Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3556 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

 

7 hours ago, dchoye said:

Surprised when I saw Bernard L name in 3rd place.  Props to the old guy . 

Old Guy! He is two years older than me!!!!:-P

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

What is it w/approaching 50, 60 that invigorates great players? Nicklaus in 86, Norman and Watson at the BO, now Langer. 

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
22 minutes ago, nevets88 said:

What is it w/approaching 50, 60 that invigorates great players? Nicklaus in 86, Norman and Watson at the BO, now Langer. 

Outside of Nicklaus in 1986, the common variable between the last three is wind. The winds were nasty at Royal Birkdale and Turnberry those two years, like it has been at Augusta this year. Combine extensive course knowledge with a lower swing speed, and you get a good formula for success where younger players' instincts to overpower the conditions work against them.

An old man's nerves ultimately caught up to Norman and Watson, as it has done to Fred Couples here in recent years. Langer likely won't be able to keep up in today's calm conditions.

  • Upvote 2

In my UnderArmour Links stand bag...

Driver: '07 Burner 9.5° (stiff graphite shaft)
Woods: SasQuatch 17° 4-Wood (stiff graphite shaft)
Hybrid: 4DX Ironwood 20° (stiff graphite shaft)Irons/Wedges: Apex Edge 3-PW, GW, SW (stiff shaft); Carnoustie 60° LWPutter: Rossa AGSI+ Corzina...


Posted

 

33 minutes ago, nevets88 said:

What is it w/approaching 50, 60 that invigorates great players? Nicklaus in 86, Norman and Watson at the BO, now Langer. 

I'm waiting for some golfer to break his age in a major.

A number of golfers have done it on the Champions Tour, and Sam Snead did it in a regular PGA event:

 

http://golf.about.com/od/faqs/f/ageshooters.htm

 


Posted
17 hours ago, RJH999 said:

Also I really get tired of this bullshit "Augusta lore and magic" type garbage.

 

http://deadspin.com/how-augusta-national-became-golfs-north-korea-1709794444

And Nantz only helps glorify the fictional history that Augusta has.

 

Don't get me wrong, I enjoy watching this tournament but the history at that place makes me really wish the public wasn't so in love with that place.

  • Upvote 1

Christian

:tmade::titleist:  :leupold:  :aimpoint: :gamegolf:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
14 hours ago, skydog said:

I think Americans are the only golf fans who aren't unanimous homers for their own. Kind of confusing to me.

I am a homer and will be happy with any of the American contenders. I'll be happy with DJ, Sneds, or Spieth.

I'm with you!


Posted
14 hours ago, ChrisP said:

We get it. You don't like Spieth. Don't need to broadcast it with every single post.

The Rory fan clubbers are the biggest excuse makers as well. If only Rory could putt, if only Rory could get some lucky bounces if only Rory. if if if, the list is a mile long. Funny because I don't hear Rory making excuses. It's a cool thing to hate Spieth, come on everybody we still got room on the bandwagon for you.. I guess when you get to the level where people hate you. You must be doing something right on the golf course.


Posted
13 hours ago, Gunther said:

If Spieth is pressing on those 2 holes tomorrow, he'll win.  The problem was that he was tapping the brakes towards the end of the round the past 2 days.  

If conditions were going to be tough tomorrow, I think it would  be Jordan's going away.  Given benign conditions, I think Rory and Day could make a charge.  But, Jordan can go low here if needbe.  He's in the driver's seat but by no means a lock. Langer and Smylie have no chance.  It'll be one of those 3, I believe.

Langer and Smylie have no chance? I could see saying they probably won't win. To say they have no chance though well, is just a pretty ignorant.


Posted

With the bizarre wind conditions, Billy Horschel ball was pushed off the green by the gusty winds.

Just a thought, under the circumstances, if he would had grabbed his ball to prevent it from rolling into the water?

Would taking the penalty for picking up his ball in motion, then play the next shot greenside, an option for a player if he reacts quick enough?

Johnny Rocket - Let's Rock and Roll and play some golf !!!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 minutes ago, Natural Patrick said:

Langer and Smylie have no chance? I could see saying they probably won't win. To say they have no chance though well, is just a pretty ignorant.

We'll see.  

Logic on Langer is that conditions are improved.  I think -7 or -8 probably wins.  Coming in to greens with hybrids is not conducive to low scoring.  

Smylie, I believe will get caught up in the spectacle, although he has shown he can go very deep.  I just don't believe he will today because of what's at stake and this being his 1st time.  These young guys are better prepared than years past, to be sure, but I don't see it with the seasoned studs that are in contention today.

So, I wouldn't call my opinion ignorant although you're entitled to your opinion.

In my Bag: Driver: Titelist 913 D3 9.5 deg. 3W: TaylorMade RBZ 14.5 3H: TaylorMade RBZ 18.5 4I - SW: TaylorMade R7 TP LW: Titelist Vokey 60 Putter: Odyssey 2-Ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Found Dustin Johnson at 10-1 this morning. Not a bad bargain. I think a guy like DJ can take advantage of these par-5s today which all mostly funnel towards the pin and have eagle written all over it. Today's a day where a guy with length has an advantage. A day like today is tough for a leader going in because of all the scoring possibilities. Jordan is probably going to have to shoot 67 or 68 to win because I think Day or DJ or Matsuyama can up a very low number.

I'll say this about Jordan....he denies he hasn't been struggling this year, but he's been a bit off and you've seen it at times this week. The biggest issue with Jordan this year has been consistency throughout a round and the last 2 days you've seen a lot of inconsistency. He's mishit his wedges a lot more than last year and mis-hit shots more often. HIs putter, though, has been his saving grace this week.

Edited by ChrisP

  • Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, RFKFREAK said:

And Nantz only helps glorify the fictional history that Augusta has.

Don't get me wrong, I enjoy watching this tournament but the history at that place makes me really wish the public wasn't so in love with that place.

I'd say it's #3 for me USO, BO, Masters, PGA. The best thing about The Masters is the course and the limited commercials and IBM's handling of streaming and its website. That it's the first major of the year after winter gives it a little more luster too. It'll be interesting to see if the PGA gets rescheduled to February how that affects The Masters.

I have to spend the rest of the week removing that sticky treacly residue that is sentimentality emitted by CBS.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 minutes ago, Gunther said:

We'll see.  

Logic on Langer is that conditions are improved.  I think -7 or -8 probably wins.  Coming in to greens with hybrids is not conducive to low scoring.  

Smylie, I believe will get caught up in the spectacle, although he has shown he can go very deep.  I just don't believe he will today because of what's at stake and this being his 1st time.  These young guys are better prepared than years past, to be sure, but I don't see it with the seasoned studs that are in contention today.

So, I wouldn't call my opinion ignorant although you're entitled to your opinion.

And I agree with everything you just said. What I don't agree with is you saying "No chance" You do know what no chance means don't you? The odds of you winning the lotery are much better I guess. 


Posted
5 minutes ago, nevets88 said:

I'd say it's #3 for me USO, BO, Masters, PGA. The best thing about The Masters is the course and the limited commercials and IBM's handling of streaming and its website. That it's the first major of the year after winter gives it a little more luster too. It'll be interesting to see if the PGA gets rescheduled to February how that affects The Masters.

I have to spend the rest of the week removing that sticky treacly residue that is sentimentality emitted by CBS.

I love the Masters, but I wish it had more TV time. Even an hour more a day would be nice. It doesn't have to be like the British or US Open where it's 12 hours a day, but at least give me 5-6 on Thurday and Friday and an extra hour on Saturday.

US Open is probably my favorite with the Open and Masters a close 2nd. The main reason I love the Masters is not just the course, but the way they set it up Sunday. They set it up for a lot of eagles and birdies and it has the potential to get really exciting if the leaderboard is bunched up.

 


Posted
8 minutes ago, ChrisP said:

Found Dustin Johnson at 10-1 this morning. Not a bad bargain. I think a guy like DJ can take advantage of these par-5s today which all mostly funnel towards the pin and have eagle written all over it. Today's a day where a guy with length has an advantage. A day like today is tough for a leader going in because of all the scoring possibilities. Jordan is probably going to have to shoot 67 or 68 to win because I think Day or DJ or Matsuyama can up a very low number.

I'll say this about Jordan....he denies he hasn't been struggling this year, but he's been a bit off and you've seen it at times this week. The biggest issue with Jordan this year has been consistency throughout a round and the last 2 days you've seen a lot of inconsistency. He's mishit his wedges a lot more than last year and mis-hit shots more often. HIs putter, though, has been his saving grace this week.

The field is almost certainly getting to 5-under today: there are so many chasers who play well at Augusta, that it's hard to imagine a scenario where none of them take advantage of ideal scoring conditions. Jordan likely needs a round in the 60s to win, but the 74-73 he's posted the last two days didn't look affected by the wind at all. The 38s on the back nine are a red flag to me, and I think the best score he can shoot in his form of the last two days is a 70. That's a playoff, at best.

In my UnderArmour Links stand bag...

Driver: '07 Burner 9.5° (stiff graphite shaft)
Woods: SasQuatch 17° 4-Wood (stiff graphite shaft)
Hybrid: 4DX Ironwood 20° (stiff graphite shaft)Irons/Wedges: Apex Edge 3-PW, GW, SW (stiff shaft); Carnoustie 60° LWPutter: Rossa AGSI+ Corzina...


Posted
17 minutes ago, ChrisP said:

I love the Masters, but I wish it had more TV time. Even an hour more a day would be nice. It doesn't have to be like the British or US Open where it's 12 hours a day, but at least give me 5-6 on Thurday and Friday and an extra hour on Saturday.

US Open is probably my favorite with the Open and Masters a close 2nd. The main reason I love the Masters is not just the course, but the way they set it up Sunday. They set it up for a lot of eagles and birdies and it has the potential to get really exciting if the leaderboard is bunched up.

 

My favorite tournaments to watch in order.

1# The U.S. Open

2# The Players Championship.

3# The Masters

4# The PGA Championship

5# The Open

 


Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, nevets88 said:

What is it w/approaching 50, 60 that invigorates great players? Nicklaus in 86, Norman and Watson at the BO, now Langer. 

Langer is playing in his 33rd Masters - he knows the course so well that the tougher things get the more the inexperienced players fall by the wayside and those who know how to play Augusta can use that experience to their advantage.  Pretty much the same with links golf - those who know how  to play it have a big advantage over those that don't.

I'm wondering now if Augusta National Greenskeeper is feeling that they finally have it right from the standpoint of a course that is long enough to keep bombers from running away and short enough for a Senior Tour guy to still be able to compete.  Or perhaps it is just a case of the "perfect wind storm" that has made experience a bit more important than length.

Also wondering what Rory is thinking about Augusta at this point - after two trips around in the weekend in the final pairing over the span of a few years his performances have been decidedly poor and he has exhibited very little patience or respect for how to play the course (like his gaffe at 11 where anybody who has watched or played in the Masters knows that you don't try to hook the ball onto the green from the left side)   Spieth did not play all that well but he excelled at making the correct recovery shots and capitalizing when he had birdie opportunities - Rory on the other hand just keep making mistakes and did not capitalize on any of his good shots.

Edited by Coronagolfman

Posted
1 hour ago, RFKFREAK said:

And Nantz only helps glorify the fictional history that Augusta has.

 

Don't get me wrong, I enjoy watching this tournament but the history at that place makes me really wish the public wasn't so in love with that place.

Nantz and CBS get the honor of doing the Masters every year because they do glorify and pay homage to the event in a way unlike any other tournament is broadcast.  Augusta revels in the aspect of the lore and the mystery and the exclusivity of their club and you can bet that if CBS doesn't play those aspects up enough then they hear about it.

I think Nantz really blew it on the interview with Smiley in the Butler Cabin - he totally forgot golf for the moment and was quizzing the kid in depth about living at home and what kind of car he drives (I think he wanted to get the kid to say he drives an '88 Volkswagon or something like that to play up on the rags-to-riches angle) - I would rather have liked to hear about the kid's golf or his thinking during the round compared to his lifestyle.

 


Note: This thread is 3556 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.