• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
PA Golf Info

What is your take on Par 3 courses for practice?

18 posts in this topic

What is your take on Par 3 courses for practice?  Do you play them for a short game work out at all? And if yes tell us why and if not tell us why as well.

For me I do use them.  I fit them in from time to time as a last min thing.  On days I do not have a tee time set and I get the bug to get out there I like to hit them up. I feel that they really give me time to dial it in. The one that is closest to my house has every hazard you would run into on a normal course. They have a hole with a full 100 yard water carry shot to the green. They have holes that you are hitting up a hill about 30 feet in elevation to the green and then back down.  I love the hole that goes back down a you can not go long as there is a stream that wraps the back of the green.  Lost of tree roots on some holes with low tree branches for those low punch shots right from the chip area.  I get to work on all my short shots I just love it. I think it is a huge help for my game to work out on a good par 3 course.

just list your take on them and if you do play them for a short game workout.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

There is a short course near me that isn't a complete par three but par is 34.   The par 4 holes are under 300 yards an I can get in 9 holes after work in a little over 1 hour if I play steady.   There are times though that I will play several balls into the greens if the pace permits, to practice my short game.   That's why I visit the course.  It is not in great shape but it does afford me the ability to practice my short game in a short amount of time.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I play a little executive course not to far from my place quite often. Very narrow, very small greens, and the six par fours all too narrow to use a wood. Playing there really helps my fine tune my distance control and club selection. Short game gets a good test as well being that you rarely have a lot of green to work with.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I played a par 3 course, 18 holes most of the Par 3s all were at least 170-225 from the tees we played, good practice and I'll go back, just not a lot.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Golfingdad and I will play a small executive/practice course nearby in the mornings where we can get in 9 holes <1 hour. I've even been know to play 9 at lunch there as well, time permitting. That said, I think they are great short game practice, and really show you how important strike is to scoring.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is one close to me with 18 holes, most of which are 160-200 yards. This definitely ain't no kiddie course, but it's a nice place to take the kids to play and not hold up play on the big boy course.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Par 3 course are a great way to dial in your iron distances too.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I enjoy playing a short executive course or a par-3 course on occasion, but I don't really consider it to be "practice", just another round.

When I think practice, I think working on one specific portion of my swing or a specific part of my game.  Let's face it, when playing a short course, there's really no difference from playing a full-sized course, except that you're not hitting as many (or any) drives with a driver.  You pretty much hit as many approach shots with irons of varying lengths and wedges playing a full-sized course as you do on a short course, so no, I don't really think of it as practice any more than any other round I play.  In fact, if you use a tee on the tee box, you may actually hit fewer iron shots that simulate the type of shots that that you'd hit on a normal course.

Good for a fun, quick round though, and there's nothing wrong with that!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I played one yesterday. It's good motivation for getting up early on a Saturday and getting the yard work done. That leaves me just enough time left for a quick trip around our local par 3 (Falcon Course, Kittyhawk, Dayton, OH). It has some pretty rugged holes for an executive course, but I can get around 18 holes in two hours or so depending on how crowded it is.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I played one yesterday. It's good motivation for getting up early on a Saturday and getting the yard work done. That leaves me just enough time left for a quick trip around our local par 3 (Falcon Course, Kittyhawk, Dayton, OH). It has some pretty rugged holes for an executive course, but I can get around 18 holes in two hours or so depending on how crowded it is.

The Falcon was the course I mentioned earlier. It actually has some teeth for an exec course. I'm still PO'd that I didn't get credit for suggesting that for a name change.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yeah Carl. That's a familiar-looking sign in your profile photo,

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yeah Carl. That's a familiar-looking sign in your profile photo,


I believe that is #11 on the Eagle. ;-)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

There was an executive course I played a ton at during college, as it was free (I worked for one of the courses a few years. It was tough to get on the regular courses, but was always easy to jump on the exec). The strongest part of my game is 150 and in... And I believe the reason is because that's where I learned to play the game, on the exec course. Just bought a "practice pass" to a local range and Par 3. It'll be good to hit the range and the Par 3 for practice... Plus it's a great way to start getting my daughter into the game.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Falcon was the course I mentioned earlier. It actually has some teeth for an exec course. I'm still PO'd that I didn't get credit for suggesting that for a name change.

I played there a lot when I was stationed at Wright-Patt, when it was called the Kitty course, it was great for the level I was at.  I played Hara Greens occasionally, too, but it got in horrible shape one year and probably never came back.  The 9-hole course on base was good, too, and just a little longer.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I play two different 9 hole courses to squeeze in a 1 - 2 hour of golf after work, or during rainy season.

One course is perfect for an iron & putting practice - an easy course with mostly par 3s of variable length.   Green conditions are very good.

The other course is very challenging with narrow fairways, small greens, and deep roughs.  In fact, they advertize it as the hardest executive course in East Bay area.  The course has five par 4 holes, three of them with sharp dog legs.  Course condition is rather poor - more like a dump.   Despite how difficult this course is, it attracts a lot of beginner golfers.  And they will lose dozens of balls before the round is over.  This is not a course for beginners.   I play the course to practice ball striking accuracy, and strategy.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

just yesterday i played an executive course in the area that is part of the metroparks system. they keep the course in great shape, and the staff there is very friendly and knowledgable. i generally go there when i'm playing bad, or if i want to sneak in a fast nine before work. there are several holes where i can use driver, and several par-threes are long enough where i can use mid-irons or even a hybrid.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love Par 3 courses, it is the reason why my short game is as good as it is. There are a couple in the area, one you can't hit more than a 6 iron but there is another in my area that has some holes that you can take out driver or fairway wood if you want to get on the green in 1.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really do enjoy a par 3 course as being a relative newcommer to the game it helps with confidence.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Willett's brother tried to be funny, but he was way offline. Bad effort in dry humor.. He should've not written anything like that. It's just going to make things harder for his brother and I'm sure Danny W. is gonna hear it from the crowds.
    • Willett's brother is not a part of the Ryder cup team. Willett made appologies: http://m.bbc.com/sport/golf/37500790
    • I like it. Especially compared to nearly all past US Ryder Cup kits. Actually before I dish out too much praise, do they have a huge Stars and Stripes flag emblazoned on the back?
    • I would say it depends on what club you're talking about. For drivers I would say that the best performing drivers of all time have been made within the last five years. Aerodynamics, material science, and the proliferation of launch monitors and data driven design have resulted in improvements across the board in distance and forgiveness as of late. I know that I personally saw a decent improvement on my G10 when I switched to a G30, in that I gained between 10 and 15 yards without sacrificing accuracy. This is on the high end of what aerodynamics can provide though, simply because higher swing speeds receive a greater benefit from decreased drag. Depending on the individual you may not see much difference so long as the driver itself was made within the last ten years or so. For irons I would be inclined to say that the main difference in the irons of yesteryear and the irons of today is forgiveness. The irons made today are much easier to hit than previous irons, simply because they aren't as drastically punishing on mis-hits as the old blades. The PING Eye2 irons seemed to be the first "widespread" GI iron that sparked the trend towards irons that were easier for the layman to hit. That being said, I found my s55 irons (their "blade" from several years ago) to be more forgiving than the Eye2's. Based on that and observations from other clubs I have hit I would say the average golfer would be best suited by irons made within the last 10 to 15 years that are in good condition with sharp grooves. If you play muscleback irons though, there's pretty much zero difference between modern "true" musclebacks and those of yore, though the current muscle-cavity irons (like the iBlade and MP-15) will likely be at least a bit easier to hit than the older blades while maintaining a similar style.  Wedges are the only thing that I would argue the "latest and greatest" provides a tangible benefit for. The reasoning for this is entirely different however, in that it's based solely off the condition of the grooves in older wedges. As wedges grow old, and get used, the grooves wear to the point that there becomes a noticeable performance difference - especially when playing out of the rough. For this reason alone do I say that the average golfer (assuming they golf at least once a week during the golfing season) is best suited by wedges no older than two or three years old.  Putters are the odd man out here. I don't think it matters in the slightest when your putter was manufactured, so long as you keep a reasonable grip on it so that it doesn't slip out of your hands. I personally am a fan of the newer milled putters for the feel they provide, but it doesn't mean I couldn't probably putt nearly as well with an original Anser putter in the same style. I think the average golfer is best suited by whatever putter style and features allow them to consistently roll the ball along their target line, with no age requirement. In summary, considering the advancement of technology, I would feel comfortable putting these "maximum age caps" on equipment for the average weekend golfer to get the most out of his/her game: Drivers: ~10 years old or newer Irons: ~15 years old or newer Wedges: ~3 years old or newer Putter: Whatever works best for you That being said, you may still enjoy the game with any kind of equipment out there. I just think that equipment that follows these guidelines will let the average weekend golfer get about as much as they can out of their game without necessarily breaking the bank. Like @iacas said, you may find incremental improvements by purchasing the R1 over an old G5 but the question then becomes whether or not this improvement is worth the price difference. This question can only be answered by the person buying the club. It can't be denied, however, that a driver from the 1960's will be severely outclassed by the G5 and the R1, making either of them a much better choice than the 1960's driver. Interestingly enough, I have had the desire to go the opposite way for a while now. I bought the s55's my last go around, and I'm thinking that my next set of irons will be a more "traditional" muscleback iron (since the s55 is mostly a CB), along the likes of the MP-4 irons by Mizuno. I hit the ball consistently enough that I don't care about the lack of forgiveness, and I believe that the wonderful look and feel of those irons, along with the little bit of extra vertical control (can thin it slightly to make punch shots even easier) would offset whatever I lose in forgiveness. I know that I would most certainly never go to an iron like the AP2, the G, or the M2. The chunky look of the club (along with the offset) gets into my head nowadays and makes me feel uncomfortable standing over the ball in a manner similar to how I used to be intimidated by the look of blades at address. I would gain forgiveness, but at the price of distance and trajectory control - an unacceptable trade for me considering I value distance and trajectory control much more highly than forgiveness.
    • My newest clubs are pretty old. Maybe 2006? I don't really remember. The other day, just for the heck of it,  I played using my old Bazooka Iron Woods. (2i-LW) Shot my normal score. Those Ironwoods are probably 15-16 years old. I don't think at this stage of my life, that a new set would make that much difference. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. mahariji_slice
      mahariji_slice
      (35 years old)
  • Blog Entries