Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Taking good balls from range buckets


Note: This thread is 3754 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Canada doesn't have states?  Wow, ground breaking revelation for me. You are wrong and I have the legal precedent to back it up.  You still have shown me nothing at all.  You just keep saying the same thing over and over with no actual content to your posts.    If you had any proof you should have posted it by now, instead of your cryptic messages...

You haven't provided any legal precedent that would be applicable to the facts of one taking a ball from a range basket. Not one. You couldn't even quote a full statute with the definition of theft... Maybe tomorrow, or in a year from now, you'll go back to drawing board, figure it out, and surprise us. And then you'll realize you were wrong. Until then, enjoy the rest of your week, kid.


  • Replies 461
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
The problem is that your logic is flawed. Ownership of property is based on certain principles and is legally defined, which your argument does not account for, so either you don't understand the law or you just refuse to acknowledge that your position is wrong. It is not simply based on who purchased the original item. I'm going to state this as clearly as I can to the best of my knowledge, hopefully @Mr. Desmond or @Duff McGee can corrrect me if I'm wrong: A golf ball hit onto a driving range can be considered either lost property or abandoned property. In either case, property ownership is transferred to the first finder of the ball. In this case, it is the driving range, as they are the ones that picked it up. You cannot claim the ball that you find in your range bucket as your own because it now belongs to the driving range; it is in their possession, in their bucket, on their property, and they did not lose, misplace, or abandon it. In essence, taking it is theft. It does not matter if it doesn't match any other ball in the bucket. BTW, if you wander onto a driving range and pick up a premium ball, it can still be considered theft, because you "found" the ball on private property, meaning you were trespassing. In that case, the only entity that can find the ball and claim ownership is the driving range. If the ball is found on public property, it's fair game. In either case, the true owner of the ball can come back and claim ownership. Obviously this can be hard to prove, but if you have a unique way of marking your ball, you can probably prove it is yours if it matches others in your bag or something. Either way, it's just a golf ball. Nobody is going to take you to court over it so this is all just academic discussion, but the range is perfectly within its rights to refuse service to you if they see you stealing from them, which is what you're doing if you pocket a ball from their bucket, no matter how you or anybody else wants to rationalize it.

It's funny you mention this just being an "academic" exercise because I was just thinking that this is the exact type of question a 1L Property professor would put on an exam and freak students out.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Ok so I just read Puma's responses and 1) he is wrong and his "precedence" means nothing bc you can find one court's response in the world doing a google search for basically anything you are claiming. Some courts get it wrong or people can easily cherry pick quotes that appear to support their positions but do not if read in its entirely. 2) I don't care if he believes I'm an attorney or not and I'm not going to go through an entire legal analysis quoting cases from 1650 England or some 1810 SCOTUS case because it's not worth my time.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
If you rented a bucket of balls from a range, and subsequently hit on off the property, would you feel morally obligated to pay the owner for losing their possession? If you went to a casino on vacation in las Vegas and kept one of the 1 dollar chips and traded in the rest this would be stealing as well, and yet there are chips from places that are worth quite a bit of money due to various reasons. I'm surprised the cops haven't gone after the owner of said chips for possessing stolen goods..

Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by rkim291968

24 pages, really?

Life is too short.

I was thinking the same thing.

yep ... amazing how some seemingly unsuspecting threads just evoke emotion and take on a life of their own.

John

Fav LT Quote ... "you can talk to a fade, but a hook won't listen"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I usually go buy a couple of dozen, Pro v1s and B330 golf balls, brand new, write "range" with a sharpee on each one and hit them into the range just to cause people to have a moral tug of war there...

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

This sign is posted in the opening credits of Tin Cup

Yet, Roy wants to be paid in cash so he doesn't have to pay income tax.

And Romeo suggests stealing ProV's from the range at the US Open.

They both must be liberals . . . . . rules are for other people.


Posted
If you went to a casino on vacation in las Vegas and kept one of the 1 dollar chips and traded in the rest this would be stealing as well, and yet there are chips from places that are worth quite a bit of money due to various reasons. I'm surprised the cops haven't gone after the owner of said chips for possessing stolen goods..

This is not illegal. Assuming you actually paid for the chip. Keeping $1 or $5 chips is very common among collectors. It's perfectly legal.

However, keeping a FOUND chip IS illegal. If you are walking and see a chip lying on the casino floor, the rule of "finders keepers" does not apply. The chip is considered casino property and must be returned to the cage.


Posted
Quote:
Originally Posted by pumaAttack View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by 14ledo81 View Post


The ball that was left on the range was abandoned. At that point the range spent their time and money to retrieve it. It became theirs.

Ha, ok.

I spent time and money getting the range balls to drop out of the machine.

So that is mine now.   What is the difference?

So I just have to spend "time and money" to make an item mine?  Hahaha

I would love for a range owner to see me take a ProV1 and place it into my bag.  Then call the cops for the theft. How is the range going to prove that is their ball .  With a receipt?  No.  With the time and money it took to collect it... Yeah that is gonna hold up in court.

You really have no clue how the legal system works, do you?

They will prove it by a funny little thing called testimony - the testimony of the range owner that he saw you take it from the bucket.  And unless you are prepared to commit perjury, when asked you will have to admit you took it from the bucket.

And case over, guilty as charged.

So guys, how about we make it next Tuesday - you know, the day we go over to puma's house and take everything he cannot produce a receipt for, since apparently he thinks that having a receipt is a necessary requirement of ownership.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pumaAttack View Post
Ha, just because some poster says its true doesn't mean it actually is.

I just found this legal precedent that says otherwise:

https://www.ngcoa.ca/Userfiles/File/GBC/1997/Fall/Legal%20Fall-97.pdf

Quote:
The acquittal was based on his view that the balls in question remained the property of the golfers who had hit them there, and not of the golf course where they were abandoned. So anyone taking them is not stealing from the golf course operator.

OK, this nonsense has to be exploded.

1) it was not a legal opinion, it was a news article.

2) It was not the US.  I suspect the precedent in Iraq might involve the loss of hands for the micreants.  THAT would not be  precedent for us, either.

3) Even if those problems did not exist, it was a trial court and there was no appeal.  The precedential (?) value of a trial court decision on a legal issue is virtually nil.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hardspoon View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by pumaAttack View Post

I just found this legal precedent that says otherwise:

https://www.ngcoa.ca/Userfiles/File/GBC/1997/Fall/Legal%20Fall-97.pdf

This is particularly interesting since it occurred during a clear case of trespassing...seems crazy to me.

Foolish prosecutors did not charge them with trespassing.

When the best he can come up with in the way of precedent is a badly charged, badly argued, badly decided case, at the trial level from a different country with no value as a precedent, I feel pretty comfortable with my position.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Ummm as long as they are not range balls go ahead and take them... we dont care.

Only reason they are in the basket is because someone was too lazy to separate them out when washing.


Posted

My takeaway from this is that we all need to keep our balls in play so that we don't lose balls, thus we wont need to take any balls from the driving range. Problem solved.

"Swing with a Purpose" 

What's In The Bag:
Woods: Driver: RBZ stage 2 10* 3 wood: RBZ 15* 5 wood: NIke vapor speed 19*
Irons/ wedges: Rbladez tour 4-PW; Mizuno MP-T4 52*, 56*, CG11 60*
Putter: Odyssey White ice #9
 


Posted

To all of you who have voted "Take it without Hesitation", I would query you this: if the range buckets were full to the ever lovin' brim with shiny, bright, new ProVs...would ya snipe a few? C'mon, there's thousand of them, brightly, shiny, beautiful ProVs. We're talking a scenario where it's a pretty sure bet that the range paid for all those balls. But...there's a sea of them, buckets and buckets of brightly, shiny, new Tour balls. Who's gonna know the difference?? Grab a few.

I think this is the right comparison.  And in this case it would obviously be stealing.  The course has paid for those balls directly.  There's no gray area in this case.  I wish I played nice enough courses that I faced this (not hard) decision regularly!

Like I said before, I don't think I've ever actually taken a ball from a range bucket, but I voted take it because it seems a gray area to me and not clearly wrong to take a premium ball someone else lost on the range that got picked up by the range picker and missed by the staff.  I see the technical/legal arguments, but in terms of right/wrong, not legal/illegal, it seems similar enough to picking up a lost ball on the course that it seems clearly different than the situation you describe above.

Matt

Mid-Weight Heavy Putter
Cleveland Tour Action 60˚
Cleveland CG15 54˚
Nike Vapor Pro Combo, 4i-GW
Titleist 585h 19˚
Tour Edge Exotics XCG 15˚ 3 Wood
Taylormade R7 Quad 9.5˚

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I don't really care that people take golf balls from the range but I am amazed at the level of justification and denial that exists within a community that encourages us to act as a gentleman and hold ourselves accountable to playing by the rules of golf.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Ummm as long as they are not range balls go ahead and take them... we dont care.

Only reason they are in the basket is because someone was too lazy to separate them out when washing.

this is surprising.  i believe @BubblesUSMC course.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3754 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.