Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3263 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

A high spinning ball will balloon more into the wind because the wind will increase the spin on the ball.

It really doesn't increase spin on the ball that, more that it increases the high and low pressure from the front to the back of the ball, which drives the ball upward. That is how a ball curves, because of a pressure difference. So basically hitting into the wind increased pressure on the front of the ball. So the ball wants to go higher if you have mostly spin around the horizontal axis.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Thanks for sharing @mvmac

How does this change driving into the wind?

Less spin I would guess means ball won't be pushed up as much by the wind but launch is higher so it's a wash?

Does teeing it low and swinging slower still apply?

I guess you missed my last post ;-)

When it's windy I don't change anything, I still try to launch it high, optimal is optimal, if the spin is low the wind won't effect it much.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have to agree, it's something I've been thinking about in my own game since I haven't had a consistent knockdown tee shot. Whenever I think I made a mistake hitting my ball high, it usually goes pretty far. I also usually get a straighter flight unless I hit it thin, so I think bombing it out there is the better option in all cases. Even in a crosswind, the ball tends to hold its line when I hit it high vs trying to fade or draw it to counter the wind.

In My Bag:

Adams Super LS 9.5˚ driver, Aldila Phenom NL 65TX
Adams Super LS 15˚ fairway, Kusala black 72x
Adams Super LS 18˚ fairway, Aldila Rip'd NV 75TX
Adams Idea pro VST hybrid, 21˚, RIP Alpha 105x
Adams DHY 24˚, RIP Alpha 89x
5-PW Maltby TE irons, KBS C taper X, soft stepped once 130g
Mizuno T4, 54.9 KBS Wedge X
Mizuno R12 60.5, black nickel, KBS Wedge X
Odyssey Metal X #1 putter 
Bridgestone E5, Adidas samba bag, True Linkswear Stealth
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have to agree, it's something I've been thinking about in my own game since I haven't had a consistent knockdown tee shot. Whenever I think I made a mistake hitting my ball high, it usually goes pretty far. I also usually get a straighter flight unless I hit it thin, so I think bombing it out there is the better option in all cases. Even in a crosswind, the ball tends to hold its line when I hit it high vs trying to fade or draw it to counter the wind.

Someone should do a detailed analysis. It would be interesting to know how much you need to compensate, even if only a little bit.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I have to agree, it's something I've been thinking about in my own game since I haven't had a consistent knockdown tee shot. Whenever I think I made a mistake hitting my ball high, it usually goes pretty far. I also usually get a straighter flight unless I hit it thin, so I think bombing it out there is the better option in all cases. Even in a crosswind, the ball tends to hold its line when I hit it high vs trying to fade or draw it to counter the wind.

Same with me.  I have been working hard to get the flight up and I don't want to change it for any reason.  I am not good enough with the driver to have a different swing or position for different shots.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Same with me.  I have been working hard to get the flight up and I don't want to change it for any reason.  I am not good enough with the driver to have a different swing or position for different shots.


As with many more of us ;-)

BTW, even "IF" I get a good shaped shot, my swing is the same. I just set up differently for the shot. That's what I think I've been told to do anyway.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

Wow, really great information Mike. Thank you for sharing.

So the conclusion is we need to reduce the backspin. Is that the main thing we are suppose to do? And the recommendation is to increase the loft? That cannot be the only suggestion. What else should we do?

Sorry if I am being dense, but I want to know what the conclusion should be because it is hard for me to accept we should only change the loft.

Michael

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
Wow, really great information Mike. Thank you for sharing.

So the conclusion is we need to reduce the backspin. Is that the main thing we are suppose to do? And the recommendation is to increase the loft? That cannot be the only suggestion. What else should we do?

Sorry if I am being dense, but I want to know what the conclusion should be because it is hard for me to accept we should only change the loft.

Make sure your angle of attack is positive. That will decrease the spin loft.

From TaylorMade's perspective, they obviously don't get into swing mechanics, they position the CoG low and forward (reduces spin) and they add loft.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

My question about the "high launch, low spin" motto for longer drives is that I wonder how it affects accuracy. I would assume that you would find less curvature of the ball with the same spin axis just because the ball is spinning less, but I want to know would the spin axis be more readily changed if the backspin is reduced? I would assume that drivers designed to lower spin would lower the "sidespin" as well as the backspin, but I just would like clarification on that.

As an interesting aside, I've used a 10.5* driver for years (Ping G10 with a ProLaunch Red in it) and have never found a benefit to the lower lofted drivers myself. Whenever I would hit them it would travel a shorter distance and have less accuracy. In addition to that I personally haven't found new drivers to be groundbreaking in either category for me, but I have only tested them with stock shafts (which performed worse than the ProLaunch Red for me in the same driver head before) so it wasn't exactly comparing apples to apples. I will say though that it's tempting to get the new shiny after having a small piece of paint flake off the center (laterally and longitudinally) of the driver's head.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Make sure your angle of attack is positive. That will decrease the spin loft.

From TaylorMade's perspective, they obviously don't get into swing mechanics, they position the CoG low and forward (reduces spin) and they add loft.


Correct, having attended the same presentation, Mine was conducted by Dr. Vincent Benoit CTO of TM. Fascinating stuff.

One element missing from the slides is unlike any other driver they have made the SLDR knocks 500-1000Rpms of spin off the vast majority of golfers, allowing them to loft up from 9 & 10degs  to 12 and 14s -However if you are currently hitting a 9-10.5 deg. Titleist** driver &  simply take and hit a 13 degree same model driver, that spin rate shoots way up in RPMs. You have increased LOFT you are hitting the ball higher, but you also engaged a lot more spin as price of that loft.- which can kill any distance you had in mind.

** just an example

This unique high launch, low spin scenario doesn't stop when the ball is air born, the decent angle is often more favorable, there can also be a high bounce at impact adding some extra yards

For over a decade I played with a 9-9.5, now I play 11.5 SLDR and have never hit a driver further.


Posted
My question about the "high launch, low spin" motto for longer drives is that I wonder how it affects accuracy. I would assume that you would find less curvature of the ball with the same spin axis just because the ball is spinning less, but I want to know would the spin axis be more readily changed if the backspin is reduced? I would assume that drivers designed to lower spin would lower the "sidespin" as well as the backspin, but I just would like clarification on that.

As an interesting aside, I've used a 10.5* driver for years (Ping G10 with a ProLaunch Red in it) and have never found a benefit to the lower lofted drivers myself. Whenever I would hit them it would travel a shorter distance and have less accuracy. In addition to that I personally haven't found new drivers to be groundbreaking in either category for me, but I have only tested them with stock shafts (which performed worse than the ProLaunch Red for me in the same driver head before) so it wasn't exactly comparing apples to apples. I will say though that it's tempting to get the new shiny after having a small piece of paint flake off the center (laterally and longitudinally) of the driver's head.


If your question is will you be able to move (draw/fade) the ball with these high lofted drivers the answer is yes. No real difference. They can fly straighter ( read: accurate) simply because of loft angages more back spin. ever try to slice or hook a 9 iron- its tough to do because of all the loft.

on a side note that prolaunch red shaft was awful IMO


Posted

If your question is will you be able to move (draw/fade) the ball with these high lofted drivers the answer is yes. No real difference. They can fly straighter ( read: accurate) simply because of loft angages more back spin. ever try to slice or hook a 9 iron- its tough to do because of all the loft.

on a side note that prolaunch red shaft was awful IMO

I'm talking about when I miss, it shouldn't be any bigger than my current miss, correct?

I do agree that there are better shafts out there, but that one was a free upgrade in the G10 and it was a whole lot better than what Ping had at the time. Their shaft they had labeled as a "stiff" played more like a senior flex since it flopped around like a wet noodle and it gave me a spin of upwards of 4500 rpm for me. I wish I could afford to get something a bit nicer, but not enough benefit for me to do so when you consider the cost put in (a couple lessons would be more beneficial to me).

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I'm talking about when I miss, it shouldn't be any bigger than my current miss, correct?

Shouldn't curve more, if anything you might be a little straighter. Gear effect would be very similar on off center hits.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
My question about the "high launch, low spin" motto for longer drives is that I wonder how it affects accuracy. I would assume that you would find less curvature of the ball with the same spin axis just because the ball is spinning less, but I want to know would the spin axis be more readily changed if the backspin is reduced? I would assume that drivers designed to lower spin would lower the "sidespin" as well as the backspin, but I just would like clarification on that.

I'm going to say that it's possible, for the same reasons as shown in the geeky video I did about why drivers curve more than 8-irons. If you narrow the spin loft, any tilt is magnified.

It's one of the reasons why PGA Tour players may still average slightly down, despite the gains distance offers in strokes saving (plus, that they hit the ball far enough).

Still, though, I recommend this as an even bigger reason why it's important to develop a pattern. If your ball always cuts, it's much easier to plan for everything from straight to big cut than if your ball sometimes cuts and sometimes draws.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm talking about when I miss, it shouldn't be any bigger than my current miss, correct?

I do agree that there are better shafts out there, but that one was a free upgrade in the G10 and it was a whole lot better than what Ping had at the time. Their shaft they had labeled as a "stiff" played more like a senior flex since it flopped around like a wet noodle and it gave me a spin of upwards of 4500 rpm for me. I wish I could afford to get something a bit nicer, but not enough benefit for me to do so when you consider the cost put in (a couple lessons would be more beneficial to me).

Correct it should not be any worse, in fact it may be less. Sorry for the misunderstanding on my part to your question


  • 4 weeks later...
  • Moderator
Posted

Bubba's recent numbers. 15 degrees launch, 1900 spin...oh yeah and he hit up 5.7 degrees

That's nasty. I really have to start figuring out this low spin stuff for myself.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

This is an area where launch monitors prove very useful. It's not very easy to work on this at the range without seeing numbers.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3263 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,831 X/6* ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩
    • Thank you.  I'll cross it off the list since it isn't going to achieve what I want. 
    • While it does turn out that both Tiger and Phil are less squeaky clean than I previously believed, I don't think golf quite has the worst in professional sports.  Or maybe they're better at image management.   Obviously I'm not fond of Phil's issue we're discussing in this thread (or his involvement with LIV) or Tiger's choices of how to drive.  I used to really like Dustin Johnson and, even before the LIV situation, we started to hear rumors that he bought more snow than Seward, although I don't think those stories were ever substantiated.  Meanwhile, I did think of Anthony Kim as the "good, bad boy" of the tour for a while fifteen years ago because of his party persona -- and if it turns out the worst he did was show up hung over to play (barring what one thinks of LIV), that's pretty good.  And I'm still happy he found a way to get his life clean. If we contrast that with some other sports I enjoy, I'm sure we could find a nice long list of NFL players that, at one point in my life, I was quite fond of, we get far worse disappointments (to put it mildly).
    • Answering that properly would land me in hot water, so I'm not going to. I don't think that many people would do that. I think that in certain circumstances many people would be willing to overlook someone doing that. But I was really referring to what I assumed was Tiger's transgressions (cheating on his wife) not Phil's.
    • No! Is a large part of the human population selfish, apathetic and cuts corners in the name of self-preservation 'more than they would like to admit', yes. Degenerate, scum, etc?.. no!! Most humans/men would not grope a woman like Phil is accused of doing (I think he absolutely did). That is scum. I mean what % of men do you think would do that? Seriously?? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.