Jump to content
IGNORED

2016 Mets World Championship Thread


Groucho Valentine
Note: This thread is 2756 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Just now, Groucho Valentine said:

In no small part due to former mets great Daniel Murphy. 

At last we agree on something.  What was Mets management thinking?

2 minutes ago, onthehunt526 said:

Are they the best team in the National League? No, the Cubs are. Are they the best team in the NL East? Ask me in a month.

I think it was Bill Parcells who said "you are what your record says you are".  At the moment, the Cubs are clearly the best.  But that's about a third of the way through a very long season.  Four long months to go.

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, DaveP043 said:

At last we agree on something.  What was Mets management thinking?

I think it was Bill Parcells who said "you are what your record says you are".  At the moment, the Cubs are clearly the best.  But that's about a third of the way through a very long season.  Four long months to go.

it came down between Cespedes and Murphy. The Mets preference was always with Yo. We all knew murphy was going to be too expensive for the Mets after the postseason he had. And he might be the worst defending middle infielder in all of professional baseball, so the value didn't add up. They made a smart move with Neil Walker, who has replaced much of Murphy's production. Plus he's better defensively. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I agree with the Parcells correlation to the Mets.

The Cubs are 39-16... That's a pace to be 62-26 at the break... 116-46 at the end of the year... (roughly).

The Mets are 31-24... They would go 92-70 on that pace... The Nats are on pace for roughly 99-63. That's why I said ask me in a month if the Mets are the best team in the division... June has a tendency to show who is for real and who is pretending.

What's in Shane's Bag?     

Ball: 2022 :callaway: Chrome Soft Triple Track Driver: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond 8° MCA Kai’li 70s FW: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond  H: :callaway: Apex Pro 21 20°I (3-PW) :callaway: Apex 21 UST Recoil 95 (3), Recoil 110 (4-PW). Wedges: :callaway: Jaws Raw 50°, 54°, 60° UST Recoil 110 Putter: :odyssey: Tri-Hot 5K Triple Wide 35”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

27 minutes ago, Groucho Valentine said:

it came down between Cespedes and Murphy. The Mets preference was always with Yo. We all knew murphy was going to be too expensive for the Mets after the postseason he had. And he might be the worst defending middle infielder in all of professional baseball, so the value didn't add up. They made a smart move with Neil Walker, who has replaced much of Murphy's production. Plus he's better defensively. 

With a Let's Go Nats avatar I don't think you're qualified to speak on behalf of the Mets or their fans.  :whistle:

  • Upvote 1

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 5/31/2016 at 8:13 PM, jamo said:

This is a lot of fun to watch. On one hand, you have the losingest (word I just made up) franchise in ... the history of sports? On the other hand, a team that's been a complete laughingstock for nearly their entire existence. 

I think I have to give the ignominious crown to the Phillies. Founded in 1883 and they only have two World Series. Yowzers. 

After quoting you I realized that you said "in the history of sports". In the history of sports since 1999 the "losingest" franchise would have to be the Cleveland Browns. As a long suffering Browns fan, I know that only too well!

On 6/1/2016 at 0:33 AM, PhxHacker said:

Football? Is that  the game where every 40 seconds of clock time there's a 6 second play run? The sport with less regular season games on the schedule than a hockey preseason? 

Football? Is that the sport where there's no contact allowed between the sidelines, the sport that frowns upon celebration of a score. The sport with 32 franchises but only 17 professional QB' s on the continent?

You know, I like football, especially pro football, but a lot less than I once did! It's been timed out and studied, and no pro sport has more "dead time" in the game than pro football. I'm reminded of the rant that Andy Rooney did at the end of "60 Minutes" about pro football. He like to watch his NY Giants on TV. Someone talked him into actually going to a game because "there's nothing like being there"! So, he shells out a buck and a half for a seat, freezes his ass off, and spends most of his time, as he put it, "watching millionaires standing around!"

That was quite a few years ago. Now, with the new rules, replays, and challenges, watching an NFL game is getting closer to watching a legal proceeding than a sporting event!

On 6/1/2016 at 1:23 PM, phan52 said:

Only a matter of time before Papelbon does his magic again and fractures the Nats.

Papelbon? I'm amazed he's still in the game! He's as washed up as Joe Piscopo!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

7 hours ago, Buckeyebowman said:

After quoting you I realized that you said "in the history of sports". In the history of sports since 1999 the "losingest" franchise would have to be the Cleveland Browns. As a long suffering Browns fan, I know that only too well!

I just meant straight loss count. The Phillies have lost more games than any baseball team, and since MLB teams plays so many games, I'm assuming that they've probably lose more games than any team period.

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

16 hours ago, jamo said:

I just meant straight loss count. The Phillies have lost more games than any baseball team, and since MLB teams plays so many games, I'm assuming that they've probably lose more games than any team period.

I see. I'm guessing Phillies fans and Browns fans have much in common. The main things being disappointment and frustration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 6/7/2016 at 6:31 AM, jamo said:

I just meant straight loss count. The Phillies have lost more games than any baseball team, and since MLB teams plays so many games, I'm assuming that they've probably lose more games than any team period.

In all fairness to the Phillies they have existed since 1883 and spent a long time as the 2nd team in the city until the Athletics moved.

What's in the bag:
Taylormade R15 
Callaway X2Hot pro 3W
Callaway X2Hot pro 20* hybrid
Mizuno JPX900 Tour 4-PW
Cleveland RTX 2.0 50,54, and 58 degree wedges
Taylormade White Smoke putter

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
12 minutes ago, Groucho Valentine said:

Emperor of cool Colon dominates the MLB beasts known as the Brewers last night in 7 strong. Is there anything he cant do? 

I'm not all that impressed by one win over a sub-500 team.  Heck, I'm not impressed by one win over anyone, not when there are 100 games left in the season.

But apparently Colon has a real tough time pushing himself away from the dinner table.

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

5 minutes ago, DaveP043 said:

I'm not all that impressed by one win over a sub-500 team.  Heck, I'm not impressed by one win over anyone, not when there are 100 games left in the season.

But apparently Colon has a real tough time pushing himself away from the dinner table.

That ballast gives him an extra 3 mph on his fastball. Easy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
4 minutes ago, Groucho Valentine said:

That ballast gives him an extra 3 mph on his fastball. Easy. 

I know I've spoken of my own belly as a "leverage muscle" for the golf swing.

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
10 hours ago, Groucho Valentine said:

Emperor of cool Colon dominates the MLB beasts known as the Brewers last night in 7 strong. Is there anything he cant do? 

Awfully quiet when they went 1-2 against the Pirates, eh? Let's see… can you get to 110 wins if you go 1-2 all year? Or even 3-2 every five games? Hmmm… 3/2 * 162 = 97.

.559 * 162 = 91.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)
On June 10, 2016 at 9:01 PM, iacas said:

Awfully quiet when they went 1-2 against the Pirates, eh? Let's see… can you get to 110 wins if you go 1-2 all year? Or even 3-2 every five games? Hmmm… 3/2 * 162 = 97.

.559 * 162 = 91.

Yes. 

Doubting the Amazins can only lead to one outcome. 

MrMet_zpshrei4ov3.jpg

Edited by Groucho Valentine
Link to comment
Share on other sites


On ‎6‎/‎6‎/‎2016 at 10:52 AM, Groucho Valentine said:

Well actually, i never technically agreed to anything. It looks like your boy iacas made that decision unilaterally. Im not talking about integrity on the internet. How silly. 

Translation: I am welching on the bet. What would you expect from a Mutts fan?

Bill M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2756 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I agree that some of the charts are hard to make sense of. That short game chart is showing how often a short game shot ends up within a certain distance. The orange bar is all shots, the green bar is for shots within 25 yards, and the blue bar is for shots between 25 and 50 yards. I just play around with all of it and will figure it out. I would suggest just diving in and see what jumps out and work on that.
    • PGA Tour players weight shift to their lead foot way sooner and to a higher % than amateur. I would say it is something like close to 90% lead foot at impact for PGA Tour player. For Amateurs it could be under 50%. You need to get the weight transfer over more and sooner. You can't rely on the feeling of finishing on the lead foot as validation you did so. 
    • Just because it's a small league at a county course doesn't mean their couldn't be a small group of people who take on the role/responsibility of ensuring the rules are properly enforced and being the rules committee for your league   That's the whole point of GUR. It's a temporary thing. Also like I mentioned before, since you're playing on the same course it's highly likely this isn't the first time this sort of thing has happened to a bunker on this course.   There's nothing that needs changed though. There is the rule for how the situation is supposed to be handled as well as an alternative for how it could have been handled differently via a committee. Just because your league chooses not to have a committee doesn't mean the rules of golf need changed for everyone.   Absurd logic. You and your opponent can't just agree on rules and make things up as you go. If it's just a 1v1 match for fun, sure do whatever you want. In an actual league with other competitors, no shot. Everyone needs to play by the same rules. How would you feel if someone else in the league took a casual drop on a different hole and their playing partner agreed with it but you didn't agree with it and you found out about it later?
    • I suggest you actually read some of the Rules, either online or on the USGA (or R&A) phone app.  Here's the Definition of Committee: You have a small league, whoever is in charge of that league is the Committee.  This would be the same person (group) who might decide that you should play Lift Clean and Place (Modal Local Rule E-3), to institute the "leaf rule", (MLR F-14), or that you should move a ball out of aerification holes (MLR E-4).  
    • Website. And yeah I was asking about the specifics within those sections under the performance tab. I guess the strokes gained by distance like you noted is probably a good place to start. This would indicate that my wedges need practice, which I figured as much so I'm not surprised by that   Some of the other ones specifically around the short game I struggle to make sense of what it actually means. Like I know this chart is measuring the percentage of the time that I get the ball within certain proximity ranges but I don't know from a quick glance at this where I need to improve.   But then again I guess these two would seem to indicate that it's chipping inside 25yds from the rough that has the most room for improvement? Does it seem like I'm interpreting that right?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...