Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

2015 PGA Show: Best New Products List


Note: This thread is 4122 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

I combed the show floor for the latest innovations in golf. Here are the top products that stood out.

For more from the PGA Show, go here,

Ben Hogan Ft. Worth 15 Irons

Ben Hogan’s new line of irons will be available with 44 available loft options that range from 20-to-63 degrees.

The Ft. Worth 15 irons don’t have traditional club stampings on their soles. Instead the Hogan irons have gone with 1-degree increments that allow golfers to pick the set makeup that best suits their game.

The design of the sole is also interesting. The irons are high bounce early and low bounce later. The high bounce portion felt great and helped the club "glide" through the turf when I hit the 31* iron. While they may appear to be muscle back irons, there is a decent amount of forgiveness built into the heads. The toplines are also thicker than most blades and there is a good amount of offset. I would say these irons are closer to a Titleist AP2 than a blade style iron. Very easy to hit and they launch the ball high.

MySwing Professional

MySwing Professional is a wireless, full-body, motion capture driven tool for golf professionals that can be used both indoors and out.

MySwing comes with 17 small, lightweight sensors that attach to various points on the user’s body and the club shaft. The sensors are able to capture the motion data, which is transmitted wirelessly to a tablet where it is stored to be analyzed.

MySwing Professional package also includes straps, a tablet PC with pre-installed software, and a carrying case that also works as a charger for the sensors. The sensors can work continuously for up to four hours between charges.

Other full-body, motion-capture systems can cost $40,000 or more, MySwing will be available to instructors on a rental plan for $199 per month for 24-month rental periods.

The Perfect Putter

The Perfect Putter is a well crafted stimpmeter-looking device to help you practice your putting more efficiently. It's easy to use, y ou read the putt, place the Perfect Putter on the green, place the ball on the number according to the distance from the hole and then let the ball go.

If it goes in, you know your read was correct. If it was incorrect, you know something was off. Going to be a lot of AimPoint instructors buying this.

PING Glide Wedges

I'll admit I'm a little biased with this one ;-) but these wedges look great and feel awesome.

Super Stroke Grips

The new + Plus Series putter grip has what SuperStroke calls CounterCore Technology. Basically it's a threaded cap design that lets golfers easily unscrew the cap and screw in a 50-gram weight to provide counterbalancing. I'm a believer in counterbalancing so it's great to see that anyone can try it out on any putter.

TRUE Linkswear

The new Classix and Game Changer Pro lines of TRUE shoes will feature spikes. Don't be worried if you're fan of TRUE shoes, they are still offering plenty of spikeless options and the design and technology (barefoot, close to the ground) that make them the most comfortable shoe in golf is still there in the TRUE Classix. The spikes are just there to appeal to more "traditional" golfers and to tour players. Look for Ryan Moore, Ben Crane, Harris English, Chris Kirk and Oscar Fraustro to be sporting TRUE shoes in 2015.


Arccos Stat Tracker

It's a system of 14 sensors (one that pairs to each club) that instantly tracks every shot in real time using GPS and Bluetooth technology. It's as simple as this: attach the sensors to the grip-end of each club, download the free Arccos app, pair the sensors to your phone, then play. The app track stats like average and longest drives, club usage and distance, greens in regulation and putts per hole. You can glance at your phone during the round if you'd like to see these stats in progress.

  • Upvote 2

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Cool.  Thanks Mike!

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Mike, what did you think of the Arccos Stat Tracker compared to Game Golf?

Christian

:tmade::titleist:  :leupold:  :aimpoint: :gamegolf:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Mike, what did you think of the Arccos Stat Tracker compared to Game Golf?

Thought there were some really cool features to it (instant tracking, nice graphics/stats, easy to use with your phone) and the guys behind it are pretty smart. Biggest difference is that you don't need to tap every shot. Only negative I saw was the weight of the sensor is almost two swing weights. Like we did with Game Golf, Erik and I plan to do some investigating.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The Ben Hogan irons are nice looking clubs, very traditional, however im not too sure about lofts on the sole rather than the club number. Im easily confused as it is :-\

Russ, from "sunny" Yorkshire = :-( 

In the bag: Driver: Ping G5 , Woods:Dunlop NZ9, 4 Hybrid: Tayormade Burner, 4-SW: Hippo Beast Bi-Metal , Wedges: Wilson 1200, Putter: Cleveland Smartsquare Blade, Ball: AD333

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The Ben Hogan irons are nice looking clubs, very traditional, however im not too sure about lofts on the sole rather than the club number. Im easily confused as it is

My thoughts exactly.  I play Hogan PCs, and love the thin top line at address and of course they have only numbers on them.  I have an idea that they made a mistake in not going with the traditional numbering system.  I also play Taylor Made fairway woods and they have the loft as well as the normal 3 and 5 designations.  Now, if Hogan had put the traditional numbers but also the loft, that would have been OK, but I don't think the majority of us care what the lofts of our irons are.  We go to the range, figure out how far we hit each iron and then use that info on the course.  Time will tell, but I have an idea that the Hogans with only the lofts won't be with us for very long.


Posted

Mike-

Was there anything in the line of Range Finders ??  I Find it hard to spend $300.00 on a range finder !!  Didn't know if there was anything less expensive in the works ??


  • Moderator
Posted
My thoughts exactly.  I play Hogan PCs, and love the thin top line at address and of course they have only numbers on them.  I have an idea that they made a mistake in not going with the traditional numbering system.  I also play Taylor Made fairway woods and they have the loft as well as the normal 3 and 5 designations.  Now, if Hogan had put the traditional numbers but also the loft, that would have been OK, but I don't think the majority of us care what the lofts of our irons are.  We go to the range, figure out how far we hit each iron and then use that info on the course.  Time will tell, but I have an idea that the Hogans with only the lofts won't be with us for very long.

I'm thinking the lofts are largely for the company's benefit. Since they offer so many irons with single degree increments, it'd be a lot easier to keep track of everything by stamping what loft the club is rather than just an iron designation.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm thinking the lofts are largely for the company's benefit. Since they offer so many irons with single degree increments, it'd be a lot easier to keep track of everything by stamping what loft the club is rather than just an iron designation.

Maybe so.  I have no idea if my 5-iron is 28° or 31°.  I have heard, though, that there is no industry standard and there has been a gradual change over the last decade or so.  Lofts have decreased somewhat from the 60s and 70s so companies can tout that their irons are longer.  I have been playing for over 40 years and can normally tell just by looking what iron someone has in their hands. Not so any more.  I'll see a pro hit a 7-iron on TV that I'd almost bet was a 5-iron just from looking at it.  As I said, a number with a loft would be OK, but I am not sure what a 37° designation means to the average golfer.  I could be way off base and this is the wave of the future, but time will tell.


  • Moderator
Posted
The Ben Hogan irons are nice looking clubs, very traditional, however im not too sure about lofts on the sole rather than the club number. Im easily confused as it is

I agree they're nice looking but disagree they're traditional. Thicker toplines and more offset than most musclebacks, "pocket" cavities for perimeter weighting and wider soles with a unique grind/bounce.

I personally don't think the different numbering would take that long to get used to. They also have an app to help with the fitting process.

Mike-

Was there anything in the line of Range Finders ??  I Find it hard to spend $300.00 on a range finder !!  Didn't know if there was anything less expensive in the works ??

Didn't have that much time to look at range finders but all the ones I saw were $300 or more. Found this Leupold one for $200.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
Lofts have decreased somewhat from the 60s and 70s so companies can tout that their irons are longer.

That's not really why lofts have gotten stronger. Iron and ball designs have changed dramatically, which altered launch conditions. Today's irons are longer because they are better clubs, not because today's 6 iron is 4° stronger than one from 40 years ago.

As I said, a number with a loft would be OK, but I am not sure what a 37° designation means to the average golfer.  I could be way off base and this is the wave of the future, but time will tell.

An iron designation with loft numbers is a lot less arbitrary than iron numbers. It really doesn't matter if your pitching wedge is stamped PW, W, 10 (iron), or 45°. The bottom line is you know the distance that you hit that club.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

That's not really why lofts have gotten stronger. Iron and ball designs have changed dramatically, which altered launch conditions. Today's irons are longer because they are better clubs, not because today's 6 iron is 4° stronger than one from 40 years ago.

An iron designation with loft numbers is a lot less arbitrary than iron numbers. It really doesn't matter if your pitching wedge is stamped PW, W, 10 (iron), or 45°. The bottom line is you know the distance that you hit that club.

Totally in agreement with your last statement. Range time will give you the distances. I can just hear the announcers now:  "What did he just hit into the 8th green there, Roger?"  "Gary, it looks like it was a 37°."


Posted

That's not really why lofts have gotten stronger. Iron and ball designs have changed dramatically, which altered launch conditions. Today's irons are longer because they are better clubs, not because today's 6 iron is 4° stronger than one from 40 years ago.

An iron designation with loft numbers is a lot less arbitrary than iron numbers. It really doesn't matter if your pitching wedge is stamped PW, W, 10 (iron), or 45°. The bottom line is you know the distance that you hit that club.

So no more hitting a '6' iron 190 yds? :-P

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Who cares about the lofts being stamped on the clubs. Dave, Erik and I helped PING name their cool new wedges ;-) RIP bounce.

  • Upvote 1

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Who cares about the lofts being stamped on the clubs. Dave, Erik and I helped PING name their cool new wedges  RIP bounce.

Maybe my next set of Edel Wedges should have "GLIDE" stamped on them :-D

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Maybe my next set of Edel Wedges should have "GLIDE" stamped on them

Or, perhaps your next set of Edels should be Pings? :-P

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Or, perhaps your next set of Edels should be Pings?

If they fit my swing better than Edel's they would be in consideration.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4122 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 587 - 2026-05-11 Got 15.5 holes in. Hit some good shots. Stop it, and then throw it in the right direction.
    • Wordle 1,787 5/6* ⬜🟨⬜🟨🟨 ⬜🟨🟨🟩⬜ ⬜🟨🟨🟩🟩 🟩🟩⬜🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Day 261 5-11 arms off chest in backswing and downswing. Made sure wrist was arching.   
    • Thank you @Ty_Webb!  I hadn't thought about that it would increase when there's a need for the third shot, something that happens to me almost every time I play a par-5;  it's pretty rare (bordering on never, but not quite) that I'm on or even within 30 yards for my third shot.   But that makes a ton of sense:  to be on or near in regulation, I need to hit at least two good shots and one not-bad one, preferably three good shots.  Asking a professional to hit two good shots in short succession is nowhere near as tall an order.  I'll continue to try for a second no-six round, but your post really did help me with the not beating myself up part, and I'll continue to be happy towards this when I have only one six (and no worse) in a round.
    • Good topic. Couple of things to add. First of all, if you look at the plot of strokes to hole out vs distance, you can see how the curve gets a lot steeper between 200 and 300 than it is between 100 and 200. That's because at some point you breach the point where you can't get there anymore. If you can reach from 120 and 170 (as most can) then the difference is just between how hard the shot is. From 220 to 270, there's a pretty good chance you can get on or close from 220 but not reach at all from 270 and need a whole other shot to get the ball on the green no matter how good of a shot you hit. It's not a whole glaring shot difference mind you because not many greens are hit from 220 either, but the difference is bigger. This is a PGA tour player chart, but something analogous likely happens for 10 handicaps: There will also be something similar to that out at 450ish yards where reaching in two becomes unlikely. That's probably why you're seeing over 6 for score expectation for a 10 handicap on longer par 5s. 545 yards is a long way to go unscathed basically. Tour players eat the par 5s alive because they can cover that ground without getting into trouble. In a very simple fashion, the longer the hole the more chance there is to show how good (or bad) you are. One last thing - avoiding 6s is a good goal, but it's not all that easy. Going 18 holes without a 6 is not something that I do all that frequently. There's always a long par 5 floating around or a difficult par 4 that something bad happens on. For example there, I played a course I hadn't played before in US Senior Open qualifying recently. No 6s for 13 holes, then on 14 (long par 4 into the breeze) I leaked my drive a little right and it plugged under the lip of a fairway bunker. Had to play backwards and then was facing 220 into the wind and I made 6. It really wasn't that farfetched. One slightly loose shot at the wrong moment and you're done. As a 10, it's still a good goal to have, but I certainly wouldn't lose sleep over it. Rounds with only one 6 are pretty good too.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.