Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Possible Liability for Internet Posts?


Note: This thread is 3449 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I read a little piece (Fox 5 News Las Vegas) on the legalities/liabilities of things folks post on internet forums. Although some what tough to trace, new and improved technologies, are making it easier to identify, and locate the OP. 

It was a short piece, and I plan to see what else comes of it. I know the lawyer who started it, and he is pretty good at his job. 

It does bring up the question about folks posting false stuff, or stuff that otherwise wouldn't work, that creates problems for others. Although not mentioned in the article, what came to my mind was folks asking for medical advice on forums, and recieving advice from someone not even remotely part of the medical community. 

If poor information from a forum member causes someone serious health or monetary harm, is there a liability there either for the poster giving the wrong advice, or the website owner allowing a platform for the bad advice to be given? 

Like I said, I will follow and see what this news article brings about. There are a lot of folks out there who are sue happy. 

 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Another example of too many lawyers, and too many people looking for someone else to blame for their own irresponsibility.

 

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm thinking there should be liability if the person is getting paid for that information and is either a practitioner or is portraying himself as such.  ie not a free forum.

Other than that who would be stupid enough to take medical advice from an unknown person? No liability there IMO.

:adams: / :tmade: / :edel: / :aimpoint: / :ecco: / :bushnell: / :gamegolf: / 

Eyad

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Wow.   I can see where this is useful if someone meets the legal definition of harassment or is threatening someone.   However all information on the internet is subject to some type of independent verification unless it's a known trusted source, like a professional medical organization, CDC, or a definitive resource that is trusted outside of the internet.

Or anything I say.  :-D

—Adam

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I found more on the article. Legal liability of social media action lawsuits, according those doing the article are on the rise. 

Most of their examples used were on Face Book, but would include other social media platforms. Judges who are determing some of these suits, have to distinguish between a written opinion, or a written statement. A written statement involves facts, where as an opinion does not require facts.  It's an opinion and doesn't mean squat. A thin line there to be sure. 

Most of the suits are for wrong, and or misleading, untrue statements. Others are of wrongful character assasinations.

What I got out of the article was that if one poster post something wrong, misleading, or calls some one a name, with out saying it's "their opinion", it becomes a statement of fact(s), and they are liabil for any consequences brought fourth against them. Also the owner(s) of the website can,  in some instances be held liable for their members' posts since they provided the platform. It gets even worse if a forum appointed moderator says something poorly about another member as a statement of unsubstantiated fact. 

Yep the laws of the land are running wild, and rampant.....in my opinion.  :-P

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 minutes ago, Patch said:

I found more on the article. Legal liability of social media action lawsuits, according those doing the article are on the rise. 

Most of their examples used were on Face Book, but would include other social media platforms. Judges who are determing some of these suits, have to distinguish between a written opinion, or a written statement. A written statement involves facts, where as an opinion does not require facts.  It's an opinion and doesn't mean squat. A thin line there to be sure. 

Most of the suits are for wrong, and or misleading, untrue statements. Others are of wrongful character assasinations.

What I got out of the article was that if one poster post something wrong, misleading, or calls some one a name, with out saying it's "their opinion", it becomes a statement of fact(s), and they are liabil for any consequences brought fourth against them. Also the owner(s) of the website can,  in some instances be held liable for their members' posts since they provided the platform. It gets even worse if a forum appointed moderator says something poorly about another member as a statement of unsubstantiated fact. 

Yep the laws of the land are running wild, and rampant.....in my opinion.  :-P

So, basically what you are saying is that before I say anything again on this site I should start with, it is my opinion.  :)

:adams: / :tmade: / :edel: / :aimpoint: / :ecco: / :bushnell: / :gamegolf: / 

Eyad

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I could use a few $$$

I have a guy at my club who's a real pain in the "arse"

Anyone care to contribute any advise with any remedies.

Please be gentle as my arse is very sore. Butt, no pun intended, When I receive my settlement, "Beers for all my friends".  :beer:

Johnny Rocket - Let's Rock and Roll and play some golf !!!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
17 minutes ago, Abu3baid said:

So, basically what you are saying is that before I say anything again on this site I should start with, it is my opinion.  :)

Yeah, that would be my most humble opinion....:beer: Kind of like using that word "alleged".

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

@Patch links?

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

uh oh...Brandel Chamblee is going to hunt me down for me hating on him...

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 hours ago, Patch said:

I read a little piece (Fox 5 News Las Vegas) on the legalities/liabilities of things folks post on internet forums. Although some what tough to trace, new and improved technologies, are making it easier to identify, and locate the OP. 

It was a short piece, and I plan to see what else comes of it. I know the lawyer who started it, and he is pretty good at his job. 

It does bring up the question about folks posting false stuff, or stuff that otherwise wouldn't work, that creates problems for others. Although not mentioned in the article, what came to my mind was folks asking for medical advice on forums, and recieving advice from someone not even remotely part of the medical community. 

If poor information from a forum member causes someone serious health or monetary harm, is there a liability there either for the poster giving the wrong advice, or the website owner allowing a platform for the bad advice to be given? 

Like I said, I will follow and see what this news article brings about. There are a lot of folks out there who are sue happy. 

 

I doubt going after some random OP would make sense financially.

By the way I've found a diet of only beer and hamburgers is a fantastic way to lose weight.

 

I use old Taylor Made clubs from eBay and golf shops.


Posted

We are a litigious country, so of course there will be more lawsuits that involve social media.  

I hope the focus of these efforts is geared towards electronic bullying type activities, such as guys posting nude pictures of their ex girlfriends, girls s!ut shaming other girls, or even more dangerous, people online encouraging individuals to commit suicide or to hurt someone else.  

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm gonna be safe....

Every post I make on this site in the future (and ones made in the past) "are my opinion"....

-Matt-

"does it still count as a hit fairway if it is the next one over"

DRIVER-Callaway FTiz__3 WOOD-Nike SQ Dymo 15__HYBRIDS-3,4,5 Adams__IRONS-6-PW Adams__WEDGES-50,55,60 Wilson Harmonized__PUTTER-Odyssey Dual Force Rossie II

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
12 hours ago, billchao said:

@Patch links?

Just google "social media law suits". Everything is there on the topic.

10 hours ago, gregsandiego said:

I doubt going after some random OP would make sense financially.

By the way I've found a diet of only beer and hamburgers is a fantastic way to lose weight.

 

What brand of beer? I could stand to lose a few pounds.

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
18 hours ago, Valleygolfer said:

uh oh...Brandel Chamblee is going to hunt me down for me hating on him...

Nah he's a public figure so little legal recourse. But he may get Bailey to do a 'special on you'!

Kevin


Posted
46 minutes ago, natureboy said:

Nah he's a public figure so little legal recourse. But he may get Bailey to do a 'special on you'!

Whew, I would hate to be burned with his curling iron!

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If it's something you wouldn't be sued for if you were to say it to someone's face then I'm sure it's safe.  The medium really doesn't matter imo.


Posted
33 minutes ago, Strandly said:

If it's something you wouldn't be sued for if you were to say it to someone's face then I'm sure it's safe.  The medium really doesn't matter imo.

I think what deal is "defamation of character" causing harm to someone's reputation, or creating a bad health issue with bad information. Calling someone a name, or posting inaccurate informatio that causes one grief, that is heard, or read by a third party. The "third party" is the key. In a private conversation, you can basically say anything you want, as long as a third party is not present. 

I have also read that public figures, except in extreme situations, can't sue because of their public figure status.  

Social media lawsuits are going to rise in numbers.  It's another source of revenue for lawyers, and their clients.

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3449 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.