Jump to content
IGNORED

Are you ready for some NFL Football? 2014 Edition.


phan52
Note: This thread is 3290 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

LOL!  They fumbled three times in the Ravens game and just did not lose possession.  Steven Ridley was a fumble machine.  They fumbled twice against Indy but they fumbles went out of bounds.  You're the one who is reaching because of your hate.

Quite a leap to accuse me of hate. Pats are an AFC team, I have no opinion of them other than they are inferior to the NFC team. I do enjoy bad guys gettin caught and punished, however. Belichek is a bad guy. [quote name="dsc123" url="/t/76052/are-you-ready-for-some-nfl-football-2014-edition/1320_40#post_1098172"]There's a lot of interesting stuff on that site. This doesn't conclusively prove anything (small sample), but its not nothing.  You might think they are just good in bad weather because...well I don't know why...but now that they've been caught cheating in a way to counteract wet weather, that's as good a theory as anything else.   That's the problem with cheating.  It casts a cloud over everything you've ever done. [/quote] Yes, that guy is to be commended, must have taken a lot of time to compile all that data. But, of course you'll still have the emotional die-hards claiming "Doesn't prove anything!" Just boggles the mind.

In my Bag: Driver: Titelist 913 D3 9.5 deg. 3W: TaylorMade RBZ 14.5 3H: TaylorMade RBZ 18.5 4I - SW: TaylorMade R7 TP LW: Titelist Vokey 60 Putter: Odyssey 2-Ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Moderator

Quote:

Originally Posted by boogielicious

LOL!  They fumbled three times in the Ravens game and just did not lose possession.  Steven Ridley was a fumble machine.  They fumbled twice against Indy but they fumbles went out of bounds.  You're the one who is reaching because of your hate.

Quite a leap to accuse me of hate. Pats are an AFC team, I have no opinion of them other than they are inferior to the NFC team. I do enjoy bad guys gettin caught and punished, however. Belichek is a bad guy.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dsc123

There's a lot of interesting stuff on that site.

This doesn't conclusively prove anything (small sample), but its not nothing.  You might think they are just good in bad weather because...well I don't know why...but now that they've been caught cheating in a way to counteract wet weather, that's as good a theory as anything else.

That's the problem with cheating.  It casts a cloud over everything you've ever done.

Yes, that guy is to be commended, must have taken a lot of time to compile all that data. But, of course you'll still have the emotional die-hards claiming "Doesn't prove anything!" Just boggles the mind.


OK, maybe hate is too strong.  But you've obviously already made a conclusion without hearing all the evidence.  That surprises me because I didn't see you as someone influenced by the media.  The media has already tried an convicted Brady without hearing anything other than the balls were below 12.5 psi when measured during the game.

There have been calls for disqualification, suspension etc. for a rule violation that specifies a fine currently.  Tony Kornhole from ESPN likened Belichick to Whitey Bulger.  Hmm.  One filmed opposing defensive signals from a location not specified by the league *, and the other was a mass murderer, racketeer, torturer (pulled the teeth out of victims before killing them) and FBI informant.  Sounds similar eh?

So it is understandable the Patriot fans are defensive.  The hate and vitriol are unequaled to anything I have seen before in sports.

*most people don't understand what the Spygate violation was actually for.  Filming signals was not illegal if you did it from the location where the league specified.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

OK, maybe hate is too strong.  But you've obviously already made a conclusion without hearing all the evidence.  That surprises me because I didn't see you as someone influenced by the media.  The media has already tried an convicted Brady without hearing anything other than the balls were below 12.5 psi when measured during the game.   There have been calls for disqualification, suspension etc. for a rule violation that specifies a fine currently.  Tony Kornhole from ESPN likened Belichick to Whitey Bulger.  Hmm.  One filmed opposing defensive signals from a location not specified by the league *, and the other was a mass murderer, racketeer, torturer (pulled the teeth out of victims before killing them) and FBI informant.  Sounds similar eh? So it is understandable the Patriot fans are defensive.  The hate and vitriol are unequaled to anything I have seen before in sports. *most people don't understand what the Spygate violation was actually for.  Filming signals was not illegal if you did it from the location where the league specified.

No question there's been a ton of hyperbole, Kornheiser is an idiot. I grew up in NE so I know a little about Whitey B. I think I can honestly say that I came to my conclusion well before much of the media hype, because you are correct, I despise most media and recognize there are precious few honest brokers in that field. I heard Aikman weigh in and a few others. Coupled with Belichek's history, I pegged them as guilty pretty much from the start. If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, good chance it's a duck. Also I apply the Occam's Razor principle pretty regularly; it's served me well.

In my Bag: Driver: Titelist 913 D3 9.5 deg. 3W: TaylorMade RBZ 14.5 3H: TaylorMade RBZ 18.5 4I - SW: TaylorMade R7 TP LW: Titelist Vokey 60 Putter: Odyssey 2-Ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Did you read the article?  It included all fumbles, not just fumbles lost.


Actually, thats not quite correct.  In fact, if I was that "journalist," I'd be ashamed of myself because that is a really pathetic attempt at trying to twist the facts to fit his conclusion.  (Unless he's really unfamiliar with football, in which case it can be chalked up to him simply misunderstanding the game)  He spends 15 paragraphs and about 6 different charts talking only of fumbles lost.  That stat is 100% irrelevant to this discussion.  Once the ball is loose, whether or not its 12psi, or 1psi or 50psi, everybody has the same opportunity to pick it up.  So why spend any time at all talking about that?

So that whole section is useless.  Skip down to the part where he actually discusses total fumbles and now what do you see?  You see that the Patriots are among the league leaders in fumbles.  Well, whoopty friction do!  They're, perennially, one of the best teams, so it kinda stands to reason that they'd be good at controlling the ball, wouldn't you say?  Factor in that they are primarily a passing team, a passing team that spends a lot of time on short drops and quick passes, a passing team that protects their QB better than almost anybody, AND they have a coach who has the least patience for fumbling as anybody.  Why would the fact that the control the ball be of ANY surprise to anybody?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

So basically in a few words, if the referee is the sole judge of whether or not the balls conform, and Walt Anderson approved the these balls prior to game-time and the way the NFL rule is worded... Deflategate is nullified? If the Patriots followed the proper procedures with the balls...The NFL can prove the someone Doctored the balls during the game, the Pats won't get fined? Or am I looking into this too much?

What's in Shane's Bag?     

Ball: 2022 :callaway: Chrome Soft Triple Track Driver: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond 8° MCA Kai’li 70s FW: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond  H: :callaway: Apex Pro 21 20°I (3-PW) :callaway: Apex 21 UST Recoil 95 (3), Recoil 110 (4-PW). Wedges: :callaway: Jaws Raw 50°, 54°, 60° UST Recoil 110 Putter: :odyssey: Tri-Hot 5K Triple Wide 35”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Actually, thats not quite correct.  In fact, if I was that "journalist," I'd be ashamed of myself because that is a really pathetic attempt at trying to twist the facts to fit his conclusion.  (Unless he's really unfamiliar with football, in which case it can be chalked up to him simply misunderstanding the game)  He spends 15 paragraphs and about 6 different charts talking only of fumbles lost.  That stat is 100% irrelevant to this discussion.  Once the ball is loose, whether or not its 12psi, or 1psi or 50psi, everybody has the same opportunity to pick it up.  So why spend any time at all talking about that? So that whole section is useless.  Skip down to the part where he actually discusses total fumbles and now what do you see?  You see that the Patriots are among the league leaders in fumbles.  Well, whoopty friction do!  They're, perennially, one of the best teams, so it kinda stands to reason that they'd be good at controlling the ball, wouldn't you say?  Factor in that they are primarily a passing team, a passing team that spends a lot of time on short drops and quick passes, a passing team that protects their QB better than almost anybody, AND they have a coach who has the least patience for fumbling as anybody.  Why would the fact that the control the ball be of ANY surprise to anybody?

Lol, definitely NOT Occam's Razor-esque. Not sure if you're arguing your side to practice your debating skills or to get under DSC's skin but it's been fun to read...mostly.

In my Bag: Driver: Titelist 913 D3 9.5 deg. 3W: TaylorMade RBZ 14.5 3H: TaylorMade RBZ 18.5 4I - SW: TaylorMade R7 TP LW: Titelist Vokey 60 Putter: Odyssey 2-Ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

http://m.espn.go.com/general/blogs/blogpost?blogname=afceast&id;=75045&src;=desktop Now Belicheat blessed the refs. Claims they just give the balls the the refs and tell them to fill it to 12.5,which is not what Tom Brady said and conflicts with the what everyone else says. [quote name="Golfingdad" url="/t/76052/are-you-ready-for-some-nfl-football-2014-edition/1320#post_1098332"] Actually, thats not quite correct.  In fact, if I was that "journalist," I'd be ashamed of myself because that is a really pathetic attempt at trying to twist the facts to fit his conclusion.  (Unless he's really unfamiliar with football, in which case it can be chalked up to him simply misunderstanding the game)  He spends 15 paragraphs and about 6 different charts talking only of fumbles lost.  That stat is 100% irrelevant to this discussion.  Once the ball is loose, whether or not its 12psi, or 1psi or 50psi, everybody has the same opportunity to pick it up.  So why spend any time at all talking about that? So that whole section is useless.  Skip down to the part where he actually discusses total fumbles and now what do you see?  You see that the Patriots are among the league leaders in fumbles.  Well, whoopty friction do!  They're, perennially, one of the best teams, so it kinda stands to reason that they'd be good at controlling the ball, wouldn't you say?  Factor in that they are primarily a passing team, a passing team that spends a lot of time on short drops and quick passes, a passing team that protects their QB better than almost anybody, AND they have a coach who has the least patience for fumbling as anybody.  Why would the fact that the control the ball be of ANY surprise to anybody? [/quote] It's not just league leader. It's historically good, every year for a decade, with all different running backs. 20 plays per fumble better than the second best, when the worst team is close to the second best. It's bit just leading the league, it's an outlier. That doesn't mean it's one hundred percent because of 2psi in the footballs. But knowing that they cheat in that way, and that doing so makes it harder to fumble.. It makes sense that there's a connection. [quote name="onthehunt526" url="/t/76052/are-you-ready-for-some-nfl-football-2014-edition/1320#post_1098357"]So basically in a few words, if the referee is the sole judge of whether or not the balls conform, and Walt Anderson approved the these balls prior to game-time and the way the NFL rule is worded... Deflategate is nullified? If the Patriots followed the proper procedures with the balls...The NFL can prove the someone Doctored the balls during the game, the Pats won't get fined? Or am I looking into this too much?[/quote] Dude, the whole point is that they doctored the balls after they were tested.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

True, but the burden of proof is on the NFL

What's in Shane's Bag?     

Ball: 2022 :callaway: Chrome Soft Triple Track Driver: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond 8° MCA Kai’li 70s FW: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond  H: :callaway: Apex Pro 21 20°I (3-PW) :callaway: Apex 21 UST Recoil 95 (3), Recoil 110 (4-PW). Wedges: :callaway: Jaws Raw 50°, 54°, 60° UST Recoil 110 Putter: :odyssey: Tri-Hot 5K Triple Wide 35”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

http://www.patriots.com/media-center/videos/Belichick-124-Followed-every-rule-to-the-letter/d607eb23-2f67-4da5-aedc-b8bfba8d4c11

Above is the last press conference by Belichick.

As I suspected it was a combination of natural atmospheric conditions that caused the deflation of the Pats footballs.

So you might ask why didn't the Colts balls become deflated?

Answer: The Colts balls probably came via air travel, were prepared back in Indianapolis and were colder than the Pat's balls. All factors that would account for the discrepancy between the two sets of balls.

So for those who like to trot out fancy GAS LAWS thats fine but make sure you are applying them correctly in your argument. Local sports critics FELGER AND MAZZ are guilty of doing this. They claimed all week that the temperature would have to drop to -18 F in order to achieve that kind of pressure drop. They are full of shit and it has been proven by many local experiments documented on UTUBE. All with very similar results. I can't figure FELGER AND MAZZ out. It is obvious that they hate Belichick but to use unsubstantiated science to make there points I think they should lose there jobs.

Finally a Boston University Physics professor concluded that Belichicks findings are correct. He also added that a 10 degree drop in temperature would cause about a 1 pound drop in PSI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Anyone willing to predict a final score?

Pats defense comes up big. Wilson desperation throws get pick off 4 times. Brady comes out fired up and gets 3  TDs passes.

Final:  Pats 35 Seahawks 16

Link to comment
Share on other sites


So basically in a few words, if the referee is the sole judge of whether or not the balls conform, and Walt Anderson approved the these balls prior to game-time and the way the NFL rule is worded... Deflategate is nullified? If the Patriots followed the proper procedures with the balls...The NFL can prove the someone Doctored the balls during the game, the Pats won't get fined? Or am I looking into this too much?

After having read the "rule", such as it is, I believe this is correct.  If the referee says the game balls are good, then they are good. I guess I was surprised that there is not a requirement the referee measure the pressure but the way the rule is written he/she could just squeeze the balls and say "these are OK" and the rule would have been followed to the letter.  So Bilicheck is probably telling the truth when he said they followed all the rules and procedures 100%.

I can't then explain why the Colt's game balls didn't suffer the deflation since they were subject to the same environment, who knows maybe Luck like them at 13.5 psi and so they understand those "fancy gas laws" and inflated them to 15 psi knowing at game temperatures they would meet specifications.  Or maybe they know the referee only squeezes them and never really checks pressure anyway since it isn't required by rule he do so, therefore close is good enough.

This entire incident is much to do about nothing really.  No one really believes the Colts could have won anyway.   No one really believes the NFL gives much concern to their image as long as the $$ keeps rolling in.  But I am enjoying the mystery and the arguments.

Butch

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Here is an interesting scenario.

Since the NFL can take away a win. The NEP can theoretically win the Super Bowl and not have won the Conference Championship Game leading into hit. The primary reason being that negating a win does not mean Indy won. I think a lot of people get that mixed up. Really the negating of wins is just to claim the win does not count towards the record books due to the nature of the cheating.

The other option for the NFL would be to reverse the win for INDY. That isn't going to happen because there is no way the game was even remotely close enough.

So the only scenario after the fact would be to take away that win. Yet NEP would have played in the Super Bowl and won under much more scrutiny and all the rules. No way the NFL is going to let the footballs be tampered with.

Just an interesting scenario that could happen.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Here is an interesting scenario.  Since the NFL can take away a win. The NEP can theoretically win the Super Bowl and not have won the Conference Championship Game leading into hit. The primary reason being that negating a win does not mean Indy won. I think a lot of people get that mixed up. Really the negating of wins is just to claim the win does not count towards the record books due to the nature of the cheating. The other option for the NFL would be to reverse the win for INDY. That isn't going to happen because there is no way the game was even remotely close enough.  So the only scenario after the fact would be to take away that win. Yet NEP would have played in the Super Bowl and won under much more scrutiny and all the rules. No way the NFL is going to let the footballs be tampered with.  Just an interesting scenario that could happen.

Independent impartial equipment manager with handle the responsibility of inflation of the balls, as per super bowl tradition, the NFL is on a f¿@$ing witch hunt if you ask me... I don't hate the Patriots one bit, not a fan, but don't hate them... the physics don't lie though, if any of you ever notice in the winter when you drive your tires seem a little flatter than they do in the summer... same principle it's 40 degrees or so cooler in the winter (average daily temperatures)... so 4 psi less on your tires in the winter.... Basically what I am saying is it could be a storage issue... that could have dropped the pressure, if Mother Nature is to blame, why is the media on a mission to crucify the Patriots... and if I remember from the game... the temperature dropped during the game...

What's in Shane's Bag?     

Ball: 2022 :callaway: Chrome Soft Triple Track Driver: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond 8° MCA Kai’li 70s FW: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond  H: :callaway: Apex Pro 21 20°I (3-PW) :callaway: Apex 21 UST Recoil 95 (3), Recoil 110 (4-PW). Wedges: :callaway: Jaws Raw 50°, 54°, 60° UST Recoil 110 Putter: :odyssey: Tri-Hot 5K Triple Wide 35”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

After having read the "rule", such as it is, I believe this is correct.  If the referee says the game balls are good, then they are good. I guess I was surprised that there is not a requirement the referee measure the pressure but the way the rule is written he/she could just squeeze the balls and say "these are OK" and the rule would have been followed to the letter.  So Bilicheck is probably telling the truth when he said they followed all the rules and procedures 100%.

I can't then explain why the Colt's game balls didn't suffer the deflation since they were subject to the same environment, who knows maybe Luck like them at 13.5 psi and so they understand those "fancy gas laws" and inflated them to 15 psi knowing at game temperatures they would meet specifications.  Or maybe they know the referee only squeezes them and never really checks pressure anyway since it isn't required by rule he do so, therefore close is good enough.

This entire incident is much to do about nothing really.  No one really believes the Colts could have won anyway.   No one really believes the NFL gives much concern to their image as long as the $$ keeps rolling in.  But I am enjoying the mystery and the arguments.

Here is why I think the Colts balls did not deflate like the Pats balls.

1) the Pats balls were kept in there heated locker room with there equipment. I would not be surprised that they find the equipment area is kept heated a little warmer so they can dry out there practice balls and other gear. Lets just say 80 degree. The Colts arrive with there balls from an airplane at a temperature of lets say 40 degrees. This I can attest to as I have noticed my clothing is very cool to the touch after winter air travel. I suspect the area in Gillette Stadium where the Colts balls were stored was significantly cooler than the Pats area. This would be under my assumptions as much as a  40 degree difference in temperature. It has been stated by a Boston University physicist that a 20 degree drop in temp creates a 1 pound drop in PSI. if the game time temp was 50 then the Pats balls would loose 1.5 pounds of pressure. The Colts balls actually would increase by 10 pounds and increase by .5 pounds.

2) According to Bellichick the "rough up" process done just proir to the game increases the pre check pressure as well. I bet the Colts "rough up" process was done the day before back in INDY.

There is certainly enough variables out here to make an indictment of the Pats for meddling with the balls nearly impossible. Especially as there is no video evidence which would be extremely hard to avoid given the amount of video surveillance that is present not to mention 80,000 people watching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Independent impartial equipment manager with handle the responsibility of inflation of the balls, as per super bowl tradition, the NFL is on a f¿@$ing witch hunt if you ask me... I don't hate the Patriots one bit, not a fan, but don't hate them... the physics don't lie though, if any of you ever notice in the winter when you drive your tires seem a little flatter than they do in the summer... same principle it's 40 degrees or so cooler in the winter (average daily temperatures)... so 4 psi less on your tires in the winter....

Basically what I am saying is it could be a storage issue... that could have dropped the pressure, if Mother Nature is to blame, why is the media on a mission to crucify the Patriots... and if I remember from the game... the temperature dropped during the game...

Just heard on MAD DOG RADIO the Super Bowl footballs are not doctored by either team and are in total control of the officiating team. I think they said they are all brand new balls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


They are new balls even week, but yes, the teams don't control super bowl balls. Perhaps that's why the pats have done so well and gone so far every year but failed to win the big game. :) Anyway, Bill Nye says Bill Belicheck is full of shit. So that settles, right @saevel25 and @Golfingdad ?http://screengrabber.deadspin.com/bill-nye-the-science-guy-says-bill-belichick-is-full-of-1681658679 And before anyone gets all excited about belicheck's tests, remember that it was 50* last Sunday, and now Boston is under 6 inches of snow with more on the way. His alleged tests were under different conditions. It was unusually warm during the afc championship.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

They are new balls even week, but yes, the teams don't control super bowl balls. Perhaps that's why the pats have done so well and gone so far every year but failed to win the big game. :) Anyway, Bill Nye says Bill Belicheck is full of shit. So that settles, right @saevel25 and @Golfingdad ?http://screengrabber.deadspin.com/bill-nye-the-science-guy-says-bill-belichick-is-full-of-1681658679 And before anyone gets all excited about belicheck's tests, remember that it was 50* last Sunday, and now Boston is under 6 inches of snow with more on the way. His alleged tests were under different conditions. It was unusually warm during the afc championship.

Yeah but Bill Nye also thinks Ken Ham is full of shit so ... Not exactly a credible source. ;) Anybody know how the Vikings (you know, those guys that were actually caught RED HANDED DURING TJE GAME attempting to doctor the balls, unlike the patriots whose evidence is still only circumstantial) investigation is going? Just like all of you, I'm dying to know how that turns out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3290 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,056 2/6* ⬛⬛🟨🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 You and me both @StuM
    • Wordle 1,056 2/6 ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Eagle 😀
    • Feel free to read or not, this is more of a benchmark post for me but I wouldn't mind questions and feedback either. In the words of Arnold Palmer, "Swing your swing". So much easier said than done. Videos to come soon (to the probable horror of most of you here lol), but man: this took along time. Hogan wasn't kidding when he said the secret was in the dirt. Can't say I'm not happy about it though. So here was my situation: My first (and only) post here was back in 2019 about trying to game a new 3-wood to replace my old 2008 Taylormade Burner (which I loved but only carried 208 yards with a stupid-high spin rate).  At that time I had been golfing for about 8 years., I was hitting four 80-ball buckets per day (320 total, I'm a psycho) and playing two rounds per week. I was using a "Width Swing" (probably my 15th try at a 'better' swing) from a book and videos called "The L.A.W.S of Golf" by Jim Suttie, TJ Tomasi and Mike Adams. Since I had hardly any flexibility back then at 49 (still don't lol), I had to get my clubhead depth from the width dimension, meaning dropping back my right foot, flaring my feet, and swinging around my body. This took a ton of work, but I got down from a 15 handicap to an 8 by using it, so I was pretty ecstatic. The problem? My lower back hated it, and I mean bad. Really bad. Like pull-out-in-the-middle-of-a-Houston-Amateur-Golf-Tour-tournament bad. Soooo...while playing some of my best golf, I just figured my golf days were over, especially after the Rona hit the next year in 2020 and shut everything down. I figured I would simply be a golf fan for the rest of my life, and that my days of playing (painfully) were done Fast forward three years. I *really* missed playing golf. I started watching (hold your nose) videos of Moe Norman's swing on YouTube and then that led down the rabbit hole of watching videos of Matt Kuchar and Craig Stadler and Bryson DeChambeau and videos by Kirk Junge and Todd Graves...you get the idea. This went on for weeks...and this is how we always get sucked back in, right? Single plane was supposedly the cure for lower back pain because the extension and torque could be mitigated to a degree that might make a golf swing tolerable for someone with lower back issues. I really missed playing the game, so last fall I thought to myself: "Self, you have nothing to lose. Get your clubs out of the trunk (they'd been sitting in there for three years).  Hold your arms straight and look like an idiot at the PGA Superstore in one of the swing bays trying this single plane swing and at least you'll be the only one who has to witness it." I tried it...and it went horribly wrong. I couldn't even get the ball in the air, I was topping everything at first. Then when I tried Moe Norman's famous 'vertical drop' as he called it, I fatted the mat every time. This went on for the hour I was in there. I left there tired, frustrated and about to say 'screw it'. But when I got to my car and went to get in the seat, I noticed something: Even after about a hundred swings, my back was totally fine. I thought maybe it was because I had injured it all those years ago with a rotary swing and now it had healed. Hmmmm...maybe that was it. After a couple days at home, and more video-watching of Moe and Moe alone, I went back to the hitting bay to see if I could find some sort of workable single plane swing based on what I had watched and taken notes on. This session went much better. Pretty straight ball flight (my miss was a slight cut), and no pulls or hooks (my old misses were the dreaded two-way misses, block or pull-hook). I had kinda-sorta figured out the 'vertical drop' deal, but it was too hard to time it consistently. When I did get the timing right, the ball went dead straight. HOWEVER...I was hitting with a 7-iron the whole time and my normal 148-yard shot now only traveled 134. 14 yards is a lot to give up...but I chalked it up to my swinging slower to get the timing down. Plus, I had no idea how the longer clubs would do or if I could even hit, say, a 3-wood with this swing. After another hundred shots or so, I called it a session and went home. So far, all I hit was a 7-iron with this 'swing' of mine. I had completely forgot about my back and didn't think about it until that evening and realized it felt fine. I thought to myself: "Even if you never get your normal distance back...wouldn't it be fun to just play golf again?" Then I thought to myself: "Self, it would be fun to be back on the golf course again." BUT...I was determined not to make a fool of myself out there, so I kept going back to the hitting bay. This third time I went back, I brought in only my Taylormade Burner 7 wood, thinking the shaft length is short enough that I can make contact with the ball, but it's a fairway wood, so I'll see if this swing can handle that. I hit it great...and straight...but the distance was, alas, like the 7-iron...just not there. "You're hitting it *really* straight though", I sad to myself, as if saying that would console a Recon Marine veteran who's ethos is that manly men do manly things...and a 165 yard 7-wood for me is about the furthest thing from 'manly' there can be on a golf course. Ego... I was torn between my love of playing the game on one hand, and on the other hand going out to the course with a swing that would be mocked, ridiculed and laughed at...but would look passable and understandable if I was 75 years old (I'm 54). Decisions decisions... I went back to the drawing board at home and thought "There's got to be some sort of compromise to this swing...some kind of combination of swings...something I can build that would get my old distance back but not destroy the lower lumbar of my spine." In the past 13 years, I had tried it *all*. Conventional swing, modern swing, stack and tilt (my back still hurts when I think of that one), rotary swing (hello shanks), the peak performance golf swing (don't ever fat one while trying that swing, you might break your wrists), 3/4 hold-off swing (great for wedges, not so much a driver), hand-and-arm swing...and on and on. Soooo...I went back to thinking about the width swing I had learned in the L.A.W.S of golf book and videos I had studied, and how I could implement the width element of that swing without destroying my back. It was the only swing technique I ever tried that got me comfortable distance and consistent impact and ball flight while swinging around say 85% or thereabouts. Hmmmm... What if I could combine it with a single plane swing? I know, I know...it sounds loony tunes. But I had already plunked down the $149 for a year's worth of unlimited hitting bay time at the PGA Superstore (commitment, right?), so I figured I had nothing to lose by attempting what would appear to be  moronic and ridiculous-looking setups and stances and swings in a hitting bay all by myself. The results have been nothing less than astounding to me. Setup (after four months of this on an actual driving range and getting *really* strange looks) is as follows (I'll have pics and video soon for whoever can bear to watch it): Grip: Left hand *slightly* strong, right hand neutral (this is to keep the ball from hooking off the planet). Alignment: All irons straight off the nose (I'll explain why in a bit), fairway woods of my left cheek, driver off my left nipple. Posture: *Slightly* hunched over with rounded shoulders (this is to give me room for my arms to come under my chest in the back swing). Foot Position: Left foot flared, right foot flared and dropped back about 12 inches (this gives me room to rotate my thoracic spine and gives the club depth in the width dimension, since I don't have Bubbas Watson's flexibility). Shoulders stay square with the target line. Hands stay high and in line with the lead forearm a la Moe Norman. Slight spine tilt away from the target. Backswing is in and up at a 45 degree angle if looking from behind. I only swing back until my lead forearm is parallel to the ground. I tuck the left elbow on the downswing and let it rip. The reason I play all my irons off my nose? Wait for it... All my irons... 7 iron to Sand Wedge... are single length irons. So I'm using a rotational swing...on a single plane...with single length irons (based off my 7 iron). Never hit my irons better in my life - and hitting just as far now as I was when I started golfing 13 years ago. Also - driver and fairway woods are stupid-easy for me to hit now. My misses are mostly a high cut now, and that only happens when I slide my left hip because I get fast at the top. As long as I keep my lower body quiet until my hands drop (they don't have far to drop, either), then I get a pretty dang straight ball flight. Pull hooks and block are now a thing of the past. Anyhoo, here's the setup of my clubs. I have about a 94 mph driver swing speed. Driver: Ping G410 9 degree cranked up to 10.5 degrees, Alta CB R flex carry is 235-ish  3-wood: Ping G 410 13.5 degrees Alta CB R flex 65 grams, flat setting, stated loft, carry is around 215 5-wood: Ping G-410 17.5 degrees Alta CB R flex 65 grams, flat setting, stated loft, carry is 202 7-wood 2008 Taylormade Burner, 21 degrees, stock REAX S flex 49 grams, carry is 192 9-wood Ping G410 23.5 degrees Alta CB R flex 65 grams, flat setting, stated loft, carry is 182 6 hybrid Ping G425 31 degrees Alta CB R flex 70 grams, stated loft, flat setting, carry is 158  Irons: are all custom fit Sterling single-length irons by Wishon Golf. 7 146 yds 8 135 yds 9 125 yds PW 110 GW 98 SW 83 Putter: Custom Edel blade I had made in 2012 after golfing for a year and I can't hit the broad side of a barn with it. REALLY interested in getting fitted for a L.A.B DF 3 with a forearm grip...stroked a L.A.B. DF 2.1 at the PGA Superstore they had on the 'pre-owned' rack and it was $519 wuuuuut!!! So that's only 13 clubs...but I am looking on eBay to fill that gap where the 5 hybrid should be, would be a perfect 170 yd club right there I think. Before doing to the single length clubs, I had Ping irons 7-PW and four Vokeys in 48, 52, 56 and 60 in the bag and the single length clubs were gathering dust in the closet for the last 5 years. However, after actually playing a few rounds and seeing where the numbers were adding up, it was missed greens from 150 and in. So, I wanted to take the variable length mid and short irons out the the equation to keep my setup simpler. Gotta say, it worked like a charm.  Same setup as a 7-iron for all my scoring clubs and it keeps everything repeatable. Yes, it feels weird looking down at a wedge with 7-iron length, but I got used to it. The ball goes the same distances as my Ping irons and Vokey wedges used to but flies *way* higher and lands super soft. Also, if I want to chip or pitch with them I just choke down a little, as the swing weight difference won't matter much for those shots. I haven't actually kept score yet, as I haven't even gotten around to really working on my short game or putting at all. Right now, I'm just scoring fairways and greens hit or missed, approaches hit or missed and how many pars per round I can make. So far my best since this 'comeback' started is 8 pars, 1 birdie (almost had a hole-in-one lol), two bogies and seven 'others' (fats, thins, skulled chips across the green and tears may have been involved). I hit 3 of the Par 4 greens in regulation and hit 10 of 14 fairways. The ones I missed were not off the fairway by much and I finished the round with the same Pro V1X I started with - albeit a little scuffed up. Anyway, that's the story and after years of struggle I finally found something that works *for me*. I'll try to get some pics of setup and possibly video if anyone's interested and has a strong stomach haha. I'm gonna start reading the Dave Pelz short game and putting bibles this week, I'm sure that will be an adventure haha! Thanks for the space to write this.
    • Day 125 - Played 18. Ball striking is still off. Way off. 
    • Day 28: Wind really aggravated my allergies today, so attempted some full swing work outdoors but was kind of miserable. Moved indoors for some putting and mirror work. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...