Jump to content
Vinsk

Rules official resigns over ...rules issue.

25 posts in this topic Last Reply

Recommended Posts

http://www.golfchannel.com/news/golf-central-blog/major-rules-controversy-leads-officials-resignation/

So once again a Major (albeit a smaller tour) decided to be cut to 54 holes this time over a disagreement on rules enforcement controversy. Poor decision IMO. The players broke a rule but complained and threatened to withdraw if enforced? Take a look and see what you think. Total loss of credibility on behalf of tournament officials and poor sportsmanship by the players overall I feel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Want to hide this ad? Register for free today!

 Those players that threatened to resign should have been allowed, nay, encouraged to do so.  I'm sure there would have been plenty of players who would have been pleased to continue with the resulting smaller field!

I'm curious to see the greens, but regardless of any potential ambiguity in differentiating the putting surface from the fringe, the rules must be applied.  When in doubt, either err on the side of safety and don't lift your ball, or ask a rules official for a ruling.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

54 minutes ago, David in FL said:

 Those players that threatened to resign should have been allowed, nay, encouraged to do so.  I'm sure there would have been plenty of players who would have been pleased to continue with the resulting smaller field!

I'm curious to see the greens, but regardless of any potential ambiguity in differentiating the putting surface from the fringe, the rules must be applied.  When in doubt, either err on the side of safety and don't lift your ball, or ask a rules official for a ruling.

 

 

Yes. Imagine if DJ had complained and threatened to withdraw after being told he grounded his club in the ambiguous bunker. LOL. Bye DJ. I know this is a 'side tour' but nonetheless I feel it's still responsible to uphold the rules of golf. I just can't believe the final decision was to erase the scores for that day! Lousy decision there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

12 hours ago, dennyjones said:

Wow...I can't believe they came to that decision.  

Yeah, pretty chickencrap IMO! Admittedly, I've never seen the course, but I've played a lot of golf and never had a problem differentiating the fringe from the "closely mowed putting surface"! Penalize the violators and let the chips fall where they may.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, Buckeyebowman said:

Yeah, pretty chickencrap IMO! Admittedly, I've never seen the course, but I've played a lot of golf and never had a problem differentiating the fringe from the "closely mowed putting surface"! Penalize the violators and let the chips fall where they may.

Yes, it would not be the first time. Remember Dustin Johnson in the US Open? It was a bunker, no it was not a bunker.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

13 minutes ago, CCC said:

Yes, it would not be the first time. Remember Dustin Johnson in the US Open? It was a bunker, no it was not a bunker.

Yes. Remember the post 3 above yours? Lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yes, I do. It bears repeating.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

1 minute ago, CCC said:

Yes, I do. It bears repeating.

What does?

Also, of course, it doesn't bear repeating if it's off topic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Oooops. My bad. Again. :)

No harm - No foul.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Todays players, both male and female are a bunch of self centered spoiled brats who make too much money, ignore the rules, especially the time guidelines, ignore warnings and do what they want.    Look at Spieth, he takes more time than normal, doesn't care, ignores warnings, and is always on the clock.    Just one example but he is never penalized, why?    He is just one of many.   Now I see his friend Thomas is following suit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember a PGA event (maybe a major, can't really remember) where there was an issue as to boundary between green and fringe. If I recall correctly, players were encouraged to get a playing partner or even a ruling from an official if they couldn't tell if they were on the green.
Not agreeing with the players or the ruling, but how "poorly" is the course prepared if they cannot tell where the green is and where the fringe is?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

15 minutes ago, Wally Fairway said:

I remember a PGA event (maybe a major, can't really remember) where there was an issue as to boundary between green and fringe. If I recall correctly, players were encouraged to get a playing partner or even a ruling from an official if they couldn't tell if they were on the green.
Not agreeing with the players or the ruling, but how "poorly" is the course prepared if they cannot tell where the green is and where the fringe is?

 

15 minutes ago, Wally Fairway said:

I remember a PGA event (maybe a major, can't really remember) where there was an issue as to boundary between green and fringe. If I recall correctly, players were encouraged to get a playing partner or even a ruling from an official if they couldn't tell if they were on the green.
Not agreeing with the players or the ruling, but how "poorly" is the course prepared if they cannot tell where the green is and where the fringe is?

 

Good point Wally, the rules are hard to enforce when there is no obvious boundary.    The Dustin Johnson thing was the worst I have ever seen and the explanation that is was well defined and posted for all to see was nothing but a attempt to justify what the powers in hand did to DJ.    When they allow people to walk and stand in what they call a "Sand Trap" they are good candidates for Densa.    That was nothing but taking the Championship away from him.      This LPGA thing is no different and should have been handled differently by the both parties.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, joro said:

Good point Wally, the rules are hard to enforce when there is no obvious boundary.    The Dustin Johnson thing was the worst I have ever seen and the explanation that is was well defined and posted for all to see was nothing but a attempt to justify what the powers in hand did to DJ.    When they allow people to walk and stand in what they call a "Sand Trap" they are good candidates for Densa.    That was nothing but taking the Championship away from him.      This LPGA thing is no different and should have been handled differently by the both parties.

Let’s not rehash the DJ thing. The players knew all sandy areas were bunkers. On a course with that many, some 100 yards from the center of the fairway, spectators were bound to be in them.

DJ isn’t the sharpest tack.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

6 minutes ago, iacas said:

Let’s not rehash the DJ thing. The players knew all sandy areas were bunkers. On a course with that many, some 100 yards from the center of the fairway, spectators were bound to be in them.

DJ isn’t the sharpest tack.

Ha ha ha, that is a great reply, brilliant.    "spectators were bound to be in them"    lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would really like to see a picture of the greens and fringe at this course. Every article I've seen doesn't have a picture. I feel like normally it's pretty obvious. For 6 players to mess it up is very strange. 

And I wish the articles would explain why the rules official resigned. Was it because she screwed up or because she did not agree with how this tour handled it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I haven't seen images of the greens in question either, but I seem to recall that some time ago on the men's tour (perhaps it was in Europe?), the distinction between green and fringe was very difficult to make and they had blue dots of some kind, spaced out every so many feet, at the boundary...

Either way, I can't believe so many players would be so careless if they couldn't tell where the boundary was, and that the decision to drop the first round scores was taken as a result. SMH.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Yeah I’ve searched for pics as well. Does seem odd that six players made the same error. Must be a ‘section’ of the green where it was ambiguous and I guess those six players were all in that particular section. @iacas, had a rules official came and looked at the area and realized it wasn’t very clear where the green border was could he/she had declared this? I assume since penalties were given somebody knew where the border was? Obviously if a player wasn’t sure he/she should’ve asked but I’m wondering if it was so unclear that the players had no doubt they were on the green? Hopefully some pictures will surface.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2018 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    FlightScope Mevo
    More to come…
  • Posts

    • Not so much from the perspective of "classic courses", but a lot of places could benefit from getting rid of trees. ... Simple fact is a lot of us just aren't that good.  Lately, it seems that the ash borer has had more to do with tree removal at my area courses than any concept of design. Community GC in Dayton even more wide open than it was before. Truly fairway optional.   
    • I am comfortably in the fairway if I hit my normal fade and I am hitting 3 on the tee if I sliced my first drive. I line up on the right side of the tee as far as allowed and do not aim left but align myself to where I want the ball to end up.
    • I am in agreement with @saevel25 on this one. Design intent is important, and I wish that more courses out there would be "restored" to their original intent. In most cases the addition of trees just eliminated more angles to the green, while also making the holes play more penal for the average golfer than originally intended. I play a lot of tree lined courses, so I am not against the trees...just not a fan of them changing the intent of the design with them. 
    • Interesting that you mention this, because I just saw a couple of tweets about this pop up in my timeline. For example: I think tree removal is almost uniformly a good thing. Most classic courses were designed to be wider than they are today. Trees have narrowed it, making the course more difficult and not play as intended. In that picture above, you have the best angle to the green blocked out by those trees. The other, more important thing to me, is that classic courses doing tree removal sets an example for other courses. I've played many courses that are not nearly as nice as a "classic course" that have wild, unmanageable trees. A lot of those trees overhang the fairway, making the fairway narrower and the hole more difficult. A lot of these trees have low branches that make recoveries, and sometimes finding your ball, impossible. Most courses were not meant to have trees like that and have just been left unmanaged. If Shinnecock taking out trees filters down, I'm all for it. It makes courses easier, which is a good thing. I'm sure some people scoff at trees coming down and making courses easier. Remember that most golf is played by people who aren't very good. Making courses easier makes the game more fun for those people, and they're more likely to come back. As an example of this, my home course recently took out about a dozen trees. These trees only came into play off the tee for average players. Removing the trees made the tee shots look easier and play easier for average players. They also opened up sight lines for better players to take more aggressive (and risky) tee shots. Unfortunately, I don't have pictures to show of this, but it was a great decision by the course. The course plays just as hard for good players, but slightly easier for average players. I have heard no one complain about this. Sure, there's a time and place for trees. And recoveries from the trees can be really fun. But the vast majority of courses have not figured out that balance and are just letting their trees run wild.
    • @DogGolf92 take any advice from me with a grain of salt... For me, it has a lot to do with angle of attack, not trying to kill the ball, and where I want to club to make contact with the turf.  I don't hit either club exactly like an iron, but I also don't "sweep" it as many people describe the feel. Hopefully, someone a bit better will give you some solid advice, but try making adjustments at a slower swing speed until you find something that seems to work consistently (if you haven't already tried this).
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bs1865
      bs1865
      (43 years old)
    2. DrMJG
      DrMJG
      (66 years old)
    3. Mikejanish
      Mikejanish
      (25 years old)
    4. Stu
      Stu
      (45 years old)

×

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...