Jump to content
IGNORED

Conceded Putt Blown Into the Hole


iacas
 Share

Ball Blown Into Hole After Concession  

33 members have voted

  1. 1. What is your answer to the question in the first post?

    • A scores a 3 for the hole.
      20
    • A scores a 4 for the hole.
      13
    • A scores something else for the hole.
      0


Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

Here's a rules question for you all:

Players A and B are in a match against one another. On a par four, A hits a birdie putt that stops several inches from the hole. B concedes A's short remaining par putt and, as A is walking to the hole to get it, but before he's anywhere near the ball (i.e. he doesn't cause it to move), the ball is blown by a gust of wind into the hole.

What is A's score for the hole and why?

I'll hold off voting for awhile so as not to "show" my answer. 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Assuming A's ball was at rest and not overhanging when B conceded his next stroke makes the total score of 4. What happens to A's ball after concession makes no difference whatsoever.

  • Like 1
  • Informative 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

If this was not match play, the answer would be a birdie 3 because wind is a natural force and you have to play the ball where it stops, Rule 9.3. But what is confounding this is it’s match play and the putt was conceded. But the ball was never marked and lifted, so I think it’s still a 3 though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

13.1d Ball on putting green (without having been lifted and replaced) is moved by a natural force, so the next stroke is played from its new spot = holed. 

3.2b(1): If a concession is made and the ball is holed, the concession does not matter.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, Never3putt said:

The ball was still in play.  The putt is deemed as holed and the score would be 3.  Player B's concession of the 4th stroke has no bearing.

That cannot be. After a concession the ball in question is no longer in play. If it were the player picking up his ball after a concession would be in breach of 9.4b.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 minutes ago, Ruler said:

That cannot be. After a concession the ball in question is no longer in play. If it were the player picking up his ball after a concession would be in breach of 9.4b.

Yes it can, because a concession can be made while the ball is still in motion from the previous stroke (and the concession then doesn't matter if the ball is holed).

If what you wrote is correct, the ball would no longer be in play before it comes to rest from the previous stroke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 minutes ago, Missouri Swede said:

Yes it can, because a concession can be made while the ball is still in motion from the previous stroke (and the concession then doesn't matter if the ball is holed).

If what you wrote is correct, the ball would no longer be in play before it comes to rest from the previous stroke.

You are correct but I was referring to the case at hand where the ball is at rest and that makes all the difference. The point is that there was a next stroke to be expected which is not the case if a ball is moving and makes its way into the hole.

Edited by Ruler
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

16 minutes ago, Ruler said:

You are correct but I was referring to the case at hand where the ball is at rest and that makes all the difference.

I see your point. I don't know what the final interpretation will be.

But the result of A's first putt (without concession) is that it is holed. If the concession prevents this, then the concession is preventing the first putt from coming to this final result.

Whether or not it was at rest, since the ball had not been lifted and replaced, if it is moved by a natural force, the next stroke will be from the "new spot." In this case, the "new spot" is from the hole. So there's no next stroke to be conceded.  At least that's the way I see it. I've been wrong before.

["I've been wrong before.  Thought I made a mistake.  Turns out I didn't."]

Edited by Missouri Swede
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, saevel25 said:

Since the golfer didn't mark the ball yet, then it should be considered holed out with a 3. 

I voted birdie. 

 

Switching my vote. Since the ball was at rest before the wind blew the ball in, and the concession happened before the ball started moving, the concession is final. 

Rule 3.2

Quote

Conceding Next Stroke. This is allowed any time before the opponent’s next stroke is made.
    »    The opponent has then completed the hole with a score that includes that conceded stroke, and the ball may be removed by anyone.
    »    A concession made while the opponent’s ball is still in motion after the previous stroke applies to the opponent’s next stroke, unless the ball is holed (in which case the concession does not matter).
    »    The player may concede the opponent’s next stroke by deflecting or stopping the opponent’s ball in motion only if that is done specifically to concede the next stroke and only when there is no reasonable chance the ball can be holed.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

26 minutes ago, Missouri Swede said:

I see your point. I don't know what the final interpretation will be.

But the result of A's first putt (without concession) is that it is holed. If the concession prevents this, then the concession is preventing the first putt from coming to this final result.

Whether or not it was at rest, since the ball had not been lifted and replaced, if it is moved by a natural force, the next stroke will be from the "new spot." In this case, the "new spot" is from the hole. So there's no next stroke to be conceded.  At least that's the way I see it. I've been wrong before.

["I've been wrong before.  Thought I made a mistake.  Turns out I didn't."]

But as the next stroke was conceded it never took place and was counted as one additional stroke, thus 3+1=4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • Support TST Affiliates

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct links for Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package. Save 10% on Mevo with coupon code "IACAS" as well.
  • Posts

    • Ugh, just heard the announcer say that on a short par-4, you always have to lay up and choose an angle.  This after a poor shot by (I think) Pereira on the 9th.  What year is it?  Not that it was true in the past, but at least in the past they had an excuse for believing it.  
    • Day 164 (22 May 22) - worked on getting weight on lead foot - used the reverse stork drill and 3w.  Key was to stay as balanced as possible, did okay.  Followed with some lefty swings with the Dunlop lefty 7i, focused on the pressure of my weight on my lead “right” foot.  Then turned it back around and completed the drill session with full swings with my SLDR 7i and the hard foam balls. 
    • Correct. The R10 is much closer to the Mevo, not the Mevo+. Yeah. 😄
    • At $300 and requiring only 3’ for a radar unit, I don’t think it’s going to be very accurate. So no, it’s not going be dominating the Mevo market anytime soon. There are those of us who didn’t get the Garmin R10 at a fraction of the price of a Mevo+ (and Pro package) because of questionable accuracy. Hell, the gifs on their site show people “playing” the simulator without even hitting a ball. It’s basically a video game at that point.
  • Today's Birthdays

    1. DocP
      DocP
      (61 years old)
    2. Isaac03
      Isaac03
      (38 years old)
    3. phillyk
      phillyk
      (32 years old)

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...