Jump to content
IGNORED

Custom Fitting Result?


ronaldkuntoro
Note: This thread is 4759 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

For those here who have been custom fitted using a launch monitor, did you get the same result on the course with what you see on the Launch monitor?  Do you gain the same yardage on the course with what you see on the launch monitor?  And how much did you pay to get custom fitted using a launch monitor?

Whats in my Golf Bag:
Driver: Nike Sumo 5000
5 Wood: Mizuno MP-001
Iron: Mizuno MX-950 5-PW
Wedge: Cobra FP 60 degrePutter: Odyssey 2-BallBall: Yellow balls
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I'll tell you when I actually get the new sticks.

I paid the local equivalent of $65 for a driver fitting, iron fitting, video swing analysis and (more or less) club making 101 seminar. Spent almost four hours in the guy's workshop. Damn interesting, I'll try and post more about it sometime.

Stretch.

"In the process of trial and error, our failed attempts are meant to destroy arrogance and provoke humility." -- Master Jin Kwon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I had a custom fitting last summer, the guy had a little gazeebo thing set up on the range (he was a mobile fitter) I found that the numbers we were getting on his launch monitor were pretty accurate, he said the range balls were about 10-15% reduced flight, so I got three or four balls out of my bag and hit those and they were right on the money.

The fitting cost me $99, if I made a purchase from him I got $75 discount, I had new shafts put into my r7 irons and I got the $75 off, and OMG what a difference, my first time out with the new shafts I shot 79, the second time out: 79, I think I have had only one round in the low 90's and all the others are low 80's. I have had quite a bit of personal/familly problems since the end of Aug and played little golf.

I can't wait to get back out and played serious golf and get into single digits!

  • Upvote 1

Driver: Taylormade R9
3 Wood: Cobra S 9-1
5 Wood: Cobra S 9-1
7 Wood: Cobra S 9-1

Irons: Taylormade r7 Custom Fit (SW-4)

Putter: Taylormade Rossa Monza Spyder

Balls: Titleist Pro V1x

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I havent checked my index since last fall but since getting fit for my new clubs which I hadnt been fitted for the old ones, I can say I have seen a improvement. They changed my flex on my irons and driver and the loft of my driver. Although the yardage is 'bout the same as on the monitor, I think I hit it a little longer now (although I thought I was hitting it longer in the first place but now I know that was ego). I didnt pay anything at Golfsmith to be fitted 'since I purchased the clubs, but would not buy another set off the rack. Hope this helps. Tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Last week I was fitted for irons. I bought used Mizuno's MP33's that I hit perfectly on the Golf Galaxy simulator but horribly on the golf course. A club repairman and a Pro golfer adjusted the length and grips ($60) for me and gave me a lesson ($45). Now I hit them good on the golf course. Then I got fitted for golf balls ($21 at Golf Galaxy). I look forward to playing much better than I did last year and improving on my 13 handicap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by SAGolfLuvr

Last week I was fitted for irons. I bought used Mizuno's MP33's that I hit perfectly on the Golf Galaxy simulator but horribly on the golf course. A club repairman and a Pro golfer adjusted the length and grips ($60) for me and gave me a lesson ($45). Now I hit them good on the golf course. Then I got fitted for golf balls ($21 at Golf Galaxy). I look forward to playing much better than I did last year and improving on my 13 handicap.



Why do you think the "Golf Galaxy" simulator was so far off?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I would never trust launch monitor numbers for distance, but everything else it measures is useful, such as shot dispersal, ballooning, ball contact. I think the launch monitor distance numbers tend to stroke our egos, but its not useful unless you bring your own club in and compare against the distance you already know you hit. Its possible to get a general idea about distances, but I wouldnt feel comfortable unless I can compare against my own clubs.

I also only go to a fitting when its free. The Ping fitting, for example, is a great way to get an idea of the process.

Titleist 910D2 8.5° Diamana 'ahina 80 S
Titleist 909F3 3W 13° Diamana D83 S, Titleist 910f 5W 19° Fubuki Ax 80X
Taylormade RAC MB TP 3-PW Irons DG S300, Callaway Jaws 54° and 60°
Titleist Futura putter, Taylormade TP5 balls

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I've seen fittings going on at the range but have always kinda been afraid to go see them because my clubs a kinda cheap (I like them) and am concerned that they will just hard sell me on upgrading them. I'm not opposed to changing shafts or tweaking my set to better fit me, so I have a few questions.

Is it best to go to a golf store or mobile fitters on the range?

When they say "Fitting" Does that mean just the stiffnes & length of my shafts *insert joke here* or does it take into account the grips and is it possible to change the setup of the club head itself based on how I swing?

What would be the average cost of new shafts & grips after being fitted?

If I have a tendency to slice or hook would a fitting help in those areas?

For those who have it done, did you notice an immediate improvment to your game or did it take a while to get used to the new set up?

Thanks for any help.

my get up and go musta got up and went..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by ronaldkuntoro

For those here who have been custom fitted using a launch monitor, did you get the same result on the course with what you see on the Launch monitor?  Do you gain the same yardage on the course with what you see on the launch monitor?  And how much did you pay to get custom fitted using a launch monitor?



I've tested new clubs sided by side with my own clubs, and I've had wedges and irons adjusted based on simulator data. So far it's been a successful process. My distances on the course are pretty much the same as those generated by the simulator. I've had subsequent sets of irons and wedges bent to those specs and been happy with them all. Getting the before and after data was free, but the adjustments and the new clubs (fairway wood and driver) were oviously not free.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


If I saw a fitting going on at a range, I would do it! Thats the best situation. You can try something out, and you might be able to get a feel for the different clubs out there.

Everyone should have a fitting once, just so they know they arent using club specs that are completely wrong. For example, if the lie of your irons are off, that could really affect your ability to just hit it straight.

Shafts are a big factor, but I would say to err on the soft side. Softer shafts make you swing slower with good rhythm.

As far as grips, try asking the golf shop to add an extra layer of tape or two (or three) during a grip change. Try it out.

If you are using the wrong club setup, you should see an immediate improvement.

If you dont see an improvement, then you know you gotta work on swing mechanics.

Either way, its good.

Titleist 910D2 8.5° Diamana 'ahina 80 S
Titleist 909F3 3W 13° Diamana D83 S, Titleist 910f 5W 19° Fubuki Ax 80X
Taylormade RAC MB TP 3-PW Irons DG S300, Callaway Jaws 54° and 60°
Titleist Futura putter, Taylormade TP5 balls

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Got full driver fitting on launch monitor about 26 months ago. I hit five driver combinations in a little over an hour. I bought a new driver (my current one), so the fitting was free.

Odd outcome: I get about 15 yards more carry on the course than I did on the launch monitor. People at shop said they set the monitor conservatively so people don't get unrealistic promise of distance.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by Robato

I would never trust launch monitor numbers for distance, but everything else it measures is useful, such as shot dispersal, ballooning, ball contact. I think the launch monitor distance numbers tend to stroke our egos, but its not useful unless you bring your own club in and compare against the distance you already know you hit. Its possible to get a general idea about distances, but I wouldnt feel comfortable unless I can compare against my own clubs.

I also only go to a fitting when its free. The Ping fitting, for example, is a great way to get an idea of the process.



Free Fitting if you buy the clubs from them.    Otherwise I would pay for them.   How could club fitters earn their living if it was free?   Not to mention they spent a fortune to buy the launch monitor.

Whats in my Golf Bag:
Driver: Nike Sumo 5000
5 Wood: Mizuno MP-001
Iron: Mizuno MX-950 5-PW
Wedge: Cobra FP 60 degrePutter: Odyssey 2-BallBall: Yellow balls
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have my 1st Driver fitting at the range with the lunch monitor last week.The previous fitting was done in doors. For the fitting at the range , you can see the actual ball flight , distance and the data from the LM. So got myself fitted with 910D2 With Kai'li 70 Stiff .
What I Play:
913D3 9.5°Diamana Kai'li 70 Stiff  "C3" | 910F 15°, Diamana Kai'li 80 Stiff "D2" | 910H 19°,  Diamana Kai'li for Titleist 85 Hybrid Stiff | Titleist 714 AP2 4 to P Aerotech Steelfiber i110 S | SM4 Vokey 50.12, 54.14 & SM5 60.11K| 34" Edel Umpqua + 40g Counter Weight
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites


The only thing I can add to this ,,,,because I just went down that road.....is DONT get fitted at a big box store.Those launch monitors in there are very generous to say the least,those guys in there are trying to sell sell sell and thats it.

Adams 9065LD 8.5* with a Nunchuk shaft
Adams CB1 gw-4i with Project X 6.0 shafts , Mizuno MT-11 58* wedge
Callaway Steelhead 3
Tour Exotics Hybrid 16* and 18*
Ping long putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites




Originally Posted by DannyB215

I'd have to say, NEVER EVER do an Iron Fitting on a Golf Galaxy or Golf Smith...ALWAYS off. The best fitting out there you can get is out on the range.



Yeah I heard about their Launch Monitor showing greater numbers than actual.

Whats in my Golf Bag:
Driver: Nike Sumo 5000
5 Wood: Mizuno MP-001
Iron: Mizuno MX-950 5-PW
Wedge: Cobra FP 60 degrePutter: Odyssey 2-BallBall: Yellow balls
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 4 weeks later...


Originally Posted by ronaldkuntoro

Free Fitting if you buy the clubs from them.    Otherwise I would pay for them.   How could club fitters earn their living if it was free?   Not to mention they spent a fortune to buy the launch monitor.



Sorry man, I live in Japan, and all the club fittings are free. Even though they have an amazing amount of electronics in this country, it still makes sense to me to make it free. If you find a club that works, you are more likely to buy it. They recycle a lot of used clubs in most stores, usually in great condition, so it helps to sell these clubs if you can try them out. Also, they usually have a deal where you can return the used club after a day or two at the range, and get 70-85% of your money back. Either way, the machines are good for selling used clubs, as well as club fitting. The club fitting process is about finding the right setup for someone, and that can be a long process, so I'd say I might pay for that from a small-business fitter, but just to use the machine, I think it should always be free if you are trying out the store clubs.

Titleist 910D2 8.5° Diamana 'ahina 80 S
Titleist 909F3 3W 13° Diamana D83 S, Titleist 910f 5W 19° Fubuki Ax 80X
Taylormade RAC MB TP 3-PW Irons DG S300, Callaway Jaws 54° and 60°
Titleist Futura putter, Taylormade TP5 balls

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I fitted myself for my driver, picked out my driver, club length, grip size, and shaft. Its a pretty damn good driver

For my irons, i just got the gaps fixed and the lie adjusted...

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4759 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I kind of figured that might be part of the problem. I’m still guilty of it myself at times and you’re a better ballstriker than I am. I imagine the temptation to go for the flag grows as you get more control over your wedges. Might want to think about shot selection, too. I don’t know how you typically play short game shots but I see a lot of people default to hitting high pitch shots from basically everywhere, to every hole location, without regard for how the green is contoured and how the ball might release depending on where it lands. I know my short game has been steadily improving from expanding my shot selection, overall. Though to be honest, part of that is from necessity because I was really struggling with pitch shots so I started hitting more chips from everywhere, but it taught me a lot more about how to play short game shots in general. NP man. We’re all learning and improving together. It is a really good tool.
    • 2 rounds this weekend, one at my home course and another course that I know well.   Played well for 3 of the 4 nines.    Ended up with an 80 and an 88.  Breaking it down by 9, it was 38, 42, 41, and a tough 47 where I somehow ended up with chipping/pitching shanks where I dropped at least 6 strokes on the last 6 holes.
    • Yikes, how time flies. Here we are, almost ten years later. After prioritizing family life and other things for a long time, I'm finally ready to play more golf. Grip: I came across some topics on grip and think my grip has been a bit too palmy, especially the left hand. I'm trying to get it more in the fingers and less diagonal. Setup: After a few weeks of playing, this realization came today after watching one of Erik's Covid videos. I've been standing too far from the ball, and that messes up so much. Moved closer on a short practice session and six holes today, and it felt great. It also felt familiar, so I've been there before. I went from chunking the bejesus out the wedges to much better contact. I love changes that involves no moving parts. Just a small correction on the setup and I'm hitting it better and is better suited for working on changes. I'm a few years late, but the Covid series has been very useful to get small details sorted. I've also had to revise ball position. The goal now is back of ball in the middle of the stance as the farthest back with wedges, and progressively moving forward the longer the clubs get. Haven't hit the driver yet, but inside left foot or at the toe I suppose. Full swing: It's not terrible. I noticed my hands were too low, so got that to work on. Weight forward. More of the same stuff from earlier days. Swing path is now out-in and I want the push-draw back. When I get some videos it'll be easier to tell. I've also had this idea that my tempo or flow/rhythm could improve. It's always felt rushed around the end of the backswing into the transition, where things don't line up as they should. A short pause as things settle before starting the downswing. Some lessons might be in order. Chipping and pitching: A 12-hole round this week demonstrated a severe need to practice, but also to figure out what the heck I’m trying to do. I stood over the ball with no idea of what I wanted to achieve. On a four meter chip! I was trying the locked wrists technique, which did not work at all. As usual when I need information, I look for something Erik has posted. I’ve seen the Quickie Pitching Video before, but if I got it back then, I’ve forgotten. After reviewing that topic, some other topic about chipping and most importantly, the videos on chip/pitch from his Covid series, I felt like I understood the concept. I love the idea of separating those two by what you are trying to achieve, not by distance or ball flight. With one method you use the leading edge to hit the ball first. With the other, you use the sole to slide it under the ball. I was surprised he said that he went for the pitch 90% of the time while playing. I’ve always been scared of that shot and been thinking I have to hit the ball first. Trying to slide the club under usually ended with a chunked or skulled shot. After practicing in the yard the last days I get it, and see why the pitching motion is more forgiving. It’s astounding how easy the concept and motion is. Kudos to Erik, David and anyone else involved for being an excellent students of the game and teachers. With those two videos, my short game improved leaps and bounds, without even practicing. Just getting the setup right and knowing what motions you are trying to do is a big part of improving. Soft hands and floaty swings feels so much better than a rigid “hinge and hold”, trying to fight gravity and momentum by squeezing the life out of the grip. At least how I took to understand the “hold” part. I also think the chipping motion will help in the full swing. Keeping pressure on the trigger finger to ensure the hands are leading the clubhead and not throwing it at the ball. I've also tried looking in front of the ball at times when chipping, which helps. That's something I've been doing on full swings for a long time, and can make a big difference on the ball flight. Question @iacas: You say in the videos that you want the ball somewhere near the middle of your stance, and that for pitching it's the same. On the videos you got a fairly narrow stance, where inside of the left foot is almost middle of the stance, but the ball looks more inside the left foot than middle of the stance. Is that caused by the filming angle or is the ball more towards the inside of the foot? I often hit chips and pitches from uphill and downhill lies, where a narrow stance would have me fall over. What is your thought process and setup for those shots? The lowpoint follows the upper body, around left armpit IIRC, so a ball position relative to the feet may not be in the same spot relative to the upper body with a wider stance. Practice: I've set up my nets at an indoors location where I can practice at home. I did a quick search on launch monitors (LM), but haven't decided on anything yet. We're probably buying a house in this area in the near future, so I may hold off a purchase until I see what I can get going there. At some point I'd love to get a proper setup with a LM that can be used as a simulator. Outdoors golf is not an option 4-6 months a year here, so having an indoors option would be great. That would also be a place to use the longer clubs. My nearest course is a shorter six hole course where I don't use anything longer than a 21º utility iron. To play longer 18 hole courses I have to drive 1-1.5 hours each way, which I will do now and then, but not regularly. The LM market has changed a lot since Trackman arrived, and more people are buying them for personal use, but it's still need to spend a lot of money for a decent one that can fi. track club path. The Mevo at £305 could perhaps be something to consider. Maybe they have lowered the price to get out units before a new model is launched? It is almost six years old, though perhaps modified since then. It's got limited data and obviously isn't an option as a simulator, but could provide some data when hitting into a net. I'd have to read more about it first. It has to be good enough to be useful for indoors practice. As long as I frequently hit balls on the range or course, I'll get feedback on any changes there.
    • I'm pretty good at picking targets with mid/long irons in hand, but yes lately I have been getting more aggressive than I should be, especially from 100-150. The 50-100 deficiency is mainly distance control, working on that mechanically with Evolvr, but the 100-150 is definitely a result of poor targets.  6,7,8 iron in my hand I have no problem aiming away from trouble/the flag, hitting a very committed shot to my target, but give me PW, GW, and some reason I think I need to go right at it (even though I know I shouldn't). Like here from my last round. 175 left on a short par 5 to a back right flag. Water short right and bunker long. Perfectly fine lie in sparse rough, between the jumper and downwind playing for about 10yds of help. I knew to not aim at the flag here, aimed 40 feet left of it, hit my 165 shot exactly where I was looking, easy 2 putt birdie.   But then there's this one. I had 120 left from the fairway to a semi-tucked front left flag. Not a ton of trouble around the green but the left and back rough does fall off steeper than short/right rough. For some reason I aimed right at this flag with my 120yd shot, hit it the exact proper distance but pulled it 5yds left and had a tough short sided chip. Did all I could to chip it to 8 feet and missed the putt for a bad bogey. Had I aimed directly at the middle of the green maybe 5yds right of the flag, a perfectly straight shot leaves me 20 feet tops for birdie and that same pulled shot that I hit would have left me very close to the hole.    So yeah I think the 50-100 is distance control and the 100-150 is absolutely picking better targets. I have good feels and am strong with distance control on those I just need to allow for a bigger dispersion.    This view is helpful. For the Under 25yds my proximity is almost double from the rough vs the fairway which reinforces that biggest weakness right now being inside 25yds from the rough. But then interestingly enough in the 25-50yds I'm almost equal proximity from fairway and rough, so it looks like I need to work on under 25yds from the rough and then 25-50 from the fairway. The bunker categories are only 1 attempt each so not worried about those.   Thanks as always for the insight, it's been helpful. I'm really liking ShotScope so far.
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟨🟨⬜🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...