Jump to content
IGNORED

Presidential Race 2016


iacas
Note: This thread is 2878 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Who do you want to see as our next President?  

81 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will you vote for as our next President?

    • Hillary Clinton (D)
      28
    • Bernie Sanders (D)
      16
    • Donald Trump (R)
      32
    • Ted Cruz (R)
      5


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Ernest Jones said:

His choices may be somewhat limited by the fact that most of the people that have the intelligence and skill-sets that Trump needs find him to be a repulsive dirtbag and an embarrassment.  

At the same time, every sniveling opportunist in the party willing to bet their future on Trump not making it to the end of his term will be fighting to be one step away from the presidency.

7 minutes ago, Gunther said:

His unfavorables are an impediment, to be sure.  But given that Hillary is also a repulsive dirtbag and an embarrassment, I think that's a wash.

Keep telling yourself that.

In my UnderArmour Links stand bag...

Driver: '07 Burner 9.5° (stiff graphite shaft)
Woods: SasQuatch 17° 4-Wood (stiff graphite shaft)
Hybrid: 4DX Ironwood 20° (stiff graphite shaft)Irons/Wedges: Apex Edge 3-PW, GW, SW (stiff shaft); Carnoustie 60° LWPutter: Rossa AGSI+ Corzina...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

2 hours ago, saevel25 said:

Does Trump want Kasich in the VP debates with how mellow Kasich has been in the Primaries? Does that help even Trump out with some of the voters who find him too offensive? Kasich's history is more inline with mainstream Republicans. Would that backfire on Trump's message of being anti-establishment?

Kind of wondered the same things myself. He is the only one that isn't a criminal, though. :whistle:

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The Hungry for Power Games has seen two more fallen. :-P

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

13 hours ago, Ernest Jones said:

His choices may be somewhat limited by the fact that most of the people that have the intelligence and skill-sets that Trump needs find him to be a repulsive dirtbag and an embarrassment.  

His endorsement list includes 6 active or former senators, 17 current and former representatives, 6 current or former military generals, 6 sitting governors and 4 former governors, and prominent academics such as Ben Carson. These are public officials with a great deal of their reputation at stake. Jeff Sessions endorsed Trump and staked his long political career on his candidacy. Sessions is one of the smartest, most respected people in congress. 

13 hours ago, Chilli Dipper said:

At the same time, every sniveling opportunist in the party willing to bet their future on Trump not making it to the end of his term will be fighting to be one step away from the presidency.

The Secret Service will have their work cut out for them this go around. 

- Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just watch the first 30 seconds of this.  A good reminder that experts don't really know what to expect this election. In June 2015, most elite opinion thought that Trump winning the Republican was simply absurd, not even worthy of consideration. The laughter that Trump had the best chance of all Republicans to win the general election at that point (quite a few had not formally entered the race by that point) was derisive.  Watch the woman to Maher's right after Coulter says Trump is the best current nominee.

Yet here we are. The people spoke. It shows a total disconnect between how the masses look at things vs. how elite opinion views things. This past year has certainly been eye-opening to me (I wouldn't have guessed Trump would win either). And we should listen to these same people to predict what will happen in 2016?

My Swing


Driver: :ping: G30, Irons: :tmade: Burner 2.0, Putter: :cleveland:, Balls: :snell:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
17 minutes ago, RandallT said:

Just watch the first 30 seconds of this.  A good reminder that experts don't really know what to expect this election. In June 2015, most elite opinion thought that Trump winning the Republican was simply absurd, not even worthy of consideration. The laughter that Trump had the best chance of all Republicans to win the general election at that point (quite a few had not formally entered the race by that point) was derisive.  Watch the woman to Maher's right after Coulter says Trump is the best current nominee.

Yet here we are. The people spoke. It shows a total disconnect between how the masses look at things vs. how elite opinion views things. This past year has certainly been eye-opening to me (I wouldn't have guessed Trump would win either). And we should listen to these same people to predict what will happen in 2016?

Coulter's got a point @ 01:30 as well. When Sanders talks about free university, I think, yeah, right, ooookay, but his general message appeals to those tired of the establishment status quo, everything's fine, let's keep it going the way it is folks for whom everything is working out great.

I've been saying most of the MSM is clueless for months, they're just riling you up for ratings and to be "relevant".

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, Braivo said:

Jeff Sessions endorsed Trump and staked his long political career on his candidacy. Sessions is one of the smartest, most respected people in congress.

He's also one of the most right wing congressman out there. If Trump wants a candidate to bring in the extreme conservatives, especially on the social issues, then it's a good pick.

26 minutes ago, RandallT said:

The laughter that Trump had the best chance of all Republicans to win the general election at that point (quite a few had not formally entered the race by that point) was derisive.  Watch the woman to Maher's right after Coulter says Trump is the best current nominee.

Also note that show hosted by one of the most crazy left wing nut jobs out there. I could see that show being more derisive just because they were talking about anything associated with the GOP.

 

 

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The fact that Ann Coulter predicted Trump's rise falls more into the "even a broken clock is right twice a day" category more than anything else.

We gravely underestimated the appeal of dog-whistle xenophobia when delivered by a boastful speaker, and we overestimated the structural strength of the Republican Party. After their post-mortem of the 2012 election, the concluded they couldn't win the presidency without expanding from their core demographics; when Trump entered the race to rile up the crazies and do the exact opposite of what the party prescribed, no one in the GOP had a plan to react to it.

In my UnderArmour Links stand bag...

Driver: '07 Burner 9.5° (stiff graphite shaft)
Woods: SasQuatch 17° 4-Wood (stiff graphite shaft)
Hybrid: 4DX Ironwood 20° (stiff graphite shaft)Irons/Wedges: Apex Edge 3-PW, GW, SW (stiff shaft); Carnoustie 60° LWPutter: Rossa AGSI+ Corzina...

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, saevel25 said:

He's also one of the most right wing congressman out there. If Trump wants a candidate to bring in the extreme conservatives, especially on the social issues, then it's a good pick.

Also note that show hosted by one of the most crazy left wing nut jobs out there. I could see that show being more derisive just because they were talking about anything associated with the GOP.

So, does that mean all left wings are "nut jobs", but the host is the craziest? Or is he the most crazy nut job who is left winged? :-D

Yeah, people thought I was crazy to think that Trump would win the GOP nomination a few months ago too. :-P

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just now, Lihu said:

So, does that mean all left wings are "nut jobs", but the host is the craziest? Or was it the most crazy nut job who is left winged? :-D

He's a nut job who is left wing ;)

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
On ‎5‎/‎4‎/‎2016 at 0:33 PM, rehmwa said:

 

it's not your business if someone chooses to own a gun

 

If Hillary chooses Bernie for VP, I think they'd win the GE regardless of who Trump chooses.  I doubt that'd happen, but I'd be in favor of it.

Sorry, I and all the police officers have a big problem if a crazy or criminal can buy a gun.  That risks the lives of many people, not just one or two.
 

Philip Kohnken, PGA
Director of Instruction, Lake Padden GC, Bellingham, WA

Srixon/Cleveland Club Fitter; PGA Modern Coach; Certified in Dr Kwon’s Golf Biomechanics Levels 1 & 2; Certified in SAM Putting; Certified in TPI
 
Team :srixon:!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

16 minutes ago, phillyk said:

If Hillary chooses Bernie for VP, I think they'd win the GE regardless of who Trump chooses.  I doubt that'd happen, but I'd be in favor of it.

Sorry, I and all the police officers have a big problem if a crazy or criminal can buy a gun.  That risks the lives of many people, not just one or two.
 

Best life insurance Hillary can get is to make Joe Biden her V.P.  Old Joe has kept Obama alive for the last eight years.  

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

27 minutes ago, phillyk said:

If Hillary chooses Bernie for VP, I think they'd win the GE regardless of who Trump chooses.  I doubt that'd happen, but I'd be in favor of it.

Sorry, I and all the police officers have a big problem if a crazy or criminal can buy a gun.  That risks the lives of many people, not just one or two.
 

Oh my god you people.  I have the right to own property, that's it.  IF, by my actions (I commit a felony or otherwise) then those rights can be removed.  But you sure as heck can't do it if I've done nothing wrong.  You can't do it arbitrarily.  you sure can't fix the system so that it's darn near impossible.  That should go for any property, including firearms.  My freedoms should extend up until they start to infringe on another's - but there they should stop.  So no kidding (CONVICTED felon for a violent crime, absolutely.  A "Crazy" as you put it so kindly - you need to be VERY careful on how you define crazy - that's a nasty point that can be abused in so many ways.  If they are crazy in a way that clearly demonstrates infringing on others - absolutely).

Most everything comes down to how it's implemented and whether that system can be abused easily or not.  That's one thing I have a real hard time about with hardcore liberals.  If you disagree on conservative reasons, then you are treated like a fanatical hardcore evangelical.  If you disagree on freedom reasons, then you are treated like a raving anarchist.  There is no acknowledgment of process, common sense, or anything else.

I get so sick of strawman arguments.  I'll stay out of this thread as it's now likely to turn to those all the time.

 

What kills me is I make a simple point about how both sides abuse the system by picking and choosing which areas they want to legislate to control the people and take away their freedoms.  I made a list showing that both sides are guilty.  So the responses I get aren't on the overall philosophy, it's actually people picking and choosing which specific items they take exception with - which is my entire point.  But they argue them by making up an extreme position.  stop proving my main point, I thought this crowd was deeper than that.  No wonder we are getting the candidates we have today.

Bill - 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
13 minutes ago, rehmwa said:

Oh my god you people.  I have the right to own property, that's it.  IF, by my actions (I commit a felony or otherwise) then those rights can be removed.  But you sure as heck can't do it if I've done nothing wrong.  You can't do it arbitrarily.  you sure can't fix the system so that it's darn near impossible.  That should go for any property, including firearms.  My freedoms should extend up until they start to infringe on another's - but there they should stop.  So no kidding (CONVICTED felon for a violent crime, absolutely.  A "Crazy" as you put it so kindly - you need to be VERY careful on how you define crazy - that's a nasty point that can be abused in so many ways.  If they are crazy in a way that clearly demonstrates infringing on others - absolutely).

Most everything comes down to how it's implemented and whether that system can be abused easily or not.  That's one thing I have a real hard time about with hardcore liberals.  If you disagree on conservative reasons, then you are treated like a fanatical hardcore evangelical.  If you disagree on freedom reasons, then you are treated like a raving anarchist.  There is no acknowledgment of process, common sense, or anything else.

I get so sick of strawman arguments.  I'll stay out of this thread as it's now likely to turn to those all the time.

 

What kills me is I make a simple point about how both sides abuse the system by picking and choosing which areas they want to legislate to control the people and take away their freedoms.  I made a list showing that both sides are guilty.  So the responses I get aren't on the overall philosophy, it's actually people picking and choosing which specific items they take exception with - which is my entire point.  But they argue them by making up an extreme position.  stop proving my main point, I thought this crowd was deeper than that.  No wonder we are getting the candidates we have today.

I'm not saying one party does it more than the other, I know they are both equally guilty.  But, it must be that way so we can draw the line on bounds to individual rights.  No one likes the line, but it has to go somewhere.  Extreme situations make that line easier to draw.

 

49 minutes ago, newtogolf said:

Best life insurance Hillary can get is to make Joe Biden her V.P.  Old Joe has kept Obama alive for the last eight years.  

Wait, who's that?... :-D

Philip Kohnken, PGA
Director of Instruction, Lake Padden GC, Bellingham, WA

Srixon/Cleveland Club Fitter; PGA Modern Coach; Certified in Dr Kwon’s Golf Biomechanics Levels 1 & 2; Certified in SAM Putting; Certified in TPI
 
Team :srixon:!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

6 hours ago, Chilli Dipper said:

The fact that Ann Coulter predicted Trump's rise falls more into the "even a broken clock is right twice a day" category more than anything else.

We gravely underestimated the appeal of dog-whistle xenophobia when delivered by a boastful speaker, and we overestimated the structural strength of the Republican Party. After their post-mortem of the 2012 election, the concluded they couldn't win the presidency without expanding from their core demographics; when Trump entered the race to rile up the crazies and do the exact opposite of what the party prescribed, no one in the GOP had a plan to react to it.

Trump rode the perfect wave.  There were just too many GOP candidates which helped Trump to latch on a movement.  Then, CNN, Fox, MSNBC, late night shows all gave Trump loads of free media time.   In case of Trump, even a bad press was a good press.   

Will Trump win the general election?   He would need another perfect wave.   I don't see that happening.   The field is down to two - Clinton & Trump.   Media will likely focus on the two on more even footing.   Clinton is a far more formidable foe than all other GOP candidates Trump faced.   

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Now that we are down to the two candidates, Clinton and Trump, who will likely to win the 2016 general election?  Who will you vote for?

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

9 minutes ago, rkim291968 said:

Now that we are down to the two candidates, Clinton and Trump, who will likely to win the 2016 general election?  Who will you vote for?

Bernie is still in the race. Superdelegates don't count until the convention.

:callaway: Big Bertha Alpha 815 DBD  :bridgestone: TD-03 Putter   
:tmade: 300 Tour 3W                 :true_linkswear: Motion Shoes
:titleist: 585H Hybrid                       
:tmade: TP MC irons                 
:ping: Glide 54             
:ping: Glide 58
:cleveland: 588 RTX 62

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2878 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Yikes, how time flies. Here we are, almost ten years later. After prioritizing family life and other things for a long time, I'm finally ready to play more golf. Grip: I came across some topics on grip and think my grip has been a bit too palmy, especially the left hand. I'm trying to get it more in the fingers and less diagonal. Setup: After a few weeks of playing, this realization came today after watching one of Erik's Covid videos. I've been standing too far from the ball, and that messes up so much. Moved closer on a short practice session and six holes today, and it felt great. It also felt familiar, so I've been there before. I went from chunking the bejesus out the wedges to much better contact. I love changes that involves no moving parts. Just a small correction on the setup and I'm hitting it better and is better suited for working on changes. I'm a few years late, but the Covid series has been very useful to get small details sorted. I've also had to revise ball position. The goal now is back of ball in the middle of the stance as the farthest back with wedges, and progressively moving forward the longer the clubs get. Haven't hit the driver yet, but inside left foot or at the toe I suppose. Full swing: It's not terrible. I noticed my hands were too low, so got that to work on. Weight forward. More of the same stuff from earlier days. Swing path is now out-in and I want the push-draw back. When I get some videos it'll be easier to tell. I've also had this idea that my tempo or flow/rhythm could improve. It's always felt rushed around the end of the backswing into the transition, where things don't line up as they should. A short pause as things settle before starting the downswing. Some lessons might be in order. Chipping and pitching: A 12-hole round this week demonstrated a severe need to practice, but also to figure out what the heck I’m trying to do. I stood over the ball with no idea of what I wanted to achieve. On a four meter chip! I was trying the locked wrists technique, which did not work at all. As usual when I need information, I look for something Erik has posted. I’ve seen the Quickie Pitching Video before, but if I got it back then, I’ve forgotten. After reviewing that topic, some other topic about chipping and most importantly, the videos on chip/pitch from his Covid series, I felt like I understood the concept. I love the idea of separating those two by what you are trying to achieve, not by distance or ball flight. With one method you use the leading edge to hit the ball first. With the other, you use the sole to slide it under the ball. I was surprised he said that he went for the pitch 90% of the time while playing. I’ve always been scared of that shot and been thinking I have to hit the ball first. Trying to slide the club under usually ended with a chunked or skulled shot. After practicing in the yard the last days I get it, and see why the pitching motion is more forgiving. It’s astounding how easy the concept and motion is. Kudos to Erik, David and anyone else involved for being an excellent students of the game and teachers. With those two videos, my short game improved leaps and bounds, without even practicing. Just getting the setup right and knowing what motions you are trying to do is a big part of improving. Soft hands and floaty swings feels so much better than a rigid “hinge and hold”, trying to fight gravity and momentum by squeezing the life out of the grip. At least how I took to understand the “hold” part. I also think the chipping motion will help in the full swing. Keeping pressure on the trigger finger to ensure the hands are leading the clubhead and not throwing it at the ball. I've also tried looking in front of the ball at times when chipping, which helps. That's something I've been doing on full swings for a long time, and can make a big difference on the ball flight. Question @iacas: You say in the videos that you want the ball somewhere near the middle of your stance, and that for pitching it's the same. On the videos you got a fairly narrow stance, where inside of the left foot is almost middle of the stance, but the ball looks more inside the left foot than middle of the stance. Is that caused by the filming angle or is the ball more towards the inside of the foot? I often hit chips and pitches from uphill and downhill lies, where a narrow stance would have me fall over. What is your thought process and setup for those shots? The lowpoint follows the upper body, around left armpit IIRC, so a ball position relative to the feet may not be in the same spot relative to the upper body with a wider stance. Practice: I've set up my nets at an indoors location where I can practice at home. I did a quick search on launch monitors (LM), but haven't decided on anything yet. We're probably buying a house in this area in the near future, so I may hold off a purchase until I see what I can get going there. At some point I'd love to get a proper setup with a LM that can be used as a simulator. Outdoors golf is not an option 4-6 months a year here, so having an indoors option would be great. That would also be a place to use the longer clubs. My nearest course is a shorter six hole course where I don't use anything longer than a 21º utility iron. To play longer 18 hole courses I have to drive 1-1.5 hours each way, which I will do now and then, but not regularly. The LM market has changed a lot since Trackman arrived, and more people are buying them for personal use, but it's still need to spend a lot of money for a decent one that can fi. track club path. The Mevo at £305 could perhaps be something to consider. Maybe they have lowered the price to get out units before a new model is launched? It is almost six years old, though perhaps modified since then. It's got limited data and obviously isn't an option as a simulator, but could provide some data when hitting into a net. I'd have to read more about it first. It has to be good enough to be useful for indoors practice. As long as I frequently hit balls on the range or course, I'll get feedback on any changes there.
    • I'm pretty good at picking targets with mid/long irons in hand, but yes lately I have been getting more aggressive than I should be, especially from 100-150. The 50-100 deficiency is mainly distance control, working on that mechanically with Evolvr, but the 100-150 is definitely a result of poor targets.  6,7,8 iron in my hand I have no problem aiming away from trouble/the flag, hitting a very committed shot to my target, but give me PW, GW, and some reason I think I need to go right at it (even though I know I shouldn't). Like here from my last round. 175 left on a short par 5 to a back right flag. Water short right and bunker long. Perfectly fine lie in sparse rough, between the jumper and downwind playing for about 10yds of help. I knew to not aim at the flag here, aimed 40 feet left of it, hit my 165 shot exactly where I was looking, easy 2 putt birdie.   But then there's this one. I had 120 left from the fairway to a semi-tucked front left flag. Not a ton of trouble around the green but the left and back rough does fall off steeper than short/right rough. For some reason I aimed right at this flag with my 120yd shot, hit it the exact proper distance but pulled it 5yds left and had a tough short sided chip. Did all I could to chip it to 8 feet and missed the putt for a bad bogey. Had I aimed directly at the middle of the green maybe 5yds right of the flag, a perfectly straight shot leaves me 20 feet tops for birdie and that same pulled shot that I hit would have left me very close to the hole.    So yeah I think the 50-100 is distance control and the 100-150 is absolutely picking better targets. I have good feels and am strong with distance control on those I just need to allow for a bigger dispersion.    This view is helpful. For the Under 25yds my proximity is almost double from the rough vs the fairway which reinforces that biggest weakness right now being inside 25yds from the rough. But then interestingly enough in the 25-50yds I'm almost equal proximity from fairway and rough, so it looks like I need to work on under 25yds from the rough and then 25-50 from the fairway. The bunker categories are only 1 attempt each so not worried about those.   Thanks as always for the insight, it's been helpful. I'm really liking ShotScope so far.
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟨🟨⬜🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Yea it is. A gave my brother a set of cobra irons at least a decade old and he walked away with 29 dollars worth of skin money the other day. 
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜🟩⬜ ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...