Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3637 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Brexit - Leave or Remain  

30 members have voted

  1. 1. Leave or Remain

    • Leave
      12
    • Remain
      18


Recommended Posts

Posted

Leave or stay, I'm glad our Brit friends have the option to decide for themselves.  Whatever way they choose, I hope it works to the positive.

I've always thought Germany would leave first as they are being forced to pay for the entitlements of so many broke countries so far.....

Bill - 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Been watching the returns.  50.1 to 49.9, at this point.  I've begun to make my assessment based on the moron Brits I've heard arguing to Remain.  Mostly they talk about short-term concerns around trade deals, blah, blah.  Great Britain is a powerful force, it will not take long to re-establish those agreements, etc.  It's the fear the Remain socialists are pushing, to great effect.  

Big cities going for Remain while the smaller towns going for Leave.  Very similar to here:  low information, but possibly well-educated, "good intentioned" people thinking they are saving the world.  How little they know.

Go Leave!  Somewhere common sense finally has to win.

In my Bag: Driver: Titelist 913 D3 9.5 deg. 3W: TaylorMade RBZ 14.5 3H: TaylorMade RBZ 18.5 4I - SW: TaylorMade R7 TP LW: Titelist Vokey 60 Putter: Odyssey 2-Ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I've been watching the BBC live feed. Remarkable similarities with our voting patterns. Urban, elite, media, young, academia, and minorities bond together to push for bigger government. Other than London, most of England and Wales is going for "Leave." Scotland/Northern Ireland going for "Remain," but not enough to make up the difference perhaps. It's a 462,000 vote lead right now (51.x to 48.x), with over half the vote counted. Could still go either way though. 

It says a lot that common people have no faith in the elite that they don't even fear the scare-mongering that has gone on with the financial markets. Even if the scare-mongering turns out to be true (the pound is dropping fast now), I think the people will be like "so what?" They seem to think it's better than the alternative, since they don't trust their leadership whatsoever anymore.

Why don't the elites in any country ever listen to the people? Do they not care until the protesters reach 50%? Up until a movement hits 50%, it seems like ruling elites simply vilify the opposition and try to make them look like ignorant yokels.

I find it a hopeful message for humanity, as there's little more soul-crushing than authoritarian control by some nameless, faceless bureaucracy (which is my impression of the EU).

Edit: Dow futures down 600 right now. Whew. Nigel Farage declared victory... but it seems way to early at the moment. It's still tight, and I see no finality. Will be interesting to see the result in the morning.

My Swing


Driver: :ping: G30, Irons: :tmade: Burner 2.0, Putter: :cleveland:, Balls: :snell:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
15 hours ago, paininthenuts said:

Sorry, I know this has nothing to do with golf, and I very much hope the mods don't remove it. 

Today is one of the biggest days in UK history. As I am sure you have heard, we have a referendum on leaving the EU today. As Americans, can you imagine having a third party making most of you laws, and all of your regulations. Can you imagine your country having to give a third party a massive sum of money every year, only to get 40% of it back, and then be told what to spend it on. Worst of all, can you imagine having to let anyone into your country from 27 other countries, and then allowing them to settle even if they can't speak your language. The EU in Brussels employs over 10,000 people who earn more than our own prime minister, and  occupies a premises the size of a town. It is as corrupt as the Mafia, and prevents the UK from trading properly with countries outside the EU.

The good news is that most people over the age of 40 have some understanding of politics, and will vote OUT, but unfortunately many younger people are a little naive and have fallen foul to the governments threats. The Scots will also vote IN, but to be honest they aren't the brightest stars in the sky. It's going to be very close, so please give us a minutes thought, and keep your fingers crossed for the LEAVE campaign.

 

 

I'm hoping you do vote "out", despite the hand wringing of the more PC of your brethren. Anyone besides me remember Vaclav Havel of the Czech Republic saying they didn't know whether or not they wanted to join the EU concerning their trade policies? Don't remember whether they eventually did or not, but there are valid issues there to be considered.

When you get right down to it, this cuts very close to some of the issues that cause the Civil War here in America. The northern states were much greater in population than the southern, so, those states had more sway in our form of government. Laws were passed that required southern growers shipping their cotton to northern textile mills to use American shipping only, who proceeded to gouge the southerners when French and British shipping was available at much less cost.

I imagine the EU's trade constraints upon Great Britain are much greater, and more complex, than that.

I once heard a great man say, "When in doubt, vote for FREEDOM!" Let's not have Wat Tyler forgotten!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Looking forward to the logic bomb of "Britain exits the EU on the backs of right-wing populism; the hard-right blames the pro-EU government for the recession that was forewarned as a consequence of leaving the EU, and makes staggering political gains" that's about to unfold in the upcoming months.

In my UnderArmour Links stand bag...

Driver: '07 Burner 9.5° (stiff graphite shaft)
Woods: SasQuatch 17° 4-Wood (stiff graphite shaft)
Hybrid: 4DX Ironwood 20° (stiff graphite shaft)Irons/Wedges: Apex Edge 3-PW, GW, SW (stiff shaft); Carnoustie 60° LWPutter: Rossa AGSI+ Corzina...


Posted

Yipppeee, we have our own independence day. We are out of the most corrupt and vile organisation in the world. Yes, things will get worse before they get better, and only a foll would have thought otherwise. We are the 5th biggest economy in the world, and if we can't make it alone, who in the EU can? I honestly believe that British electorate would have put up with the bureaucracy, the financial outlay, and even the ridiculous regulations. What we couldn't accept is the open border policy. We are a small country creaking at the seams, and we need to get the head count down. As a very large country, it is difficult for the U.S to understand this, but believe me, we are are to to sink, there are so many people here.

In my bag (Motocaddy Light)

Taylormade Burner driver, Taylormade 4 wood, 3 x Ping Karsten Hybrids, 6-SW Ping Karsten irons with reg flex graphite shafts. Odyssey putter, 20 Bridgestone e6 balls, 2 water balls for the 5th hole, loads of tees, 2 golf gloves, a couple of hand warmers, cleaning towel, 5 ball markers, 2 pitch mark repairers, some aspirin, 3 hats, set of waterproofs, an umbrella, a pair of gaiters, 2 pairs of glasses. Christ, it's amazing I can pick the bloody thing up !!


Posted
5 hours ago, RandallT said:

It says a lot that common people have no faith in the elite that they don't even fear the scare-mongering that has gone on with the financial markets. Even if the scare-mongering turns out to be true (the pound is dropping fast now), I think the people will be like "so what?" They seem to think it's better than the alternative, since they don't trust their leadership whatsoever anymore.

 

This quote really makes me laugh, if the people "don't trust their leadership whatsoever anymore" why have they just voted to give that same leadership more power than they had under the EU? This doesn't make any sense and is quite ironic.

As I've said in my previous posts, I voted to remain for reasons that made sense to me, knowing that this is going to have a financial effect on me in some of the most important years of my career (i'm 24 now). I guess I just have to hope for the best, and that Boris Johnson and co actually have a plan for what to do next (they haven't actually stated any plans during their campaign other than "take back control".

Congratulations to the leave campaign, I really hope you prove me wrong and that the future is bright and great. I will happily eat my words and be thankful, but for now we wait (with a devalued pound and crashing market)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

image.jpeg

Is that right about 17m voted? I thought the population was 65m, take away ineligible voters, 20m say, 45m, only about 1/3 voted? I must be reading it wrong. 

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
11 minutes ago, nevets88 said:

image.jpeg

Is that right about 17m voted? I thought the population was 65m, take away ineligible voters, 20m say, 45m, only about 1/3 voted? I must be reading it wrong. 

17m voted to leave while 16m voted to stay roughly speaking.

:adams: / :tmade: / :edel: / :aimpoint: / :ecco: / :bushnell: / :gamegolf: / 

Eyad

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

HOW AGES VOTED
(YouGov poll)
18-24: 75% Remain
25-49: 56% Remain
50-64: 44% Remain
65+: 39% Remain

http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/eu-referendum-uks-youngest-voters-11518690

 

This says a lot in my opinion. The majority of Brexit voters won't even live long enough to see all the consequenses, while the majority of the people who will actually be there in the future voted to Remain.

~Jorrit

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, Silent said:

HOW AGES VOTED
(YouGov poll)
18-24: 75% Remain
25-49: 56% Remain
50-64: 44% Remain
65+: 39% Remain

http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/eu-referendum-uks-youngest-voters-11518690

 

This says a lot in my opinion. The majority of Brexit voters won't even live long enough to see all the consequenses, while the majority of the people who will actually be there in the future voted to Remain.

What that really shows me is that most people that were around in those countries *as adults* prior to the EU decided that it was better without it. They would be the ones I expect to know better whether it was a good or bad thing.

Edited by Jeremie Boop

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/06/23/markets-live-will-sterling-surge-or-slump-as-the-eu-referendum-c/

Quote

UK now poorer than France as pound hits 30-year low and FTSE 100 drops 5pc following British vote to leave EU

 

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
21 minutes ago, Jeremie Boop said:

What that really shows me is that most people that were around in those countries *as adults* prior to the EU decided that it was better without it. They would be the ones I expect to know better whether it was a good or bad thing.

Then I'm guessing their memory isn't that clear, which might again be a result of their age :P

But seriously, that would be strange jump. Prior EU is like 30 years ago, and the 'EU light' is there since 1973 even. Since than the living standard is better, there's less unemployment, less criminality, no war inside those borders, better travel arrangements for themselves...

In this particular case mostly the oldies voted for a dramatic future change, while the young ones will have to deal with mostly.

~Jorrit

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
31 minutes ago, Silent said:

Then I'm guessing their memory isn't that clear, which might again be a result of their age :P

But seriously, that would be strange jump. Prior EU is like 30 years ago, and the 'EU light' is there since 1973 even. Since than the living standard is better, there's less unemployment, less criminality, no war inside those borders, better travel arrangements for themselves...

In this particular case mostly the oldies voted for a dramatic future change, while the young ones will have to deal with mostly.

I guess if things are that much better the question is why did this come about at all? I confess pretty much complete ignorance about the whole situation, but typically if things are good the people don't vote to change it.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I wonder what it will bring. I think it's a stupid decission. Having said that: will things change? We have big multinationals all over the world. Economy's are so much condemned to each other. Does Scotland want to leave Brittain? Northen Ireland? When will the negotiations start? Who will lead them? Does the British Parlement have any saying in this? Who will call upon article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty first? What about  the power of EU judges and limiting the free movement of workers, potentially in breach of the UK's treaty obligations?  A long, hard road of negotiations between the UK and EU beckons although it is unclear when this process - likely to take years - will begin.

I absolutely do not know what will happen next. I think it is an illusion that a leave will resolve all the UK problems. It won't. But it seems clear that the EU has to reform. 

 

my 2 eurocents or penny's. 


Posted

A big reason for them leaving the EU was Merkel's quota system for accepting Syrian refugees.  The UK will endure some pain as it's unlikely the EU will be as easy on the UK as it was on Norway.  If the UK becomes an EEA member it will still have favorable trade benefits with the EU, but better control over their currency and borders.  

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
7 minutes ago, Jeremie Boop said:

I guess if things are that much better the question is why did this come about at all? I confess pretty much complete ignorance about the whole situation, but typically if things are good the people don't vote to change it.

I think that question has too many answers. And actually that's exactly the problem. A lot of people when experiencing a problem want to blame a particular thing, since that's the most easy thing to do. I'm not rich? Blame the EU. I pay taxes? Blame the EU. I'm not happy with my job, or have troubles finding one? Blame the EU. I can't buy a bigger house? Blame the EU. 

If it wasn't the EU some people think they can blame, it would be something else. Blame the immigrants. Or blame the muslims. Nothing works better than a common 'enemy'. I see the same thing happening in Holland with the populist party here. At first the common enemy they were trying to create was 'the Euro', that was the cause for some people's missery. Than it was the Eastern European people coming here. Now for some time it's the people from Syria running away from war. And starting today it will be a Nexit (Netherlands - exit EU) probably.

It's a simple fact that Europe pre-EU had it much worse; unstable, two wars in quite recent history, less standard of life, more unemployment etc. There might be very legimitate reasons to vote for a Brexit, but old people voting in favour because they saw pre-EU was better is not one of them.

~Jorrit

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
7 minutes ago, Jeremie Boop said:

I guess if things are that much better the question is why did this come about at all? I confess pretty much complete ignorance about the whole situation, but typically if things are good the people don't vote to change it.

Bunch of right wing thinking people with an obsession with nationalism want to take Britain back to the old days of drinking scotch and looking down on the rest of Europe. (sarcasm :-P)

Here are some demographics.  

-More education wanted to stay, less education wanted to leave
-Those with more median income wanted remain, those with less wanted to leave
-Younger wanted to remain, older wanted to leave
-Laborers wanted to leave, managers wanted to remain
-Conservatives wanted to leave, Labour party wanted to leave, Liberal democrats wanted to remain. 

Just now, newtogolf said:

A big reason for them leaving the EU was Merkel's quota system for accepting Syrian refugees.  The UK will endure some pain as it's unlikely the EU will be as easy on the UK as it was on Norway.  If the UK becomes an EEA member it will still have favorable trade benefits with the EU, but better control over their currency and borders.  

This probably has a lot more to do with jobs and money versus Syrian Refugees. I think the Syrian Refugees just gave them more ammo rather than being a primary reason. 

http://www.cnbc.com/2015/05/27/why-would-the-uk-want-to-leave-the-eu.html

 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3637 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have been debating getting a launch monitor of some sort, if only so I can re-figure my shot zones (I haven't actually mapped them in years) and also to practice distance wedges at home.  I have to see if this works with either my current setup, or what my setup would be if I move it to the garage.  
    • Day 48, June 23.  After work today, I took 25 minutes in my practice room;  6-iron, same everything as yesterday except the time and count. 
    • Well, this is interesting.  I think we discovered a few months ago that I haven't been following professional golf in a while (my confusion about Scotty's footwork confirmed that), so at least as I aim to follow a bit more I'll get something new to learn with all of you.  My very quick read of Erik's summary makes me think this new Challenger series fits somewhere between Korn Ferry and the Championship (not Champions, but I know I'm going to make that mistake a few times if I'm not careful!).   My recollection is that there were already second-tier events among the PGA Tour;  the Bob Hope didn't have the same quality of field as the event at Riviera (whose current name I forget, although now that I say that, I realize the Palm Springs event hasn't been called the Bob Hope in a few years either).   With the absence of the FedEx (if I'm reading that correctly), does that mean no more FedEx Cup at all? Hopefully I'll have time later in 2026 to sit down and see what we're in for in 2027, where one of my goals already is to follow more professional golf.
    • The highlights as I see them: Championship and Challenger Series The creation of the PGA Tour and the PGB Tour, in the words of Joel Dahmen a few years ago. They're calling them the Championship Series (23-24 events) and the Challenger Series (20+ events). Both run February to August. They feel this will achieve three things: increasing the consistency and quality of fields across the season creating a clear system for players to earn and retain status and delivering a more structured and competitive experience for fans and partners—all in an effort to strengthen meritocracy. Championship Series Structure and Eligibility The 23-24 events includes the Players, majors, season-ending events, and the Presidents Cup and Ryder Cup. These will be 72-hole events with a 36-hole cut to the top 65 and ties and purses of $20M+. 120 players without an alternate list. 90 players (roughly) from the previous year and 20 players promoted from the Challenger Series. Full eligibility will be finalized later this year. Sites (cities) to be finalized soon, but 10 of the 15 courses have already been determined. Postseason: includes retention and relegation and concludes with match play. The Tour Championship will also be played across a rotation of prestigious courses. Challenger Series Structure and Eligibility 20+ events. Running concurrently. Will feature players fighting their way back to the Championship Series or players graduating and on the upswing from the Korn Ferry Tour. Many of these events will be current PGA Tour courses. About 7 of the Challenger Series events will be during off weeks for the Championship Series with elevated purses and visibility. Purses of at least $4M, with cuts similar to the Champ series. 144 player fields. Competitive Fields for Both Series Players will be eligible for only one series at a time: Championship Series Players are not eligible for Challenger Series events. Championship Series members will have a known schedule with all events having the same eligibility. Players and Majors will have their own eligibility criteria. Championship Series players don't have to play all events. This begs the question about, say, the Canadian Open, and other "home-town" events that players might want to play, even if they're Challenger Series events. Will releases be granted? Promotion and Relegation At least 90 players will be retained in the Championship Series, and 20 players will be promoted from the Challenger Series each year. Battlefield promotion for two-time winners from the Challenger Series. Players relegated from the Championship Series will have a "last chance" opportunity to retain status, or will go to the Challenger Series. Criteria will be finalized before the start of the 2027 season. Points System New points system (not FedExCup points). Separate points systems for the Championship and Challenger Series. Elevated points in the Challenger Series for off-weeks on the Championship Series. More details tk. Elevated International Events in the Fall The fall schedule will include a limited series of elevated international events with top players from the Championship Series, with the intent to deliver in partnership with the DP World Tour as part of the Strategic Alliance. Last Chance Series The Tour will develop a “last chance” series of 4-6 events in the fall, with a limited number of spots on the Championship Series available for top finishers. Eligibility will include players relegated from the Championship Series, Challenger Series players, and other categories to be determined. Q-School continues, as do the Korn Ferry Tour and PGA Tour Latinoamerica. Also, Brian Rolapp is the new commissioner as of January 1, 2027.
    • You can download the PDF at this link or see the first page of it above.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.