Jump to content
IGNORED

Being tall an advantage?


Hardballs
Note: This thread is 2419 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Not that outrageous, one of the people I spend rounds with is 6'10" (Although he says he's only 6'8",slouching of course).

Um, yeah, I would say that 6'10/6'11" is outrageous. [quote name="DrvFrShow" url="/t/75159/being-tall-an-advantage/150#post_1069141"]I'm tall. 6'. [/quote] Not really.

Colin P.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Um, yeah, I would say that 6'10/6'11" is outrageous. Not really.

It's funny that I don't really notice until we go through a door. ;-)

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 year later...

Length is an inherent advantage in golf. Synopsis of the link:

Quote

The reason taller golfers hit it farther is mostly because their size provides a frame for more muscle and larger lever arms at the joints. The rest of it -- larger arc, more massive body -- reduces clubhead speed, and the longer club doesn't get enough back to make up for it. But the bigger golfer is also stronger (or at least has the potential to be stronger, given proper conditioning and nutrition). If he/she realizes that potential, the result is higher clubhead speed.

Now don't go throwing Jamie Sadlowski at me... nor, for that matter, Nick Faldo. Technique matters, of course. But the question was asked in terms of trends. What does height do, all other things being equal? I'm answering in the same spirit.

 

Quote
  1. Strength matters! If you assume the taller golfer is scaled up in all dimensions -- weight, muscles, size of joints, etc -- there is an implied strength advantage that accounts for all of the extra driving distance.
  2. Length of arc is detrimental, if it comes from a bigger radius. That's because it increases the need for strength to get the same rotation rate. (I have done other studies that show length of arc helps if it comes from a bigger angle. But that's not a tall-vs-short thing. You can have the extra shoulder turn whether you are tall or short.)
  3. "Taller implies farther" is not a statistical accident. Taller golfers are statistically likely to hit a golf ball farther. But the statistical correlation is far from the whole story; other factors are more important for driving distance.

http://www.tutelman.com/golf/swing/tallGolfer.php

Edited by natureboy

Kevin

Link to comment
Share on other sites


9 minutes ago, No Mulligans said:

I imagine there is an optimal body height and weight for golf but I'd bet it is not 7'6" (but probably taller than John Daly at 5'11")

 

john-daly-yao-ming.jpeg

If you have correctly proportioned clubs, and at least an average physique, I wouldn't see why it's a disadvantage. I would think he should at least be capable of average to better than average golf after a reasonable period of learning and practice.

Yao may have less than average dexterity / coordination, though, because he was essentially selected for his outlier height - not exceptional athleticism. What golf requires is not necessarily what basketball requires and I would expect all exceptionally tall guys get pushed into basketball early and therefore have less comparative time to put in at getting good at golf. That means there's a very small sample population of really tall golfers who spent the necessary time to get good at golf and that small population makes it less likely that several of them will also have what it takes to get exceptional at golf instead of just average.

I expect his height would be an advantage with the right clubs and extended technique training. I think when he was filmed on course that he was essentially a 'beginner'.

Edited by natureboy
  • Upvote 1

Kevin

Link to comment
Share on other sites


2 hours ago, natureboy said:

If you have correctly proportioned clubs, and at least an average physique, I wouldn't see why it's a disadvantage. I would think he should at least be capable of average to better than average golf after a reasonable period of learning and practice.

Yao may have less than average dexterity / coordination, though, because he was essentially selected for his outlier height - not exceptional athleticism. What golf requires is not necessarily what basketball requires and I would expect all exceptionally tall guys get pushed into basketball early and therefore have less comparative time to put in at getting good at golf. That means there's a very small sample population of really tall golfers who spent the necessary time to get good at golf and that small population makes it less likely that several of them will also have what it takes to get exceptional at golf instead of just average.

I expect his height would be an advantage with the right clubs and extended technique training. I think when he was filmed on course that he was essentially a 'beginner'.

He couldn't have proportional clubs as the USGA limits club length.  Maybe his wedge could be proportional with a driver length 48" shaft but then it would be an awfully long hitting and high flying wedge, "houston I think we have visual contact".

More importantly, the longer your arms plus clubs are the more precise in a % way you need to be to touch/hit an object.  He would have to be more coordinated than someone say 6' to have the same precision with his ball striking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

With a slow enough tempo, and a modicum of tension in the limbs; Yao Ming could influence a golf ball one week hence.  Distance traveled/time elapsed.  We are living in the distant past.  Years from now; we will be even older.  A 300 yard drive?...a modest effort.  200 yards?...I'd say a pigeon wedge.

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, No Mulligans said:

He couldn't have proportional clubs as the USGA limits club length.  Maybe his wedge could be proportional with a driver length 48" shaft but then it would be an awfully long hitting and high flying wedge, "houston I think we have visual contact".

More importantly, the longer your arms plus clubs are the more precise in a % way you need to be to touch/hit an object.  He would have to be more coordinated than someone say 6' to have the same precision with his ball striking.

Well I think he should have a set made just to see how he'd play with them while adopting a more normal posture. The difference in his and Daly's head heights does seem larger than their wrist to floor lengths. So Yao ends up playing with proportionally shorter clubs which should make them both lighter and easier to control if he has normal coordination.

I haven't seen any evidence that larger size necessarily equals less precision in movement. Even if so, the proportionally shorter shafts for Yao could offset that.

The great Seve didn't seem to think short arms were an advantage: "You know, David, you are not a bad player for a tall man with short arms."

Kevin

Link to comment
Share on other sites


All things being equal the taller player should generate more club head speed. That said of the guys I play with the longest two hitters are 5'6" and 5'8" , stocky, bit of a gut and they flat out hammer the ball. Go figure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

7 minutes ago, chilepepper said:

All things being equal the taller player should generate more club head speed. That said of the guys I play with the longest two hitters are 5'6" and 5'8" , stocky, bit of a gut and they flat out hammer the ball. Go figure. 

That's a fair summary, I think. Technique matters tremendously in golf.

Kevin

Link to comment
Share on other sites


On 6/11/2014 at 5:24 PM, Hardballs said:

Does being tall in height give an advantage? Amongst the group of friends I play with, I'd say 4/5 are approx. 5'8" ish, with 4/5 being 6' or slightly over! Now it could be coincidence? Or it could be height advantage? But the taller ones are the big hitters, up to 40 yards longer on drives, and hitting 8irons over 150yrds, and although were all capable of beating each other, the taller guys tend to win more? And I don't think this is coincidence! Just wondering what others views are of this? And if anyone can name a really good short arse golfer?

It must make a difference, because I am 5' 7" and rubbish

In my bag (Motocaddy Light)

Taylormade Burner driver, Taylormade 4 wood, 3 x Ping Karsten Hybrids, 6-SW Ping Karsten irons with reg flex graphite shafts. Odyssey putter, 20 Bridgestone e6 balls, 2 water balls for the 5th hole, loads of tees, 2 golf gloves, a couple of hand warmers, cleaning towel, 5 ball markers, 2 pitch mark repairers, some aspirin, 3 hats, set of waterproofs, an umbrella, a pair of gaiters, 2 pairs of glasses. Christ, it's amazing I can pick the bloody thing up !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I would say yes height is an advantage. 

The top 15 in driving distance this year

DJ: 6'4"
JB Holmes: 5'11"
Tony Finau: 6'4"
Bubba: 6'3"
Andrew Loupe: 6'1"
Jason Kokrak: 6'4"
Gary Woodland: 6'1"
Luke List: 6'2"
Hudson Swafford: 6'3"
Jamie Lovemark: 6'4"
Rory: 5'10"
Ryan Moore: 5'11"
Jhonattan Vegas: 6'3"
Adam Scott: 6'0"
Jason Day: 6'0"
Brooks Koepka: 6'0"
 

3 out of the top 15 are under 6' tall
6 out of the top 10 are 6'3" and taller

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
5 hours ago, saevel25 said:

3 out of the top 15 are under 6' tall
6 out of the top 10 are 6'3" and taller

To be fair, you can probably subtract two inches from all of those. They must have been wearing some big cleats the day they were "measured." But that adjustment probably exists right down the line, so they're still the taller players.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

paininthenuts I am 6'5 1/2" and I stink at golf!  :whistle:

I don't think I have any advantage over anybody else. 

I'm curious about the list saevel25 supplied.  I was at last years Deutsche Bank Championship and we were right on the 17th Tee box and a lot of those pro's are pretty small.  TV certainly make them look taller.  They also looked a lot thinner in person.

I guess the saying of "TV adds 15 lbs" is correct.

Driver: :callaway: Diablo
Woods: :callaway: Big Bertha 2 & 4
Irons: Miura MC 102's 3 - PW & Mizuno MP 67's 3 - W
Wedges: :mizuno: MP-R12 52* & 58*
Putters: :ping: WRX Ti4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 10/25/2014 at 1:10 PM, DrvFrShow said:

My height gives me an advantage as far as distance, but the disadvantage is that the little errors multiply. The takeaway and downswing has to be more precise, and it takes more practice to get consistent center contact. I struggle with this.

 

 

 

 

Same for me. I'm 6'5". From what I've read elsewhere and my own experience it is harder for the tall people to make consistent contact. Sure we may have an easier time with SS but the cost is more mis-hits. 

 

Its also worth noting that the tallest PGA tour winner was Phil Blackmar at 6'7". Tallest to win a major was George Archer at 6'5". 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


i agree, being tall may offer a distance advantage, but I would think shorter people have an easier time staying centered and hence keeping a steady spine, with a more stable base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


 

22 minutes ago, MrDC said:

i agree, being tall may offer a distance advantage, but I would think shorter people have an easier time staying centered and hence keeping a steady spine, with a more stable base.

It might help with the short game because you are closer to the ground. I'm not very tall (5'9") but my short game is very good. 

Pretty much everyone who is taller than I am is also longer off the tee. I've never out-driven a taller man. This is my second year playing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, MrDC said:

i agree, being tall may offer a distance advantage, but I would think shorter people have an easier time staying centered and hence keeping a steady spine, with a more stable base.

How so, if they are using the same neurology and muscle groups?

No one has a precisely centered pivot - even the pros. By that thinking (less physical precision due to height), tall men should be incapable of hitting a nail on the head consistently with a hammer. I don't see many warnings about this out there in home improvement media.

Also don't take it personally if you're tall and not very good. It's an inherent advantage - on average & all else being equal. But there are many other abilities that go into golf that don't make height a strong determinant of success like in basketball.

Edited by natureboy

Kevin

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 2419 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,056 3/6* ⬛🟨🟨⬛🟨 🟨🟨🟨🟨⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,056 3/6* 🟦🟧🟦⬛⬛ ⬛🟧🟧🟦⬛ 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧
    • Wordle 1,056 2/6* ⬛⬛🟨🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 You and me both @StuM
    • Wordle 1,056 2/6 ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Eagle 😀
    • Feel free to read or not, this is more of a benchmark post for me but I wouldn't mind questions and feedback either. In the words of Arnold Palmer, "Swing your swing". So much easier said than done. Videos to come soon (to the probable horror of most of you here lol), but man: this took along time. Hogan wasn't kidding when he said the secret was in the dirt. Can't say I'm not happy about it though. So here was my situation: My first (and only) post here was back in 2019 about trying to game a new 3-wood to replace my old 2008 Taylormade Burner (which I loved but only carried 208 yards with a stupid-high spin rate).  At that time I had been golfing for about 8 years., I was hitting four 80-ball buckets per day (320 total, I'm a psycho) and playing two rounds per week. I was using a "Width Swing" (probably my 15th try at a 'better' swing) from a book and videos called "The L.A.W.S of Golf" by Jim Suttie, TJ Tomasi and Mike Adams. Since I had hardly any flexibility back then at 49 (still don't lol), I had to get my clubhead depth from the width dimension, meaning dropping back my right foot, flaring my feet, and swinging around my body. This took a ton of work, but I got down from a 15 handicap to an 8 by using it, so I was pretty ecstatic. The problem? My lower back hated it, and I mean bad. Really bad. Like pull-out-in-the-middle-of-a-Houston-Amateur-Golf-Tour-tournament bad. Soooo...while playing some of my best golf, I just figured my golf days were over, especially after the Rona hit the next year in 2020 and shut everything down. I figured I would simply be a golf fan for the rest of my life, and that my days of playing (painfully) were done Fast forward three years. I *really* missed playing golf. I started watching (hold your nose) videos of Moe Norman's swing on YouTube and then that led down the rabbit hole of watching videos of Matt Kuchar and Craig Stadler and Bryson DeChambeau and videos by Kirk Junge and Todd Graves...you get the idea. This went on for weeks...and this is how we always get sucked back in, right? Single plane was supposedly the cure for lower back pain because the extension and torque could be mitigated to a degree that might make a golf swing tolerable for someone with lower back issues. I really missed playing the game, so last fall I thought to myself: "Self, you have nothing to lose. Get your clubs out of the trunk (they'd been sitting in there for three years).  Hold your arms straight and look like an idiot at the PGA Superstore in one of the swing bays trying this single plane swing and at least you'll be the only one who has to witness it." I tried it...and it went horribly wrong. I couldn't even get the ball in the air, I was topping everything at first. Then when I tried Moe Norman's famous 'vertical drop' as he called it, I fatted the mat every time. This went on for the hour I was in there. I left there tired, frustrated and about to say 'screw it'. But when I got to my car and went to get in the seat, I noticed something: Even after about a hundred swings, my back was totally fine. I thought maybe it was because I had injured it all those years ago with a rotary swing and now it had healed. Hmmmm...maybe that was it. After a couple days at home, and more video-watching of Moe and Moe alone, I went back to the hitting bay to see if I could find some sort of workable single plane swing based on what I had watched and taken notes on. This session went much better. Pretty straight ball flight (my miss was a slight cut), and no pulls or hooks (my old misses were the dreaded two-way misses, block or pull-hook). I had kinda-sorta figured out the 'vertical drop' deal, but it was too hard to time it consistently. When I did get the timing right, the ball went dead straight. HOWEVER...I was hitting with a 7-iron the whole time and my normal 148-yard shot now only traveled 134. 14 yards is a lot to give up...but I chalked it up to my swinging slower to get the timing down. Plus, I had no idea how the longer clubs would do or if I could even hit, say, a 3-wood with this swing. After another hundred shots or so, I called it a session and went home. So far, all I hit was a 7-iron with this 'swing' of mine. I had completely forgot about my back and didn't think about it until that evening and realized it felt fine. I thought to myself: "Even if you never get your normal distance back...wouldn't it be fun to just play golf again?" Then I thought to myself: "Self, it would be fun to be back on the golf course again." BUT...I was determined not to make a fool of myself out there, so I kept going back to the hitting bay. This third time I went back, I brought in only my Taylormade Burner 7 wood, thinking the shaft length is short enough that I can make contact with the ball, but it's a fairway wood, so I'll see if this swing can handle that. I hit it great...and straight...but the distance was, alas, like the 7-iron...just not there. "You're hitting it *really* straight though", I sad to myself, as if saying that would console a Recon Marine veteran who's ethos is that manly men do manly things...and a 165 yard 7-wood for me is about the furthest thing from 'manly' there can be on a golf course. Ego... I was torn between my love of playing the game on one hand, and on the other hand going out to the course with a swing that would be mocked, ridiculed and laughed at...but would look passable and understandable if I was 75 years old (I'm 54). Decisions decisions... I went back to the drawing board at home and thought "There's got to be some sort of compromise to this swing...some kind of combination of swings...something I can build that would get my old distance back but not destroy the lower lumbar of my spine." In the past 13 years, I had tried it *all*. Conventional swing, modern swing, stack and tilt (my back still hurts when I think of that one), rotary swing (hello shanks), the peak performance golf swing (don't ever fat one while trying that swing, you might break your wrists), 3/4 hold-off swing (great for wedges, not so much a driver), hand-and-arm swing...and on and on. Soooo...I went back to thinking about the width swing I had learned in the L.A.W.S of golf book and videos I had studied, and how I could implement the width element of that swing without destroying my back. It was the only swing technique I ever tried that got me comfortable distance and consistent impact and ball flight while swinging around say 85% or thereabouts. Hmmmm... What if I could combine it with a single plane swing? I know, I know...it sounds loony tunes. But I had already plunked down the $149 for a year's worth of unlimited hitting bay time at the PGA Superstore (commitment, right?), so I figured I had nothing to lose by attempting what would appear to be  moronic and ridiculous-looking setups and stances and swings in a hitting bay all by myself. The results have been nothing less than astounding to me. Setup (after four months of this on an actual driving range and getting *really* strange looks) is as follows (I'll have pics and video soon for whoever can bear to watch it): Grip: Left hand *slightly* strong, right hand neutral (this is to keep the ball from hooking off the planet). Alignment: All irons straight off the nose (I'll explain why in a bit), fairway woods of my left cheek, driver off my left nipple. Posture: *Slightly* hunched over with rounded shoulders (this is to give me room for my arms to come under my chest in the back swing). Foot Position: Left foot flared, right foot flared and dropped back about 12 inches (this gives me room to rotate my thoracic spine and gives the club depth in the width dimension, since I don't have Bubbas Watson's flexibility). Shoulders stay square with the target line. Hands stay high and in line with the lead forearm a la Moe Norman. Slight spine tilt away from the target. Backswing is in and up at a 45 degree angle if looking from behind. I only swing back until my lead forearm is parallel to the ground. I tuck the left elbow on the downswing and let it rip. The reason I play all my irons off my nose? Wait for it... All my irons... 7 iron to Sand Wedge... are single length irons. So I'm using a rotational swing...on a single plane...with single length irons (based off my 7 iron). Never hit my irons better in my life - and hitting just as far now as I was when I started golfing 13 years ago. Also - driver and fairway woods are stupid-easy for me to hit now. My misses are mostly a high cut now, and that only happens when I slide my left hip because I get fast at the top. As long as I keep my lower body quiet until my hands drop (they don't have far to drop, either), then I get a pretty dang straight ball flight. Pull hooks and block are now a thing of the past. Anyhoo, here's the setup of my clubs. I have about a 94 mph driver swing speed. Driver: Ping G410 9 degree cranked up to 10.5 degrees, Alta CB R flex carry is 235-ish  3-wood: Ping G 410 13.5 degrees Alta CB R flex 65 grams, flat setting, stated loft, carry is around 215 5-wood: Ping G-410 17.5 degrees Alta CB R flex 65 grams, flat setting, stated loft, carry is 202 7-wood 2008 Taylormade Burner, 21 degrees, stock REAX S flex 49 grams, carry is 192 9-wood Ping G410 23.5 degrees Alta CB R flex 65 grams, flat setting, stated loft, carry is 182 6 hybrid Ping G425 31 degrees Alta CB R flex 70 grams, stated loft, flat setting, carry is 158  Irons: are all custom fit Sterling single-length irons by Wishon Golf. 7 146 yds 8 135 yds 9 125 yds PW 110 GW 98 SW 83 Putter: Custom Edel blade I had made in 2012 after golfing for a year and I can't hit the broad side of a barn with it. REALLY interested in getting fitted for a L.A.B DF 3 with a forearm grip...stroked a L.A.B. DF 2.1 at the PGA Superstore they had on the 'pre-owned' rack and it was $519 wuuuuut!!! So that's only 13 clubs...but I am looking on eBay to fill that gap where the 5 hybrid should be, would be a perfect 170 yd club right there I think. Before doing to the single length clubs, I had Ping irons 7-PW and four Vokeys in 48, 52, 56 and 60 in the bag and the single length clubs were gathering dust in the closet for the last 5 years. However, after actually playing a few rounds and seeing where the numbers were adding up, it was missed greens from 150 and in. So, I wanted to take the variable length mid and short irons out the the equation to keep my setup simpler. Gotta say, it worked like a charm.  Same setup as a 7-iron for all my scoring clubs and it keeps everything repeatable. Yes, it feels weird looking down at a wedge with 7-iron length, but I got used to it. The ball goes the same distances as my Ping irons and Vokey wedges used to but flies *way* higher and lands super soft. Also, if I want to chip or pitch with them I just choke down a little, as the swing weight difference won't matter much for those shots. I haven't actually kept score yet, as I haven't even gotten around to really working on my short game or putting at all. Right now, I'm just scoring fairways and greens hit or missed, approaches hit or missed and how many pars per round I can make. So far my best since this 'comeback' started is 8 pars, 1 birdie (almost had a hole-in-one lol), two bogies and seven 'others' (fats, thins, skulled chips across the green and tears may have been involved). I hit 3 of the Par 4 greens in regulation and hit 10 of 14 fairways. The ones I missed were not off the fairway by much and I finished the round with the same Pro V1X I started with - albeit a little scuffed up. Anyway, that's the story and after years of struggle I finally found something that works *for me*. I'll try to get some pics of setup and possibly video if anyone's interested and has a strong stomach haha. I'm gonna start reading the Dave Pelz short game and putting bibles this week, I'm sure that will be an adventure haha! Thanks for the space to write this.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...