Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Claim Chowder: Rory has another Decade (or has to change his swing)


Note: This thread is 3837 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
The big thing I worry about with Rory long-term is his back. If he has to change his swing substantially to take pressure of his back (if that's even possible), his game could change entirely (plus, y'know, regular aging). The short game has never been his strength, so if he can't bomb it past people and knock short irons close, that could limit his effectiveness.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Weirdly, this is the major problem with my own golf swing.  But I'm 41, and still have "fast hips."

He can adjust.  And he can do it slowly enough over time as he ages (I mean, it doesn't change overnight) that it won't necessarily will be a problem.

But I think your general analysis is pretty good.  I mean, I can't find any fault.

"Witty golf quote."


Posted

I am kinda thinking he can be pretty dynamic and get better sync'd up, and not rely on that move he has. I am not entirely sure how much he gains with a stuck right elbow and driving through the ball with insanely fast hips. There are a lot of powerful players who don't  have this move. It might be the only way he can get his dominant distance advantage with his body size.

Though he could go all Jim Furyk on us. Guy with not fast hips, but has his elbow in his right pocket at impact ;)

I thought of this too with stuck elbows and longevity. Given his Trackman numbers I expect Furyk has a downward AoA (above avg spin with below average swing speed plus apex height and launch angle). I think Rory is level to up on AoA and his path through the ball from delivery may give his arms more room than it appears from the pics.

With distance like Rory & Bubba it doesn't take much of a degree of being 'off' to produce some score-wrecking shots - particularly on tight and curvy courses. I think Bubba has developed a good 'gear-down' shot with his 4 wood for tighter tee shots that might keep his ball in safer landing zones on more demanding driving holes. Rory seems to hit driver a lot, which if he's slightly off can cost him. Re. Wentworth MC: because of the possibility / likelihood of a lost ball, wouldn't a shot to deep woods (with no hazard boundary) be statistically more costly than one to water that moved almost the same distance down the fairway before crossing the boundary?

I also think he sometimes gets a little mentally 'stuck' with his own expectations and desire to still 'make things happen' on days when he isn't as sharp and his resulting frustration compounds the issue.

If course management / frustration errors are substantial contributing factors for him they can certainly be corrected without a new swing, but his swing speed is likely to diminish from where he is now - with any swing - as he ages.

Kevin


  • Moderator
Posted

I think this is a great question @iacas is bringing up. Other than Jim Furyk I can't think of any other "older" golfer that has to open up as much as Rory. Furyk also doesn't swing at 120mph.

I do think the right arm/elbow has gotten a smidge better that last couple years. This is from a few months ago.

Changing this piece could be a tough one for Rory. He's used to lowering the handle almost straight down from 4-4.5. This might be a move that feels powerful to him. Or maybe the fix is as simple as keeping the arm a little more in front on the backswing. Alignment wise it doesn't get "behind" him on the backswing but there's a little move he does at 4 with his right shoulder that then puts the arm behind his pivot. So if he keeps it more "in place" it will be more synced with his pivot. This is basically what Hunter Mahan is working on.

Originally Posted by natureboy

I thought of this too with stuck elbows and longevity. Given his Trackman numbers I expect Furyk has a downward AoA (above avg spin with below average swing speed plus apex height and launch angle). I think Rory is level to up on AoA and his path through the ball from delivery may give his arms more room than it appears from the pics.

Furyk is slightly down, about a degree. Rory hits up 3-4 degrees consistently.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I am not an expert on the golf swing like Erik and Mike, but I am an expert on the body breaking down. :-) Rory is on the right path by keeping is core strong on maintaining flexibility.  But eventually he will have failures.  Each injury can then lead to injury in other areas because your body naturally compensates.

This is what Tiger has gone through. First the left knee, then back, achilles, etc.  Tiger recognized that his swing style put a great deal of stress on the left knee and changed. I believe he changed again because it was stressing other parts.

I like Rory and hope that he keeps it going.  With his talent and today's teaching technology, I think he can adapt.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

What do you we think about that video emphasizing to start the down swing with the left knee?

If you are talking about the Somax stuff, you can take a look at this thread which covers that video,

http://thesandtrap.com/t/75116/goofy-rory-video-knee-angle-measurement-in-golf-swing

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'd say he should cross that bridge when he gets to it. As good as he is right now, he should get while the gettin' is good.


I'm not going to get technical and talk about "fixing" the swing for the #1 ranked player in the world; but I completely agree with dkolo - I'd rather get 5 wins (including major(s)), and 5 missed cuts per year, than 1 win and maybe a couple of additional top 10's.

Players play, tough players win!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think that you are right that he will need to make a change if he wants to compete at the level he is at now. However, I don't agree with the timeline. I think he has 15-17 years to compete with this swing rather than the 10 @iacas claimed.

I also wonder why getting the right elbow more in-front of him would cause him to be less dynamic. What is the thought for that logic? He doesn't need to look like Dustin Johnson but why not going in that direction help him be just as dynamic?

Michael

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

I think that you are right that he will need to make a change if he wants to compete at the level he is at now. However, I don't agree with the timeline. I think he has 15-17 years to compete with this swing rather than the 10 @iacas claimed.


I think he'll start to slow down when he's 33-35. That's ten years from now. Hockey players, baseball players, etc. all slow down at 33-35…

I also wonder why getting the right elbow more in-front of him would cause him to be less dynamic. What is the thought for that logic? He doesn't need to look like Dustin Johnson but why not going in that direction help him be just as dynamic?


Depends on what you mean by dynamic. I think he probably feels tremendously powerful from that position and I think he'll feel more controlled from a different one. At least, so far as this discussion goes… ;-)

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

As long as his core muscles are strong enough to counter his upper body dynamic forces he will protect his joints ok. He can always back off (he will absolutely have to in his mid late 30s latest) a tad to Adam Scott or Louis Oosthuizen type swing - keep the club more in front of the body throughout. That should be easier on, spine, hips and knees.

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
As long as his core muscles are strong enough to counter his upper body dynamic forces he will protect his joints ok. He can always back off (he will absolutely have to in his mid late 30s latest) a tad to Adam Scott or Louis Oosthuizen type swing - keep the club more in front of the body throughout. That should be easier on, spine, hips and knees.

I think what we've seen from Tiger is that that's easier said than done.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think what we've seen from Tiger is that that's easier said than done.


No doubt. But what would be the option? I think he might just be forced to do so, as was Tiger. No?

Vishal S.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I am 51 now, have extremely fast hips, have always had a good back, and have never suffered a golf-related injury.  I don't think fast hips has anything to do with it


  • Moderator
Posted
I am 51 now, have extremely fast hips, have always had a good back, and have never suffered a golf-related injury.  I don't think fast hips has anything to do with it

There have been a couple of posts like this. Correct me if I'm wrong @iacas but I think when we're talking about fast hips it concerns how things are synced up as well as the speed that Rory is swinging at. Most amateurs have slow arms and hips that don't get forward or open enough. Not saying this is you @golfnz34me , you may swing at 115-120 mph, just wanted to clarify .

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I am 51 now, have extremely fast hips, have always had a good back, and have never suffered a golf-related injury.  I don't think fast hips has anything to do with it

I doubt your hips are anything like as fast as his, and I doubt you have hit as many golf shots in your 51 years as he has hit in his 20 something years.  Just saying that your personal experiences are not really a good model for what happens to professional golfers. and what might or might not be causing injuries.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I doubt your hips are anything like as fast as his, and I doubt you have hit as many golf shots in your 51 years as he has hit in his 20 something years.  Just saying that your personal experiences are not really a good model for what happens to professional golfers. and what might or might not be causing injuries.


My personal experiences are at least as relevant as the ridiculous speculation that was the start of this thread.  I have very fast hips, and I hit more than enough buckets of balls to know whether or not it really contributes to injuries. It does not.


Note: This thread is 3837 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.