Jump to content
IGNORED

Is the science research gap widening?


jkelley9
Note: This thread is 2386 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

I had a bit of a shower thought today, albeit not in the shower.

Growth in effective research in nearly all fields is increasing at a fantastic rate with the help of improved computing power (information processing) and speed (and at a lower cost), innovations in data storage and searches, robotics, improved detection limits and accuracy, etc.

But an old fashioned example stood out in my mind today: the natural glucose versus high fructose corn syrup debate. There's still people even today that go back and forth on this, while the science is pretty damn straightforward. 

That got me thinking, it seems like every "breakthrough" has to be taken with an enormous grain of salt these days, right? 

1. How does the general public get their information? The media, obviously. 

2. What is the media's motivation? To get more viewers and be the "first." Honesty? Nah. Integrity? Nah. Just "shock."

3. How many people can accurately (regarding perception) interpret results of a study? VERY few.

On the flip side, what are the "researchers" (which can be a team, a company, etc.) motivations? Discovery, fame, time commitment to a study, etc. Without integrity here of course it leads to additional skepticism from the public (me included).

Lastly, I'm sure there's financial motivations for companies that combat discoveries, of sorts. I'm not one of those folks that thinks there's a cure for cancer but the "man" is holding it back. But at the same time there are almost certainly companies that pick up patents and such for great potential trials and they can them because they purchase the rights.

Say someone does make an incredible discovery TODAY (2017). What are the odds that the CORRECT perception is able to permeate through society, widespread? I feel like with today's media, social media, feverish indictments of the education system (rampant ignorance), etc are all stacked against research at large. 

The media jumps on and often puts a REALLY bad spin on published data because frankly, they aren't equipped to interpret and they may (likely) be filled with bias - yet they want the limelight. That hits those viewers who go on and play telephone on social media. Social media blows up with controversy, haters, etc. Bad info is like an infection, with little chance for a cure. Especially with how stubborn people are.

There's a difference between innovation research and standard studies, though. I think studies have it harder with what I've described above. If they found out that there is an incredibly high and accurate correlation between ingesting taurine and cancer.... what are the chances the general population actually accepts it? What are the chances that it doesn't get covered up or skewed in favor of the soda/energy drink industry? 

I think research today has a much tougher time than it did a few decades ago, even though the effectiveness of our research is orders of magnitude better.

This is the gap I'm referring to: discovery to acceptance, or implementation.

Is this gap widening?

D: :tmade: R1 Stiff @ 10* 3W: :tmade: AeroBurner TP 15* 2H: :adams: Super 9031 18* 3-SW: :tmade: R9 Stiff P: :titleist: :scotty_cameron: Futura X7M 35"

Ball: Whatever. Something soft. Kirklands Signature are pretty schweeeet at the moment!

Bag: :sunmountain: C130 Cart Bag Push Cart: :sunmountain: Micro Cart Sport

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

The problem is also with researchers as well.

Here's something you might like to read.

S1579212914004078_S300_en.pdf

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 4/28/2017 at 3:49 PM, Lihu said:

The problem is also with researchers as well.

Here's something you might like to read.

S1579212914004078_S300_en.pdf

Absolutely. I only touched on that in my OP but yea... so much pressure these days that it's creating a lot of bias and bad data out there to fulfill some "need." Whether it be a company needing funding, a headline, a stock price shift, whatever. 

I haven't read you link yet but I'll check it out tomorrow morning.

D: :tmade: R1 Stiff @ 10* 3W: :tmade: AeroBurner TP 15* 2H: :adams: Super 9031 18* 3-SW: :tmade: R9 Stiff P: :titleist: :scotty_cameron: Futura X7M 35"

Ball: Whatever. Something soft. Kirklands Signature are pretty schweeeet at the moment!

Bag: :sunmountain: C130 Cart Bag Push Cart: :sunmountain: Micro Cart Sport

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...

This kind of brushes the "agendized science" post, plus brings in many other variables.

Einstein was lionized in his day. How many are today? Einstein was pretty out there, but his theories could be discussed by intelligent laymen.

Pure science today has become so "esoteric", for lack of a better descriptor, that the average intelligent person can't keep up.

I'm a fan of the TV show "The Big Bang Theory". So much so that I will have a notepad handy when I watch it to jot down science references from the show to check out on the computer.

The last one I checked out was "Unruh Radiation". The explanation of it was pretty much incomprehensible. The upshot of it, I think, was that a detector moving through space would register a temperature slightly higher (by maybe 1 degree Kelvin), than a detector stationary in an inertial coordinate system!

The reasoning was that so called "empty" space, while a vacuum. was populated by energetic fields which would impact the detector!

At least ,that's what I got out of it! Way out of my league!

And if we're not smart enough to understand it, guess what? Neither are the news people!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 4/28/2017 at 9:57 AM, jkelley9 said:

But an old fashioned example stood out in my mind today: the natural glucose versus high fructose corn syrup debate. There's still people even today that go back and forth on this, while the science is pretty damn straightforward. 

Glucose causes obesity and diabetes.  

High fructose corn syrup causes obesity and diabetes.

There both bad for you.  What's the debate.

Edited by No Mulligans
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator

 

15 hours ago, Buckeyebowman said:

And if we're not smart enough to understand it, guess what? Neither are the news people!

Yeah I can't read a newspaper author's version of a journal article and count it as legit.  I'll try to find the actual article because the abstract is typically put into easier reading terms.  Then if I think I can understand it enough, I'll get the pdf and read more.  I think more people could read abstracts if they took the time to find them.

Pertaining to the gap widening, it's tough right now, because one half of research is trying to grasp at straws to find the one key to success in the medical world.  Another side is physics/astronomy/theoretical physics which are so advanced right now.  Simple relativity and gravity can be taught in high school now, but not dark matter and M Theory (or whatever it is now).  It's so complex that only a few can really work at it.

Another part that confuses people is that science is not static.  As you dive deeper, you find more questions.  Chemistry/physics/math can find equations or numbers that are static, but almost everything else is always growing and growing more complicated.  Today's final "answer" can be turned upside down 20yrs from now.  It's always based on current and past data.

Philip Kohnken, PGA
Director of Instruction, Lake Padden GC, Bellingham, WA

Srixon/Cleveland Club Fitter; PGA Modern Coach; Certified in Dr Kwon’s Golf Biomechanics Levels 1 & 2; Certified in SAM Putting; Certified in TPI
 
Team :srixon:!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
On 6/2/2017 at 2:24 PM, No Mulligans said:

Glucose causes obesity and diabetes.  

High fructose corn syrup causes obesity and diabetes.

There both bad for you.  What's the debate.

I would add, 'excessive' to your statement.  Glucose is the primary fuel for the human body. We kind of need it.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

"Excessive" can be put in front of pretty much everything we eat or drink.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 6/4/2017 at 8:52 AM, boogielicious said:

I would add, 'excessive' to your statement.  Glucose is the primary fuel for the human body. We kind of need it.

Glad someone said it (politely) before I did (which may have been more demeaning) lol.

But it's that type of comment that scares the crap out of me. 

For example, a nearly PERFECTLY similar example to that would be to say "consuming water causes death."

Back in the early 2000's a radio show had a water chugging contest to win a Nintendo Wii. Shockingly, nobody on the staff knew that chugging water can kill you, easily. You dilute the salt in your body so low that it can't conduct electricity (which is what your brain needs to communicate with your muscles and organs). A well known fact.

The woman died.

Water is essential for human life.

...so is glucose. It's literally #2 essential to humans.

D: :tmade: R1 Stiff @ 10* 3W: :tmade: AeroBurner TP 15* 2H: :adams: Super 9031 18* 3-SW: :tmade: R9 Stiff P: :titleist: :scotty_cameron: Futura X7M 35"

Ball: Whatever. Something soft. Kirklands Signature are pretty schweeeet at the moment!

Bag: :sunmountain: C130 Cart Bag Push Cart: :sunmountain: Micro Cart Sport

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 hour ago, jkelley9 said:

You dilute the salt in your body so low that it can't conduct

Not exactly. It causes an osmotic shift where fluid enters the cells to try to balance the concentration due to the hyponatremia (low sodium) which causes the cells to swell....thus increasing intercranial pressure. The shame is that its relatively easy to reverse and had she received proper care in a timely matter she would've lived.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...

The media is the biggest thing wrong with this country hands down imo.  I knew it was a problem even before Trump came around but his presence in the White House really caused it to explode.  You've got a bunch of for-profit companies running around claiming to be the benevolent guardians of truth and it's absolutely laughable.  24-hour news cycles with massive spin to generate shock value which translates into viewers so the company gets the ad revenue necessary to pay their multi-million dollar executive and on-air personality contracts.

There hasn't been a legitimate news channel in this country for decades; we've got small groups of people who pretend to be journalists sitting around pandering and gossiping in 30 or 60 minute blocks between episodes of reality TV and various other audio/visual trash.  It's actually impressive in a way, when I step back and look at what TV has become it's incredible how this country has managed to take an invention as incredible as the television and turn it into a 55" box of electromagnetic diarrhea.

I mean the only way you can really one-up this is to make it happen in real time.  Oh wait, there's facebook and twitter!

Anyway, about the OP I don't think there is anything unusual going on between the news and research.  If someone can make money by warping the news then they will certainly try.  The only real way to know what is going on is to get the information from the horse's mouth which is ridiculous considering the mass media tools we have available.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • 1 month later...
On 24.06.2017 at 10:28 PM, Strandly said:

The media is the biggest thing wrong with this country hands down imo.  I knew it was a problem even before Trump came around but his presence in the White House really caused it to explode.  You've got a bunch of for-profit companies running around claiming to be the benevolent guardians of truth and it's absolutely laughable.  24-hour news cycles with massive spin to generate shock value which translates into viewers so the company gets the ad revenue necessary to pay their multi-million dollar executive and on-air personality contracts.

There hasn't been a legitimate news channel in this country for decades; we've got small groups of people who pretend to be journalists sitting around pandering and gossiping in 30 or 60 minute blocks between episodes of reality TV and various other audio/visual trash.  It's actually impressive in a way, when I step back and look at what TV has become it's incredible how this country has managed to take an invention as incredible as the television and turn it into a 55" box of electromagnetic diarrhea.

I mean the only way you can really one-up this is to make it happen in real time.  Oh wait, there's facebook and twitter!

Anyway, about the OP I don't think there is anything unusual going on between the news and research.  If someone can make money by warping the news then they will certainly try.  The only real way to know what is going on is to get the information from the horse's mouth which is ridiculous considering the mass media tools we have available.

agree with this

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator
On 6/24/2017 at 3:28 PM, Strandly said:

The media is the biggest thing wrong with this country hands down imo.  I knew it was a problem even before Trump came around but his presence in the White House really caused it to explode.  You've got a bunch of for-profit companies running around claiming to be the benevolent guardians of truth and it's absolutely laughable.  24-hour news cycles with massive spin to generate shock value which translates into viewers so the company gets the ad revenue necessary to pay their multi-million dollar executive and on-air personality contracts.

There hasn't been a legitimate news channel in this country for decades; we've got small groups of people who pretend to be journalists sitting around pandering and gossiping in 30 or 60 minute blocks between episodes of reality TV and various other audio/visual trash.  It's actually impressive in a way, when I step back and look at what TV has become it's incredible how this country has managed to take an invention as incredible as the television and turn it into a 55" box of electromagnetic diarrhea.

I mean the only way you can really one-up this is to make it happen in real time.  Oh wait, there's facebook and twitter!

Anyway, about the OP I don't think there is anything unusual going on between the news and research.  If someone can make money by warping the news then they will certainly try.  The only real way to know what is going on is to get the information from the horse's mouth which is ridiculous considering the mass media tools we have available.

I agree with a lot of this. But aren't WE really the problem? We're the ones watching. We're the ones giving them the rating and sponsor dollars. I would love a real news channel, but it wouldn't sell with today's short attention span society. If there were one, without political lean, corporate incentives or lobbyist's influence, I would watch.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
6 hours ago, boogielicious said:

I agree with a lot of this. But aren't WE really the problem? We're the ones watching. We're the ones giving them the rating and sponsor dollars. I would love a real news channel, but it wouldn't sell with today's short attention span society. If there were one, without political lean, corporate incentives or lobbyist's influence, I would watch.

I don't think the blame can solely rest on just one side.

We are susceptible to behavior modification and manipulation, and there are plenty of people and companies out there willing to exploit that for their own gain.

At the same time, I think a lot of people like their opinions validated and companies segment and cater to different markets to fill consumer needs.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 2 months later...
On 8/12/2017 at 8:54 AM, boogielicious said:

I agree with a lot of this. But aren't WE really the problem? We're the ones watching. We're the ones giving them the rating and sponsor dollars. I would love a real news channel, but it wouldn't sell with today's short attention span society. If there were one, without political lean, corporate incentives or lobbyist's influence, I would watch.

 

On 8/12/2017 at 3:29 PM, billchao said:

I don't think the blame can solely rest on just one side.

We are susceptible to behavior modification and manipulation, and there are plenty of people and companies out there willing to exploit that for their own gain.

At the same time, I think a lot of people like their opinions validated and companies segment and cater to different markets to fill consumer needs.

Perhaps I'm out of the mainstream, but I don't watch! Haven't watched for years! I learned to recognize "fake news" long before Trump ever coined the phrase.

I also recognize the blandishments coming from the other side. I subscribe to neither!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 8/12/2017 at 5:34 AM, SandraH155 said:

agree with this

Not going to ask what you specifically agree, but if I had to guess. . . :-D

 

10 hours ago, Buckeyebowman said:

Perhaps I'm out of the mainstream, but I don't watch! Haven't watched for years! I learned to recognize "fake news" long before Trump ever coined the phrase.

I also recognize the blandishments coming from the other side. I subscribe to neither!

"Fake News" was actually coined a long time ago and you can read about it here.

Frederick Burr Opper 1894:

Three running men carrying papers with the labels "Humbug News", "Fake News", and "Cheap Sensation".

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

10 hours ago, Buckeyebowman said:

 

Perhaps I'm out of the mainstream, but I don't watch! Haven't watched for years! I learned to recognize "fake news" long before Trump ever coined the phrase.

I also recognize the blandishments coming from the other side. I subscribe to neither!

Most people will struggle to recognize fake news. Most like to sit in their own packs to get confirmation bias. People tend to shy away from facts that prove their previously thought confirmations wrong. It’s tough, but people should read facts from all sides to form a true opinion they can stand behind. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

8 minutes ago, saevel25 said:

Most people will struggle to recognize fake news. Most like to sit in their own packs to get confirmation bias. People tend to shy away from facts that prove their previously thought confirmations wrong. It’s tough, but people should read facts from all sides to form a true opinion they can stand behind. 

Most scientists are also "Most people", which is possibly one reason why we have a science research gap in the first place. There's no point delving into something that could disprove your fundamental beliefs.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2386 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Posts

    • I kind of figured that might be part of the problem. I’m still guilty of it myself at times and you’re a better ballstriker than I am. I imagine the temptation to go for the flag grows as you get more control over your wedges. Might want to think about shot selection, too. I don’t know how you typically play short game shots but I see a lot of people default to hitting high pitch shots from basically everywhere, to every hole location, without regard for how the green is contoured and how the ball might release depending on where it lands. I know my short game has been steadily improving from expanding my shot selection, overall. Though to be honest, part of that is from necessity because I was really struggling with pitch shots so I started hitting more chips from everywhere, but it taught me a lot more about how to play short game shots in general. NP man. We’re all learning and improving together. It is a really good tool.
    • 2 rounds this weekend, one at my home course and another course that I know well.   Played well for 3 of the 4 nines.    Ended up with an 80 and an 88.  Breaking it down by 9, it was 38, 42, 41, and a tough 47 where I somehow ended up with chipping/pitching shanks where I dropped at least 6 strokes on the last 6 holes.
    • Yikes, how time flies. Here we are, almost ten years later. After prioritizing family life and other things for a long time, I'm finally ready to play more golf. Grip: I came across some topics on grip and think my grip has been a bit too palmy, especially the left hand. I'm trying to get it more in the fingers and less diagonal. Setup: After a few weeks of playing, this realization came today after watching one of Erik's Covid videos. I've been standing too far from the ball, and that messes up so much. Moved closer on a short practice session and six holes today, and it felt great. It also felt familiar, so I've been there before. I went from chunking the bejesus out the wedges to much better contact. I love changes that involves no moving parts. Just a small correction on the setup and I'm hitting it better and is better suited for working on changes. I'm a few years late, but the Covid series has been very useful to get small details sorted. I've also had to revise ball position. The goal now is back of ball in the middle of the stance as the farthest back with wedges, and progressively moving forward the longer the clubs get. Haven't hit the driver yet, but inside left foot or at the toe I suppose. Full swing: It's not terrible. I noticed my hands were too low, so got that to work on. Weight forward. More of the same stuff from earlier days. Swing path is now out-in and I want the push-draw back. When I get some videos it'll be easier to tell. I've also had this idea that my tempo or flow/rhythm could improve. It's always felt rushed around the end of the backswing into the transition, where things don't line up as they should. A short pause as things settle before starting the downswing. Some lessons might be in order. Chipping and pitching: A 12-hole round this week demonstrated a severe need to practice, but also to figure out what the heck I’m trying to do. I stood over the ball with no idea of what I wanted to achieve. On a four meter chip! I was trying the locked wrists technique, which did not work at all. As usual when I need information, I look for something Erik has posted. I’ve seen the Quickie Pitching Video before, but if I got it back then, I’ve forgotten. After reviewing that topic, some other topic about chipping and most importantly, the videos on chip/pitch from his Covid series, I felt like I understood the concept. I love the idea of separating those two by what you are trying to achieve, not by distance or ball flight. With one method you use the leading edge to hit the ball first. With the other, you use the sole to slide it under the ball. I was surprised he said that he went for the pitch 90% of the time while playing. I’ve always been scared of that shot and been thinking I have to hit the ball first. Trying to slide the club under usually ended with a chunked or skulled shot. After practicing in the yard the last days I get it, and see why the pitching motion is more forgiving. It’s astounding how easy the concept and motion is. Kudos to Erik, David and anyone else involved for being an excellent students of the game and teachers. With those two videos, my short game improved leaps and bounds, without even practicing. Just getting the setup right and knowing what motions you are trying to do is a big part of improving. Soft hands and floaty swings feels so much better than a rigid “hinge and hold”, trying to fight gravity and momentum by squeezing the life out of the grip. At least how I took to understand the “hold” part. I also think the chipping motion will help in the full swing. Keeping pressure on the trigger finger to ensure the hands are leading the clubhead and not throwing it at the ball. I've also tried looking in front of the ball at times when chipping, which helps. That's something I've been doing on full swings for a long time, and can make a big difference on the ball flight. Question @iacas: You say in the videos that you want the ball somewhere near the middle of your stance, and that for pitching it's the same. On the videos you got a fairly narrow stance, where inside of the left foot is almost middle of the stance, but the ball looks more inside the left foot than middle of the stance. Is that caused by the filming angle or is the ball more towards the inside of the foot? I often hit chips and pitches from uphill and downhill lies, where a narrow stance would have me fall over. What is your thought process and setup for those shots? The lowpoint follows the upper body, around left armpit IIRC, so a ball position relative to the feet may not be in the same spot relative to the upper body with a wider stance. Practice: I've set up my nets at an indoors location where I can practice at home. I did a quick search on launch monitors (LM), but haven't decided on anything yet. We're probably buying a house in this area in the near future, so I may hold off a purchase until I see what I can get going there. At some point I'd love to get a proper setup with a LM that can be used as a simulator. Outdoors golf is not an option 4-6 months a year here, so having an indoors option would be great. That would also be a place to use the longer clubs. My nearest course is a shorter six hole course where I don't use anything longer than a 21º utility iron. To play longer 18 hole courses I have to drive 1-1.5 hours each way, which I will do now and then, but not regularly. The LM market has changed a lot since Trackman arrived, and more people are buying them for personal use, but it's still need to spend a lot of money for a decent one that can fi. track club path. The Mevo at £305 could perhaps be something to consider. Maybe they have lowered the price to get out units before a new model is launched? It is almost six years old, though perhaps modified since then. It's got limited data and obviously isn't an option as a simulator, but could provide some data when hitting into a net. I'd have to read more about it first. It has to be good enough to be useful for indoors practice. As long as I frequently hit balls on the range or course, I'll get feedback on any changes there.
    • I'm pretty good at picking targets with mid/long irons in hand, but yes lately I have been getting more aggressive than I should be, especially from 100-150. The 50-100 deficiency is mainly distance control, working on that mechanically with Evolvr, but the 100-150 is definitely a result of poor targets.  6,7,8 iron in my hand I have no problem aiming away from trouble/the flag, hitting a very committed shot to my target, but give me PW, GW, and some reason I think I need to go right at it (even though I know I shouldn't). Like here from my last round. 175 left on a short par 5 to a back right flag. Water short right and bunker long. Perfectly fine lie in sparse rough, between the jumper and downwind playing for about 10yds of help. I knew to not aim at the flag here, aimed 40 feet left of it, hit my 165 shot exactly where I was looking, easy 2 putt birdie.   But then there's this one. I had 120 left from the fairway to a semi-tucked front left flag. Not a ton of trouble around the green but the left and back rough does fall off steeper than short/right rough. For some reason I aimed right at this flag with my 120yd shot, hit it the exact proper distance but pulled it 5yds left and had a tough short sided chip. Did all I could to chip it to 8 feet and missed the putt for a bad bogey. Had I aimed directly at the middle of the green maybe 5yds right of the flag, a perfectly straight shot leaves me 20 feet tops for birdie and that same pulled shot that I hit would have left me very close to the hole.    So yeah I think the 50-100 is distance control and the 100-150 is absolutely picking better targets. I have good feels and am strong with distance control on those I just need to allow for a bigger dispersion.    This view is helpful. For the Under 25yds my proximity is almost double from the rough vs the fairway which reinforces that biggest weakness right now being inside 25yds from the rough. But then interestingly enough in the 25-50yds I'm almost equal proximity from fairway and rough, so it looks like I need to work on under 25yds from the rough and then 25-50 from the fairway. The bunker categories are only 1 attempt each so not worried about those.   Thanks as always for the insight, it's been helpful. I'm really liking ShotScope so far.
    • Wordle 1,053 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 🟨🟨⬜🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟩⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...