Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Solheim Cup Controversy: Who is more at fault?


Note: This thread is 3721 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Solheim Cup Controversy: Who is more at fault?

    • Alison Lee
      45
    • Suzann Pettersen
      32
    • Charley Hull
      6
    • Carin Koch
      4


Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

Walking off the green when a putt hasn't been conceded is bad sportsmanship IMO but I voted for Alison Lee. It's her responsibility to make sure the putt is good and Brittany Lincicome was yelling at her to not pick it up. Lee said she thought she heard it was good (don't understand why she heard that and not her partner telling her not to pick it up) but you also have to be sure that the concession is coming from your opponents and not someone in the crowd. Look for the thumbs up, make eye contact or just ask for confirmation.

I also think that the right thing to do would have been to have Lee put the ball back and putt it rather than have them automatically lose the hole. So I put that on Pettersen/Hull or even Captain Koch for not stepping in.

2-4/3

Player Lifts Ball in Mistaken Belief That Next Stroke Conceded

Q. In a match between A and B, B made a statement which A interpreted to mean that his (A's) next stroke was conceded. Accordingly, A lifted his ball. B then said that he had not conceded A's next stroke. What is the ruling?

A. If B's statement could reasonably have led A to think his next stroke had been conceded, in equity (Rule 1-4 ), A should replace his ball as near as possible to where it lay, without penalty.

Otherwise, A would incur a penalty stroke for lifting his ball without marking its position - Rule 20-1 - and he must replace his ball as near as possible to where it lay.

Here's the putt.

And a good recap of the whole thing.

http://www.geoffshackelford.com/homepage/2015/9/20/concessiongate-solheim-overshadowed-by-17th-hole-antics.html

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
AL at fault but the move by the Euro pair away from the green was bad form. Though it seemed to have fired the U.S. Team up so... Given how upset Hull was really not worth it. She had an odd look coming offf the green after the harsh way SP reacted and obviously by 18 she was toast. Regardless of what anyone says it was a pivot point. The singles comeback was an epic beat down.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I find the whole giving putts thing silly and causing more negativity to these cups. We've seen controversy over putts not being given etc. before. As far as I'm concerned, they could just drop the option of giving putts and have the players putt out.

If the putt is easy enough to be given, they might as well putt it. We all know they can miss many of these putts, especially in a high pressure situation .

I struggle seeing how the European players are at fault here. If the putt is not conceeded, you putt it. This is a big tournament that everyone wants to win. Why should one team be blamed for not giving a putt that could be missed and eventually lead to their victory? Which is why I think the entire thing should be removed. It adds something to the game that I don't think we need. One putt is given, a similar putt is not.

Is it bad form wanting to win the Solheim Cup? Should they conceed putts just to be nice and possibly lose the cup because of it?

The cup should be about which team is the better at playing golf, not bickering about shots players don't want to hit. It's impossible, but would've been interesting to have the cup played in an alternate reality where everything was identical, except that putts weren't conceeded.

  • Upvote 1

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

You don't take the ball away until you have visual and verbal confirmation that the putt was given.  I played match play yesterday and no matter how close the ball was to the hole I made my opponent confirm he was giving me the putt.  Lee should know better.

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I thought Hull was upset because she meant to concede the putt but she walked away without saying the words. Pettersen wasn't near the action so she assumed Hull would handle conceding the putt.

In a match between A and B, B made a statement which A interpreted to mean that his (A's) next stroke was conceded. Accordingly, A lifted his ball. B then said that he had not conceded A's next stroke. What is the ruling?

On TV they interviewed the official for that group and I think he said that he looked closely for some indication that the putt might have been conceded and didn't see/hear any so the bit in bold never happened so they couldn't replace the ball.


Posted
All at fault (except lincicme) but mostly euros and more mostly Peterson. Purely speculating here, but I've never seen a 15" putt NOT conceded in these type events so I'm thinking petterson caused a stink solely because she saw a cheap way to win a hole - and there isn't a less sportsmanlike move possible than that.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I thought Hull was upset because she meant to concede the putt but she walked away without saying the words. Pettersen wasn't near the action so she assumed Hull would handle conceding the putt.

Maybe, but I bet that SP and Hull agreed ahead of the match that SP would do all the match decisions. So Hull stayed quiet even though she wanted to give it. I think SP knew what she was doing. It's all on Lee, she should've known better.

Steve

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Thing is right or wrong if you want someone to putt out watch them putt it out. If you were playing a match in league you wouldn't bee line for the next tee before your opponent setup for the putt. Knowing better or not there is a sportsmanship dynamic to golf.

Dave :-)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I think lee shouldn't have picked up her ball - one of the first things you learn is that you have to putt out unless your opponent explicitly tells you that you don't have to. So she broke the rules. However, the way the Europeans just walked off the green without either conceding the putt or waiting for her to putt the next one was very bad. Maybe they were trying to game her into rushing to putt out but really they should be watching and waiting while the hole is still live. Also don't understand why the rules guy didn't get them to put the ball back and putt it. Just generally poor golf from everyone.

Adam

:ping: G30 Driver 

:callaway: XR16 3W
:callaway: Big Bertha 5W
:ping: S55 4-W 
:ping: 50' , 56', 60' Glide Wedge
:odyssey: White Hot #7 Putter


Posted

I would say that multiple people are at fault here. Lee first, rules guy second and the euros next. If I was playing a round and walked off before my opponent putted, he misses it but says he made it, I cannot argue either way. It doesn't matter that they are in a audience setting, you watch your opponent finish out.

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I think lee shouldn't have picked up her ball - one of the first things you learn is that you have to putt out unless your opponent explicitly tells you that you don't have to. So she broke the rules.

However, the way the Europeans just walked off the green without either conceding the putt or waiting for her to putt the next one was very bad. Maybe they were trying to game her into rushing to putt out but really they should be watching and waiting while the hole is still live.

Also don't understand why the rules guy didn't get them to put the ball back and putt it.

Just generally poor golf from everyone.

A.If B's statement could reasonably have led A to think his next stroke had been conceded,...

My understanding is that the rules guy said he didn't see Hull/Pettersen do or say anything that could be interpreted as conceding the putt so placing the ball back where it was wasn't an option.


Posted
My understanding is that the rules guy said he didn't see Hull/Pettersen do or say anything that could be interpreted as conceding the putt so placing the ball back where it was wasn't an option.

Hull and her caddy starting walking to the next tee immediately after he putt came to rest - that doesn't count as saying anything but I certainly think that could be construed as "doing" something. If these people want somebody to make a putt they always just stand there stone faced with their arms folded, or avoiding looking directly at their opponent. When they walk to the next tee, that is body English for "I think this hole is over."

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

based on the video Europe should win the hole but it seems a little bush league to me...they all started walking off of the green as if they had given the putt only to stop and decide that they didn't want to give the putt after she had already picked up.

What's in the bag:
Taylormade R15 
Callaway X2Hot pro 3W
Callaway X2Hot pro 20* hybrid
Mizuno JPX900 Tour 4-PW
Cleveland RTX 2.0 50,54, and 58 degree wedges
Taylormade White Smoke putter


  • Moderator
Posted

My understanding is that the rules guy said he didn't see Hull/Pettersen do or say anything that could be interpreted as conceding the putt so placing the ball back where it was wasn't an option.

Right but Lee thought she heard "that's good", give her the benefit of the doubt, put the ball back and have her putt it. It's not like Lee was trying to cheat or get away with something, it was an honest mistake.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Honest mistake by Lee who would have thought that like every other time in that situation you scoop it up. If I see my opponents walking off line that, I assume I'm done. This is like being busted for doing 56 mph on the highway. Technically you are speeding but you do so without thinking. Total jerk move by the Europeans SP I think saw a cheap shot to go one up and took it. Watching the video it's very clear to me that Hull thought it was over and done with for a half. Unfortunately without the verbal to go with it, Lee loses the hole. But that is ridiculous. That's like the guy from my old golf league who once watched someone address his ball (balls were side by side). The other guy hit and while it was in the air he goes "two strokes, you hit my ball". Yes, according to the rules you should check your ball but that's just a dick move. If you are going to do that to win, you don't play the same game I do. In a sport where we honor the rules, even if we disagree with them and frequently people point something out that might cause someone else a penalty. This was a gotcha move by a real jerk, IMO. Didn't want to put it that way until I saw the video. But yeah, SP is a real jerk on this one
  • Upvote 1

—Adam

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Honest mistake by Lee who would have thought that like every other time in that situation you scoop it up. If I see my opponents walking off line that, I assume I'm done. This is like being busted for doing 56 mph on the highway. Technically you are speeding but you do so without thinking. Total jerk move by the Europeans SP I think saw a cheap shot to go one up and took it. Watching the video it's very clear to me that Hull thought it was over and done with for a half. Unfortunately without the verbal to go with it, Lee loses the hole. But that is ridiculous. That's like the guy from my old golf league who once watched someone address his ball (balls were side by side). The other guy hit and while it was in the air he goes "two strokes, you hit my ball". Yes, according to the rules you should check your ball but that's just a dick move. If you are going to do that to win, you don't play the same game I do. In a sport where we honor the rules, even if we disagree with them and frequently people point something out that might cause someone else a penalty. This was a gotcha move by a real jerk, IMO. Didn't want to put it that way until I saw the video. But yeah, SP is a real jerk on this one

Well said ... My thoughts exactly.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

the whole thing lacked class. Petersen, Koch and Inksters poor choice of public reaction.

Mark

Weapons of choice:
:titleist: 910 D2 :titleist: 910 Fd 15° :titleist:910H 17°
:mizuno: Mp54 4-PW :vokey:52 -12 :vokey:  56 - 12 :vokey: 60 - 08
:odyssey: Pro Type 2 ball 

They say golf is like life, but don't believe them. Golf is more complicated than that


  • Moderator
Posted

Let's call it even? :-\

Quote:

It happened at the 2000 Solheim Cup at Loch Lomond in Scotland. Sorenstam holed a 25-foot chip shot that appeared to halve the 13th hole in a match against Kelly Robbins and Pat Hurst. Then Robbins realized she actually had been away and should have gone before Sorenstam.

U.S. captain Pat Bradley stepped in and decided to make Sorenstam replay the shot, which caused angry feelings among the Europeans and some regret and embarrassment for the American side. Ultimately, the whole thing underscored just how fiercely competitive the Solheim had become.

http://espn.go.com/espnw/news-commentary/article/9570485/espnw-replayed-chip-2000-irks-annika

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3721 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.