put Shuksan at a 6-6.5 with Eaglemont.  Loomis, I'd say is the 7 in our area.

And Semiahmoo, designed by Arnold Palmer, is now a 1.5.  Too damn many houses lining the fairways... I feel like I'm playing golf in someone's backyard.  But Loomis Trail is cool.

Edited by Double Mocha Man
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Administrator

Friendly pro shop staff is completely irrelevant. It’s all about the architecture.

  • Upvote 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

3 hours ago, David in FL said:

The subjectivity is also dependent on the experiences of the person rating the course.  
 

If someone has never played truly top tier courses (or absolute dog tracks for that matter), they’re likely to consider the relative extremes with which they are familiar as closer to either side of the scale than they actually are.

Agreed. Doak actually acknowledges this in his book series. He states something along the lines of if his “4” is our “6” then we just need to take that into consideration when reading the books. 

3 hours ago, iacas said:

I probably slightly under-rated my home courses. Bump them all up 0.5 points.

I looked yours up after you had posted the first time and thought I would rate them a little higher than you originally did. Impossible for me to know though without playing them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The muni courses that I play would range anywhere from 1-3. 

A couple of them have some interesting holes, but the course maintenance is never going to good enough for more than a three.

I'd rank my "home" courses at Kittyhawk a straight 2. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Kind of depressing IMO.  I was happy with the two muni's I frequent but looking at this rating scale they are "3" at best so maybe I shouldn't be so satisfied.  The other two courses in my "rota" are likely a "4-5" and a "6" so that's not too bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator

I'd say Neshanic is about a 6, the rest of the courses that I usually play are 3s.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

More on Doak's scale.  Thinking it over, it's really two scales--6-10 are a way to rate the world's top courses.  1-5 is a way to rate the rest of the world.  3 is average, 1 is awful, 5 is really good, 4's would be 5's except for some drawback, and 2's are either 3's in lousy shape or 1's with some TLC.  It seems to me that most of this crowd ought to be able to find an accessible 4 or 5.  Depending on where you live.

Two further observations--yes, the scale is subjective, but any course that the USGA uses for qualifying or regional events probably rates as a 5 (unless it's in the top half of the scale).  And, the scale doesn't address what to do with a course that has the bones to be a 6-10, but is the victim of hard times or poor maintenance.  The Fallen Angel problem is a conundrum, and, unless Doak has blotted out the memory of Apache Stronghold, he's aware of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, DwightC said:

More on Doak's scale.  Thinking it over, it's really two scales--6-10 are a way to rate the world's top courses.  1-5 is a way to rate the rest of the world.  3 is average, 1 is awful, 5 is really good, 4's would be 5's except for some drawback, and 2's are either 3's in lousy shape or 1's with some TLC.  It seems to me that most of this crowd ought to be able to find an accessible 4 or 5.  Depending on where you live.

Two further observations--yes, the scale is subjective, but any course that the USGA uses for qualifying or regional events probably rates as a 5 (unless it's in the top half of the scale).  And, the scale doesn't address what to do with a course that has the bones to be a 6-10, but is the victim of hard times or poor maintenance.  The Fallen Angel problem is a conundrum, and, unless Doak has blotted out the memory of Apache Stronghold, he's aware of it.

The scale is obviously skewed to split hairs between really good golf courses, and really he focuses on what makes golf courses different. So a 3 just isn't really different than any other course out there in the world. The closer to 10 a course gets the more special or unique in a good way a course becomes. 

Yeah, I agree that the bottom of the scale is much more common to find, and the vast majority of golfers have access to some 4's and 5's. (unless your in Alaska as Doak Jokes).

Doak states that conditioning never adds to a Doak score on his scale, but can remove a point (maybe more?) if the course falls on bad times. I heard Apache Stronghold got really bad there for a while on conditioning...and knowing Doak gave it a 6 still he may not follow his own advice all the time haha!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I guess my home course Elizabeth Manor  would fall in the range of 4-4.5. It is a straight forward old city parkland style course that devoid of trickery but has well guarded greens with very healthy bunkering. Variety of holes is good and a fun set of finishing holes. The best thing is it offers options for all level of players to score. The greens are usually in great shape rolling true between 7-9 so does not break hearts of high handicappers. The Eastern Virginia Amateur gets played here every year so it has some pedigree and flex muscle when it wants to.

On the flip side it is not visually appealing and meanders through a city neighborhood. 

I feel like cost of play should figure in the assessment as an addendum to the criteria, even if it muddies up the scale a bit. From that perspective, cost to quality of play ratio would probably have me rating my course as a 5.5.

Edited by GolfLug

Vishal S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

25 minutes ago, GolfLug said:

I feel like cost of play should figure in the assessment as an addendum to the criteria, even if it muddies up the scale a bit. From that perspective, cost to quality of play ratio would probably have me rating my course as a 5.5.

That's the big key here. Don't think Doak cares much about what something costs.

My old Kittyhawk would skyrocket from a 2 to a solid 3.5 if cost was considered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

9 minutes ago, mcanadiens said:

That's the big key here. Don't think Doak cares much about what something costs.

My old Kittyhawk would skyrocket from a 2 to a solid 3.5 if cost was considered.

Well, I figured you gotta let the girl next door play to her strength if you are gonna put her on a scale featuring supermodels..😊

Edited by GolfLug
  • Like 1

Vishal S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Whitemarsh Valley CC outside of Philly. George Thomas design, 1908. PGA Tour event from 1963-80. Every great player from Harry Vardon to Jack Nicklaus has played in competition there. Twenty years ago I would have given it no more than a 3. It was neglected, had shrinking greens, bad bunkering and way too many trees that were planted 50-60 years ago. But an ongoing reclamation project over the last ten years has lifted it to a 7, some would argue 7.5. The Philly area has a lot of great golf courses and Whitemarsh is back to being one of them. Right around the corner is Philadelphia Cricket Club, whose Wissahickon course is a solid 8, but Whitemarsh is very close on the scale, IMO, and much more accessible. 

Bill M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
4 hours ago, HarrogateHacker said:

Just read the scale and think one of the clubs i’m a new member of would be 8 - maybe 9.  The other my home course a 6.  The higher one has recently been restored somewhat by Tom Doak so I assume he’d like it. 

What course? 8s and 9s are pretty rare.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

4 hours ago, iacas said:

What course? 8s and 9s are pretty rare.

Hi, it’s the Hotchkin at Woodhall spa, world golf have recently ranked it at 54 in the world.  I love it, so am a bit biased, but given I’ve joined as a member and it’s +100miles from where I live, it’s defo worth an 8 (in my ratings anyway) it’s v subjective though.  Doak has been making changes to the course over the last few years  

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 1291 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • If it's not broken don't fix it. If you want to add grooves to it just because of looks that's your choice of course. Grooves are cut into putter faces to reduce skid, the roll faced putter is designed to do the same thing. I'm no expert but it seems counter productive to add grooves to the roll face. Maybe you can have it sand-blasted or something to clean up the face. Take a look at Tigers putter, its beat to hell but he still uses it.     
    • I get trying to limit relief to the fairway, but how many roots do you typically find in the fairway? Our local rule allows for relief from roots & rocks anywhere on the course (that is in play). My home course has quite a few 100 year old oaks that separate the fairways. Lift and move the ball no closer to the hole. None of us want to damage clubs.
    • Hello, I've been playing a Teardrop td17 F.C. putter for many years and love it. It still putts and feels as good or  better than any of the new putters I've tried and it's in excellent condition except the face has dings in it ever since I bought it used that kind of bother me. I was just wondering if it's possible to have some really shallow horizontal grooves milled into the face on a "roll face" putter. I think I would rather spend some money on it instead of trying to get used to a new putter.  Thanks
    • I agree with @klineka & @DaveP043 above.  When a new member first joins the club they cold be told that they are not eligible for tournaments until they have an established HCP.  As you said, it only takes a few rounds.  If they do not to post HCP that was their choice and choices have consequences.  If playing in the tournament is important to them then they should step up and establish an HCP.  Maybe they miss the 1st tournament, is that a real big deal?  And if it is a "Big Deal" to them then they had the opportunity to establish the HCP. As for not knowing how to report for HCP I assume your club has a pro and they should be able to assist in getting the scores reported and I suspect out of state courses may also have staff that can assist if asked.
    • Wordle 1,013 2/6 🟨⬜⬜🟨🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Thought I was gonna be a big shot today...  🙂    Nice Job!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...